Boston Bruins Game Recap: From Detroit Disaster to a Statement Week at Home | Ep 120
Liner notes
🎙️ It’s a packed December for the Boston Bruins, and this week we break down everything fans need to know. We cover all the major Bruins hockey updates, including Pastrnak’s non-contact return, McAvoy’s full-practice milestone, and how the lineup is adjusting as players work back into form.This episode dives deep into what these performances reveal about the team’s structure, accountability, and evolving identity.
We also examine the rising leadership conversation along with how depth players like Geekie and Steeves are influencing the roster. With thoughtful hockey analysis, up-to-date Bruins news, and genuine fan discussion, this episode brings the Tape to Tape fan community into the conversation about where this team is headed and how the Bruins lineups may shift in the coming weeks.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please?
Speaker 2: I need something to do.
Speaker 1: All Jack send it out and talk about going to
Speaker 1: say today, here's a chance, pop right down with goalie scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my one a move by the rookie to on
Speaker 1: one plaster not moving in Marsha get it. Jot on
Speaker 1: his own oil dances in podcast wat home right away corner,
Speaker 1: Pastern Chest.
Speaker 2: What's that for? Boston?
Speaker 3: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruin's Tape to Tape.
Speaker 3: I'm your host today, Caroline with a K and it
Speaker 3: is just number eighth that we're recording. And my goodness,
Speaker 3: are we in the thick of everything hockey all the time?
Speaker 3: People are getting injured left and right. It is the
Speaker 3: chaos of a condensed season ahead of the Olympics. So
Speaker 3: I'm welcoming in my fantastic co host Maria from Watertown
Speaker 3: to talk about it.
Speaker 1: How's it go with Maria? It's going, it's going. Yeah,
Speaker 1: You're right, it is. It is utter madness and chaos
Speaker 1: at this time of the year.
Speaker 2: It's all fun stuff, you know.
Speaker 1: We everyone has their their holidays in whichever manner that
Speaker 1: they celebrate them, but it still lends itself to chaos.
Speaker 2: And then trying to.
Speaker 1: Squeeze in the viewing of hockey games in addition to
Speaker 1: all the festivities it is.
Speaker 3: It's it's a tough time for everybody, no matter what,
Speaker 3: no matter what you're doing, whether it's the holiday things
Speaker 3: or the hockey things or what have you. So we're
Speaker 3: trying our best to stay on top of our snapshots.
Speaker 3: But if we don't have out there, you'll know why
Speaker 3: because it is December and there's just a lot of
Speaker 3: hockey games that we have to try and keep up with.
Speaker 2: So and not.
Speaker 1: Only that, you know, we have families, we have lives.
Speaker 1: We're not making any excuses, but this is the time
Speaker 1: of the year where some things take a little bit
Speaker 1: of priority over hockey. What jocking that's never happened before
Speaker 1: in my life. Plasma's coming from.
Speaker 2: Me, I know, I know. Well, let's dive in. We'll
Speaker 2: set the table.
Speaker 3: There's just so much happening, Like I said, so many injuries,
Speaker 3: some crazy news out there, not just for the Boston
Speaker 3: Bruins pretty much really now, it sounds terrible to say
Speaker 3: scraping the bottom of the barrel, because I don't think
Speaker 3: that these guys are terrible, but they're literally reaching for
Speaker 3: their final backup players at this point. And we've also
Speaker 3: got the Olympic decisions are going to be coming out
Speaker 3: very soon, so lots to talk about, but Bruins will
Speaker 3: some updates on the most I don't know, intriguing significant
Speaker 3: injuries because they are to our two main leaders. David Pasternak,
Speaker 3: we've just seen today again it's Monday, middle of the
Speaker 3: day that Pasta was at practice, but he is in
Speaker 3: a red no contact jersey. Yeah, he was skating before
Speaker 3: on his own, yes, so he is in a red
Speaker 3: no contact which is interesting. That was a little bit
Speaker 3: of a surprise to me. And then Charlie McAvoy, we
Speaker 3: know he's been skating and he was at practice on
Speaker 3: Friday in a no contact jersey, but today Monday.
Speaker 2: Regular jersey. Yeah yeah, regular jersey.
Speaker 3: That's kind of pretty big news, especially since we all
Speaker 3: learned on Friday when he went to practice for the
Speaker 3: first time and met with media that he had lost
Speaker 3: twenty pounds in that first week and a half thanks
Speaker 3: to the all liquid diet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, eating a steak and drinking it doesn't carry the
Speaker 1: same benefits, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I could have told you that it doesn't really work.
Speaker 1: It stands to reason, right, it just stands to reason, Yes,
Speaker 1: he would have lost weight, so you know, and it's
Speaker 1: a losing of weight I would realize goes along with stamina, yes, strength,
Speaker 1: all of that that he needs to kind of rebuild.
Speaker 3: Right well, and keep in mind, you know, it's twenty
Speaker 3: pounds and in his case, that's twenty pounds of muscle effectively,
Speaker 3: so he also has to bring that back up. He
Speaker 3: can't have solid food for six weeks post surgeries, presumably,
Speaker 3: even if he were to rejoin the Bruins this week.
Speaker 3: I mean, that guy is still on a liquid diet,
Speaker 3: so that's.
Speaker 2: Going to be interesting to see.
Speaker 3: Can he can he even actually join the team yet,
Speaker 3: I'm assuming no, he's I think he he's really lucky
Speaker 3: he didn't have to have his jaw wired shut, because
Speaker 3: I can't possibly imagine having to play NHL level hockey
Speaker 3: and have your jaw shut.
Speaker 2: I would venture to guess that if you're the Growings,
Speaker 2: you might want to hold off on getting him back
Speaker 2: in knee a line up until they come back lay
Speaker 2: at home before the Christmas break.
Speaker 3: The other big kind of Ruins news is, as I mentioned,
Speaker 3: it's December. Olympic rosters are now being decided by the
Speaker 3: various nations, and not surprisingly, Morgan Gegee's name has been
Speaker 3: coming up in Olympic roster talk. It'd be very interesting
Speaker 3: to see if we do see him make his way
Speaker 3: to Milan in about two months. He's just the most
Speaker 3: on fire player the man. Every time he touches that puck,
Speaker 3: it's finding the back of the net, it's going exactly
Speaker 3: where he wants it to go. I mean, I hate
Speaker 3: to say it because it almost sounds disrespectful, but honestly, like,
Speaker 3: I still can't wrap my head around it that he
Speaker 3: has just gone from you know, zero to one hundred
Speaker 3: in seemingly no time at all. Like, no, it's it's
Speaker 3: a cliche and it's it sounds insulting to him, but
Speaker 3: I can't help it.
Speaker 1: No, And I think it's even more impressive for from
Speaker 1: my standpoint that he's still still popping in goals, he's
Speaker 1: still assisting on goals with David Pasternak out of the lineup. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so you know, he he is taking his role and
Speaker 1: running with it, which is it's it's a beautiful thing
Speaker 1: to see. He's certainly making a case for himself to
Speaker 1: be talked about as you know some type of an
Speaker 1: alternate on Team Canada. Whether that comes to fruition or not,
Speaker 1: we'll see, right And and he's also being very very
Speaker 1: humble about what he is doing thus far this season
Speaker 1: for the Boston Bruins.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I agree.
Speaker 3: It's We're very lucky because I think we've talked in
Speaker 3: the past that, oh man, the Bruins just need someone
Speaker 3: who can play with Pasta. They need someone who can
Speaker 3: play with Pasta because Pasta is this elite level player
Speaker 3: that Boston hasn't really had another player of his caliber,
Speaker 3: and all of a sudden, here he is, out of
Speaker 3: seemingly nowhere. Yeah, I think we finally do have that
Speaker 3: person who can play with David Pasternak and actually can
Speaker 3: do pretty darn well without him too.
Speaker 1: And I think we have to give, as much as
Speaker 1: I hate to even say this, we have to give
Speaker 1: that Queenie a little bit of credit for seeing a
Speaker 1: bit of a diamond in the rough. And contract that
Speaker 1: Morgan Geeky has is just so team friendly, so I
Speaker 1: think it was a good fit for both sides.
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 3: I agree for our listeners who tuned in last week,
Speaker 3: we had run out of time to get one of
Speaker 3: Maria's classic hot takes about the current Bruins leadership situation,
Speaker 3: we very briefly alluded to there's not been any further conversation.
Speaker 3: I mean, granted, I certainly am not expecting any further
Speaker 3: conversation until the postseason, but this leadership vacuum and the
Speaker 3: fact that we are continuing on this season without a captain,
Speaker 3: and Maria, you've been giving this a little bit of thought.
Speaker 2: Take us on the journey of your hot take.
Speaker 1: We heard initially Dan Swaeney and even Marco Sturm alluding
Speaker 1: to the fact that they wanted someone to emerge as
Speaker 1: the leader basically earn that. See now, how many games
Speaker 1: and we're thirty close to thirty games in this year.
Speaker 1: We've had Charlie McAvoy now out of the lineup unfortunately
Speaker 1: for an extended period of time. You know, when his
Speaker 1: play has been it's been better, it's been better. Pasta
Speaker 1: hasn't been lighting things up crazily either, and he's had
Speaker 1: some time out of the lineup, no, for the first
Speaker 1: time in his career. Yeah, and I'm looking at a
Speaker 1: particular player to me who showed signs of an emergence
Speaker 1: at the end of last season, who has carried that
Speaker 1: emergence forward with not only his play on the ice
Speaker 1: and making changes to the way plays, but the fact
Speaker 1: that he has said and done I know who you're
Speaker 1: going to say all the right things as far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned throughout the course of the season and continues
Speaker 1: to be a leader.
Speaker 2: And I'm talking about Nikita Zadora.
Speaker 1: And I don't understand why if that if it was me,
Speaker 1: And I'm looking at this in you know, the way
Speaker 1: it was presented to us by the Boston Bruins organization. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and you're saying you're waiting for someone to stand out
Speaker 1: and take that leadership role on I don't give him
Speaker 1: the sea.
Speaker 2: Give him the sea.
Speaker 3: I don't know if I'm one hundred percent there with
Speaker 3: giving him the sea, because i do want to keep
Speaker 3: going and seeing because I'm nervous just because of the
Speaker 3: whole year that we saw last year, just because of that,
Speaker 3: and I'm a little bit more conservative on that end.
Speaker 3: But I agree in terms of the leadership. The fact
Speaker 3: that at the start of the season, Bruins management, I
Speaker 3: don't know who really made the decision obviously, but that
Speaker 3: they decided they were not even going to introduce any
Speaker 3: degree of rotation in any sort of way.
Speaker 2: We've seen in the.
Speaker 3: Past that one of the alternates was rotated in and out.
Speaker 3: I think is a fantastic motivator and reward recognition for
Speaker 3: a guy who maybe is really contributing in that time.
Speaker 3: So I've always been a fan of that idea. I
Speaker 3: don't have a problem with there being, you know, a
Speaker 3: captain and then an alternate who's just like that steady
Speaker 3: right hand man, as has been the model for a
Speaker 3: number of seasons in Boston. I'm also a little bit
Speaker 3: surprised that they opted again for here's our set three
Speaker 3: when we've seen other other teams and other iterations of
Speaker 3: the Bruins when they have been without a captain handing
Speaker 3: out more than three a's and then rotating some of
Speaker 3: them in and out, because obviously you can only have
Speaker 3: a max of three in a game. But again, I
Speaker 3: will point to the New York Rangers from a number
Speaker 3: of years back, where they had five alternates. Name I
Speaker 3: believe it was the late sixties early seventies Boston Bruins
Speaker 3: that had multiples right where there was obviously one chief
Speaker 3: he had it all the time, but you know, rotating
Speaker 3: in and out. So I think it's weird. I kind
Speaker 3: of question the reasoning and logic behind the way that
Speaker 3: they have put it together. Because to your point, Maria,
Speaker 3: if you want to say, we're gonna let nature take
Speaker 3: its course, which is plausible, right, and we're gonna see
Speaker 3: who rises to the occasion, either you were just I
Speaker 3: don't know, feeding us some bs, which is also very likely, right,
Speaker 3: or like, how could you possibly expect that to happen
Speaker 3: if then, tacitly you've already said it's these three guys,
Speaker 3: it's going to be one of these three guys. Like
Speaker 3: I think, to Zadorov's credit, he is I think a
Speaker 3: genuine leader, and I don't think.
Speaker 2: He cares if you have a letter or not.
Speaker 3: He's going to come in and be the leader that
Speaker 3: he is, showing us that he can be right. He's
Speaker 3: not going to necessarily, like automatically.
Speaker 2: Defer to the letter.
Speaker 3: I fully expected him to if they were going to
Speaker 3: do some degree of rotation, that he was going to
Speaker 3: be one of the guys who had it. And it's
Speaker 3: shocking to me that he only just recently got that recognition,
Speaker 3: like the fact that they went Hampus Linnholm Elias Linnholm
Speaker 3: and then him Yeah.
Speaker 1: And he's likely not it. And the team itself seems
Speaker 1: to be unconcerned about who has a sea or who
Speaker 1: doesn't have the sea. I'm just making the case based
Speaker 1: on what this organization said that they were looking for
Speaker 1: in terms of, you know, the next captain of the
Speaker 1: Boston Ruins. Like this guy is showing me that he
Speaker 1: has the capability of doing that.
Speaker 2: I agree the at its core.
Speaker 3: While you and I may disagree with the timing with
Speaker 3: which to hand out the sea, I will say right now,
Speaker 3: in my eyes, in what I see both on the
Speaker 3: ice and off the ice.
Speaker 2: He's the leader. He's the guy right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just kind of hit me and I thought,
Speaker 1: could we potentially go through the whole season with that one?
Speaker 2: It looks likely that we might. Right, we made very
Speaker 2: well go through.
Speaker 3: I expect that for sure. Definitely this food for thought,
Speaker 3: very interesting food for thought. We want to hear from
Speaker 3: our listeners.
Speaker 2: Is he the guy? I don't know. We'll find out.
Speaker 3: I guess we'll find out as the season goes on.
Speaker 3: Let's just take a super quick tour around the rink again.
Speaker 3: These injuries, My god, the number of players who are
Speaker 3: getting It feels like these ACL injuries, Oh my god,
Speaker 3: left and right. Because you've got Kyle Paul Mary. We
Speaker 3: talked about him and his ridiculous play that he assisted
Speaker 3: on last week, me whatever situation happening with Connor Hellibuck.
Speaker 1: And now poor Tyler Sagan. This kid can't catch a
Speaker 1: freaking break. I went down and looked at his injury history.
Speaker 1: Not easy injury. No, he's had achilles hip surgeries, now
Speaker 1: a torn ACL. I mean it just like, at what
Speaker 1: point do you sit down and evaluate and say, what
Speaker 1: am I doing to my body here? I know that
Speaker 1: these hockey players are the ultimate competitors and don't want
Speaker 1: their bodies to ever quit on them.
Speaker 2: But my god, and he's he's only thirty three.
Speaker 3: I thought he was maybe closer to thirty five because
Speaker 3: in my mind, you know, when I think back to
Speaker 3: the twenty eleven Bruins, I think of him and I
Speaker 3: think of Marshy as like this pair, but not really
Speaker 3: actually realizing how much older Marshand is than Sagan.
Speaker 2: Tyler Sagan wasn't even drinking age.
Speaker 3: I know, yeah, it's at first when I saw that,
Speaker 3: I was like, oh man, that's going to be the
Speaker 3: end of his career time.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's thirty three.
Speaker 3: By no means, especially in this day and age, is
Speaker 3: that particularly old.
Speaker 2: It's older.
Speaker 3: But I think you're seeing a lot of these long
Speaker 3: term guys making it to thirty five. So we will
Speaker 3: see if he does, because that's that's a tough one.
Speaker 2: That's basically that's it for the season for him. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's it sounds like it's it. Is it for the
Speaker 2: season for him. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And the other big piece of news that's kind of
Speaker 3: around the rink.
Speaker 2: Is the speaking of rinks.
Speaker 1: Yeah, literally is the Joe It's laughable at support.
Speaker 2: That is the Olympic ice rink in Italy.
Speaker 3: It's shocking to me because a Italy, you know, Milan,
Speaker 3: they've known that they've had the Olympics since twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3: Italy last had the Winter Olympics in two thousand and six.
Speaker 3: So the fact that they are effectively still constructing an
Speaker 3: arena early December of twenty twenty five is first of
Speaker 3: all shocking, Like what.
Speaker 2: Is going on?
Speaker 3: I mean, yes, there's always corruption and bated pricing and
Speaker 3: stuff when it comes to the Olympics, because like whatever,
Speaker 3: that's always a thing.
Speaker 1: No, the IOC is farious organization as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 2: So the biggest issue is the fact.
Speaker 3: That if you haven't heard the news somehow this rink size,
Speaker 3: So an NHL rink is two hundred feet in length
Speaker 3: and ninety feet in wit. An Olympic or international ice
Speaker 3: surface is slightly wider and I think a slightly shorter.
Speaker 3: It's a little bit ultimately, it's a little bit bigger
Speaker 3: square footage wise, this is now going to be smaller
Speaker 3: than the specs or an NHL rink with And you
Speaker 3: may be thinking, all right, well, what's what's three to
Speaker 3: six feet? Honestly, what difference does it make? The difference
Speaker 3: is at this particular speed of play, these players have
Speaker 3: learned how to play almost with instinct, at a very
Speaker 3: very high speed on a very particular size of rink.
Speaker 3: It can pose a significant scene set issue when you
Speaker 3: take away two four six eight of feet in length,
Speaker 3: and this is not an ice surface that they have
Speaker 3: spent much time on. So that's kind of the biggest
Speaker 3: concern and part of me and Marie I want to
Speaker 3: get your take on this. The NHL primarily, you know,
Speaker 3: Gary Bettman has basically come out and he's said there's
Speaker 3: no backup plan. This is all on the on the
Speaker 3: IOC to get sorted out. Now, my take is, my
Speaker 3: initial thought is why the heck is the NHL being
Speaker 3: so passive aggressive about all of this? Because you would
Speaker 3: imagine after the massive, massive success of the fore Nations
Speaker 3: and the NHL is always looking to continue to capitalize
Speaker 3: on opportunities that really get the NHL's name out there
Speaker 3: for him to be passive aggressive about all of this.
Speaker 3: The only thing I can think of is that truly,
Speaker 3: deep down they don't want the players to go, which
Speaker 3: I think is true. I think that Betman he always
Speaker 3: is working for the owners. However, money is everything, Right,
Speaker 3: if there's an opportunity for the NHL to make money,
Speaker 3: they will pursue it, right. That's capitalism and the amount
Speaker 3: of money that they could make, if not directly from
Speaker 3: the Olympics long term off of the Olympics. Right, the
Speaker 3: new fans, the excitement around it. People are going to
Speaker 3: be tuning in to see maybe who these players are
Speaker 3: before the games, and then they'll follow after the games
Speaker 3: because they just saw and fell in love with XYZ
Speaker 3: player from this team, like from Team Canada or whoever. Right, So,
Speaker 3: I'm surprised that even if they're even if he's being
Speaker 3: passive aggressive, because they really secretly not secretly, don't want
Speaker 3: the players, like but the money.
Speaker 2: How could you sing no to the money.
Speaker 3: I want to hear your take on your understanding of
Speaker 3: the situation, suation and why the heck is the NHL
Speaker 3: being so uninvolved.
Speaker 1: I agree with you, I really don't think that they
Speaker 1: want the players going be lave itself wants now.
Speaker 2: Is it a good opportunity to continue.
Speaker 1: Growing your game, Yes, but the league isn't going to
Speaker 1: be directly profiting from the Olympics. And I think also
Speaker 1: the statements made by Bill Daily, I don't want to
Speaker 1: say that they're disingenuous, but to some degree there might
Speaker 1: be a little bit of disingenuousness in the statement in
Speaker 1: saying that, hey, we're supporting our players, but if you
Speaker 1: don't get this rink built, we're not sending our guys
Speaker 1: there right to benefit you. Some of that might be
Speaker 1: pressure trying to put some pressure on the IOC to
Speaker 1: get this rink, Like, let's get going here, people. You've
Speaker 1: had so much time to get this rink built, so
Speaker 1: much time to get this rink built, that there's really
Speaker 1: no plausible rationale why we're having this conversation right now.
Speaker 1: What's what's frightening from the player standpoint, And I read
Speaker 1: this earlier this weekend, comments that Elliott Friedman may is
Speaker 1: that the players themselves are less concerned about the size
Speaker 1: of the rink but very concerned about the ice condition
Speaker 1: because there will be a lot of activity on this
Speaker 1: one rink and there won't be a lot of time
Speaker 1: in between to bring the ice surface up to standards
Speaker 1: that the players have been accustomed to, and that's where
Speaker 1: it becomes a safety concern for the players. And the
Speaker 1: fact that the NHL and the league isn't talking about
Speaker 1: an alternative plan or trying to figure out an altern
Speaker 1: the plan to keep the players, say, is another problem me. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I think that the league could give two ships if
Speaker 1: the players went, oh yeah, well, they've already canceled one
Speaker 1: one one test event in the early.
Speaker 3: Par At some point, Gary Bettman and the league, they
Speaker 3: and you know and Bill Daily, they're gonna have to
Speaker 3: realize that there's a certain point of no return where
Speaker 3: if Betman and the league pull the players, the players
Speaker 3: Association and the players themselves are going to be very
Speaker 3: upset and you can't you know, like what what that
Speaker 3: point of no return is date wise, I don't know,
Speaker 3: but probably not too much longer after final rosters are announced,
Speaker 3: like they no matter what, they they can't if they can,
Speaker 3: but they can't, like if they know what's good for
Speaker 3: them and the relationship with the players and everything, every
Speaker 3: all that goodwill that they've been building and they got
Speaker 3: back after all of this stuff with COVID, like they
Speaker 3: cannot just let it fail. That they are going to
Speaker 3: potentially have to step in and help make it right
Speaker 3: because you can't tell them a week, two weeks, four
Speaker 3: weeks before going that you're now not going.
Speaker 2: Can't do that for people.
Speaker 3: Then the NHL needs to do whatever it is that
Speaker 3: they can do to ensure the success of the Olympics,
Speaker 3: because the NHL has the world's best of everything when
Speaker 3: it comes to the game of hockey, right, all the resources,
Speaker 3: all the brains, all the ability to coordinate and put
Speaker 3: on events and things like that, so they have what
Speaker 3: is needed to execute.
Speaker 2: A an Olympic program.
Speaker 3: So you're going to get to the point where you
Speaker 3: have to know it is too late to tell the
Speaker 3: players you're not going, So then you damn well better
Speaker 3: do everything you possibly can to ensure the safety and
Speaker 3: the well being of your players when they go there.
Speaker 3: And if that means figuring out a solution for the
Speaker 3: incompetent IOC, then they got to do that.
Speaker 1: It wouldn't bode well for the relationship between the NHLPA
Speaker 1: and the league.
Speaker 2: I'll give you that. However, the league.
Speaker 1: Has the ability to pull the plot because they need
Speaker 1: to protect their investments. Can you imagine can you imagine
Speaker 1: we're already seeing we just talked about injuries to keep
Speaker 1: players on teams because of and I think a lot
Speaker 1: of it is because of this compressed schedule to accommodate
Speaker 1: the Olympic break, right, Can you imagine you send all
Speaker 1: of these superstars, because let's face it, that's who, in
Speaker 1: essence is going to the Olympics, NHL superstars across the
Speaker 1: league from various countries. And now if you've got an
Speaker 1: ice surface that is not up to standards, not being
Speaker 1: maintained properly, and then you see superstars going down and
Speaker 1: they come back injured.
Speaker 3: To the area, and if you think that Walsh is
Speaker 3: gonna let it go right right right, because like if
Speaker 3: they don't either they pull the players, who now they
Speaker 3: all knew going into this season that the schedule would
Speaker 3: be compressed. It is harder on them mentally, physically, emotionally,
Speaker 3: and then to have that taken away from them, that's
Speaker 3: gonna piss them off, right because they've already said, all right,
Speaker 3: we'll do this this way for that, we're giving, we're
Speaker 3: sacrificing ourselves for that. So the expectation is you're gonna
Speaker 3: sacrifice and let us have this. If they are then
Speaker 3: finding themselves in a situation where they sacrificed on their
Speaker 3: side and the NHL doesn't reciprocate in some way, I
Speaker 3: think regardless, you're gonna see issues between the NHL and
Speaker 3: the NHLPA. So the NHL, like Gary Bettman and the
Speaker 3: league and the owners like if they want to play
Speaker 3: at this pissing context with the IOC find but at
Speaker 3: some point, right if they need to step in, they
Speaker 3: damn well better because it's not just the players who
Speaker 3: are going to be disappointed. All the fans are going
Speaker 3: to be disappointed. Like that, enough of these games stop
Speaker 3: being children.
Speaker 1: I don't know who's playing games with who. It sounds
Speaker 1: like maybe there's a little bit of game and somebody is.
Speaker 1: But something concern is the fact that and maybe maybe
Speaker 1: the league is working on a plan B and you
Speaker 1: know it hasn't been the tea hasn't been spilled on
Speaker 1: that yet, but the fact that there's been no information
Speaker 1: forthcoming about what is the alternative if in.
Speaker 2: Fact the rink right isn't ready because you know here
Speaker 2: it is December eight.
Speaker 3: Well, and I'm not surprised that again the NHL is
Speaker 3: saying we don't have a plan. I mean that could
Speaker 3: be complete bs, but they don't want right right right
Speaker 3: right the ioce to no. And again here we are
Speaker 3: with the games right. It's ridiculous, but regardless, that's the
Speaker 3: international around the rink. T So let's super quick do
Speaker 3: a rundown of the different games that we saw in
Speaker 3: the past week. We saw Detroit. They were in Detroit.
Speaker 3: It was a pretty pathetic, as you described.
Speaker 2: In a recent snapshot, lazy, listless and uninspired. Yep.
Speaker 3: I would like to describe it as the Bruins have
Speaker 3: kind of been floating up and down, and that was
Speaker 3: them kind of going down and touching a toe on
Speaker 3: that rock bottom that they've been on before and then realizing,
Speaker 3: oh shoot, You're right, we can't be doing that and
Speaker 3: then turning around and as you predicted, kind of coming
Speaker 3: back when they return home to the Blues and the
Speaker 3: Devil's overall take on that Detroit game, they were zero
Speaker 3: for two on the power play.
Speaker 2: Swayman was awful. It was not good.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, And as I said in the snapshot,
Speaker 1: it didn't it didn't fall all at his feet. But
Speaker 1: here's what I'm going to say, the Boston Bruins, the
Speaker 1: way this roster is constructed currently, if they don't play
Speaker 1: sixteen minutes in their defensive structure, they do not give
Speaker 1: themselves a chance to win. And the losses that they
Speaker 1: suffer are a direct result of the fact that either
Speaker 1: they don't start strong with this defensive structure, they are
Speaker 1: unwilling to play their defensive structure because maybe they think
Speaker 1: they haven't one up on their opponent to do so.
Speaker 1: So if they're not playing their defensive structure and their
Speaker 1: goalie is not the goalie whoever it is, that evening
Speaker 1: is not right on point. They are not giving themselves
Speaker 1: a chance to win.
Speaker 2: That's it.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think that that was a perfect representation
Speaker 3: this game, in particular, perfect representation of a larger issue
Speaker 3: that is I don't know, is that like, how do
Speaker 3: you fix that?
Speaker 2: Is that a culture shift?
Speaker 3: Is that just continuing to work on the system, Like
Speaker 3: where does that land in?
Speaker 2: How you address that? You know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: That's something we should ask Marco because I'm sure that
Speaker 1: when he sees a game like that against the Red
Speaker 1: Wings where for the first periods, you guys are basically
Speaker 1: a no show and then you spot any team in
Speaker 1: the NHL, as I said in a snapshot, you spot
Speaker 1: any team NHL A three to nothing Lee. I don't
Speaker 1: know how the hell did plausibly think you're going to
Speaker 1: come back and win that game because you're not playing
Speaker 1: the way that you're supposed to be playing.
Speaker 3: Right, So they go from that game and we've now
Speaker 3: gotten a couple of guys back. We had Arvidson and
Speaker 3: middle stat both come back at different points leading up
Speaker 3: to this Detroit game. I believe we heard remind me
Speaker 3: which one was it? If not, both had not done
Speaker 3: really any practicing stat Arvidson prior to their return to
Speaker 3: the lineup. How much do you think that was a
Speaker 3: contribution to kind of some of that listless play versus Finally,
Speaker 3: seeming like by the time they played the Blues at home, everybody.
Speaker 2: Was now starting to kind of click back together.
Speaker 1: No, because you know, I thought Arbitson had some decent
Speaker 1: jump in the game against Detroit. It was the same old,
Speaker 1: same old in the instances where you know, you've got
Speaker 1: five Boston Bruins standing around in our own end looking
Speaker 1: at each other, like, who's going to do what here?
Speaker 1: That's what's frustrating. Yes, that's the point that I'm trying
Speaker 1: to make right. It wasn't for a lack of trying
Speaker 1: to get yourself scoring opportunity. It's what you're doing when
Speaker 1: the other team is coming into your own zone and
Speaker 1: you're making things so goddamn too goddamn easy.
Speaker 3: Do you think then, because what we saw against the
Speaker 3: Blue was I would say arguably the complete transformation, because
Speaker 3: not only did they actually start on time, they had
Speaker 3: contributions all across the lineup, not just coming from Morgan yeeky.
Speaker 3: Do you think that that kind of turnaround was a
Speaker 3: result of let's say, knocking heads together and saying, what
Speaker 3: are you idiots doing?
Speaker 2: Hello?
Speaker 3: Remember the system? Or do you think there was something
Speaker 3: else kind of contributing in that case?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I think those are instances the game against Detroit, which
Speaker 1: I have to give credit to the coaches and also
Speaker 1: you know who, those who are leaders in that locker
Speaker 1: room basically looking at each other in the face and
Speaker 1: holding each other accountable and saying, we played like dog.
Speaker 2: Shit in the first two periods.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we can't play like that and expect to
Speaker 1: win hockey games. And I think this is the difference.
Speaker 1: Right when you see the bounce backs, and they have
Speaker 1: been pretty consistent in bouncing back, it's not they're not
Speaker 1: doing scenarios where Okay, they have a game like that
Speaker 1: against Detroit and then it carries into the next game,
Speaker 1: and then they lose another game and they lose a
Speaker 1: third game. So to their credit, whoever is taking the
Speaker 1: bowl by the horn in those instances is getting too
Speaker 1: other players. My bigger issue is why I don't understand
Speaker 1: why you're not doing this consistently right when I know
Speaker 1: you're not going to win every game.
Speaker 2: It's just not possible, well plausible, right, But when you
Speaker 2: see instances of the first two periods of that Detroit game,
Speaker 2: yeah right, and then you say, oh Jesus, we've been
Speaker 2: playing like crap. You've got to get our leap together. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: you know, yeah, you gave it a valiant effort in
Speaker 2: the third period, but I don't really even think the
Speaker 2: game was that close.
Speaker 3: No, And it's and you make an interesting point, you know,
Speaker 3: why do we keep finding ourselves in that kind of
Speaker 3: situation where okay, so they have that kind of like,
Speaker 3: you know, deflated, uninspired play, just ridiculous, like some of
Speaker 3: these things that we've seen. Then they kind of come back,
Speaker 3: they come back to life, they're clicking, they're all over
Speaker 3: the place, they're doing this, that and the other, and
Speaker 3: then they slowly start to deflate again. Why does that
Speaker 3: keep happening? You know, why can't they address it after
Speaker 3: one period? Why is it two periods, three periods before
Speaker 3: they can like wake up and say, oh, yeah, that's right,
Speaker 3: we're doing that thing again. I don't know, right right right?
Speaker 1: Yeah? And and you know, these issues aren't the Bruins
Speaker 1: aren't the only ones. Ver is struggling with these issues, right,
Speaker 1: You don't want to make excuses. Yes there have been injuries,
Speaker 1: yeah right, Yes, their schedule sucks, but you still got
Speaker 1: to play the game exactly.
Speaker 3: This was also the Blues game was also Monty's first
Speaker 3: time back to the Garden. I wasn't really sure how
Speaker 3: that was going to go.
Speaker 1: I can't I can't deal with these tribute videos. What
Speaker 1: did what did he do that warranted getting a tribute video?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was.
Speaker 3: Weird because there were there was someone else recently who
Speaker 3: came back and all they got was a picture and
Speaker 3: it was a player.
Speaker 2: They like, what do we doing here? Right?
Speaker 1: Something that you know should be quote unquote special, and
Speaker 1: now we're watering it down so that every person who's
Speaker 1: a former player or coach gets a tribute video like
Speaker 1: Monty Listen, right, did he get a raw deal here?
Speaker 1: Perhaps he did, But what did you do Monty for
Speaker 1: the Boston Brew? And now, I don't know, just just
Speaker 1: a little pet pee.
Speaker 2: I agree. This game.
Speaker 3: Was I thought it was actually one of their more
Speaker 3: exciting of the of the three from last week. You know,
Speaker 3: we had, shockingly a goal from Geeky, but Arbitson and
Speaker 3: Zaka actually had two and they were power plays.
Speaker 2: Two goals shocking. Yeah, one was a power play.
Speaker 1: What was just strength because the power play has been
Speaker 1: a little bit a little bit of knee mick a
Speaker 1: little bit lately, so it was good to see a
Speaker 1: power play goal. And yeah, so Arbardson hit the four
Speaker 1: hundred point mark ye in that game as well, So
Speaker 1: that's that's kind of a cool modelstone for a player. Yeah,
Speaker 1: reach and you know, good bounce back contributions up and
Speaker 1: down the lineup. Jonis Corporsalo was solid in that he
Speaker 1: had thirty eight sabs. Crazy, crazy crazy, And I really
Speaker 1: wanted Jordan Bennington to get lit up so that Monty
Speaker 1: would have to pull him again.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, I kind of wonder if Monty didn't pull him
Speaker 3: because of the whole argument that they had last time
Speaker 3: he got pulled.
Speaker 2: I'm sure that's why he did. No.
Speaker 1: No, I'm sure that's why he didn't because he didn't
Speaker 1: want to have to answer questions two games in a row.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, and hey, you didn't want to get pulled,
Speaker 3: So here you go. You get to fit here and
Speaker 3: let in five goals. But I've been super impressed with Arbitson.
Speaker 2: I think I like his game.
Speaker 3: You know, it took him a little, it took him
Speaker 3: a minute to kind of get going for Boston, but
Speaker 3: so far, so good. I think that he's been doing
Speaker 3: the things that we were hoping to see from him.
Speaker 3: So I think that's been an incredibly useful Well, I
Speaker 3: guess technically it was a trade, right, it feels like
Speaker 3: it was a signing, but it was a trade.
Speaker 1: No no, But it was a traite no no.
Speaker 2: And I think he feels like he's in a good
Speaker 2: spot too.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, I think he took a lot
Speaker 1: of heat in Edmonton, some of it probably was not justifiable. Now, yeah,
Speaker 1: Edmonton's a hot mess. You know, he's he's in a
Speaker 1: better place. He's in a better place.
Speaker 2: And then they played the Devils.
Speaker 3: The Devils came into that game having lost two games prior,
Speaker 3: both being shutouts, coming into that game against Boston, and
Speaker 3: the Devils are really struggling without Jack Hughes.
Speaker 1: It's it's kind of jocket. They haven't won a game
Speaker 1: yet in December. They haven't won a game yet. And
Speaker 1: before they after they've played the Bruins, they've been outscored
Speaker 1: fifteen to four.
Speaker 3: Crazy because they have so many good offensive players on
Speaker 3: that team. You know, we know that Jack Hughes isn't
Speaker 3: the only player who can score goals there. But for
Speaker 3: whatever reason, that team is now just dropping like a stone.
Speaker 3: I mean, they were a top ten last month and
Speaker 3: now they are fighting for a wild card spot at
Speaker 3: this point, and credit to the.
Speaker 1: Bruins for taking advantage of a wounded yet team. Those
Speaker 1: are the kinds of teams, yes, that you do need
Speaker 1: to feast on.
Speaker 2: For lack of a better word.
Speaker 3: Well, and you know, to reference back to Thanksgiving model
Speaker 3: and saying, you know, the Boston needs to get what
Speaker 3: would consider be considered two extra regulation wins, and I
Speaker 3: think that this could be one of those because this
Speaker 3: is a team, like you said, where they're coming in wounded,
Speaker 3: whether it's through injury.
Speaker 2: Or bad luck or what have you.
Speaker 3: And those are the teams that Boston has to take
Speaker 3: advantage of and actually get those wins.
Speaker 2: And they did.
Speaker 3: I will say the very beginning of this game really
Speaker 3: not all that interesting. I would say borderline boring. But
Speaker 3: that was because the Devils twice had extended extend periods
Speaker 3: of time where they were just smothering Boston. It was
Speaker 3: almost very reminiscent of twenty five years ago in the
Speaker 3: New Jersey Devils where they would smother teams.
Speaker 2: I mean they were trap systems. So all that was
Speaker 2: happening in the oh.
Speaker 1: God, great hockey to watch, but I mean it won
Speaker 1: them some cups. But right, and so this wasn't quite
Speaker 1: like that, but it was smothering hockey, and so it
Speaker 1: was a little boring to me. But Boston weathered the storm.
Speaker 1: They I think they left the first period with certainly
Speaker 1: fewer than ten shots on goals.
Speaker 2: They held on. They waited for.
Speaker 3: The devils to kind of tucker themselves out a little bit,
Speaker 3: and then they took advantage of it, and Swayman just
Speaker 3: he was back in good form. I honestly was surprised
Speaker 3: to see him in net not because necessarily because of
Speaker 3: how terrible he'd had a time in Detroit, but combined
Speaker 3: with the fact that, okay, he laid that egg on
Speaker 3: what was it Monday or Tuesday, and then the prior
Speaker 3: game Corposalo was so so phenomenal, I thought we might
Speaker 3: see Corpusolo. But regardless, we got lucky because Swaymen had
Speaker 3: his twenty nine saves, Andrew Peak finally got his goal
Speaker 3: for the season with an empty netter.
Speaker 2: Did you see the got the monkey off his back?
Speaker 3: And middle Stat's beautiful tic tac toe goal was just
Speaker 3: you love to see it.
Speaker 1: That's that to me. I love though I love those
Speaker 1: kinds of goals. There's nothing there's nothing prettier in hockey.
Speaker 2: I agree that is.
Speaker 3: You see that when you've got line mates that are
Speaker 3: really in sync, they really know where they're going to be,
Speaker 3: they're communicating. So you love to see that. You love
Speaker 3: to see the same because of how especially last year,
Speaker 3: the chemistry, the lack of you know, cohesiveness. You'll love
Speaker 3: to see this transformation. So Boston is heading out on
Speaker 3: a mini I mean I call them mini because they're
Speaker 3: not doing any sort of extensive road trips. So it's
Speaker 3: Britain but a little visit to the Midwest. They're heading
Speaker 3: out this week to Saint Louis, then they're going up
Speaker 3: to Winnipeg, and they're rounding it out in Minnesota. You know,
Speaker 3: Saint Louis finally turning things around after having lost to
Speaker 3: the Ruins. But then when they go to Winnipeg, there's
Speaker 3: no Hellibuck. There's Jonathan Tayes, who listeners maybe have forgotten.
Speaker 3: He came back after two years away from suffering from
Speaker 3: long COVID.
Speaker 2: He's not doing awesome.
Speaker 1: No, I mean when I looked up that stat today
Speaker 1: of him being a minus thirteen, this was Jonathan Taves,
Speaker 1: who you know, patries bergeron Jonathan Taves like such.
Speaker 2: I know, sound defensively responsible forward.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I found that to be a little and he
Speaker 1: and he is played in every game for the Jets.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so which good Good on him.
Speaker 3: Good on him for at least being able to play
Speaker 3: all those games.
Speaker 1: Here's another instance where the Bruins need to take advantage
Speaker 1: of a team that is struggling without fin number one goalie.
Speaker 1: They're without cornor Hallibuck for the foreseeable future. You know,
Speaker 1: my expectation is win in Saint Louis, Well, take points
Speaker 1: in Saint Louis, take points in Winnipeg, and then Minnesota
Speaker 1: might be a different story because that is a legit
Speaker 1: hockey team.
Speaker 2: Yes it is.
Speaker 3: And if you haven't seen their rookie goaltender, they call
Speaker 3: him the Wall Wolstatt. He's just he's phenomenal. For as
Speaker 3: fantastic as a rookie goalie, Dustin Wolf was this guy.
Speaker 2: He's next level as well.
Speaker 3: So I don't know who they're gonna have in net
Speaker 3: when Boston comes, but the Bruins are gonna have to
Speaker 3: really be offensively aggressive as much as they possibly can
Speaker 3: because they because Minnesota just they have that young netminder
Speaker 3: who's been phenomenal and of course their defense with Corilla Thrill.
Speaker 3: You can't you can't forget about him at all. So
Speaker 3: they're they're a fantastic team. Yeah, they're they're right now.
Speaker 3: There are top seven, top seventeen in the league, the
Speaker 3: wild there. So let's talk stick taps. Who who do
Speaker 3: you want to give a stick tap to?
Speaker 1: Going with Pablo Zaka for his real performance because you
Speaker 1: know we've given him a little bit of heat in
Speaker 1: the past too. It takes a shot but goes high,
Speaker 1: goes wide, goes here, goes there, right, so good on him.
Speaker 2: Two goes against the Blues.
Speaker 1: Morgan Geeky's kind of stay in the stick taps because
Speaker 1: it's just inevitable that he's just there. And I want
Speaker 1: to give some stick taps to Victor Arvidson and Elias
Speaker 1: Lindholm because they in you know, the last handful of games.
Speaker 1: If they're putting up some points too, since they got
Speaker 1: me in the lineup, much needed secondary points. Yeah for
Speaker 1: this team too, you know, so put on them. And honestly,
Speaker 1: Alex Steves, I don't know how you're going to take
Speaker 1: this guy out of the lineup when everyone's back healthy.
Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know what they're going to do
Speaker 3: because they can't send him down because they'd have to
Speaker 3: send him through waivers.
Speaker 1: He's doing, and has done so far, everything that an
Speaker 1: organization has asked you to do. Earn the opportunity, make
Speaker 1: the most of that opportunity, and you're helping the team
Speaker 1: get wins. So how do you how do you take
Speaker 1: this guy out of the lineup?
Speaker 3: Guys like him, ask Barrow, these guys who have come
Speaker 3: up in Boston's time of need, And we say all
Speaker 3: the time, if you're gonna get called up because somebody's
Speaker 3: injured or whatever, all that we ask is that you
Speaker 3: not cause damage. Right, these guys not only have not
Speaker 3: done that, which is good, they have significantly contributed in
Speaker 3: a positive way to the outcome of games. Yeah, it's
Speaker 3: a good problem to have for Boston quite frankly. And
Speaker 3: I would also throw in, of course, the goaltending. You know,
Speaker 3: our goaltending for on the whole. Yes, one or two
Speaker 3: games here and there, individual goalies have not had great games.
Speaker 3: It's always going to be more amplified when they don't
Speaker 3: have their best game. Also, if a if the team
Speaker 3: in front of them isn't really helping them out. But
Speaker 3: on the whole, the goaltending continues to be a pretty
Speaker 3: reliable feature of this defense sture.
Speaker 2: Steady.
Speaker 1: It's been steady for the most part, which when you're
Speaker 1: playing the structure that we're being told that they want
Speaker 1: to play, the lives heavily on goaltender right exactly.
Speaker 2: In the penalty box though, Bruins defencemen are just not
Speaker 2: scoring any goals. And I don't know.
Speaker 3: If that's weird to us because the last few years
Speaker 3: we've been used to the system where they just they
Speaker 3: are involved in offensive work. But right now you brought
Speaker 3: this statistic to my attention. As a group, the Bruins
Speaker 3: defensemen have only had seven goals. Meanwhile, you've got Jacob Chickrin,
Speaker 3: he's got eleven just for himself. Yea, even Matthew Schaefer
Speaker 3: as eight, Like is this first year a rookie?
Speaker 2: Right? Yeah?
Speaker 1: So you know, and I think this was talked about
Speaker 1: before the season even started, about the contributions that we
Speaker 1: needed from the back end, both defensively and to some
Speaker 1: degree offensively. While for the most part the defensemen are
Speaker 1: doing their job, sure defensively, they got to be pushing
Speaker 1: the pace a little bit more offensively, I think for
Speaker 1: this team to have to have success, especially when you
Speaker 1: get Macavoy dock right, You've got you've you got to.
Speaker 1: You got to see a little bit more offense from
Speaker 1: from these guys.
Speaker 2: Yeap, just a little bit.
Speaker 3: That's what we've got going on ahead this this week.
Speaker 3: Hopefully we'll be able to get a couple of snapshots
Speaker 3: out there for you folks for our reactions after these games.
Speaker 3: They're not like West Coast games, so I expect to
Speaker 3: be able to, for the most part, watch most of
Speaker 3: the games in full without falling asleep.
Speaker 2: I don't know about you, Maria, but I'm not making
Speaker 2: any promises. But any other final thoughts before we say goodbye.
Speaker 1: No, it's been a yeah, pretty steady diet of like
Speaker 1: three games per week here, three games per week, the
Speaker 1: games per week, So I myself am looking forward to
Speaker 1: when we get to that little Christmas.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it'll be it'll be a good thing.
Speaker 3: But as you've heard us say many times before, make
Speaker 3: sure you like and subscribe for more content, and be
Speaker 3: sure to leave a rating and review to help other
Speaker 3: Bruins fans find us. You can support the podcast by
Speaker 3: joining our Patreon or following us on our socials at
Speaker 3: tape to tape MK and on Substack at tape to
Speaker 3: Tape MK dot substack dot com, and as always, go Bees,
Speaker 3: Go Bees,
Podbean