Boston Bruins Road Trip Breakdown: Testing the Depth | Ep. 121
Liner notes
🎙️ Dive into this detailed Bruins game recap as the Boston Bruins secured four out of six points on their NHL road trip, featuring key returns from David Pastrnak and Charlie McAvoy. In this episode, we break down Bruins games against the St. Louis Blues, Winnipeg Jets, and the Minnesota Wild, highlighting Boston's challenges and strengths in finishing against elite teams.Stay updated with Bruins injury updates, lineup changes, power play and penalty trends, and hot takes on trade chatter and coaching performance. We also discuss why Marco Sturm may deserve early Jack Adams consideration. This is a must-listen NHL Bruins news episode packed with expert hockey analysis and Bruins insider chatter.
Join us for a full Bruins hockey recap filled with context, fan discussion, and all the black and gold hockey updates you need to stay informed!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please? I need
Speaker 1: something to do all Jack, send it out and talk
Speaker 1: about this, says today. Here's a chance pop fa right
Speaker 1: down the goalie scars, Oh my one a.
Speaker 2: Move by the rookie.
Speaker 1: Too on one faster not moving? Set it on his
Speaker 1: own Oil dances in podcast at home right corner pastor Chester.
Speaker 1: What is that for? Most?
Speaker 2: Hello, everyone, welcome into another episode of Ruin's Tape to Tape.
Speaker 2: I will be your host for today's episode, Maria from Watertown,
Speaker 2: where recording on Monday morning, December fifteenth, only ten shopping
Speaker 2: days actually left folks ten or nine. Technically, I hope
Speaker 2: you're not going to be shopping on December twenty five,
Speaker 2: so get crack and folks get brapkin. I want to
Speaker 2: welcome in my co host Caroline with a kay, and
Speaker 2: I'm sure that she's got everything wrapped and ready to go.
Speaker 1: Do you have my print? Absolutely not? Absolutely not. I'm flying.
Speaker 1: I'm flying by the seat of my pants here. But
Speaker 1: also a happy Hanukah to our friends who celebrate because
Speaker 1: yesterday was the first one. So lucky you guys, you
Speaker 1: get to be done sooner than us.
Speaker 2: Happy Honakah to all of our listeners and viewers, So
Speaker 2: we've were We've got a lot to talk about, none
Speaker 2: the least of which is kind of a somewhat ugly
Speaker 2: game in Minnesota on Sunday night. The Bruins had a
Speaker 2: rare six pm game coupled with a lost by our
Speaker 2: beloved New England Patriots. So not a great sports day
Speaker 2: on Sunday in Boston. But we'll get to that game
Speaker 2: and the two prior games, which were much better results
Speaker 2: for the Boston Bruins. But we'll do our usual Bruins
Speaker 2: news update, including injuries. I have a little food for thought,
Speaker 2: and your dad has a hot take for us, which
Speaker 2: we always find welcoming and entertaining. We'll do our quick spin,
Speaker 2: spin around the rink, stick tabs for our Bruins and
Speaker 2: penalty box for this week. So let's start with yep,
Speaker 2: the good news for the Bruins with regard to injuries.
Speaker 2: Both Pasta and McAvoy returned to the lineup in the
Speaker 2: game against was It Winnipeg.
Speaker 1: They both played well. Pasta came back for against Saint
Speaker 1: Louis and then Chucky came back in Winnipeg.
Speaker 2: And then of course you get and you lose because
Speaker 2: and the Winnipeg game, we lost Victor Ardwitdson and Jonathan Asparo,
Speaker 2: and unfortunately both guys playing well. Ardvitdson only recently back
Speaker 2: from some kind of an injury, and Marco Sturm said
Speaker 2: that there was no really timetable yet for these guys.
Speaker 2: They were going to wait until they got back here
Speaker 2: to Boston to reassess to maybe get some better insight
Speaker 2: as to what the status of their injuries are, which
Speaker 2: is which is pretty unfortunate for both of them, but
Speaker 2: especially Jonathan Asboro because he's been playing really, really well
Speaker 2: and I think that leaves that leaves somewhat of a
Speaker 2: defensive gap, defensive hole. And I wasn't thoroughly impressed with
Speaker 2: Mason Lori's game against Winnipeg. Seems like he definitely got
Speaker 2: a little bit exposed and maybe was targeted a little
Speaker 2: bit on his side of the ice because he still
Speaker 2: still has struggles making strong plays on the puck, aggressive
Speaker 2: strong plays on the puck. And that's I mean, it
Speaker 2: costs let you a couple of goals in that game.
Speaker 2: But we'll get to that game. So your thoughts on
Speaker 2: the injuries.
Speaker 1: It's frustrating, and you know, every team in the NHL
Speaker 1: is dealing with this right now. It's absolutely crazy. I
Speaker 1: haven't taken the time to explore it. I'm sure there
Speaker 1: are other analysts out there who have, so I would
Speaker 1: love to hear the info on this, but it almost
Speaker 1: seems like it's I can't tell if it's anecdotal or not,
Speaker 1: but it certainly feels like it's just amplified this year.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure it has to do with this condensed schedule.
Speaker 1: We've talked about it at nauseum. I would just really
Speaker 1: like to hear for certain that, No, this is definitely
Speaker 1: a crazy year, and it's not an injury bug. It
Speaker 1: is like a plague, and every team is losing multiple
Speaker 1: players at once. It's not there's no one team that's
Speaker 1: either got no injured or they're only losing one person
Speaker 1: and they're losing significant players. This morning, I was just
Speaker 1: taking a look around the rink and reading on substacks
Speaker 1: some of the other hockey blogs that I follow, and
Speaker 1: reading about Tampa Bay. I mean, that's a team and
Speaker 1: we've discussed this that there's no team in the East
Speaker 1: really pulling away and running away with it, and I
Speaker 1: think the injuries are really what's holding all the teams
Speaker 1: in the East back? Because I agree with you. You
Speaker 1: took the words right out of my mouth, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: Tampa Bay, by all other measures, should have pulled away
Speaker 1: from the rest of the East, and they've got the
Speaker 1: Vassie is down, Headman is down. Like how many? How
Speaker 1: many players there have been taken out? Look at the West.
Speaker 1: I think Colorado has just gotten a little bit lucky
Speaker 1: because none of their major players are out.
Speaker 2: I think that's why there's such a wagon right now.
Speaker 2: They're stayed healthy.
Speaker 1: Right, all their key players have been able to stay healthy,
Speaker 1: and it just they're good. I don't mean to diminish
Speaker 1: they're very very good. They're very very deep. But they've
Speaker 1: also had the benefit of good health thus far. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So it's tough. It's tough to watch. It's beyond frustrating
Speaker 1: because and as we will talk about in particular in
Speaker 1: the Minnesota game, Boston has struggled when push comes to
Speaker 1: shove against solid, solid teams, they've struggled to be able
Speaker 1: to finish. They will be on it like you know
Speaker 1: that it's close, you know they're about to score. They're
Speaker 1: doing all the right things, and they just simply can't.
Speaker 1: And I think this injury bug is the issue around
Speaker 1: that because in the past seasons it's been because they
Speaker 1: don't have the talent. This year, I think they have
Speaker 1: the right combination of guys working together to get the
Speaker 1: scoring done. But when you take out a single piece,
Speaker 1: it's like a Jenga tower for this team, you take
Speaker 1: out one piece and it all falls apart. You need
Speaker 1: to have all of these pieces together to have a
Speaker 1: really strong Bruins team this year. And that that's just
Speaker 1: how they're constructed. And it's let's let's let's turn this back,
Speaker 1: as you said, wait into the Bruins and then the
Speaker 1: two guys they got back this week and the impact
Speaker 1: that they've had now pasta in the first two games
Speaker 1: that he played coming back from his injury, what he
Speaker 1: had like seven freaking points, crazy two goals in two games.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then Charlie macavoy, you're thinking he's gonna get
Speaker 2: limited minutes in his first game back.
Speaker 1: No, just a mere twenty four plus minutes in ice time.
Speaker 2: Like it's it's it's crazy, but in a good in
Speaker 2: a good way to have those two guys back in
Speaker 2: the line up. And you know, Marco didn't waste any
Speaker 2: time in being very decisive about the fact that Charlie's
Speaker 2: going back with Zadora and then adjusting the defensive pairings accordingly,
Speaker 2: and Pastuff is playing on a different line with younger guys,
Speaker 2: and as he put it, just three young kids having
Speaker 2: fun playing hockey.
Speaker 1: Yeah much, yep, Yeah, it was. It was fun to
Speaker 1: watch him play, and I'm sure he enjoyed. Not that
Speaker 1: it was like a break or that it was necessarily easier,
Speaker 1: but it allowed him a refreshing little change that sometimes
Speaker 1: in the slog fest that is the season, sometimes that
Speaker 1: can also be a little bit of a mental break,
Speaker 1: a little mental recovery as well, not having to place
Speaker 1: all of that responsibility of carrying the team. So you
Speaker 1: could tell he had a lot of fun. I mean,
Speaker 1: he was pasta was pasta. He was great. I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: The one person I was a little bit surprised who
Speaker 1: was quote unquote quiet, although only in the goal scoring department,
Speaker 1: was Morgan geeky, but he was still pretty darn active.
Speaker 1: He was pretty much everywhere he needed to be, So
Speaker 1: that was kind of funny to observe, like, oh, finally
Speaker 1: he's not the only one score.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, and again this has been a slog
Speaker 2: fest for them. I think they're likely they may not
Speaker 2: openly say that they're looking ahead, but they're probably looking
Speaker 2: ahead and looking forward to having a little.
Speaker 1: Bit of a breather here. Yes, they're going to be
Speaker 1: after this game that happened last night in Minnesota. They're
Speaker 1: coming home for a home stand. Yet I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's good or bad at this time of the year,
Speaker 1: with the hall that goes along with preparing for holidays
Speaker 1: and family coming in and the poland tug with family
Speaker 1: matters and your spouses and kids and whatnot. But be
Speaker 1: that as it may, I think coming home is probably
Speaker 1: something that they might have been looking ahead to a
Speaker 1: little bit. Yeah, and you know, I'll I'll forgive them
Speaker 1: in this case for a couple of reasons. First of all,
Speaker 1: that we knew Minnesota was going to be a tough
Speaker 1: game even before the insane trade that happened, So we
Speaker 1: knew it was going to be a tough one to
Speaker 1: begin with. That's why I said last week it was
Speaker 1: really important that Boston win the first two games on
Speaker 1: that road trip so they could they were those were
Speaker 1: insurance wins, those were must wins because Saint Louis being
Speaker 1: kind of not a great team, right Boston, the expectation was, indeed,
Speaker 1: that's a winnable game, you need to win it. You
Speaker 1: did your job, You did your job, you took the points. Winnipeg,
Speaker 1: while they are a good team, was down their goaltender,
Speaker 1: who is I would say, their best player, and they
Speaker 1: have a ton of good players. So for the Winnipeg game,
Speaker 1: it was a you need to take advantage of while
Speaker 1: they don't have their full compliment of players, you need
Speaker 1: to take advantage of opportunities. And those are the thing
Speaker 1: issues that plagued this team in October, not winning winnable
Speaker 1: games and not taking advantage of opportunities. And they did
Speaker 1: exactly that because we knew it was very possible, very
Speaker 1: likely that they would not win against Minnesota, just because
Speaker 1: of how great they've been, and they played twenty minutes
Speaker 1: of that game pretty well, maybe forty, and then they
Speaker 1: decided they were done understandably. Yeah maybe yeah, I'd say
Speaker 1: maybe forty. I'd say maybe forty from what little I
Speaker 1: was able to plan.
Speaker 2: I mean when you look at the at the game
Speaker 2: Center report, yeah, it wasn't as lopsided as the score shows.
Speaker 1: The problem. No, not the first period.
Speaker 2: That game is again, penalties are costing you game, right.
Speaker 2: You gave up two power play goals. You take away
Speaker 2: those power play goals and you're out a point where
Speaker 2: you're still in the game with the possibility of taking
Speaker 2: a point.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: But I'll tell you, the Minnesota Wild pulled off a
Speaker 2: trade to get from you in a Minnesota Wild's uniform.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And he made his debut on Sunday against Boston Bruns
Speaker 2: and scored. And I'm looking at the injuries right now
Speaker 2: that the Minnesota Wild has and I can't imagine how
Speaker 2: good that team is likely going to be when they
Speaker 2: get all their injured players.
Speaker 1: Back the foal. Yeah that's good. Yeah. I mean they've
Speaker 1: got six guys out right now and they're not shop guys, even.
Speaker 2: Marcus, bill Hanson, Matt Zucarello, Marcus Folino. That's that's some
Speaker 2: good quality hockey talent right.
Speaker 1: There, exactly. But take us around the ring.
Speaker 2: Okay, So, speaking of trades and had the trade.
Speaker 1: Can I just throw out there one thing that's just
Speaker 1: been driving me absolutely bonkers everywhere. Of Course, everybody wants
Speaker 1: the storyline of the of the Hughes brothers together and
Speaker 1: for whatever reason that the algorithm is feeding me, people
Speaker 1: are saying that it's as if that dream is dead.
Speaker 1: I would like to remind folks that Quinn has the
Speaker 1: rest of this season and one more season to go
Speaker 1: in a year and a half. It's still a very
Speaker 1: high possibility, very plausible. That door is not closed. It's
Speaker 1: just not happening right now. And you know what, the
Speaker 1: Devil's may be the better for it because they won't
Speaker 1: necessarily have to give up somebody for him. I just
Speaker 1: got to throw that out there because I kept seeing
Speaker 1: that everywhere and I'm like, what are you talking about
Speaker 1: his contract? He didn't He can't sign an extension because
Speaker 1: he's not in the final year of his contract. Until
Speaker 1: you see either he has signed an extension or not, relax,
Speaker 1: but anyways, continue might rant for the day. No, no enough,
Speaker 1: and credit to Bill Garrant for what he's been building
Speaker 1: there in Minnesota. The other trade that was pulled off
Speaker 1: was between the Edmonton Oilers and the Pittsburgh Penguins, where
Speaker 1: they trade. The Penguins traded Kristin Jari or Stewart Skinner
Speaker 1: Bret Kulak, So I don't know, does Jari make the
Speaker 1: Oilers any better from a goaltending standpoint, better than Skinner?
Speaker 1: Can we say better than a Stewart Skinner? No. First
Speaker 1: of all, I think the Penguins won that trade because
Speaker 1: even though you're trading UH for the exact same player,
Speaker 1: I think both goalies they're they're they're average goalies. Okay, Remember,
Speaker 1: if you are a regular playing, starting goaltender in the NHL,
Speaker 1: clearly you have some degree of talent. So I am
Speaker 1: not saying that either of these players are talentless. Clearly
Speaker 1: that is the baseline, right, but I will say they
Speaker 1: seem to be equally average. The other thing is Skinner
Speaker 1: is probably the personal winner out of all of this
Speaker 1: because I can't imagine being in a in a Canadian
Speaker 1: market and then being in that market as well. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's not the same as Toronto or Vancouver markets. However,
Speaker 1: Edmonton has kind of turned itself, at least in recent
Speaker 1: years in the McDavid era, into the microscope. So personally,
Speaker 1: he's only gonnait leaving that environment. Maybe it'll make him better,
Speaker 1: who knows. The second thing, I've always believed that you
Speaker 1: have to be incredibly sure that the goaltender is the problem.
Speaker 1: If you're trading a goalie during the year, for me,
Speaker 1: it just feels like that you have to be certain
Speaker 1: that that's the problem. That leads into my third like,
Speaker 1: thank god, this is not my circus and not my monkeys,
Speaker 1: because I think that that particular trade, unless it was
Speaker 1: done specifically just for Skinner and his mental health and
Speaker 1: well being, it still makes me question what the heck
Speaker 1: is Edmonton's management doing because you traded your goalie who's
Speaker 1: been there, who's a part of the team, who's You're
Speaker 1: now going to disrupt the locker room for a guy
Speaker 1: who isn't particularly excellent. I mean the guy signed Yari,
Speaker 1: signed a five year contract in Pittsburgh and then almost
Speaker 1: immediately was sent down to the AHL because he wasn't
Speaker 1: doing the job. It just makes me question Edmonton's management
Speaker 1: and the choices that they're making the GM whoever in
Speaker 1: roster construction, because one of the beautiful things about the
Speaker 1: game of hockey is the fact that you cannot win
Speaker 1: a championship on the back of one player, and they've
Speaker 1: continued to invest in all the wrong players to support
Speaker 1: said superstar, plus Leon eight year contract for Trent Frederick
Speaker 1: Darnell Nurse, Like, what are you thinking you let someone
Speaker 1: like Perry go Miles Shadenfreuda over here, because Edmonton and
Speaker 1: the Edmonton fans, they're starting to irritate me, Like, all right,
Speaker 1: calm down. Well, you know, I think that sometimes it
Speaker 1: change of scenery for some players, and a reset is
Speaker 1: not a bad thing. Oh yeah, clearly, yeah, clearly Skinner
Speaker 1: was never going to be the guy in Edmonton. We
Speaker 1: knew that two years ago, Jesus, and they should have
Speaker 1: addressed it.
Speaker 2: I don't know why the hell it took them so
Speaker 2: long to get this addressed, other than their superstar Conor
Speaker 2: McDavid might be losing some semblance of his patients, right
Speaker 2: and who knows. Maybe Yari is the answer, maybe he's not.
Speaker 2: He's certainly a better answer than Skinner right now. And
Speaker 2: Yari was having his issues in Pittsburgh because again, maybe
Speaker 2: he was told he was going to be the guy.
Speaker 2: Maybe he thought he was going to be the guy.
Speaker 2: Then he gets some competition. Everyone responds a bit differently
Speaker 2: to that competition. We'll see what happens. You know, Edmonton,
Speaker 2: their first game that Yari played, they played the Washington Capitals,
Speaker 2: which is a good team, and Edmonton won that game
Speaker 2: by a score of six to two or six to three,
Speaker 2: and then proceeded to lose to the Montreal Canadians the
Speaker 2: next night. However, Yari start that.
Speaker 1: Game and the one last thing I'll say about this
Speaker 1: so we can move on, because enough of Edmonton, But
Speaker 1: in defense of all goaltenders, I would like to remind
Speaker 1: everyone that it's never, in my opinion, it's never fair
Speaker 1: to one hundred percent place the blame on a goaltender.
Speaker 1: The five guys in front of him also have to
Speaker 1: not have done their job, So you can't necessarily say, well,
Speaker 1: he didn't do his job when those other players also
Speaker 1: didn't do their job. Now, if they did, maybe that's
Speaker 1: a different conversation. But I think in this case the
Speaker 1: sentiment stands, yeah, well, the other teams in the leagues, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: we'll see how it all plays out. But we have
Speaker 1: three games to discuss. The Bruins played the Saint Louis Blues.
Speaker 1: They won that.
Speaker 2: Game five to two. Then they played two days later
Speaker 2: the Winnipeg Jets. Bruins won that game six to three.
Speaker 2: Took advantage of the fact that Connor Hellibuk was not
Speaker 2: a Net. I believe Connor Hellibuck came back after the
Speaker 2: Bruins played them ew and yeah, Winnipeg ended up winning
Speaker 2: that game. We saw some a little bit of line shuffling.
Speaker 2: We also alluded to that at the start of our pod.
Speaker 2: And we've got some balanced scoring to talk about, yeah too.
Speaker 2: So let's start with the win against Saint Louis. Now,
Speaker 2: that game started in not an ideal manner. First shot
Speaker 2: on goal.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Saint Louis Blues score, and you think to yourself, please,
Speaker 1: are you kidding me right now?
Speaker 2: With this one shot one goal? But to the Bruins credit,
Speaker 2: they took advantage of some power play opportunities yeah, and
Speaker 2: pushed right back.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It should come as no surprise that the Bruins
Speaker 1: worst period of that game, which was the first period,
Speaker 1: had all the penalties. First of all, no surprise there.
Speaker 1: What I was pleased about was the fact that last
Speaker 1: week on this podcast, you and I had talked about
Speaker 1: how Boston on the whole has done a good job
Speaker 1: of not allowing Funk to bleed from one game to
Speaker 1: the next, a malaise as Jim Montgomery famously referred to
Speaker 1: it at one point in time, and we said it
Speaker 1: would be great if they could do that in game,
Speaker 1: and do it in fewer than three periods, do it midgame,
Speaker 1: do it in two periods, or whatever where they figure
Speaker 1: it out for they get it out. And they did
Speaker 1: it in one period in this game, which I loved
Speaker 1: to see. Similar thing ultimately then happened in Winnipeg. The
Speaker 1: first two periods were not ideal. Also not a surprise
Speaker 1: there all the period. All the penalties happened in the
Speaker 1: first and the second period, and then Boston came in third.
Speaker 1: They had done the adjustment like we wanted to see
Speaker 1: in game, no penalties in the third period and they
Speaker 1: dominated that period. I loved seeing that happen that play
Speaker 1: out in both of those games, because I found them
Speaker 1: to be kind of similar in theme, you know, starting
Speaker 1: out with that less than ideal start and then really
Speaker 1: pulling it together and taking control and just dominating in
Speaker 1: that Bionus played the game against Winnipeg and he basically
Speaker 1: he saved their asses in the second period of that
Speaker 1: game because Winnipeg, yeah was showing some hard, yeah hard push,
Speaker 1: hard push in that game, and the Bruins were also
Speaker 1: playing down one forward and down one defenseman because Ardvidson
Speaker 1: went down and Aspero went down, and it would have
Speaker 1: been really in the part.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it would have been really easy for the brow
Speaker 2: ones to no potentially fold like a deck of cards,
Speaker 2: but to their credit, they did not. And I have
Speaker 2: to say that line of janeau Kerally and Castle Lick
Speaker 2: love it. What a bitch it must be to play
Speaker 2: against those guys. Those guys are a real problem to
Speaker 2: play against.
Speaker 1: Yeah, love that line. Love to see it very quickly
Speaker 1: becoming my favorite personality line. When they get out there,
Speaker 1: I think that's good. Things are gonna are gonna happen.
Speaker 2: Because and it's funny, you know Corall is referred to
Speaker 2: as the old man I know of that line, crazy
Speaker 2: can you You know, you imagine those guys get out
Speaker 2: on the ice and you don't know who's going to
Speaker 2: bash you first, Castle Lick or right credit to Marco Sturm.
Speaker 2: And you know, we'll we'll we'll talk about this because
Speaker 2: I want to go back to you know, the Food
Speaker 2: for Thought and your dad's hot tape. But in the game,
Speaker 2: you didn't have macavoy right and Pasta it was his
Speaker 2: first game back.
Speaker 1: But you know what, no problem, right, No prop mean,
Speaker 1: you had two goals from two goals each from Casta
Speaker 1: and Minton that was great, and Pavel Zaka, for crying
Speaker 1: out loud, got a goal Andazka added the empty net
Speaker 1: goal and the Bruins only had six minutes of penalties
Speaker 1: in that game. It's critical in past seasons I would
Speaker 1: find something that would be the bell weather of the
Speaker 1: game in so in previous seasons it was tracking their
Speaker 1: shots on goal because they for whatever reason were not
Speaker 1: shooting the puck. I think it was maybe even last
Speaker 1: year and the year before this year, it's it's the penalties.
Speaker 1: So track those penalties, see how it's going. As long
Speaker 1: as they can stay out of the box, and if
Speaker 1: they get on the power play, they can they score
Speaker 1: right right right, But that seems to be that's that's
Speaker 1: the key, that's the key. These two power play didn't
Speaker 1: look awesome against Minnesota last night. They did have a
Speaker 1: couple of opportunities and they gave up to power play goals.
Speaker 1: So you know, you can what if, do the what if,
Speaker 1: but we're going to do the what if.
Speaker 2: What if you met yourself a power play goal or
Speaker 2: two and you're able to kill up a couple of
Speaker 2: those penalties or even one of them, right, you could
Speaker 2: have been looking at a different game. Instead you end
Speaker 2: up with a six to two loss. And for me,
Speaker 2: it was simple. The Bruins, to me, simply did not
Speaker 2: have enough offensive by your power to counter what the
Speaker 2: Minnesota Wild have available to that.
Speaker 1: Because, first of all, their goaltender is phenomenal. Philip Gustafson
Speaker 1: is an incredible goaltend. He was good, and he was good.
Speaker 2: He had to make some hard saves he was Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's fantastic. But also Quinn Hughes.
Speaker 1: Yes, I know he missed some passes and whatever, but
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, he's like a generational defenceman.
Speaker 1: He put in twenty six minutes playing with these guys
Speaker 1: that he's really not played with before. Literally just met
Speaker 1: literally just met literally just who knows if he even
Speaker 1: on safe So you know, yes, I agree, maybe Hughes
Speaker 1: wasn't as dangerous as he has the potential to be,
Speaker 1: but my god, he still put in twenty six minutes
Speaker 1: and scored a goal. And then you have him and Gustavson.
Speaker 1: Forget it. Forget it the fact that Boston was only
Speaker 1: down by a goal after the first period, and they
Speaker 1: genuinely had so many good chances and a lot of
Speaker 1: the goals that came in the first two periods were
Speaker 1: weird goals, deflections, crazy bounces, like, yeah, this game was
Speaker 1: the hockey gods in full action up until that third period,
Speaker 1: and then Boston was like, you know what, we'll go home.
Speaker 1: We'll see ourselves out.
Speaker 2: If you look at the game stats, yeah, right, and
Speaker 2: you look at the score and you say, wow, how
Speaker 2: did that happen? Shots on goal were even, Bruins had
Speaker 2: the edge in face off percentage. The glaring issue in
Speaker 2: this game was Minnesota was two to three on the
Speaker 2: power play and the Bruins were ozerver two. But in
Speaker 2: terms of the Bruins out hit the Wild, they had
Speaker 2: a couple more block shots. Yeah, giveaways and takeaways were
Speaker 2: relatively even. This came down to it was as simple
Speaker 2: as their goaltender was better than our goaltender could be
Speaker 2: last night.
Speaker 1: It could be. I mean, you're absolutely right. If you
Speaker 1: look at the stats and looking at the Corsey measures,
Speaker 1: the game was Boston's theme, the game was Boston's and
Speaker 1: in this case, again I'm not mad about this particular loss,
Speaker 1: because what's different from this game and those winnable games
Speaker 1: that we saw them lose left and right at the
Speaker 1: start of the season. It's not that I think that
Speaker 1: they lost a winnable game. Certainly, I'm not happy about
Speaker 1: the fact that they just couldn't finish some of these
Speaker 1: phenomenal plays that they had out there, but it's not
Speaker 1: like it was a winnable game when you have a
Speaker 1: goalie like Gustavsen, you know, and it's you know, those
Speaker 1: winnable games that they had where they were in control,
Speaker 1: but then they would go and they would give up
Speaker 1: a goal. So it was like, you know, the six
Speaker 1: to five, seven to six, like that was just a
Speaker 1: circus and should definitely have been won by Boston. This
Speaker 1: one was incredibly still incredibly tight, in spite of all
Speaker 1: of those metrics that you mentioned that typically lead to
Speaker 1: a Boston win. But again we said at the top
Speaker 1: of the pod, this team is fragile. It's that Jenga tower,
Speaker 1: and even just losing one little piece, I think even
Speaker 1: if we had lost just Arvidson or just Asproom, I
Speaker 1: think the result probably would have been the same.
Speaker 2: I agree with you in this game, and you jokingly
Speaker 2: said in our discord because I made a comment about
Speaker 2: you know, I'm going to cut them some Christmas slack
Speaker 2: for that game, into which you responded, you are getting
Speaker 2: a little soft, right, which was a sterical I am
Speaker 2: getting a little.
Speaker 1: You are, Maria. I had to hold you to a
Speaker 1: high standard year. I'm a soft one.
Speaker 2: Come on, it's that time of the year. But you know,
Speaker 2: they went out on this three game road stand. They
Speaker 2: had a potential of six points and they're coming home
Speaker 2: with four. How pisstop? Can you get now? I would
Speaker 2: get really pissed off if they tucked their tail and said, oh,
Speaker 2: well right, no fight, no pushback, no nothing, which was
Speaker 2: what would happen in games last season.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, they would have rolled over in the first
Speaker 1: They're not.
Speaker 2: They're not doing that this season. They're still continuing to
Speaker 2: try to push back and fight their ways back into
Speaker 2: into games. And isn't isn't that something that we can
Speaker 2: and should give this team credit for us? And you know,
Speaker 2: I listened to a lot of Boston sports talk radio here.
Speaker 2: We all had the same assessment of the Bruins to
Speaker 2: start the season, like, oh my god, it's going to
Speaker 2: be who the hell knows what we're going to get
Speaker 2: this year, where some people were downright saying this is
Speaker 2: going to be an awful team.
Speaker 1: They're not an awful team. No, they are playing better
Speaker 1: than any of us who follow watch this team could
Speaker 1: have ever expected them to play. Yeah, at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, I want to watch my high key
Speaker 1: team play, play competitively and right. And the most painful
Speaker 1: part of last year was I had to force myself
Speaker 1: to watch them because they didn't want to be there,
Speaker 1: and that was obvious. So why would I want to
Speaker 1: be here? I want to have fun watching them play, right,
Speaker 1: even if they're not having a good night like last night.
Speaker 1: I mean, it wasn't ugly hockey. I mean I don't
Speaker 1: I don't believe it was ugly hockey. Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: just at the end. Yeah, it's a Sunday night.
Speaker 2: You want to get home, you know, you know you're
Speaker 2: going to be home for what the next five six
Speaker 2: games are at home. That's okay, you got four out
Speaker 2: of six. You're staying the course, right, and that's all
Speaker 2: right now that we can ask for until you know,
Speaker 2: they give us any reason to look at them a
Speaker 2: little bit more harshly, and it could likely happen.
Speaker 1: We hope that it doesn't, but if it does, then
Speaker 1: we'll talk about it. But in the.
Speaker 2: Meantime, stick taps. Who do you give your stick taps to?
Speaker 1: So this week obviously the Catholic Correljano line. I mean,
Speaker 1: well done, fantastic, Love those guys. David Pasternach didn't skip
Speaker 1: a beat. Doesn't matter honestly what line you put him on.
Speaker 1: The man is going to create magic out there. Love
Speaker 1: love seeing him this week, in particular, especially with him
Speaker 1: moving up all time goal scoring for Boston.
Speaker 2: He has jumped to fifth overall in Bruin's history.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so he's coming right up next on his former
Speaker 1: teammates there, Patrice Bergeron and Brad Marshans and then Chucky
Speaker 1: My god, for a guy who lost twenty pounds and
Speaker 1: was needing to bring up his stamina as well. Not
Speaker 1: only did he play twenty four game of twenty four
Speaker 1: games twenty four minutes in Winnipeg, he had the most
Speaker 1: time on ice. Also of all the Bruins outside of
Speaker 1: Jeremy Swayman against the Wild another twenty four fifties, he
Speaker 1: has not missed a beat. And I actually thought he
Speaker 1: had a couple of great chances. I thought he was
Speaker 1: actually gonna get his first goal a couple of times theirs, and.
Speaker 2: I think he was a plus two in the game
Speaker 2: that he came back. What a machine by in Winnipeg.
Speaker 1: Credit to him. Yep, now we get to our penalty box.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. All right, well this I mean, okay,
Speaker 1: I'll save the worst for last. Obviously they can't score
Speaker 1: when they need it. That's been a frustrated, frustrating point
Speaker 1: for a couple of years now. I feel like that's
Speaker 1: just what it's been. It like, it's just beyond frustrating
Speaker 1: because it they deserve it. I'm not even just saying
Speaker 1: that as a fan, like objectively watching some of these
Speaker 1: plays and you're like, yes, yes, yes, amazing. That should
Speaker 1: be rewarded with ah did that go in? And then
Speaker 1: there are other times where they're just being bums and
Speaker 1: making any old m look like asn't a trophy winner?
Speaker 2: Now, well, sometimes they still have a propensity to overpass. Yes,
Speaker 2: it's a bad habit, it rehears its ugly head. Still
Speaker 2: it's maddening because you can see it when you're watching
Speaker 2: the game, going just take what the good board gives you.
Speaker 2: If the shot is there, god damn take it.
Speaker 1: Well. And I agree because I think that's also partly
Speaker 1: what had happened and what was part of the issue
Speaker 1: in the wild game. Yes, both teams finished with very similar,
Speaker 1: if not identical shots on goal. Boston was behind in
Speaker 1: their shots for a good chunk and it was when
Speaker 1: they had all these opportunities they got to still try
Speaker 1: and get it on net. Injuries, I mean, for crying
Speaker 1: out loud, that's just going to be a standing irritation.
Speaker 1: I know. I just wish we could get to a
Speaker 1: point where don't just get everybody back for an extended
Speaker 1: period healthy. We had like what five minutes five minutes
Speaker 1: of that in Winnipeg, Arvidson went down and Asparo went
Speaker 1: down so quickly it was basically like, here's five minutes
Speaker 1: of everybody together and you're done. Oh I did forget
Speaker 1: one other person to give stick tabs to. Yeah, Steve's
Speaker 1: he just keeps, he just keeps. My God, making his
Speaker 1: case peep in Marco's hands tied and not taking him
Speaker 1: out of the lineup. Good for him, Good for him. Yeah, yep,
Speaker 1: he's he's making a very good he's creating a very
Speaker 1: good problem. That's that's all I have to say. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, I want to beat a dead horse. However,
Speaker 1: I want to hear from listeners if they agree with
Speaker 1: this hot take. Again not necessarily my hot take, although
Speaker 1: I'm not going to say I disagree, but Mason Laurai
Speaker 1: belongs in the AHL. That's the statement, that is the
Speaker 1: hot take. I would agree. I don't know if he
Speaker 1: can be sent down well.
Speaker 2: Logistics aside, Mason Lorii still frightens me. At one point,
Speaker 2: he had a bad night against the Winnipeg Jets. They
Speaker 2: clearly targeted his side of the ice because there are
Speaker 2: still weaknesses there with an ill inability to make a
Speaker 2: strong defensive play on the puck. And at one point
Speaker 2: I texted my son and I said, how fast can
Speaker 2: you pack a bag and get to Winnipeg, because I
Speaker 2: think you can play better defense than Mason Morii is
Speaker 2: playing right now. So I understand, and I asked this
Speaker 2: question when I called the Morning Bru Show on Saturday morning,
Speaker 2: and I asked them what they thought. And I understand
Speaker 2: that these are the pros and cons with a young
Speaker 2: player who is still developing and growing and maturing his game.
Speaker 2: But but what I see and what I saw in
Speaker 2: those defensive plays, like you're a defenseman and you have
Speaker 2: your goddamn back to the guy who's coming in.
Speaker 1: I just the the issue behind that. I mean, first
Speaker 1: of all, the Morning Brew guys, they're never gonna be
Speaker 1: critical in any sort of meaningful way. Well, Razor World,
Speaker 1: to some degree, usually doesn't. He's he's very diplomatic. He's diplomatic,
Speaker 1: diplomatic about it.
Speaker 2: Billy will go a little bit Billy Jeffy will go
Speaker 2: a little bit deeper. But I understand their points. But
Speaker 2: I'm specifically talking about certain plays and certain things that
Speaker 2: I think should be inherent and automatic in an NHL defenseman.
Speaker 1: The the problem is, this is a self inflicted issue
Speaker 1: by Boston Bruins management. If he hadn't been offered that
Speaker 1: insane kind tract insane contract. He's almost twenty five years old,
Speaker 1: He's got a birthday in January, he'll be twenty five
Speaker 1: years old. He'll be in the league. This is what
Speaker 1: his third I think, second full season, Yeah, second full season.
Speaker 1: If he'd been offered a more reasonable contract, and let's say,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't disagree that he's a young player,
Speaker 1: maybe he needs a little bit more development. The solution
Speaker 1: is typically sending them to the AHL for that development,
Speaker 1: and management's hands are tied. How do you justify sending
Speaker 1: a three million dollar player down to the AHL. They
Speaker 1: they've bungled some of his development progress, which is not
Speaker 1: uncommon with these this Cousta Bruins organization. Right, So this
Speaker 1: is not to say, you know, to forgive him or
Speaker 1: acquit him of his defensive crimes, but they, yeah, he
Speaker 1: needs he needs AHL work and unfortunately, unless the Bruins
Speaker 1: are willing to part with him permanently, it is it's
Speaker 1: just not an option, no, and it doesn't seem like
Speaker 1: the organization is ready or wanting to go that route.
Speaker 1: So you know, we'll like, you're going to have to
Speaker 1: put up with these pickumps. This will be a curious test.
Speaker 1: Would management allow Marco to bench him again for a stretch? Like? Okay?
Speaker 1: They maybe they let him, gave him the freedom to
Speaker 1: do that before, to send a message, but is management
Speaker 1: going to be okay with him doing that again for
Speaker 1: a three million dollar player? Not necessarily because they think
Speaker 1: that it's not warranted. I'm sure they think it would
Speaker 1: be warranted. They all have eyeballs. It's the but he's
Speaker 1: he's making this kind of money and if we're going
Speaker 1: to be paying him that, we need to have him playing.
Speaker 2: You know what, I saying, I just found it a
Speaker 2: little bit maddening and frustrating, like, dude, what what are
Speaker 2: you doing?
Speaker 1: What are you doing? Yes, yes, And they likely might
Speaker 1: have a tough decision to make when some of these
Speaker 1: defensemen who were hurt come back, So we'll see what
Speaker 1: happens with that. But you know, I thought it was
Speaker 1: a little he needed to go in my our penalty box.
Speaker 1: I think I think he needs another time out. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he might. It might be working towards towards that. I mean,
Speaker 1: he did have an assistan in that game, but still
Speaker 1: he's not a forewhirl. I know, I know, I know,
Speaker 1: food for thought, Just to give us something to think
Speaker 1: about and give our listeners something to think about, and
Speaker 1: we can expand on this at a later pod, maybe
Speaker 1: during the holiday break. I alluded to the fact that
Speaker 1: I believe that the Boston Bruins are surprising many people,
Speaker 1: including IT fans and other people across the league with
Speaker 1: the way that they have been playing thus far this season.
Speaker 1: And while I know it's early, I wonder if there
Speaker 1: will be any discussion about a potential vote or Macrossturm
Speaker 1: as a Coach of the Year candidate. If this team.
Speaker 2: Continues to progress in the manner in which they are progressing.
Speaker 2: And the reason this food but thought came into my
Speaker 2: head is because the New England Patriots here in Boston
Speaker 2: have had a dramatic turnaround and part of that is
Speaker 2: largely due in part to the hiring of Mike Ravel,
Speaker 2: who's a former player and a Super Bowl champion. I
Speaker 2: didn't know that more than one time. And so I
Speaker 2: look at how the players have been responding to Rabel
Speaker 2: as a coach and looking up to him, and him
Speaker 2: having that cachet that he comes in as a former champion,
Speaker 2: having played in the order organization for a great deal
Speaker 2: of time. And then compare and contrast also to Marco
Speaker 2: Stern who was a former player in the Bruins organization
Speaker 2: and the work ethic that he brought game after game
Speaker 2: as a member of the Boston Bruins and being a
Speaker 2: part of a very integral growth in the development of
Speaker 2: the culture of the Boston Bruins. And I think that
Speaker 2: says something about these the current.
Speaker 1: Roster in how they're playing and wanting to play for
Speaker 1: him and wanting to play for each other. So just
Speaker 1: my boot for thought.
Speaker 2: We'll see how the season continues.
Speaker 1: And plays out. I would think that that should be
Speaker 1: a consideration. Everybody loves the underdogs getting better story. Typically
Speaker 1: that's who wins the Jack Adams. I wouldn't be surprised
Speaker 1: if Marco ends up being a nominee and a finalist,
Speaker 1: but I think we all know who's probably going to
Speaker 1: win that. Yeah, I agree with you, So yeah, Coinvolle
Speaker 1: probably yeah, because again, everybody loves an underdog story where
Speaker 1: the bad team gets becomes good. And as bad as
Speaker 1: people thought Boston was gonna be, they've never been as
Speaker 1: bad as Anaheim has for the last couple of seasons,
Speaker 1: right right, right right, But I would like to think
Speaker 1: maybe you know, he gets a vote voter to or
Speaker 1: or at least gets consideration or is in a conversation
Speaker 1: at some point in time if things continue progressing in
Speaker 1: the way in which they've been so far this season.
Speaker 2: So we talked about a homestand coming up with the Bruins.
Speaker 2: Their schedule doesn't get any better because they've got an
Speaker 2: every other day game starting Tuesday against the Utah Mammoth
Speaker 2: was seeing them for the first time. Then we get
Speaker 2: the Edmonton Oilers coming into town, which is always musty
Speaker 2: TV anytime Connor McDavid takes the ice. We've got the
Speaker 2: Vancouver come Ucks, and then we've got Ottawa and Montreal
Speaker 2: coming in game. And again, these games are out at home,
Speaker 2: and I know that there can be distractions once you
Speaker 2: get home, but these are critical, crucial points that you
Speaker 2: want to take advantage of. Oh my's it's it's a must,
Speaker 2: it's a must. Must get some points. Boys get some points.
Speaker 2: So as always, folks, thank you for tuning in, Thank
Speaker 2: you for listening. You can like and sub subscribe for
Speaker 2: more contact content. Be sure to leave us a rating
Speaker 2: and review to help other Bruins fans find us. You
Speaker 2: can support our podcast by joining our Patreon or following
Speaker 2: us on any of our socials. You can find us
Speaker 2: at Tape to Tape MK and on Substack at Tape
Speaker 2: to Tape MK dot substack dot com. You can find
Speaker 2: me on x at Maria of H two O town.
Speaker 2: Any closing thoughts obs go bes.
Speaker 1: STI still b
Podbean