The Return of Cliffy Hockey in Boston | Ep. 153
Liner notes
🎙️The Boston Bruins welcome back Connor Clifton as he rejoins the team. Discover how Clifton's game has grown during his time away, why he could thrive under coach Marco Sturm, and what his presence means for the Bruins' defensive strategy and roster changes.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please? I need
Speaker 1: something to do. I'll Jack send it out of trouble bocking.
Speaker 2: To say watch today.
Speaker 1: Here's a chance pop from right down with goalie scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my one a move by the rookie to.
Speaker 2: On one poster, not moving, set it on his own
Speaker 2: Oil dances in podcast at.
Speaker 1: Home right away, corner faster Chista, what is that for? Most?
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruin's Tape to Tape.
Speaker 1: I will be your host today. I am Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 1: I am joy as always by my steadfast and reliable
Speaker 1: co host Caroline with a kay, how are you today,
Speaker 1: my friend?
Speaker 2: I'm good, I'm good. Happy recording Monday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we've been able to enjoy some downtime ourselves while
Speaker 1: the hockey world is on a little bit of a
Speaker 1: hiatus as well. But today we're going to continue with
Speaker 1: what we have somewhat become a little bit of a
Speaker 1: tradition for us and doing some player profiles, and today
Speaker 1: we're going to focus on Honor Clifton who returns to Boston.
Speaker 1: Cliffy Hockey is back. In what way, shape or form
Speaker 1: that translates, we'll find out soon, but he comes back
Speaker 1: on a relatively friendly deal familiarity with the organization just
Speaker 1: by way of a refresher. Honor is thirty one years
Speaker 1: old and he signed a two year, four point five
Speaker 1: million dollar contract with the Bruins with a a two
Speaker 1: point two million dollar annual cap hit. We all know
Speaker 1: that from his prior experience here in Boston that he
Speaker 1: does play with a high degree of energy, sometimes a
Speaker 1: little frenetic, but probably had his best year with the
Speaker 1: Bruins in twenty twenty two twenty twenty three, which ultimately
Speaker 1: led to Connor basically pricing himself out of Boston as
Speaker 1: a free agent, and was one of those things everybody
Speaker 1: knew it was coming and everyone was like, hey, go
Speaker 1: out and get your bag of cash. And he did
Speaker 1: with the Buffalo Sabers, but the results never really translated
Speaker 1: with the Sabers, and I think a lot of that
Speaker 1: is due to the fact that that was a pretty
Speaker 1: bad Buffalo Sabers team at that time, both offensively, defensively,
Speaker 1: all the way around. I don't think you can say
Speaker 1: too much a Levy too much criticism at any players
Speaker 1: on that Buffalo Sabers team at the time. But he
Speaker 1: does come back to Boston. He is a right hand
Speaker 1: shot defenceman. Then much has been made about the fact
Speaker 1: that the Ruins don't have enough depth with right handed
Speaker 1: shot defenseman. I'm not sure this is the upgrade, honestly,
Speaker 1: that one was looking for. I think part of this
Speaker 1: signing is a little bit of a stop gap because
Speaker 1: Ruins are going to start the season the first seven
Speaker 1: games without Charlie Matcvoy. Not that I'm saying I'm not
Speaker 1: comparing the two, no, but.
Speaker 2: That's a big gap regardless of the type of defenseman
Speaker 2: any of them, like all of the defencemen on the roster,
Speaker 2: are going to be picking up extra slack and you
Speaker 2: need to have or don't have enough right handed defenseman period.
Speaker 2: And then you've got to bring in somebody who is
Speaker 2: a little bit more experienced, who played with some of
Speaker 2: the guys currently on the roster.
Speaker 1: And just as a reminder, Karna Clifton was part of
Speaker 1: that twenty nineteen year and making it to the stand
Speaker 1: only Cup finals. In the Cup run, he did get
Speaker 1: a decent amount of ice time.
Speaker 2: Yeah year, Yeah, He's played with Sean Corally in Boston,
Speaker 2: he played with Pasta, he played with Chucky. I think
Speaker 2: that's everybody that he played with.
Speaker 1: On that roster that far back.
Speaker 2: Crach was that, no, Yeah, I'm I think that he
Speaker 2: is probably a little bit of a stop gap at
Speaker 2: least in that regard some insurance in the in at
Speaker 2: the start of the season, especially because of Chucky being
Speaker 2: also the right handed d and they're being a lack
Speaker 2: of them to begin with. For folks who maybe aren't familiar,
Speaker 2: who don't necessarily remember, there's the concept of Cliffy hockey
Speaker 2: that initially was a joking term meaning, oh, it's chaotic
Speaker 2: and he's a little out of control and he's just
Speaker 2: out there being crazy, And that sort of changed for
Speaker 2: him as a defense as a player under Jim Montgomery.
Speaker 2: And if I'm recalling correctly, at one point Jim Montgomery
Speaker 2: had said, yeah, we don't use that phrase anymore. But
Speaker 2: when he's at his best, being very physical and dominant
Speaker 2: out on the ice, I think you can still affectionately
Speaker 2: call that Cliffy hockey because I think he has a
Speaker 2: very distinct playing style. When he has a very specific role,
Speaker 2: he does incredibly well. My impression, and I don't know
Speaker 2: if you had also kind of had this impression when
Speaker 2: he left Boston, he seemingly fell a little bit by
Speaker 2: the wayside, maybe was underperforming or I'm going to use
Speaker 2: this phrase very loosely, quote unquote getting worse as a player,
Speaker 2: And I certainly went into my research on this episode
Speaker 2: with that mindset. But I have to say, and hopefully
Speaker 2: this is going to be a little bit reassuring for you,
Speaker 2: Maria especially, he actually is in great shape. He left
Speaker 2: Boston to go to a Buffalo team that at the
Speaker 2: time was still very much so actively dying under the
Speaker 2: leadership of Kevin Adams. Remember their Cinderella transformation literally only
Speaker 2: happened about what a quarter of the way into last season,
Speaker 2: So keep that in mind. And so going out there
Speaker 2: and knowing the type of defenceman that he is, he
Speaker 2: didn't really receive a ton of guidance. And when you're
Speaker 2: that type of defenceman and you're not really being given
Speaker 2: a good structured role and you're in an organization that
Speaker 2: is constantly losing. Buffalo is a massive hockey town. They
Speaker 2: love the Sabers through the good times and the bad,
Speaker 2: and so there is a lot of pressure to perform
Speaker 2: well for fans that truly love the franchise and Buffalo
Speaker 2: was also and still is in arguably the most competitive
Speaker 2: division in the entire league. It can be easy to
Speaker 2: look at him, look at his situation, and interpret a decline,
Speaker 2: but in reality, he's remained remarkably stable over the last
Speaker 2: couple of seasons. First of all, you cannot deny the
Speaker 2: positive impact of a player coming quote unquote home. Right,
Speaker 2: He's still to maintain an apartment in Boston all these years,
Speaker 2: So who is renting his apartment with Fraser Minton renting
Speaker 2: Cliffy's apartment. One of the young guys is actually living
Speaker 2: in his house, right, So he has no place to
Speaker 2: live right now. Sure he's found something, but yeah, having
Speaker 2: a player come home is going to bring that positive
Speaker 2: mental attitude an approach to his game right off the bat,
Speaker 2: which is going to be great. I think we saw
Speaker 2: that to some degree with Sean Corally. The other thing
Speaker 2: that I think is going to go in Cliffy's favor
Speaker 2: is his style of play is probably a better fit
Speaker 2: with the coaching style of Marco Sturham, even more so
Speaker 2: than when he was in Buffalo when he first started
Speaker 2: out there. And again, it has less to do with
Speaker 2: overall talent and more about that role clarity. We've talked
Speaker 2: about that hundreds of times on this podcast, where if
Speaker 2: a player doesn't have a specific role or a job,
Speaker 2: then he becomes a jag. And for a team to
Speaker 2: be successful, you look at every team that goes on
Speaker 2: a deep Cup run, those teams that actually win the
Speaker 2: Stanley Cup, every single player has a clear role in
Speaker 2: responsibility and somebody else who can easily transition to fill
Speaker 2: some of those responsibilities when necessary. Connor Clifton, he's the
Speaker 2: type of player who has to exist for a reason.
Speaker 2: You have to ask what is the hockey problem that
Speaker 2: he is solving. He is an incredibly physical right shot defenseman.
Speaker 2: He closes gaps very quickly, he wins battles, and he
Speaker 2: ends these own possessions. So imagine him with someone like
Speaker 2: Jonathan Asparo like we talked about in last week, where
Speaker 2: Asparo is very effective at ending defensive zone time, and
Speaker 2: partner him with somebody like Connor Clifton, and Cliffy is
Speaker 2: gonna then lay out some pretty massive hits at the
Speaker 2: same time.
Speaker 3: So I find that very exciting. I'm looking forward to
Speaker 3: the depth that he brings. Yes, it's still a little
Speaker 3: to me. The signing itself is a little okay?
Speaker 1: Does that speak to what was available in the market
Speaker 1: and the fact that you needed something to potentially bridge
Speaker 1: the gap of not having Charlie McAvoy in your lineup
Speaker 1: for the first seven games of the season. Ye. I
Speaker 1: do recall saying to myself those of us who are
Speaker 1: fans of the Bruins, knowing that his final season in
Speaker 1: Boston was likely his best career year. So that was
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty two to twenty three season where he's
Speaker 1: played seventy eight games, five goals, eighteen assists, twenty three points,
Speaker 1: and he was a plus twenty yeah, sixteen minutes and penalties,
Speaker 1: which honestly not too shabby given the physical level of fight,
Speaker 1: which means to me he knows how to deliver a
Speaker 1: hint and do it within the parameters of what's allowed.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Right, A little bit older now that those statistics haven't
Speaker 1: continued to translate throughout his career or his time with
Speaker 1: Buffalo and then a very short period of time with
Speaker 1: the Pittsburgh Penguins last season.
Speaker 2: True, I did also take a look at some more
Speaker 2: defensive significant stats, and yes, he played a lot less
Speaker 2: in Pittsburgh. One of the better ways that you can
Speaker 2: really evaluate his performance over the last three years away
Speaker 2: from Boston is looking at the per sixty rate of
Speaker 2: everything that he's done. And when you're talking about a defenseman,
Speaker 2: you really want to look at what is his expected
Speaker 2: goals against per sixty goals against being how many goals
Speaker 2: are going to be scored against him, scoring chances against him,
Speaker 2: high danger chances against, and high danger goals allowed. These
Speaker 2: are all things that a good defenseman is going to
Speaker 2: try to minimize, and I will own it. I was
Speaker 2: pleasantly surprised to see that across all of those kind
Speaker 2: of key defensive metrics he's been improving, even if he's
Speaker 2: playing less ice time in those areas. To me, that
Speaker 2: means perhaps he has matured as a defenceman, that his
Speaker 2: focus has become much more clearly defensive, defensively minded, and
Speaker 2: I think he can bring to the table that plus
Speaker 2: that physicality, it's going to be huge and he's.
Speaker 1: Reliable, right, you know what you're going to get pretty
Speaker 1: much shift after shift when he takes the ice. I
Speaker 1: do recall at that time saying to myself, it's unfortunate
Speaker 1: that he's going to price himself out of duston lease.
Speaker 2: Let's face it.
Speaker 1: Every team needs a Connor Clifton type guy on the
Speaker 1: back end, someone that you know you can pretty much
Speaker 1: throw out there in a variety of scenarios, maybe not
Speaker 1: on the power play, and you pretty much know what
Speaker 1: you're going to get from him.
Speaker 2: And I don't think anybody wants to see any player
Speaker 2: for that matter, but especially a defenceman being the type
Speaker 2: that has to chase plays. And he is an aggressive defenceman.
Speaker 2: And if you look at him playing that way, that's
Speaker 2: partly where the Cliffy Hawks the idea came from, is
Speaker 2: that chaos comes from his willingness to be aggressive. And
Speaker 2: he was even more successful in Boston because this has
Speaker 2: always been a franchise that really emphasizes strong defensive structure.
Speaker 2: And then during his tenure, in particular, starting under Bruce
Speaker 2: Cassidy and Jim Montgomery, those were well oiled machines in
Speaker 2: terms of defense and having a kind of back up,
Speaker 2: a safety net that would allow an aggressive defenseman to
Speaker 2: take those chances, whether it was to go and finish
Speaker 2: a really aggressive hit or take a risk. He was
Speaker 2: able to be successful because of the system in place
Speaker 2: around him, and without that kind of system and structure
Speaker 2: in Buffalo that can really leave somebody exposed and can
Speaker 2: make mistakes happen. And so when you think about now
Speaker 2: the type of coach that Marco Sturm is, where he
Speaker 2: is expecting a lot of simple play details structure, he's
Speaker 2: not going to be He doesn't give any of the
Speaker 2: players free reign to go out and play willy nilly
Speaker 2: however they want. Whether it's David Pasternak or Mason Laurai,
Speaker 2: everyone has a job. He has a specific expectation for
Speaker 2: every single person. And I think we could see potentially
Speaker 2: a resurgence in some of that well known Cliffy hockey
Speaker 2: in the positive way because of the environment that Sturm
Speaker 2: has created. He will have some of that safety net.
Speaker 2: Now we're not there yet by any means.
Speaker 1: This is all speculation on our part, because there's no
Speaker 1: denying for whatever reason that his level of play has
Speaker 1: declined a little bit. And to your point, a lot
Speaker 1: of that could be due to the fact of teams
Speaker 1: that he's played on, right, the personnel that were already there,
Speaker 1: the type of system, the type of role. I think
Speaker 1: what happened to him in Buffalo was that there were
Speaker 1: high expectations and the threshold for him was set at
Speaker 1: such a level that you would say, good luck there.
Speaker 1: They may want you to be the big dog there,
Speaker 1: but I don't know how that's going to translate for you,
Speaker 1: And I'm not sure that it did translate for him
Speaker 1: in the manner in which he might have expected it
Speaker 1: and the Sabers organization might have expected it to translate.
Speaker 2: Yeah, definitely. And I think the other part of his game,
Speaker 2: besides that physicality and that good solid defensive ability, as
Speaker 2: I mentioned, his ability to keep the goals against scoring chances,
Speaker 2: all of those things low, which is obviously ideal. Some
Speaker 2: of his less great abilities in terms of exiting with
Speaker 2: possession and pucked retrieval, those were not so awesome, although
Speaker 2: again when he was involved.
Speaker 4: To a number he had some good speed. But he
Speaker 4: has actually improved over the last three years with his
Speaker 4: exit exiting with possession, and honestly, he hasn't completely collapsed
Speaker 4: when it comes to his puck retrieval. I don't think
Speaker 4: he's gotten objectively worse in that regard. I think sometimes
Speaker 4: that's the bare minimum, and if that's not, what is
Speaker 4: ultimately part of his job imagining him partnered up with
Speaker 4: Jonathan Asperau Asby is one who is going to be
Speaker 4: more likely to be better at the puck retrieval and
Speaker 4: the exits right while he's supporting him in that role
Speaker 4: and he's doing something slightly different as Aspero's partner.
Speaker 1: I'm going to find that very curious to see how
Speaker 1: this all plays out, because whatever happens in the first
Speaker 1: seven games of the season without Charlie Mack in the
Speaker 1: line up is I'm not quite sure that's what we're
Speaker 1: going to see throughout the course of the season. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I do think he fits the bill of what cam
Speaker 1: Neely said of wanting the Bruins to be tougher to
Speaker 1: play against. And I still think Karna Clipton can bring
Speaker 1: some of that yes to the table because you know,
Speaker 1: he's not afraid to hit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And what I find fascinating as I was thinking
Speaker 2: about it, he's not dissimilar in terms of his style
Speaker 2: of play in some of his defensive abilities compared to
Speaker 2: Andrew Peak. In terms of the good stuff. The value
Speaker 2: wasn't coming from offense. Is not like Mason Lori or
Speaker 2: even Hampus in solid two way play. It's really in
Speaker 2: keeping things calm in the back end, winning those battles
Speaker 2: and killing plays, and you can't judge him and his
Speaker 2: abilities as a defenceman by what we see from players
Speaker 2: like Charlie McVoy right, because he plays most successfully in
Speaker 2: a very particular structured role. And I'm feeling optimistic that,
Speaker 2: especially because he did not have that kind of structure
Speaker 2: around him. He did not have that kind of role
Speaker 2: assignment in Buffalo and in Pittsburgh. He just was never
Speaker 2: going to be able to perform as well as he
Speaker 2: had in his final season in Boston because he was
Speaker 2: already then a little bit behind the eight ball. So
Speaker 2: your point there, do you find it odd that Andrew
Speaker 2: Peak they were fine with him moving on, right, But
Speaker 2: now comparing a little bit the type of play. So
Speaker 2: Andrew Peak goes off to Utah at a one million
Speaker 2: dollar cap hit for one year, but we've picked up
Speaker 2: Connor Clifton for a little bit longer, for a little
Speaker 2: bit more money. What is the turning point there? What
Speaker 2: is the Bruins rationale do you think for that?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm fine with it, and I was fine
Speaker 1: with saying goodbye to Andrew Peak because there were definitely
Speaker 1: some shortcomings that we saw defensively with Andrew Peak. Especially
Speaker 1: when things became a little bit frantic or chaotic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, now, yeah, I think there are a couple of
Speaker 2: things in Connor's favor. I don't know that they're necessarily
Speaker 2: worth more financially compared to the one million and then
Speaker 2: the two whatever, but I think it's a couple of things.
Speaker 2: That he is older as a defenseman, you mature later.
Speaker 2: You want to have somebody in your back end who
Speaker 2: can reliably kill those plays, assist with getting the puck
Speaker 2: out of his own. That's a hallmark of Storm System
Speaker 2: is get it out fast because we want to play
Speaker 2: a high transition game. I think that he can help
Speaker 2: facilitate that transition game from the back end. So his
Speaker 2: decision making I think is probably better than Andrew Peaks,
Speaker 2: not just because of the age difference and that Connor
Speaker 2: Clifton has grown up a little bit more since he
Speaker 2: was last in Boston and Andrew Peak being twenty eight
Speaker 2: and he's thirty one. And I think he's a known
Speaker 2: entity that they know very well. They know is he coachable?
Speaker 2: How can he play four different kinds of coaches? He
Speaker 2: was in Boston for two different coaches. He's gone and
Speaker 2: seen some of the others and this is me entirely speculating,
Speaker 2: But when you've been around the block and you've worked professionally,
Speaker 2: like I'm going to speak for my own experience, I
Speaker 2: know what's important. I know it's not important at this
Speaker 2: point in my career. I know what a good boss
Speaker 2: looks like and a bad boss looks like. I know
Speaker 2: how to work with different kinds of people. And you
Speaker 2: probably wanted to come home, and so you already then
Speaker 2: have somebody who has some degree of buy into the system.
Speaker 2: He knows what a good structured defensive system looks like
Speaker 2: and how he can help. That just makes it one
Speaker 2: less thing potentially that Bruin's management has to worry about
Speaker 2: in the back end, whether it's the first ten games
Speaker 2: of the season or it's March and people are getting squirrely.
Speaker 2: That's my impression. Let's call a spade a spade here too.
Speaker 2: Campus lind Home cannot seem to stay healthy any longer.
Speaker 2: You just go into now a season thinking what is
Speaker 2: going to be the next injury or when is that
Speaker 2: knee or whatever going to resurface again where he's going
Speaker 2: to be out for a significant period of time. So
Speaker 2: maybe the organization is also hedging its bets on we
Speaker 2: could likely lose this.
Speaker 1: Guy campus again for a chunk of time in the season.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you really want somebody who can step in
Speaker 2: and knows what they're doing. We've got a lot of
Speaker 2: young guys on d these days, and that's great, but
Speaker 2: that means there's a lot of inexperience there. And at
Speaker 2: this point, Connor Clifton is an experienced veteran defenseman now,
Speaker 2: and that's incredibly valuable when you have a system that
Speaker 2: really emphasizes defense, but does.
Speaker 1: It lends yourself to giving you a lot of confidence
Speaker 1: when now we're saying Connor Clifton is a veteran defenseman, right,
Speaker 1: and we're going to be doing an episode focusing on
Speaker 1: our defensive four and our forward four groups heading into
Speaker 1: the season, and there's quite a bit too unpack when
Speaker 1: it comes to the Bruins quote unquote defensive death at
Speaker 1: this point. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I would suggest for new watchers of the game who
Speaker 2: have not seen the joys of Cliffy hockey, or even
Speaker 2: folks who don't remember, look for a player who is
Speaker 2: going to be throwing good hits and he doesn't rack
Speaker 2: up a lot of penalty minutes.
Speaker 1: So he knows unlike other members of the Bruins defensive core,
Speaker 1: he knows how to hit someone legally.
Speaker 2: Yes, and effectively exactly, And that's great. Yeah. I think
Speaker 2: what I'm expecting to see out of Connor Clifton is
Speaker 2: exactly like we said. We're going to see a high energy,
Speaker 2: We're going to see good physical play. We're going to
Speaker 2: see a player who has a strong ability to gap
Speaker 2: up and really assist in that zone exit hopefully them
Speaker 2: getting better with more of the correct personnel and getting
Speaker 2: more familiar with Sturm's system. Really trying to create a
Speaker 2: team that thrives on transition. That's what he's ultimately trying
Speaker 2: to accomplish with this Bruins team. And I think that
Speaker 2: Connor Clifton is a good addition to make that happen.
Speaker 1: And I am going to be curious to see his
Speaker 1: usage and I'm going to be curious to see how
Speaker 1: that translates in terms of the defensive structure, if they
Speaker 1: clearly want to play, and how that helps the goaltenders too.
Speaker 2: Let's face it, we relied way too much.
Speaker 1: I can't even believe I'm saying this, but we've relied
Speaker 1: way too much on our goalies last season more than
Speaker 1: I think even they might have anticipated expected.
Speaker 2: Swamon has played roughly the same number of games as
Speaker 2: other significant starters, but I guarantee you he had a
Speaker 2: lot more work to do in that amount of time.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, oh yes.
Speaker 2: And the last thing I did fail to mention I
Speaker 2: fully expect to see him doing a lot of PK
Speaker 2: work is I don't know that I would necessarily call
Speaker 2: him a PK specialist, but he's definitely one that you
Speaker 2: want to have fully engaged and used a lot on
Speaker 2: the penalty kill. And that is again something else that
Speaker 2: for most of his time in Boston and most of
Speaker 2: what we've seen in the last two decades has been
Speaker 2: something that the Bruins have particularly excelled at and in
Speaker 2: recent years have not done as well on the penalty
Speaker 2: that was.
Speaker 1: Actually quite literally killing this team a little bit of regression.
Speaker 2: I would expect to see a much improved penalty kill
Speaker 2: with Connor Clifton on Matt Unit.
Speaker 1: I think fans who are unfamiliar with Connor Clifton will
Speaker 1: likely enjoy seeing him play because I myself love to
Speaker 1: see defencemen who are physical right and do it within
Speaker 1: the realms of the rules, but I'm all for ensuring
Speaker 1: that whoever's coming in to our end of the house
Speaker 1: as to look over his shoulder to see what's coming at.
Speaker 2: Yes, exactly. Can't wait for Cliffy hockey.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we'll see how that translates and how it surfaces
Speaker 1: in the upcoming season. So with that being said, folks,
Speaker 1: thank you for listening. Please make sure you like and
Speaker 1: subscribe from more contact, and be sure to leave us
Speaker 1: a rating or a review to help other Bruins fans
Speaker 1: find us. You can also support our podcast by joining
Speaker 1: our Patreon or following us on our socials at Tape
Speaker 1: to Tape MK and on Substack at Tape to Tape
Speaker 1: m K dot substack dot com. Any closing thoughts, Go Bees,
Speaker 1: Go Bees.
Podbean