Boston Bruins Are Beating Themselves: Penalties, Officiating, and Missed Chances | Ep 123
Liner notes
🎙️ The Bruins didn’t just lose games — they lost control of them.A six-game winless slide continues as Boston wastes strong goaltending, can’t finish chances, and repeatedly sabotages itself with undisciplined penalties. Losses to Ottawa and Montreal exposed the same cracks, while the overtime defeat against Calgary underscored a growing issue: this team struggles to close when it matters most.
We break down the disastrous third period against the Canadiens, the waved-off Elias Lindholm goal that flipped momentum, and why NHL officiating — particularly goaltender interference — continues to create chaos instead of clarity.
Plus: mental fatigue comments, accountability gaps, the Bruins’ failure to play clean five-on-five hockey, and a hard look at what’s slipping away in the standings.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 1: I need something to do. All Jack sending out a trip.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say this.
Speaker 2: Today.
Speaker 3: Here's a chance popta right down the goalie scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my wa a move by the rookie to on
Speaker 1: one poster not moving in shot?
Speaker 2: It too time.
Speaker 1: Oil dances in podcast?
Speaker 3: Wait at home right away? Faster Chester?
Speaker 2: What is that for?
Speaker 1: Most? Welcome in, everyone to another episode of Bruin's Tape
Speaker 1: to Tape. I will be your host today, Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 1: We are recording on a different, different, altered schedule here
Speaker 1: due in large part too not only the holidays, but
Speaker 1: the Bruins' schedule. So we're recording on Tuesday, twelve thirty,
Speaker 1: and I want to welcome in my co host Caroline
Speaker 1: with a K. I hope you had good holidays. I
Speaker 1: know that the Bruins really haven't given us a whole
Speaker 1: time to celebrate, but hopefully you had some good time
Speaker 1: with family and friends. I mean, I've.
Speaker 2: Basically been in my pgs for the last couple of days,
Speaker 2: not just because it's vacation, but because suffering from the plagues,
Speaker 2: various plagues that have been going around.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I feel you in that regard. I think
Speaker 1: we're both that we're we're both playing a bit injured here, folks,
Speaker 1: So we are going to do our best to give
Speaker 1: you some good, solid content here.
Speaker 2: But just because I'm a little under the weather doesn't
Speaker 2: mean I am any less spicy and irritated.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, I think we're both. We're both feeling irritated, annoyed, frustrated,
Speaker 1: and maybe me, I'm feeling a little bit of disillusionment
Speaker 1: because I thought I knew what this team was, but
Speaker 1: now maybe I don't think I know what this team is,
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure I like the direction in which
Speaker 1: it's going. So we'll get down to all of the
Speaker 1: specifics of those questions that we have, but first we'll
Speaker 1: do our set the table segment where we did get
Speaker 1: Jonathan Asboro back in the lineup against the Calgary Flames
Speaker 1: the Bruins played them on Monday night. We now have
Speaker 1: another injury, so it seems like we get someone back
Speaker 1: and then someone goes on ir So now it's Tanner
Speaker 1: Janeau's turn to hit the injury list for this team.
Speaker 1: And I want to take a look at a tweet
Speaker 1: that came from Ty Anderson. I think it was last
Speaker 1: night because we have spent a good amount of time
Speaker 1: talking about the number of penalties that the Boston Bruins take,
Speaker 1: keep taking, and the types of penalties that they keep taking,
Speaker 1: and Tie did a deep dive and an inventory of penalties. Specifically,
Speaker 1: I believe during the course of this losing streak that
Speaker 1: the Bruins are on penalty breakdown over this six game
Speaker 1: winless slide, tripping seven times, hooking five times, I sticking
Speaker 1: five times, including double minors twice, slashing three times, frost
Speaker 1: checking twice, interference, delay of game, holding, rocking.
Speaker 2: Yep Well and Maria, you remember in our conversation about
Speaker 2: a month ago when I was talking about our Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: predictor just how high the PK load is for this
Speaker 2: team and how much of an impact even at Thanksgiving,
Speaker 2: that statistic that measure has on this team's ability to
Speaker 2: be successful, that they need in order to turn things
Speaker 2: around at Thanksgiving, they needed to start taking I can't
Speaker 2: remember now what I said, but no more than three
Speaker 2: penalties per game average, no more than one per period,
Speaker 2: preferably limited bringing it down only like I think I said,
Speaker 2: like twenty percent, right, because at the time they were
Speaker 2: averaging five or six on average. They've been successful when
Speaker 2: they can manage that PK load, and it sinks them
Speaker 2: when they can't, mostly because we have seen a surprising
Speaker 2: drop off in that that penalty kill that that this
Speaker 2: team has always been known for. That's that's a not
Speaker 2: an individual seasonal team identity piece. That is a that
Speaker 2: is a franchise identity piece that is important to the franchise.
Speaker 2: And I will say credit to the team last night,
Speaker 2: that was one of their best penalty killing nights that
Speaker 2: they've had in a long time. Uh, because they are
Speaker 2: quickly approaching the bottom of the league in penalty killing percentage.
Speaker 2: But it's still a significant problem. It's this huge problem
Speaker 2: that coupled with and I'm sure you're going to take
Speaker 2: us down this road a little bit later, but that
Speaker 2: coupled with those losing the winnable games, the moral victories,
Speaker 2: because I'm sick and tired of that.
Speaker 1: But continue, well, well let me give you, let me
Speaker 1: give you some stats, the kind of I don't want
Speaker 1: to say quantified, but correlate to this this the struggles
Speaker 1: that they're having in this six game losing streak. So
Speaker 1: we have not one player, regular player that have has
Speaker 1: pretty much played the majority of these games during the
Speaker 1: six game slide that are plus players right now. Okay,
Speaker 1: so you have leading leading the pack is David Pasternak,
Speaker 1: who is a minus seven, really wow, minus seven, and
Speaker 1: again I know this, he's not scoring no. And again
Speaker 1: Charlie McAvoy is a minus six. We have one, two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five four guys. Five guys is minus fives, including Elias Slindholme,
Speaker 1: Pavel Zaka, Casey Millstat Andrew Peak, Morgan Geek's minus four,
Speaker 1: Hampus slind Home minus four. And it's not one The only.
Speaker 2: Guys who are, you know, seemingly not in the house
Speaker 2: here are guys who aren't really cutting a hold on
Speaker 2: a time because they're at zero.
Speaker 1: Mason Lauri is even right, he's at a zero. Wow.
Speaker 1: Mikey is Simont is at a zero. So you know,
Speaker 1: it stands to reason when you see a slide such
Speaker 1: as this and you're spending an inordinate amount of time
Speaker 1: on the penalty kill. What is very frightening to me
Speaker 1: is those guys that are minus players that aren't typically
Speaker 1: part of penalty kill units. So I don't want to
Speaker 1: say that this is a recipe for disaster, but we
Speaker 1: knew that this team would need to heavily rely on
Speaker 1: certain players to carry the load offensively, and when said
Speaker 1: players are not carrying the load and then they're costing
Speaker 1: you while they're out there on the ice, it's mind boggling.
Speaker 1: And it's not a recipe or success. And now I'm
Speaker 1: saying to myself, is this the team that we actually
Speaker 1: thought we were going to get at the start of
Speaker 1: the season, which is a middle of the pack Dare
Speaker 1: I say mediocre team as opposed to the team that
Speaker 1: might have been overachieve it at some point in time. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's hard to stay because this season has been
Speaker 2: such a roller coaster and it's it's easy to sit
Speaker 2: here and say, if you're looking at this team and
Speaker 2: you've got let's say a control board, a switchboard, right,
Speaker 2: and oh, okay, we need to lower the lower the
Speaker 2: volume of the penalties, and we need to increase this,
Speaker 2: that and the other, and do you know all of
Speaker 2: these different things that have to be in alignment that
Speaker 2: I believe is what Marco Sturm is actually trying to
Speaker 2: accomplish with this team. The execution when it fails, it
Speaker 2: goes sideways. And you know, we've said on the pod,
Speaker 2: when the last time we had a six game losing
Speaker 2: streak that I felt we just simply did not have that.
Speaker 1: Talent, kind of to your point that this.
Speaker 2: Is maybe exactly who we are, what we have, and
Speaker 2: them's the breaks, and we've just gotten lucky. But then
Speaker 2: they turn it around and they played how what was
Speaker 2: the seven game win streak and it was the exact
Speaker 2: opposite team, and I during that time I amended my interpretation,
Speaker 2: my assessment of the team to say, Okay, it's not
Speaker 2: that we don't have a talented enough team. This is
Speaker 2: the fragile nature of this team. This team I'm gonna
Speaker 2: continue to use again the Jenga tower as a descriptor
Speaker 2: for what this team is because they are so fragile.
Speaker 2: If both a random player who seems on the surface
Speaker 2: to be not a main character guy goes out, the
Speaker 2: team really struggles. But also if certain things aren't being
Speaker 2: done by the players out on the ice, the Djenga
Speaker 2: tower starts to fall and crumble. So the reason why
Speaker 2: I don't think that they were just overperforming is the
Speaker 2: fact that they did it for seven games. That's why
Speaker 2: I think they are. They are a good team deep,
Speaker 2: they got good bones. This team has good bones. It's
Speaker 2: all the other crap that this is what the coaching.
Speaker 1: Staff is like. I don't envy them.
Speaker 2: They are trying to figure out how to stabilize the
Speaker 2: team and to make it more robust with what they have. Okay,
Speaker 2: I don't know if a new body, a different body
Speaker 2: is the answer, because because again it's not just when
Speaker 2: people are out of the lineup or individuals fail. There
Speaker 2: are team wide things that if they're not doing or
Speaker 2: they're doing too much of, impacts the outcome of the game.
Speaker 2: I will say, compared again to the other losing streak
Speaker 2: that we've experienced this season, this one is slightly different
Speaker 2: in that the team for the most part has been
Speaker 2: better than the team that we saw in that first
Speaker 2: losing stretch.
Speaker 1: Well, and I want to get into some things that
Speaker 1: Marco Sturm and David Pastronach said when they hit the
Speaker 1: holiday break, because it annoyed me to no end. Oh,
Speaker 1: I know I heard you on Morning Brew. It annoyed
Speaker 1: me to no end. And I'm going to re annoy
Speaker 1: myself and others with my take on that. But and
Speaker 1: we'll break down the debacle that was the.
Speaker 2: Homes before the break because those were crucial games and
Speaker 2: just not acceptable in my view the performances yet we
Speaker 2: saw at home and I want to, you know, maybe
Speaker 2: kick myself in the seat of the pants because I
Speaker 2: have been on more than one occasion giving this team
Speaker 2: credit for their ability to self correct and bounce back,
Speaker 2: and I'm not sure they passed either of those tests
Speaker 2: during that Breek home stand. But right if that was,
Speaker 2: if that was their identity, if that was what they've
Speaker 2: decided is their identity, they did not play to their identity.
Speaker 1: That was not So we'll let's let's do a quick
Speaker 1: spin around the rink. We have the Winter Classic coming
Speaker 1: up on January second, which to me, I understand why
Speaker 1: the league is scheduling it on January second, because they
Speaker 1: don't have the needs to compete against football or basketball
Speaker 1: or whatever other sports may be on January one. But
Speaker 1: I missed the tradition they tuggling down on January first.
Speaker 1: With my hangover and watching this game, you know, be
Speaker 1: that as it may. It will be the Florida Panthers
Speaker 1: facing the New York Rangers, and old friend Brad Marshant
Speaker 1: is undefeated. Undefeated in Winter Classic games. Mary, are you
Speaker 1: gonna rub some salt. Yeah, he didn't participate in the
Speaker 1: game that the Bruins lost against the Montreal Canadians when
Speaker 1: it was played at Foxborough at the home of the
Speaker 1: New England Patriots because he was suspended for that game.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it was like he did no, no, he
Speaker 2: was suspended for that. He had done one of his
Speaker 2: boneheaded things and done himself. This is back in the day,
Speaker 2: back in his heyday. Brad Marshan Folks is leading the
Speaker 2: Florida Panthers in goals with twenty two and assists with
Speaker 2: twenty two. So do with that stat as you want,
Speaker 2: but I felt compelled to share it. I'm sorry. I
Speaker 2: know it gives you. Thanks me, it pisses me off.
Speaker 1: Don Sweeney. I will never forgive them. Thems are the numbers.
Speaker 1: THEMS are the numbers. So World Juniors Update, Team Canada,
Speaker 1: Team USA ye bowling along James Hagens is having himself
Speaker 1: a series there and Zeller's and Zellers.
Speaker 2: I'm so excited for the future of the Boston Bruins
Speaker 2: because of the fact that two Bruins prospects, Hagen's and
Speaker 2: Zellers on Team USA TMUSA was down. They had to
Speaker 2: come from behind when quite literally on the back of
Speaker 2: James Hagen and Will Zellers. They are the reason they
Speaker 2: won that game. If you see the highlights, it's just
Speaker 2: it's just phenomenal and I'm so excited. We're gonna have
Speaker 2: Marybeth back on the p in about two to three weeks.
Speaker 2: She's gonna give us all the updates. But we were
Speaker 2: talking last night and our guess is, for now we
Speaker 2: will see Hagen's in the black and gold.
Speaker 1: Probably.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't be surprised if we see him at the
Speaker 2: end of the season because the college hockey season ends
Speaker 2: in the beginning of April earlier, so we might see
Speaker 2: him after that stretch, maybe actually late April, because the
Speaker 2: BC Eagles are killing.
Speaker 1: It so they might go all the way.
Speaker 2: And then there was question mark whether or not Zeller's
Speaker 2: would need another year to cook, but quite frankly, seeing
Speaker 2: how he performed, maybe we'll see him again.
Speaker 1: It was just it was crazy. It was crazy to see.
Speaker 2: So go check out those highlights, because why would they
Speaker 2: put these games on a channel that most people can access.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just don't understand. I don't understand, but you
Speaker 1: know what that that's been the NHL for years and
Speaker 1: years and years. They just can't seemingly get out of
Speaker 1: their own freaking way with any of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Hockey cannot outside of Canada, cannot market itself.
Speaker 1: Well, no, it just doesn't have the resources or the
Speaker 1: cashee in the States that the NFL is king. So
Speaker 1: you got to get creative, Maria, Yeah, they do. I
Speaker 1: agree with you.
Speaker 2: I want to defend you know, the people of Minnesota
Speaker 2: here for a minute, because there's been a ton of
Speaker 2: criticism I've seen online. I don't know if you've seen
Speaker 2: this of Oh my god, the stands are so empty.
Speaker 2: This is this, this is the state of hockey. I
Speaker 2: get it. It is surprising, a little disappointing. But I
Speaker 2: question again the I guess that's the IF in charge,
Speaker 2: but also the United States and whoever else you was
Speaker 2: partnering with the International Hockey Federation to put this game on.
Speaker 2: I'm putting a bunch of that back on them because
Speaker 2: there's no excitement. I think you have to be a
Speaker 2: big hockey fan to know that it's happening. I don't
Speaker 2: know what the prices are for tickets at the games either, too,
Speaker 2: So if you consider the fact that if you you
Speaker 2: know EHL teams or AHL teams that get a lot
Speaker 2: of fans to come to their games. A lot of
Speaker 2: times it's because they are already have that built in
Speaker 2: connection with their community, whether it's local advertisements you see everywhere,
Speaker 2: cheap tickets, honestly, the gimmicky stuff that you see in
Speaker 2: a lot of major and minor league no matter what sport, baseball, whatever,
Speaker 2: they have those things to really make it a much
Speaker 2: more festive and family friendly environment. You when it comes
Speaker 2: to juniors, you have to be I think a certain
Speaker 2: level of hockey fan to even know that it exists.
Speaker 1: Understand what you're watching.
Speaker 2: Like, people may think, why would I want to watch
Speaker 2: a bunch of under eighteens under twenty year olds play hockey?
Speaker 2: It sounds like it's it sounds like a youth hockey thing,
Speaker 2: And in reality, you're watching the future of the game,
Speaker 2: and I don't think people know that exactly.
Speaker 1: You took the thoughts right out of my head. This
Speaker 1: is the future of the NHL here. I don't think
Speaker 1: people know that. And I put that information that.
Speaker 2: That squarely on whoever is the organizer of these games,
Speaker 2: because how could you have failed so spectacularly in the
Speaker 2: state of hockey to have empty seats because it's almost
Speaker 2: between Minnesota and Massachusetts. Those are the two states I
Speaker 2: would say that can compete against the entire nation of
Speaker 2: Canada in a populace that is hungry for hockey all
Speaker 2: the time. That if oh, there's a free hockey game
Speaker 2: or a cheap hockey game, I'm going. If it's at
Speaker 2: a good time, I'm going. He used to go to
Speaker 2: the college games all the time before I had a kid.
Speaker 2: Games are at seven, so it's not convenient anymore. But
Speaker 2: the games were at one o'clock.
Speaker 1: I'd be in every game, right right.
Speaker 2: I put this on the organizers ninety percent. And some
Speaker 2: of the timing is not ideal. Right, people are traveling,
Speaker 2: everyone's taking a break. You have a kid that plays.
Speaker 2: I used to have two kids that two kids that played.
Speaker 2: At some point in time, it's like you want to
Speaker 2: somewhat detach yourself from the sport. So I wonder about
Speaker 2: the timing, which is unfortunate because it's a disservice to
Speaker 2: these young players who are really really good. Like you
Speaker 2: have the number one player in the world, r Gavin McKenna,
Speaker 2: who's likely going to go first overall, and he scored
Speaker 2: a he had a hat trick in a nine to
Speaker 2: one victory against Denmark. I wonder how many people saw
Speaker 2: that other than the Canadian copulation or from diehards or
Speaker 2: the people who actually have NHI network, because again that's
Speaker 2: another like.
Speaker 1: The softball, correct, Like why would you do that? Would
Speaker 1: you put it on NHL Network? I want, I want
Speaker 1: to watch. I don't want to watch.
Speaker 2: I'm invested this year because of those players. I can't watch.
Speaker 2: I can't even temporarily watch, you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Like I can't even sign up for a month's subscription
Speaker 2: to and.
Speaker 1: Then just drop it NHL Network. I can't even I
Speaker 1: can't even.
Speaker 2: I want to give you once again, Maria, the NHL
Speaker 2: does not want my money, correct, Please take my money.
Speaker 1: They don't want the short money, they want the long
Speaker 1: term money, which.
Speaker 2: I don't even know how to get NHL Network, Maria,
Speaker 2: I can't.
Speaker 1: I don't even know how to get it. Well, I
Speaker 1: have it, and I honestly haven't been but peeking in.
Speaker 1: To be perfectly honest with you, I have been peeking
Speaker 1: in two of these games for a variety of reasons
Speaker 1: that we don't need to rehash.
Speaker 2: It's also the prelimbs and that's kind of less exciting.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't be surprised if we do start to see
Speaker 2: an increased crowd, I mean, for crying out loud, if
Speaker 2: Canada and the United States play for a medal, or
Speaker 2: you know, the United States is in the final, I
Speaker 2: certainly would expect significantly fuller seats. But like, let's be honest,
Speaker 2: would you go, I mean, unless it was free and
Speaker 2: very convenient and there was stuff going on, would you
Speaker 2: go see Latvia play Denmark?
Speaker 1: No one's going to a game that. I was just
Speaker 1: going to say that. No, no disrespect, no disrespect any
Speaker 1: of those players, Absolutely none. But it's just the nature,
Speaker 1: right the beast.
Speaker 2: You mean to tell me when this game was in
Speaker 2: Canada that the arena was sold out for Latvia versus Denmark?
Speaker 1: Was it? Probably not? Probably not? But anyways, take a look, folks,
Speaker 1: because there's there's some there's some good, good hockey being
Speaker 1: played there. Buffalo Sabers, I need to give them a
Speaker 1: little bit of a golf clap. Nine games, nine games
Speaker 1: team a row that this team has won. So they
Speaker 1: are they, along with the Colorado and a Lanche, are
Speaker 1: on heaters. The Avalanche I believe, have been on an
Speaker 1: eight game winning streak and the Buffalo Sabers, who started
Speaker 1: the season with their fans wanting to like take out
Speaker 1: ads to get everybody freaking fired. What a what a turnaround,
Speaker 1: What a turnaround that they have made since now they
Speaker 1: fired their GM. This kind of winning streak started a
Speaker 1: little before that, but they have taken on a whole
Speaker 1: new a whole new light since. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Look, let's be honest, I think the firing of Kevin
Speaker 2: Adams was huge for this organization. I mean we've said
Speaker 2: on the pod in the discord, like, what the heck
Speaker 2: is this guy doing? And we're just casual observe outside observers,
Speaker 2: And yes, okay, they were on a winning streak before that,
Speaker 2: but look, a broken clock is right twice a day, right,
Speaker 2: It's not like they were completely defeated prior to that.
Speaker 2: They weren't, oh in twenty five or whatever. What was
Speaker 2: happening to them was really unfortunate and not fair to
Speaker 2: the fans, to the league, to the players. So I'm
Speaker 2: pleased for them.
Speaker 1: I am too. I mean, they've been the long suffering
Speaker 1: fan base felt compelled to at least give them a
Speaker 1: mention in our around the rink. And the last thing
Speaker 1: I want to bring up in this segment is we
Speaker 1: have another goalie injury. I can't even pronounce this guy's
Speaker 1: last name. Check Kov, but check coov. Okay. He will
Speaker 1: be out for the rest of the season, according to
Speaker 1: what Rob Brindamore shared on Monday, So he apparently he's
Speaker 1: been dealing with something all season long. They thought he
Speaker 1: could play through it and decide he decided, the player
Speaker 1: decided to have the surgery.
Speaker 2: And we'll likely be out for the rest of the season.
Speaker 2: So it seems like they're the Carolina Hurricanes are going
Speaker 2: to need to rely on Freddy Anderson and and who
Speaker 2: has now earned the true number two spot random bussy,
Speaker 2: So good on him. Love to see goalies ninety nine
Speaker 2: percent of them love to see them shine, So good
Speaker 2: on him.
Speaker 1: No, good for him. Yeah. So now we're going to
Speaker 1: get to the week that was, and it seems like
Speaker 1: it's long ago because we had the holiday break. But
Speaker 1: the Bruins had a home stand in which they were
Speaker 1: outscored by a margin of like twenty goals to like
Speaker 1: I can't even remember how many. But hutred, hutred awful, embarrassing,
Speaker 1: Will Will. We'll focus on the games between Montreal and
Speaker 1: I started with Ottawa. I think we talked about that
Speaker 1: game previously, so they lost.
Speaker 2: With Can I share a fun, not so fun stat
Speaker 2: that I included in this past week's wrap around, which
Speaker 2: if you haven't subscribed on our substack, definitely get this
Speaker 2: right in your inbox, condensed of everything that we've talked
Speaker 2: about all of our episodes and things that have been
Speaker 2: released in the week. Ottawa has scored so many goals
Speaker 2: on Boston this season that their goals account for seventeen
Speaker 2: percent of all goals allowed by the Boston Bruins seventeen percent.
Speaker 1: I don't know what it is about it, and the
Speaker 1: guys on Morning Brew talked about it. Other local podcasts
Speaker 1: have talked about it. People you talk about the team
Speaker 1: here locally can't figure out what it is about this
Speaker 1: Ottawa Senator's team that has the Boston Bruins number there.
Speaker 1: The fortune up and backcheck is absolutely effing relentless. They're fast,
Speaker 1: they're good skaters. This is a stagers and they're freaking fast.
Speaker 2: With enough talent, right they don't have they're not superstar talents,
Speaker 2: but they have enough and if you can get there first.
Speaker 2: Which another little sidebar, one thing that we forgot to
Speaker 2: mention in around the rink. Former Boston Bruins goaltender Linas
Speaker 2: Almark has taken a leave of absence from the Ottawa Senators.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, yes, how do I missed that? Yes, we
Speaker 1: wish him well, hope.
Speaker 2: All is okay, Yeah, he's This is probably one of
Speaker 2: his roughest seasons and we can't know what's happening in
Speaker 2: his life, and so we hope that whatever is happening,
Speaker 2: he and his family can can be together and that
Speaker 2: you know, we see him again soon, because that's another
Speaker 2: goalie that special place in my heart. Yes, no, I
Speaker 2: think he always will have a special place in the
Speaker 2: hearts of many many Bruins fans. So we hope all
Speaker 2: is well, he and his family all right. So that
Speaker 2: game was ugly. I have given this team kudos on
Speaker 2: more than one occasion for their ability to self correct,
Speaker 2: reset and bounce back. So then we have the Montreal
Speaker 2: Canadians come in to your house, and for the first
Speaker 2: forty minutes it was a good game. I think what
Speaker 2: changed the whole dynamic of that game was when the
Speaker 2: goal that Elias Lindholm scored with less than five seconds
Speaker 2: left in that second period that would have given the
Speaker 2: Bruins a three to two lead heading into the third period.
Speaker 2: Was called back. Well, it wasn't even called back. It
Speaker 2: was never even called or waved off. No, it was
Speaker 2: just waved off. It wasn't right.
Speaker 1: It was just totally waved off on a suspect goaltender
Speaker 1: interference call on David Pastronach and there was no challenge made.
Speaker 1: And many of us, you know, we're listening to the
Speaker 1: call on the radio or the TV, conflicting information about
Speaker 1: whether it could be challenged or not be challenged. Bottom
Speaker 1: line is that could have been challenged by the Bruins.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure why they didn't challenge it, even with
Speaker 2: the mindset that the league is on this mission and
Speaker 2: Toronto is on this mission that when it comes to
Speaker 2: those calls by the officials, they're pretty much standing with
Speaker 2: the calls being made by the officials, to which I say,
Speaker 2: then why the fuck are we even reviewing or challenging anything.
Speaker 2: If you're just gonna go ahead and let what the
Speaker 2: ref calls on the ice stand, then why are we
Speaker 2: even why do we even have this protocol to be
Speaker 2: able to challenge right well, and like I ranted in
Speaker 2: our snapshot, and now you're just getting me angry again, Maria, geez.
Speaker 1: Look, NHL officiating sucks right now.
Speaker 2: Officiating an NHL game separate of the skill set of
Speaker 2: the people on the ice, it is not an easy task.
Speaker 2: This game is fast, A lot happens. I understand that
Speaker 2: we have introduced some people would argue, I'm not sure
Speaker 2: that I necessarily agree, but some people would argue too
Speaker 2: much review to the point to the detriment of the game,
Speaker 2: because it slows things down. But if you have shown,
Speaker 2: and now I'm talking about the league, that you are
Speaker 2: open to certain reviewable plays, things that can be reviewed, right,
Speaker 2: so you can review I believe now delay of game,
Speaker 2: you know, over the glass, you can review offsides, you
Speaker 2: can We've always been able to.
Speaker 1: Review goal whatever.
Speaker 2: I don't understand why I have not heard more of
Speaker 2: the conversation around GTI in this particular way, because lately
Speaker 2: I've been hearing like a lot of a in passing
Speaker 2: and whatever. If you know that over the last couple
Speaker 2: of years there's been a lot of hubbub about goaltender interference,
Speaker 2: which yes, is subjective. It I get it. In some
Speaker 2: instances it is. In some instances it is, but in
Speaker 2: some instances it's it's it's blatantly visual to all of
Speaker 2: us that are watching that a defensive player is the
Speaker 2: one who's causing the interference on his own goalie, right,
Speaker 2: And like I understand why they also the league doesn't
Speaker 2: necessarily want to make it more black and white, because again,
Speaker 2: every situation can be different.
Speaker 1: I get it, I get it.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying we need to be, you know, going
Speaker 2: down the conversation of what is or what is in
Speaker 2: goaltender interference. What I am saying what enrages me at
Speaker 2: this point is the fact that you know that this
Speaker 2: is a thing.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a thing.
Speaker 2: You know when they've gotten it wrong, you know, right,
Speaker 2: They review all the calls after a game, so you
Speaker 2: have somewhere a database of how often a call has
Speaker 2: been gotten wrong.
Speaker 1: I don't remember now how many years ago. It was
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago.
Speaker 2: They established a protocol that if they wanted to review
Speaker 2: a penalty that they did, they took steps, they call
Speaker 2: it a major penalty. They then have the ability to
Speaker 2: review and watch it and then they can downgrade it
Speaker 2: so that it is an appropriate call made.
Speaker 1: Loved that new rule, Loved that rule fantastic.
Speaker 2: Explain to me why with an infract like goaltender interference
Speaker 2: you wouldn't build in a protocol to give officials the
Speaker 2: time and space to actually review it properly, because that
Speaker 2: is mind boggling to me. If you're saying that it
Speaker 2: has the potential to be so subjective and this game
Speaker 2: happens so fast and you can't tell was this player
Speaker 2: pushed in.
Speaker 1: By their own teammate. Call the goal. You should always
Speaker 1: call the goal.
Speaker 2: And then if the official is the one who thinks
Speaker 2: it was goaltender interference, it shouldn't take a coach's challenge
Speaker 2: on either side, the defending or the offensive team to.
Speaker 1: Do that review.
Speaker 2: If that's what you thought you saw in two seconds
Speaker 2: in an NHL game where there are bodies all in
Speaker 2: front of the net, because that's their job, that's how
Speaker 2: they're supposed to play the game. You think you saw
Speaker 2: goaltender interference, you better be able to stake your life
Speaker 2: on it, and if you can't, you call the goal,
Speaker 2: and to protect the referees, build a protocol that allows
Speaker 2: them to take the time to review it.
Speaker 1: I don't understand what they in essence did. They made
Speaker 1: the job easier easier for the Montreal Canadians, right because
Speaker 1: they didn't have to waste a challenge on that. And
Speaker 1: then they grabbed the Bruins by that, you know what,
Speaker 1: to basically say, I dare you to challenge this. Now. Again,
Speaker 1: I'm not a coach, I don't profess to be a coach,
Speaker 1: but I might have challenged that. Now I understand what
Speaker 1: I understand and what this showed it on the jumbo track.
Speaker 1: I understand the rationale behind the fact that this mandate
Speaker 1: is there. It's an unwritten mandate that they're likely not
Speaker 1: going to reverse the call. But then, as a Boston
Speaker 1: Bruins you go into a little bit of a panic
Speaker 1: mode because now you may be second guessing yourself, but
Speaker 1: the fact that you didn't challenge that goal, you're still
Speaker 1: to too. To start the third period, and Zach Bolduck
Speaker 1: scores a goal that, again we're watching it in real time,
Speaker 1: look like a good goal to all of us. But
Speaker 1: then you waste a challenge on that and you lose
Speaker 1: the goddamn challenge and then they're down.
Speaker 2: So that opened up That opened up the third period
Speaker 2: to turn into a shit show for the Bruins because
Speaker 2: the Canadians scored or unanswered goals in that period, two
Speaker 2: of which were power play goals. That that was a
Speaker 2: bad night all the way around, for players in the
Speaker 2: third period and for the Bruins' coaching staff. And you
Speaker 2: know what, weeken Monday morning quarterback. All we want because
Speaker 2: that's what we do. We can talk about it in
Speaker 2: our podcast, we can talk about it on sports talk radio.
Speaker 2: But me, I have never been a fan of going
Speaker 2: into the start of a period with a power play.
Speaker 2: I just think sometimes it takes too long to get
Speaker 2: set up and to get your game going.
Speaker 1: That's just my view. So I would have rather had
Speaker 1: the Bruins challenge that and if you lose it, right,
Speaker 1: take your chances with your penalty kill to start the
Speaker 1: third period. That's just my take on it.
Speaker 2: People can call me foolish, but then you waste it
Speaker 2: on what to all of us was a clearcut goal
Speaker 2: and we're scratching our heads going is everybody is everybody
Speaker 2: like working on their Christmas online shop.
Speaker 1: Right here in this game. So it was just yeah,
Speaker 1: was just demoralizing, just a beatdown after the beatdown that
Speaker 1: you already took from the Autawa Senators and huge, huge
Speaker 1: point swing for your playoffs structure.
Speaker 2: And and Maria, I'm what I'm gonna say next is
Speaker 2: probably gonna kind of go into what I know you
Speaker 2: want to talk about.
Speaker 1: I think people might not.
Speaker 2: Really realize that in an a in a situation like
Speaker 2: what we saw, it is demoralizing. And I think folks
Speaker 2: don't necessarily realize even in game, the psychological impact of
Speaker 2: what's happening out there. I'm I'm sure players like David
Speaker 2: Pasternak or even all the way down to you know,
Speaker 2: mikey Asama, they're not sitting there thinking, well, I'm this
Speaker 2: isn't worth playing anymore.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: A lot of it is just deep down and then
Speaker 2: your ability to execute and whatever maybe goes sideways. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's it does have an impact, like how you're perceiving
Speaker 2: the game out there, and.
Speaker 1: The officials like they were horrible.
Speaker 2: I'm not surprised that the wheels fell off after all
Speaker 2: of that. And I listened to Morning Brew this weekend.
Speaker 2: Fortunately the producer knew not to make you wait and
Speaker 2: for you to be first. I was definitely on your
Speaker 2: side to and to the extent that we've heard David
Speaker 2: Pasternak say this. I think we talked about this in
Speaker 2: a previous episode, and then Marco Sturm about the.
Speaker 1: What the mental fatigue?
Speaker 2: That mental fatigue, and look, I get it, that is
Speaker 2: that is a very real thing.
Speaker 1: That is a very real thing. And I didn't say
Speaker 1: that it wasn't right. I didn't say that it wasn't.
Speaker 2: But right right, But I understand. I understood what you
Speaker 2: were saying. And I feel like maybe maybe you know,
Speaker 2: maybe Billy didn't really pick up on exactly your point. No, no, Billy, Billy, No,
Speaker 2: Billy did it's it was Razor who And again it
Speaker 2: was Razor Who's.
Speaker 1: Yeah, He's like, you don't want to hear about it.
Speaker 2: No, I don't want to hear the excuse. You know,
Speaker 2: I don't want to hear the excuse. I don't want
Speaker 2: to hear the excuse.
Speaker 1: I know you're tired, right, Okay, your your your schedule
Speaker 1: has been grueling. I understand that fully, and I thought
Speaker 1: I stated my case fully. I picked up what you
Speaker 1: were saying for sure.
Speaker 2: What I said. What I said was it makes me
Speaker 2: bristle you. We're all tired. Everyone is the entire league.
Speaker 1: When I hear any professional athlete reference fatigue. What I
Speaker 1: want to hear from you is that you played like
Speaker 1: crap at home. You wasted a valuable opportunity to bank
Speaker 1: points that would keep you in a playoff contending spot.
Speaker 1: What I don't want to hear is that your mentally fatigue.
Speaker 1: I'm not a cold hearted person. I can fully understand.
Speaker 1: I can fully understand, right because we're all feeling some
Speaker 1: type of fatigue. And I have never been a professional athlete,
Speaker 1: nor do I would want to even entertain the thought
Speaker 1: at this point in my life, however, But you've worked.
Speaker 1: I have worked a good long time, and I would
Speaker 1: never allow myself or the people that I work for,
Speaker 1: the people that rely on me, your stakeholders, my stakeholders,
Speaker 1: correct that I am not performing up to the abilities
Speaker 1: that are expected to me because I'm tired. I'm tired.
Speaker 2: Just say we didn't have it, we were outplayed, We
Speaker 2: are not playing because we can all see it.
Speaker 1: We can all see it happening. You're not playing a
Speaker 1: full sixty minutes. What if we said about this team
Speaker 1: time and freaking time again. For them to have any
Speaker 1: sustained success, they have to a solid sixteen minute game,
Speaker 1: up and down the freaking ice and maybe some will say, Okay,
Speaker 1: well you're making David Posternac point with the lapses. No no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no no. You're there to do your job. You're there
Speaker 1: to do your job. Ay rate.
Speaker 2: And I think that there's two things that I'll say
Speaker 2: about this one. You know, I don't remember which one
Speaker 2: said it. And I thought it was actually a little
Speaker 2: bit of a ridiculous question because it was a fishing
Speaker 2: question like, oh, well, if your spouse comes home and
Speaker 2: blah blah blah and talks about you don't want to
Speaker 2: hear it. First of all, I'm not married to anyone
Speaker 2: on the Boston Bruins, So that's a false equation, like
Speaker 2: equation here. Okay, it's that's not my job as a fan.
Speaker 2: That's the job of you know, his family to listen
Speaker 2: and be supportive and do what you know they need
Speaker 2: to do. But the other thing is like, if you
Speaker 2: feel like you need to say, look, our game is
Speaker 2: struggling because mentally we are not in it. Okay, there
Speaker 2: are other you can you can say it, but still
Speaker 2: be honest about what has happened. Yeah, you know, we
Speaker 2: let our mental fatigue get the better of us, and
Speaker 2: we weren't playing smart hockey.
Speaker 1: That's what happened. Still take ownership. I agree.
Speaker 2: I don't like it as an excuse because, like, is
Speaker 2: any player gonna say we are not playing well because
Speaker 2: we are out of shape? That would be completely inexcusable.
Speaker 2: So why is your why is the mental health just
Speaker 2: a straight up excuse, like you still have to own
Speaker 2: what you did wrong? No, it's just it's just hearing
Speaker 2: it after a game. I'm not being unsympathetic to them
Speaker 2: because it is hard, right, right, So what are you
Speaker 2: gonna do about it? Right? If you're not strong enough,
Speaker 2: you're gonna go lift more weights. We just weren't good enough, Okay,
Speaker 2: so get better? What can you do to get better?
Speaker 2: We were mentally tired, Okay, what are you going to
Speaker 2: do to get better? I mean the Ottawa Senators didn't
Speaker 2: seem fatigued. The Montreal Canadians didn't seem fatigued. Yet they
Speaker 2: marched into your building and kicked your ass up and
Speaker 2: down one side of the ice to the other.
Speaker 1: Now, a game against the Canadians, they played a good
Speaker 1: forty minutes. I mean that game looked like it was
Speaker 1: going to have everything right from the junk right we
Speaker 1: had the fights, we had the back and forth, we
Speaker 1: had good goaltending on both sides.
Speaker 2: It's just simply it's the excuse without accountability. And if
Speaker 2: that's the issue, because again I'm not saying that it's
Speaker 2: not an issue. You're not saying that it's not an issue,
Speaker 2: a legitimate issue, So still take accountability.
Speaker 1: And then then.
Speaker 2: I would be looking to the coaching staff, the support staff, Okay,
Speaker 2: what are you.
Speaker 1: Going to do? What are the players going to do
Speaker 1: to handle that, to deal with it? So in keeping
Speaker 1: what we have expected from this team, and we heard
Speaker 1: David Pasternak say and make reference to a reset, so
Speaker 1: we fast forward him now to the game against the
Speaker 1: Buffalo Sabers, where I again maybe shame on me, because
Speaker 1: I've seen this team reset self correct. I expected a
Speaker 1: bounce back from this team.
Speaker 2: And the first period, yeah, and let me just say,
Speaker 2: just to kind of quickly loop in last night's game,
Speaker 2: it was the first and second periods were almost like
Speaker 2: a copy and paste of that Buffalo Sabers game that
Speaker 2: they played, the only difference being that Calgary just doesn't
Speaker 2: have what it takes to take advantage of when Boston
Speaker 2: just fails to perform in the way that Buffalo took advantage.
Speaker 2: Like I left for UH to do the bedtime routine
Speaker 2: at the start of the second period, and I come
Speaker 2: back with like five minutes and it's three to one.
Speaker 1: I'm like, what the heck just happened? Yeah, quick, quick scores.
Speaker 1: I just and things started off well because I had
Speaker 1: I had said after after David Pastronach's comments and the
Speaker 1: need of a reset, I believe that I put in
Speaker 1: our discord that I was expecting a big game from
Speaker 1: David Pastronach, and he got the score and started him
Speaker 1: off of the Bruins. The only goal came in the
Speaker 1: first period from David Pastronach, and you would think that
Speaker 1: the rest of the team would kind of pick up
Speaker 1: and follow suit, and it did not. It did not happen.
Speaker 2: It did not happen, and once again they left Corpie hanging.
Speaker 2: He gave them time and time again, chance after chance,
Speaker 2: time again.
Speaker 1: I just don't understand how.
Speaker 2: You've got a goalie who makes an awesome save, a
Speaker 2: timely save.
Speaker 1: And that doesn't light a fire under you. And and
Speaker 1: even with the mess that was that second period, I mean,
Speaker 1: he worked his assof to keep them in the game.
Speaker 2: So they've wasted him. They wasted him, and I think
Speaker 2: I was. I heard this on actually on the on
Speaker 2: the broadcast last night that the Bruins had a practice
Speaker 2: in Buffalo the day after. They stayed overnight in Buffalo,
Speaker 2: because this road trip is kind of funny. It's actually
Speaker 2: very quite spread out, which is good. So they had
Speaker 2: a chance to have a practice.
Speaker 1: And a word is that.
Speaker 2: The theme of the episode was playing with your brain
Speaker 2: and playing smart hockey.
Speaker 1: And I will say.
Speaker 2: Jud Sarat referred to it as spirit uses, a spirited practice.
Speaker 1: So you use your effing brains. I'm sure was use
Speaker 1: your imagination as to what you think the word spirited means,
Speaker 1: because I'm sure there was some pretty pissed off shape,
Speaker 1: some pretty pissed off coaches and players out on that ice.
Speaker 2: And I will say, you know, the transitioning now into
Speaker 2: the Calgary game, I did see a difference in the team.
Speaker 2: I certainly saw, and it helped that Asparo is back,
Speaker 2: he had great. Yes, it wasn't the game the biggest issue,
Speaker 2: but they couldn't finish.
Speaker 1: They had that. We can even fast forward to the
Speaker 1: overtime period because now Calgary did take it to the
Speaker 1: Bruins for most of the second period. I don't think
Speaker 1: the Bruins had many shots on goal in that minimal
Speaker 1: second period of that Calgary game, but they did play
Speaker 1: a solid game for the most part up and down
Speaker 1: the ice. The thing that killed them is their inability
Speaker 1: to finish on the opportunities that a team such as
Speaker 1: Calgary gives to you. When a team like Calgary, right,
Speaker 1: they're just not good.
Speaker 2: They're not that good, you know, Dustin Wolf aside, Dustin
Speaker 2: Wolf aside. The mistakes that Calgary made and the fact
Speaker 2: that Boston couldn't take.
Speaker 1: Advantage frustrating, frustrating, especially in that overtime period Daca had
Speaker 1: a breakaway.
Speaker 2: I think Boston was able to get away with killing
Speaker 2: so many penalties because Calgary is just not there in
Speaker 2: their ability to execute. But the number of times that
Speaker 2: Boston had fantastic entry, beautiful movement all over the ice.
Speaker 2: Can't get it in. Pavo Zaka, I gotta tell you
Speaker 2: I had a moment because this happened. I can't remember
Speaker 2: now which game it was. It was the game after
Speaker 2: he had I think a game winner, overtime winner, whatever,
Speaker 2: and we tease that the man can't hit the broadside
Speaker 2: of a barn, and that thought had crossed my mind
Speaker 2: as we go into overtime and you know, Boston's struggling whatever,
Speaker 2: and I'm thinking, get Pavo Zaca out there, because clearly
Speaker 2: at this point he's the only one who can actually get.
Speaker 1: The job done.
Speaker 2: And my god, right after I thought that, he has
Speaker 2: a gorgeous breakaway, oddly enough, hits the target and it's like, dude,
Speaker 2: you can't. Don't shoot it at the goalie, and then
Speaker 2: there wasn't enough of a rebound. Dustin Wolf did a
Speaker 2: good job of managing the rebound, and there just wasn't
Speaker 2: It didn't come out far enough. I remember now who
Speaker 2: but the person behind Zacha door on with him. The
Speaker 2: puck was on get it, the puck was on edge,
Speaker 2: come out to him. And I believe that in that
Speaker 2: overtime period the Bruins had two shorthanded opportunities, two shorthanded opportunities,
Speaker 2: and I will argue that they shouldn't have even been
Speaker 2: shorthanded to begin with, because that was a bone headed,
Speaker 2: bone headed play by Jonathan Asparo to pretty much end
Speaker 2: the third period to send Calgary into a power play.
Speaker 2: I've said it once and I'll say it a million
Speaker 2: freaking times. These guys need to control their goddamn sticks.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I understand the fast game, but I am sick and
Speaker 1: tired of seeing these guys with their sticks almost at
Speaker 1: shoulder length. Okay, cut the shit now. And Asperon knew
Speaker 1: it was his bad because after that goal was scored,
Speaker 1: they panned over to the penalty box and you did
Speaker 1: not come out of the box right away. He sat
Speaker 1: there with a look of shame on his face because dude,
Speaker 1: you know that was on you. You should have never
Speaker 1: put your team in that position to begin with.
Speaker 2: I will say, and I'm not disagreeing whatsoever one I
Speaker 2: was surprised that it got called because there were a
Speaker 2: lot of like non calls, and I almost.
Speaker 1: Wonder, Oh, the officiating sucked in that game, sucked stuck.
Speaker 1: I almost wonder if he thinking.
Speaker 3: It wasn't going to get called that late in the
Speaker 3: period right because he got a cross check to the face,
Speaker 3: and I wouldn't be surprised then if in his mind.
Speaker 2: You know, players pick up on this, They watch what
Speaker 2: the refs are calling, and they can kind of start
Speaker 2: to get a sense of Okay, what can I get
Speaker 2: away with granted, he shouldn't have done that, right, because
Speaker 2: that was stupid.
Speaker 1: It was the end of the period.
Speaker 2: Do it after, Like, I don't I get why he
Speaker 2: probably thought he could do it.
Speaker 1: But see, here's here's my mindset on that theory. As
Speaker 1: a coaching staff. You're watching this play out in the
Speaker 1: way that the game is being officiated, where it appears
Speaker 1: that the officials are have swallowed their whistle when there
Speaker 1: is an infraction levied against a Bruins player, or I
Speaker 1: play many men on the ice and Steve Pott, Steve
Speaker 1: Pott let the officials when the period ended, and he
Speaker 1: can carry it because he left he was starting to
Speaker 1: lead and head down to the tunnel and then came
Speaker 1: back to give it to the linesman even more, to
Speaker 1: which I said, good on you. But this is when
Speaker 1: I think that it's incumbent on any of the coaches
Speaker 1: to say, we're getting pull It seems like we're getting
Speaker 1: porked here. Yeah, all right, keep your sticks down, all right,
Speaker 1: don't give them any reason to make any more calls
Speaker 1: against us than they're already racking up.
Speaker 2: That's just my mindset, well, and not even just in
Speaker 2: that in this specific game. The fact that the number
Speaker 2: of penalties that Boston has taken this season that are
Speaker 2: sticking fractions, Like I don't care if you think you
Speaker 2: can get away with it, maybe you can, but like
Speaker 2: you've already done too many right this whole season, So
Speaker 2: keep your stick to yourself. And again, it's gonna cost them.
Speaker 2: It's going to cost them if if they don't get
Speaker 2: this in the long run, yeah, remedy it it is.
Speaker 2: It could potentially cost them the ability to stay in
Speaker 2: the wild card race. Right at this point, the only
Speaker 2: reason by Jonathan Asparo doesn't necessarily get one hundred percent
Speaker 2: of the blame is because of the fact that Bruins
Speaker 2: had two huge chances in the overtime and they couldn't score,
Speaker 2: And that had nothing to do with being shorthanded. They
Speaker 2: they they were just they were the Bruins were better
Speaker 2: and they couldn't finish. And for listeners who have been
Speaker 2: listening for a really long time now for the last
Speaker 2: three years, you know that I like to put an
Speaker 2: epitaph on every season's tombstone, and I'm I can't believe it.
Speaker 2: It's it's not even January and there are two front
Speaker 2: runners already for the tombstone. Couldn't finish and we should
Speaker 2: have won. Yeah, it's I mean those those are very appropriate.
Speaker 2: And we can't stay out of the box might be
Speaker 2: another one, because look what that does to your when
Speaker 2: you say we can't win or we just aren't able
Speaker 2: to win. You have to start the overtime not three
Speaker 2: on three, but four on three.
Speaker 1: You can't put David Pasternak on the ice. You can't
Speaker 1: put Morgan Geeky on the ice because you have to
Speaker 1: put your penalty killers out on the ice who aren't
Speaker 1: necessarily you're top floorers. So you're shooting yourself in and
Speaker 1: I'm going to keep saying this, you're shooting yourself in
Speaker 1: the foot. And again it sounds like an old, broken,
Speaker 1: tired record.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's only in time, but they keep giving us
Speaker 2: opportunities to talk about this. They need to play five
Speaker 2: on five monkey. I mean, there's just I can't simplify
Speaker 2: it any more than that. Well, that's one of the
Speaker 2: little blocks in this Jenga tower is the fact that
Speaker 2: because they have to, because they're not dynamic enough for
Speaker 2: whatever reason, to play the same way on the peque,
Speaker 2: you pull out the five on five and the tower
Speaker 2: starts to Wobble the Crumble, So let's get two hour.
Speaker 1: I don't even know, so we've got coming up. This
Speaker 1: road trip continues with the Edmonton Oilers on New Year's
Speaker 1: E twelve thirty one. Then they've got a bit of
Speaker 1: a break because there is the Winter Classic grown in there,
Speaker 1: so the Bruins won't play again until January third. They're
Speaker 1: at Vancouver and then they've got three days off and
Speaker 1: they play the Seattle Kraken, which, again, this schedule has
Speaker 1: just been so bizarre, where the Bruins have gotten more
Speaker 1: days off being on the road than they have had
Speaker 1: when they're at home. So I don't know if that's
Speaker 1: a benefit or a curse. Who knows. We'll see as
Speaker 1: the results of these games come in. But my god,
Speaker 1: they need they need to take points away because they're
Speaker 1: not out of contention because again the East is so
Speaker 1: many mediocre that there are lots of teams that have
Speaker 1: one point differentials between each other. But taking points is
Speaker 1: crucial and critical. Just get some points out of these
Speaker 1: games so you can feel good about yourselves, your chances,
Speaker 1: and your game. So stick taps, my friend.
Speaker 2: Yes, So I will give a stick tap to Andrew Peak.
Speaker 2: He's had kind of an up and down season, but
Speaker 2: quite frankly this last month in terms of in terms
Speaker 2: of goals, He's had three goals during this lose streak,
Speaker 2: and I believe he leads defensemen and goals scored. He
Speaker 2: looked great last night offensively.
Speaker 1: I mean his goal that was a nice, dirty goal.
Speaker 1: That was nice. Yeah, to my point that Calgary is
Speaker 1: just not good.
Speaker 2: I mean he was left just he was left all
Speaker 2: alone and he just walked right in and scored that goal.
Speaker 1: So good on him for having.
Speaker 2: The you know, the thought to be down low and
Speaker 2: just go for it like love to see that.
Speaker 1: Good for him. And then I know.
Speaker 2: This guy's going to be in two places at once.
Speaker 2: But I will give stick taps to Jonathan Asparau because
Speaker 2: I think that there was a huge question mark, you
Speaker 2: know about his you know, are we going to see
Speaker 2: the same Asparrow that we saw before, because the Bruins
Speaker 2: had a really great wet record when he was in
Speaker 2: and they've been pretty abysmal since he's been out again.
Speaker 1: Jena and Flint Holme's play to to I don't know
Speaker 1: what's been going on with campus his play has He's
Speaker 1: just not been the same guy. During this this stretch here,
Speaker 1: and I know he had been, so maybe it will
Speaker 1: be a plus plus that we start seeing the Hampus
Speaker 1: Lynch home that we've grown accustomed to seeing, having them
Speaker 1: both air it up again.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I mean we did get a point with
Speaker 2: asby being back, and I thought that he did a
Speaker 2: great job.
Speaker 1: He did his job up until the final seconds of that.
Speaker 2: I mean, I didn't say anything detrimental about his play.
Speaker 2: I'm just that specific to me.
Speaker 1: You're just in a game like that, in a game
Speaker 1: that you know that you know the refs are looking
Speaker 1: more at you than the home team. Don't do it.
Speaker 2: No, and rightly, so he also deserves to be in
Speaker 2: the penalty box because that was just that is a
Speaker 2: hallmark now of this team, and he is just a
Speaker 2: symptom of whatever the larger issue is with this team.
Speaker 1: But you just can't do that. And so a little
Speaker 1: bit of penalty box time for him too.
Speaker 2: And then I mean the top guys, where are you?
Speaker 2: I mean, I again, I understand they are not on
Speaker 2: the ice as frequently because of the constant penalty kill.
Speaker 2: But then if you are a top guy, that means
Speaker 2: you're a clutch guy, which means you are able to
Speaker 2: perform under very tight conditions in a way that we expect.
Speaker 2: And even if you're saying pasta geeky, all these other
Speaker 2: guys are having fewer opportunities, fewer minutes in order to
Speaker 2: score goals. If you're a top guy, it doesn't matter
Speaker 2: if you have one minute or fifty minutes of opportunity.
Speaker 2: You have to score those goals. You have to and
Speaker 2: they're not so penalty box. Penalty box for theseis no
Speaker 2: And yeah, I'm more you know, Morgan geeky has gotten
Speaker 2: a big quiet as well.
Speaker 1: David Pasternak has been much too quiet, much too. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of these got these are your these are your
Speaker 1: top guys. Why slim home? Where the hell has he been? So?
Speaker 2: They need and again a lot they need to get
Speaker 2: back to five on five flight.
Speaker 1: They need to get back to five on five flight.
Speaker 1: I can't say it any more clearer than that. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, and then also another person that we gave stick
Speaker 2: taps to that's also in the box. It feels like
Speaker 2: nobody gets to just be in the stick taps category completely.
Speaker 2: But uh, for as good as a Peaks goal scoring
Speaker 2: has been, he's also not had a great defensive stretch
Speaker 2: because he's also a minus seven right.
Speaker 1: Now, he's five now, I believe, right because he scored
Speaker 1: David Lee, David is David Pasternaka is the lead to
Speaker 1: rub the pack. So yeah, yeah, but even still, I
Speaker 1: mean again, we don't have many guys with plus no
Speaker 1: numbers attached to their names right now. So it just
Speaker 1: kind of shows that some of the degree of the
Speaker 1: struggles that they're having.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's unfortunate that, you know, right now, for
Speaker 2: the last five games, we've been saying, Okay, they need
Speaker 2: to come back with this next one.
Speaker 1: They need to come back with this next one.
Speaker 2: And the fact that the next one is Edmonton, not
Speaker 2: only does that pressure to Okay, you gotta get the
Speaker 2: monkey off your back and you gotta score, you got
Speaker 2: to win. That pressure is increasing. But they're gonna be
Speaker 2: playing against Edmonton and Connor McDavid and I don't even
Speaker 2: know who their goaltender is on the regular right now
Speaker 2: because the Yari's out. It's it's gonna be a bit
Speaker 2: of an uphill battle this next game.
Speaker 1: I'm just checking because I know that they had been
Speaker 1: the Oilers themselves had been on a virtual tear after
Speaker 1: right they came, They came into the garden and beat you,
Speaker 1: and Connor McDavid was like a one nan flipping show.
Speaker 1: So in in the game. Since they beat the Bruins,
Speaker 1: they have played one, two, three, four or five five
Speaker 1: games and they have won one, three and lost two.
Speaker 2: So yeah, well better than the Bruins have been the
Speaker 2: last five. We'll see what happens there.
Speaker 1: Would I be surprised if the Bruins come out and
Speaker 1: have themselves a game? No, I wouldn't.
Speaker 2: But but hopefully we don't have a YIPS situation and
Speaker 2: that the psychological pressure of you must win takes over,
Speaker 2: because that's also a very real possibility. Well, and then
Speaker 2: you know, yes, it's a domino effect too. Could sticks
Speaker 2: start getting a little bit tighter and tighter. But all
Speaker 2: I want them to do is I don't even care
Speaker 2: if they lose their points.
Speaker 1: Just get some points. Yeah, get some points.
Speaker 2: The last bit of news, another little tidbit that we
Speaker 2: forgot to talk about at the top before we say goodbye.
Speaker 2: I believe so today is December thirtieth. I believe tomorrow
Speaker 2: December thirty first Olympic rosters drop get posted? Okay, yep,
Speaker 2: I mean fanatics has already accidentally leaked some of Team
Speaker 2: Canada because it's fanatical.
Speaker 1: Aren't they different versions though? Were they different iterations of
Speaker 1: the Team Canada roster? As far when I didn't drop
Speaker 1: the whole roster, they dropped products with Mitch Marner, Brad Marshan,
Speaker 1: and Nick Suzuki their names.
Speaker 2: I mean, those guys are probably given, so I don't
Speaker 2: think those are any state secrets.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I'm sure you can chip find that
Speaker 1: all on the the NHL's website, so we'll be all
Speaker 1: curious to see how that lands. Thank you all for listening, folks.
Speaker 1: As always, please like and subscribe for more content. Be
Speaker 1: sure to leave us a rating and a review to
Speaker 1: help other Bruins fans find us. You can support our
Speaker 1: podcast in a couple of ways by joining Patreon or
Speaker 1: following us on our socials. You can find us at
Speaker 1: Tape to Tape MK and on Substack at Tape to
Speaker 1: Tape mk dot substack dot com. With that being said,
Speaker 1: do you have any closing thoughts?
Speaker 2: My friend, go bees, go bes, please let us out
Speaker 2: of our misery
Podbean