NHL Officials Deserve Coal in their Stockings, Bruins Lose to Habs | Snap Shot 69
Liner notes
🎙️Frustration boils over after the Bruins’ collapse against the Montreal Canadiens at TD Garden, and not just because of their own mistakes. What should have been a momentum-building goal late in the second period was immediately wiped out by an inexplicable goaltender interference call, a decision that was never reviewed and completely altered the course of the game.Yes, the Bruins deserve blame for letting the wheels fall off in an embarrassing third period, taking careless penalties, and losing discipline when it mattered most. But two things can be true at once: Boston didn’t help themselves, and the NHL’s broken approach to GTI put its thumb squarely on the scale.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: I don't know about you, but all I want for
Speaker 1: Christmas is officiating that is actually competent. I am sick
Speaker 1: and tired of the objectively bad decision making and poor
Speaker 1: work of NHL officials. Referees should never be the reason
Speaker 1: why a game is decided, and while the Bruins let
Speaker 1: the game get away from them, it never would have
Speaker 1: happened if the idiot officials had actually taken the time
Speaker 1: they are allowed to take and review a goal for
Speaker 1: quote unquote alleged goaltender interference. When will the league establish
Speaker 1: a better protocol for how to handle GTI, if not
Speaker 1: more concretely define it. This is a Bruins tape to
Speaker 1: tape snapshot.
Speaker 2: The Bruins played the Montreal Canadians on Tuesday night at
Speaker 2: the TD Garden, and I thought after the first two
Speaker 2: periods of that game that the Bruins were going to
Speaker 2: gift us with a beautiful, shiny object to go into
Speaker 2: the holiday break. The game started off so well for
Speaker 2: the first two periods. You had right off the opening
Speaker 2: drop a fight that involved Tanner Janeau. Then shortly after
Speaker 2: that you had Nikita Zadorov in a heavyweight bout. The
Speaker 2: game was two to two. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: the Bruins we thought had taken the lead three to
Speaker 2: two with less than five seconds left in the second period. However,
Speaker 2: this was a call that changed the entire trajectory of
Speaker 2: the game, in that the referee immediately waved off Elias
Speaker 2: Lindholm's goal, claiming that David Pasternak was interfering with the
Speaker 2: Canadian goalie. Now, I've heard a couple of different spins
Speaker 2: and rapes for why the Bruins didn't challenge that goal,
Speaker 2: one of which is the rationale that the trend in
Speaker 2: the league is that they are allowing whatever called the
Speaker 2: official makes to stand, whether the official waves it off
Speaker 2: or calls it a goal, to which I say, then
Speaker 2: why the hell are we even bothering with reviews and
Speaker 2: coaches challenges. Then just eradicate it all together and spare
Speaker 2: us all the angst and aggravation and the waste of
Speaker 2: time if you're not going to actually review the call.
Speaker 2: And why the Bruins' coaching staff didn't take the shot
Speaker 2: at that time to challenge it is beyond me. Maybe
Speaker 2: they were doing online shopping at the time, I don't know,
Speaker 2: but me I might have given it a shot. I'd
Speaker 2: rather go into the start of the period with a
Speaker 2: power play rather than have I've wasted the challenge such
Speaker 2: as the Bruins did on a goal that was clearly
Speaker 2: a goal. So bad night all the way around. The
Speaker 2: Bruins totally fell apart in the third period of the
Speaker 2: game after that, and Montreal scored four unanswered goal. Then
Speaker 2: we fast forward to the post game and we are
Speaker 2: listening to Marco Sturm make excuses for the fact that
Speaker 2: the team is mentally fatigued, mentally tired. David Pasternach made
Speaker 2: similar comments to which I say, boo freaking who You're
Speaker 2: all aware of what your schedule is. This was a
Speaker 2: huge stand on home ice and you let opponents come
Speaker 2: in and kick your asses on your home ice from
Speaker 2: one end to the other. This team needs to do
Speaker 2: some heavy setting during the holiday break. And one thing
Speaker 2: that needs to change to start after the holiday break
Speaker 2: is the stupid penalties. Alex Steves swinging his stick like
Speaker 2: it's a flipping golf club on the ice, Okay, sticks
Speaker 2: between the legs, the tripping calls. It is simply unacceptable
Speaker 2: any longer, and it needs to be fixed.
Speaker 1: This game was the case of two things can be
Speaker 1: true at once. The Boston Bruins let the wheels fall
Speaker 1: off in an embarrassing display of ineptitude in the third
Speaker 1: period against the Halves, but I am thoroughly convinced that
Speaker 1: the immediate no call goal due to quote unquote goaltender
Speaker 1: interference in the second period was the tipping point for
Speaker 1: this team. In an era where there is near constant
Speaker 1: criticism of the league and officials about the definition of
Speaker 1: an interpretation of GTI, there must be a better protocol
Speaker 1: for review. I understand that there is a degree of
Speaker 1: individual interpretation, and yes, we don't want to go down
Speaker 1: the path of pausing the game to review every little thing,
Speaker 1: but this is one of those things that has been
Speaker 1: such a hot topic of debate. The league has forced
Speaker 1: itself into a corner here. They created a protocol to
Speaker 1: give officials the ability to review a penalty by initially
Speaker 1: calling for a five minute major in order to pause
Speaker 1: play and review the film. This gives officials the time
Speaker 1: and space to make a better decision about what has
Speaker 1: actually happened on the ice. So why can't the league
Speaker 1: establish some kind of process like this for GTI? The
Speaker 1: game is fast, and it is not always possible to
Speaker 1: make the right call right away, so why stop goal scoring.
Speaker 1: The default should be to allow goals and then review
Speaker 1: right away if there's any question by the officials, and
Speaker 1: for every GTI called, the league should be required to
Speaker 1: release a detailed explainer for that call. No excuses. This
Speaker 1: is bullshit, especially since the league is shoving sports gambling
Speaker 1: down our throats. Anyways, the Bruins hit the road for
Speaker 1: a stretch right after the holiday break. I'm too mad
Speaker 1: to talk about it still, so Merry Christmas. You have
Speaker 1: filthy animals. Make sure you rate and review the podcast
Speaker 1: to help us reach more listeners, and tune in weekly
Speaker 1: to our full podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, and
Speaker 1: all podcast platforms.
Podbean