Boston Bruins are Struggling at the Worst Time | Bruins News | Ep. 137
Liner notes
🎙️ The Boston Bruins are running out of time and their game is trending in the wrong direction.In this episode, we dive deep into the latest Boston Bruins news and NHL hockey updates after a challenging stretch where the Bruins have struggled to find their rhythm. Despite elite goaltending, the Bruins are facing issues in their 5-on-5 scoring, a faltering power play, and costly mistakes that are threatening their playoff prospects.
Our Bruins game recap and player analysis cover what’s going wrong and what’s still going right for the team. We discuss potential Bruins lineup changes and share honest Bruins hot takes to keep you informed and engaged. For detailed Bruins game breakdowns, insider chatter, and Boston hockey updates, this episode has everything fans need as the Bruins fight to flip the switch in these crucial games.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 1: I need something to do.
Speaker 3: All Jack sitting out a trop OBOCKNNA says gay lunch today,
Speaker 3: here's a chance pod from right down.
Speaker 1: The goalie scars, Oh my one a move by the
Speaker 1: rookie to on one plaster not moving in with Marsha
Speaker 1: get it, joins Time.
Speaker 3: Oil dances in podcast.
Speaker 1: Wait at home, right way corner, pastors there.
Speaker 2: What is that?
Speaker 3: Most? Welcome in everyone to another episode of Ruins Tape
Speaker 3: to tape. We are recording today on Monday, April sixth.
Speaker 3: I will be your host today, Maria from water Town.
Speaker 3: I'm going to welcome in my co host Caroline with
Speaker 3: a ky.
Speaker 1: How are you? How is the weekend? Besides some lousy hockey?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, it was just terrible hockey to watch.
Speaker 1: But the weather was decent, so that made me happy.
Speaker 1: Although it was definitely spitting snow this morning. We're not
Speaker 1: in the clear.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The Red Sox have a game this evening and I'm
Speaker 1: in Boston in case people don't know, and it will
Speaker 1: likely be temperatures potentially as well as in the twenties
Speaker 1: at Sunway Park. The scene bundle up, folks, It's April
Speaker 1: sixth and we're still freezing our asses off in the Longlands.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we will be for a while. But I
Speaker 1: guess given the topic at hand, which is hockey, it's
Speaker 1: would segue that pulled into hockey talk. So to set
Speaker 1: our teable today, I want to talk about. Obviously, we
Speaker 1: will touch on the games that occurred this WEE weekend
Speaker 1: for the Bruins, of which they played three games and
Speaker 1: only came away with one lousy point. And so the
Speaker 1: questions I want to dive into with regard to these
Speaker 1: games is what's currently right with the Bruins? What is
Speaker 1: wrong with the Bruins? Will the Bruins be a tuck
Speaker 1: out in the playoffs, as some who I believe are
Speaker 1: smarter than I am are speculating, And should the Bruins
Speaker 1: consider bringing James Hagens up? And the segue for that
Speaker 1: question is that we are clearly definitely struggling with generating
Speaker 1: offense five on five and also powerfuly. So those are
Speaker 1: the topics of conversation for today's podcasts. But before that,
Speaker 1: I want to do a little housekeeping in that today
Speaker 1: will be the last that many of you will be
Speaker 1: hearing from me for the next couple of podcasts because
Speaker 1: I will be traveling on a beautiful trip to Italy
Speaker 1: or a few day, so I will be missing the
Speaker 1: end of the Bruin season and likely the start of
Speaker 1: playoffs until I get back. But we do have a
Speaker 1: special guest who will be joining Marline next week, Anna
Speaker 1: Hudak from prism QUACKI and Anna has joined us before
Speaker 1: and the timing is impeccable in that Anna can speak
Speaker 1: very informatively with regard to the Columbus Blue Jackets and
Speaker 1: the Detroit Red Wings, both of which are still trying
Speaker 1: to worm their way into a playoff position.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's gonna be a good time. It's gonna be
Speaker 3: a very good time, friend of the pod, good Yes,
Speaker 3: thank you, thanks friend in advance, Anna for filling in
Speaker 3: for me. So before we get started on the Bruins,
Speaker 3: let's do our typical little trip around the rank.
Speaker 1: And for those of you who weren't paying any attention yesterday,
Speaker 1: and I admittedly am one of those people because we
Speaker 1: had a very busy Easter weekend here with all of
Speaker 1: our grandkids running around the place. But Patrick was fired
Speaker 1: by the New York Islanders and Pete de Beer's is
Speaker 1: now their coach, which again, now this is the second
Speaker 1: coach within a relatively short period of time for teams
Speaker 1: that have decent playoff positioning who have relieved their coaches.
Speaker 1: And I'm not quite sure I understand it. I know
Speaker 1: with respect to the Islanders that they had lost or
Speaker 1: games in a row and were struggling offensively, struggling defensively.
Speaker 3: It seemed like nothing was really going right, and that
Speaker 3: I don't understand what precipitates these changes other than you know,
Speaker 3: my theory sometimes is you can't fire an entire roster
Speaker 3: right and still the coach in an effort to maybe
Speaker 3: send a message wake the team the hell up. This
Speaker 3: seems a little desperate to me at this time of
Speaker 3: the season to fire a coach. Yeah, I was at
Speaker 3: a loss when I read this yesterday. This one confused
Speaker 3: me because, first of all, it was exactly a week
Speaker 3: after Cassidy was out from Vegas and Tortorella was brought
Speaker 3: in in his place.
Speaker 1: And obviously, as we discussed.
Speaker 3: It was enough of maybe a little bit of a
Speaker 3: breathing room. Yes, it was close to the end of
Speaker 3: the season, but it wasn't that close. And you bring
Speaker 3: John Tortorella in.
Speaker 1: For a very specific purpose. I could understand that.
Speaker 3: I get that as an outsider's perspective and understanding of
Speaker 3: the team culture, the organization's culture in Vegas. Like, all right,
Speaker 3: I buy that that makes sense. They're crazy. They'll stab
Speaker 3: anyone in the back to preserve a season. They were,
Speaker 3: and I believe are still firmly in a playoff spot,
Speaker 3: so they had the luxury to do that. The Islanders
Speaker 3: confused me because they've lost some games. By that account,
Speaker 3: and by what you've described, I mean, we've seen the
Speaker 3: exact same thing from the Bruins. I believe when the
Speaker 3: firing happened at that time, the Islanders were in a
Speaker 3: playoff spot. They've just been bumped by the Philadelphia Flyers,
Speaker 3: so they are now on the outside looking in, and
Speaker 3: they have four games left, so ten ten days.
Speaker 1: Basically, this seems kind of crazy.
Speaker 3: I've thought about since we last talked, your point of
Speaker 3: not wanting to throw away a season, or that you
Speaker 3: know everything that you've built towards for that playoffs in
Speaker 3: regards to our conversation about Vegas, and I get that.
Speaker 1: I buy that.
Speaker 3: I think that makes a lot of sense, But this
Speaker 3: one doesn't really make a lot of sense, because what
Speaker 3: is a new coach going to do other than as
Speaker 3: we've said, and we typically see this happen much earlier
Speaker 3: in the season, that when you team is really just
Speaker 3: falling flat, you fire the coach, not necessarily because the
Speaker 3: coach should be fired, but because you can't fire the
Speaker 3: whole team.
Speaker 1: And as the Rangers proved, apparently you can fire players.
Speaker 3: However, you can't do that right now because the trade
Speaker 3: deadline has passed.
Speaker 1: Those guys couldn't play, So that's kind of the only
Speaker 1: other option.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think I'm trying to like come up
Speaker 3: with a good enough reason in my head, you know,
Speaker 3: did lose the room that badly that it like they
Speaker 3: literally could not go on, that they could not be
Speaker 3: relied upon to perform in the playoffs. De Bor is
Speaker 3: an excellent coach, but what can he possibly do other
Speaker 3: than be a body on that bench. They don't play
Speaker 3: that in their favor, But I think the timing is
Speaker 3: such that from what I've read a little bit and
Speaker 3: listen to some folks, it seems like it was warrant
Speaker 3: is shit are The Islanders were playing more of like
Speaker 3: a kind of an uptempo game, like a running gun
Speaker 3: type of front and they were getting and have been
Speaker 3: getting really really.
Speaker 1: Good goaltending as a result of that. But I think
Speaker 1: they've stumbled a little bit in that structure. And I
Speaker 1: don't know if it was a philosophical thing between coach
Speaker 1: and GM about the system of play that they wanted
Speaker 1: to implement, if the GM wanted to tighten things up
Speaker 1: a little bit, because that's all well and good that
Speaker 1: system when you're winning games, but when you start losing games,
Speaker 1: like you know, they had a really bad loss against
Speaker 1: Penguins eight to three, they lost to Buffalo and they
Speaker 1: and they have since fired off four losses in a
Speaker 1: row as a result of that. You know, they lost
Speaker 1: four to one to Philadelphia and then they lost four
Speaker 1: to three to Carolina, so you know, and again it's
Speaker 1: also a timing thing as well, because if you were
Speaker 1: going to make a change and bring in a new coach,
Speaker 1: to your point, the Islanders don't say again until Wednesday night,
Speaker 1: So they've got four days now to get Pete de
Speaker 1: Beers in and have him implement something, meet with players,
Speaker 1: meet with veterans. However, they're going to make a subsequent
Speaker 1: change to try and get them back into playoff contention,
Speaker 1: So you know, again, it could be an issue like
Speaker 1: we've come so far, We've worked so hard to put
Speaker 1: ourselves in a playoff spot to now seemingly have that
Speaker 1: orl go down the drain simply because you know, we
Speaker 1: have a coach potentially, and I'm not saying that's what
Speaker 1: the case is, but if he doesn't want to make
Speaker 1: changes to the way that they play, then again, you know,
Speaker 1: sometimes the GM is forced to make a difficult decision.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but then now you are forcing the team to
Speaker 3: change the way that they play because our new coach
Speaker 3: may or may not. I know from my understanding from
Speaker 3: the other news sources that I could. I believe it
Speaker 3: was the Athletic Hockey Show I was listening to recently
Speaker 3: discussing the Tortorella transition over in Vegas and how these
Speaker 3: are the things that we should be expecting from him.
Speaker 3: Typically when he comes in and takes over like this,
Speaker 3: the teams are not necessarily going to see that massive
Speaker 3: bump that you normally see. But he's also going to
Speaker 3: basically come in and he's going to take Cassidy's system
Speaker 3: and basically apply that same system but with his flavor.
Speaker 3: But that's kind of how he operates, and that's how
Speaker 3: he's going to be doing And that makes sense because
Speaker 3: this is a system that this team has been playing
Speaker 3: in all season. What's the expectation here because this seems
Speaker 3: very risky and my impression is that some mensa candidate
Speaker 3: had the Islanders front office thought hey, that is a
Speaker 3: great idea, not really realizing that the context I think
Speaker 3: is extremely different. Vegas was in a spot, firmly in
Speaker 3: a spot because they're in like the worst the worst,
Speaker 3: so like they could they can't afford to lose some
Speaker 3: games at the end in that transition with a new
Speaker 3: coach and any new systems and things that he decides
Speaker 3: he wants to do. The Islanders do not have that
Speaker 3: luxury because they also now only have four games and
Speaker 3: they are currently not in the playoffs because they got
Speaker 3: bumped out completely.
Speaker 1: Not only out of their division ranking, but completely out.
Speaker 1: They currently are third in the wild card. Right, But
Speaker 1: what are you thinking? I think it was a sign
Speaker 1: of desperation and I have to do something to stop
Speaker 1: the bleeding. From the GM's perspective, because the Islanders have
Speaker 1: played one more game than all the other teams that
Speaker 1: they're chasing, and so I think when as a GM
Speaker 1: you sit down and look at that and you're like
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ, the maintaining our position. Now we keep losing, losing, losing,
Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, we don't have any games
Speaker 1: in hand. So I've got to stop the bleeding because
Speaker 1: that got to get this team back on the right
Speaker 1: track to at least start getting some points back in
Speaker 1: here and tightening up this race again. So you know,
Speaker 1: is it right or wrong? Who the hell knows. We'll
Speaker 1: find out by April fourteenth, because that's when the season
Speaker 1: comes to an end.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a massive, massive risk because if you look
Speaker 3: at who the Islanders are playing in their final four games,
Speaker 3: they played Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Carolina.
Speaker 1: They could win two of those games. Is that going
Speaker 1: to be enough? You're right, it is a big risk,
Speaker 1: but apparently it was one that they're GM deemed worthy
Speaker 1: of taking in an effort to salvage the season. And honestly,
Speaker 1: it's also a way to say, listen, I did my best.
Speaker 1: I made a change to try and stop the bleeding,
Speaker 1: Because sometimes I wonder if some of these moves by
Speaker 1: GM's are also made in an effort to not put
Speaker 1: themselves on a hot seat when things start going down
Speaker 1: the shitter.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but I think a move like this at time,
Speaker 3: under these circumstances, if they don't make it, this will
Speaker 3: have I.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yea, yeah, blown up.
Speaker 3: I agree, there's a potential prayer you that have poopball
Speaker 3: over your face. But it's still somewhat shocking, right to
Speaker 3: be hearing about coaches being let go. And this is
Speaker 3: crazy in the NHL, And it's like a revolving wheel.
Speaker 3: It's like the wheel of fortune. Let's spin the wheel,
Speaker 3: but then names of the coaches who have lost their
Speaker 3: jobs and are still out there looking for jobs, and
Speaker 3: wherever the wheel lands, that's the coach that we're going
Speaker 3: to hire and bring back in. There's no really you
Speaker 3: to like look towards. Let's bring someone new and fresh in.
Speaker 3: Let's just go with what we know.
Speaker 1: So two other thoughts popped into my head.
Speaker 3: One, I found it very interesting that in both circumstances
Speaker 3: for Vegas and for the Islanders, what didn't happen, which
Speaker 3: we often see is if you see a firing of
Speaker 3: a coach earlier, let's say November, December, January, they usually
Speaker 3: just tap a current member of the coaching staff as
Speaker 3: interim head coach, right, they don't bring somebody new in.
Speaker 1: This is very different.
Speaker 3: And I wonder the second thought that I had was
Speaker 3: maybe not with the Vegas situation, because again, they're a
Speaker 3: whole other beast.
Speaker 1: I wonder if with the Islanders it was less.
Speaker 3: So about trying to save face going into the playoffs
Speaker 3: and more so about making sure that they get debor
Speaker 3: as for.
Speaker 1: The market for to speak, that's a validate point because
Speaker 1: I'm assuming Craig Ferrovi is probably in a very tentative
Speaker 1: situation in Toronto because they fired their GM. And typically
Speaker 1: the way it works is a GM is going to
Speaker 1: want to pick his own coach normally, so Barovi's on
Speaker 1: shaky grounds there as well. And what other segues into
Speaker 1: our next topic, which is teams that have clinched and
Speaker 1: teams that have been eliminated. You have got a boatload
Speaker 1: of teams that have been eliminated.
Speaker 3: Now, I don't think there's any chance that Paul Maurice
Speaker 3: is going to lose his job in Florida, but the
Speaker 3: Panthers have been mathematically eliminated. The maple Leafs have been
Speaker 3: mathematically eliminated. They've met a change at GM, so I
Speaker 3: don't think Barrubi's coaching position there is rock solid.
Speaker 1: I don't think he has the room anymore either. The
Speaker 1: New York Rangers again have been eliminated. I mean Mike
Speaker 1: Sullivan didn't do a bang up job there himself. The
Speaker 1: black Hawks have been eliminated, and the Canucks have been eliminated.
Speaker 1: So those are potentially one two people at five five
Speaker 1: open spots depending on what these organizations, what direction they decide.
Speaker 3: To go on. Honestly, I think the only organizations where
Speaker 3: you might not see really any kind of change in
Speaker 3: that regard would be Chicago and Florida.
Speaker 1: I agree with you. I think Chicago is still very
Speaker 1: much so actively building them.
Speaker 3: Being eliminated was not a reflection, I think on the
Speaker 3: direction that the team is going in. I think that's
Speaker 3: just where they are right now. But they are trending
Speaker 3: in the right direction. And then again with Florida, I mean,
Speaker 3: what do you expect. You've been to the Stanley Cup
Speaker 3: three years in a row. It's extremely taxing on the body.
Speaker 3: You can't maintain that like you could in the eighties
Speaker 3: when you would have the Islanders and the Oilers going
Speaker 3: back to back to back all those times, so I
Speaker 3: think those are the only two where we're not really
Speaker 3: going to see any kind of significant changes in those regards.
Speaker 1: I agree with you. So just an interesting, interesting bit
Speaker 1: of information on an Easter Sunday to say, holy what
Speaker 1: I mean? I checked it a couple of times to
Speaker 1: make sure that it was actually in fact correct, nos.
Speaker 3: And it was.
Speaker 1: So with luck to them, let's see what happens. We've
Speaker 1: got our own concerns with our team lumping into a
Speaker 1: playoff spot. Teams that have officially clinched a playoff spot,
Speaker 1: they have an official clinched you know, one their division
Speaker 1: or whatever other or trophy you want to wave around.
Speaker 1: But as of today, which is Monday, April sixth, we
Speaker 1: have Colorado Avalanche, Carolina Hurricanes, Tampa Bay Lighton, Dallas Stars,
Speaker 1: Buffalo Sabers, Montreal Canadians, and Minnesota Wild all officially clinched
Speaker 1: playoff spots and they're all one hundred points or more.
Speaker 1: So yeah, that's that theory stands true so far? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so far.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's also turned into a doodle bug race this
Speaker 3: final week.
Speaker 1: This is what you didn't want, but it hasn't fact
Speaker 1: turned into them and it didn't seem.
Speaker 3: Like it was going to be one this year because
Speaker 3: literally a week ago it was this team's winning. Now
Speaker 3: this team's winning and they're getting in, and now it's like,
Speaker 3: for the love of God, can like, Boston, do you
Speaker 3: want this or do you not want this?
Speaker 1: Because well, the Ruins are very lucky in that the
Speaker 1: teams that have been been up there plus are also losing.
Speaker 1: So the Ruins right now seen a solid footing for
Speaker 1: the number one wild card spot.
Speaker 3: Better footing than But that doesn't mean we like how
Speaker 3: it's right exactly, because Boston has played seventy eight games,
Speaker 3: so that means there are only four games left, so
Speaker 3: eight points max at this point. But you have other
Speaker 3: teams in that really really close situation, which now I
Speaker 3: would argue you've got one, two, three, four, five teams
Speaker 3: gunning for one spot, Ottawa, the Islanders, Detroit, Columbus, and
Speaker 3: even Washington is only three points out there. I think
Speaker 3: Washington is probably less of a threats true than the
Speaker 3: teams you previously margin. Plus you have Philadelphia, even though
Speaker 3: they are in the third spot of the Metro. I
Speaker 3: mean they have the same number of points as Ottawa,
Speaker 3: different division. So you're looking at the Islanders as their
Speaker 3: next threat. With eighty nine points. Philly has one more
Speaker 3: game Detroit Columbus. They've all played only seventy seven I mean,
Speaker 3: if they were to win all of them, then you're
Speaker 3: looking at ten points and a bunch of them play
Speaker 3: each other this final week, so it's it's madness.
Speaker 1: And again, this is great to the league break for
Speaker 1: the sport to have because they can point to look
Speaker 1: at what great parody we have. They're all losing. Nobody
Speaker 1: wants that.
Speaker 3: Nobody wants that last spot, Jesus so just because the
Speaker 3: Kadchuk boys intriguely so they have their own podcasts, and
Speaker 3: they had Dad on the podcast and one of the
Speaker 3: topics of conversation was, you know, the back to back games,
Speaker 3: and he was Dad was comparing back in his day
Speaker 3: when he played, which was a very different right he played.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's face it, most of these guys play her.
Speaker 1: They do play her. They didn't have the back to
Speaker 1: back they didn't play with the same kind of intensity.
Speaker 1: James Baster. These players are a hell of a lot
Speaker 1: stronger than they were back then, and they're likely playing
Speaker 1: more games than they did back in Bada Kuchuk's day. However,
Speaker 1: there was an instance where apparently Omar plays for the
Speaker 1: Auto Senators needed a day off, You needed a day
Speaker 1: of rest because the man has been open about his
Speaker 1: mental health struggles and his panic attacks. Like, yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't want to put words in his mouth, but if
Speaker 1: you listen to what he said, it creates an issue
Speaker 1: for Rady because he then needs to answer questions. He
Speaker 1: didn't have to publish the episode. It's their podcast, right,
Speaker 1: or just say listen, that's not what I think.
Speaker 3: If you have a problem with what he said, go
Speaker 3: ask him directly, or just don't you have the friggin thing.
Speaker 1: But you know, you get it, asked about it, but
Speaker 1: it was almost like intimating that and others this whole
Speaker 1: load management thing, because it's a big deal and a
Speaker 1: big controversy right now in the NBA, where the league
Speaker 1: is trying to figure out a way to get it addressed,
Speaker 1: because I agree with the fact that people are saying
Speaker 1: countless ridiculous sums of money to go to sporting events
Speaker 1: to specifically watch their team and watch their superstar or
Speaker 1: watch the superstar of another team, and then randomly this
Speaker 1: player is out of the game for quote unquote whatever.
Speaker 1: Load management well, that doesn't It shouldn't fly. It shouldn't
Speaker 1: be okay, It shouldn't be okay. So I understand the
Speaker 1: frustration with that, but players or former players should not
Speaker 1: be calling out each other when you don't. First of all,
Speaker 1: not your teammate, not your business, not your lockerable, don't
Speaker 1: say a friggin thing about it. And you two numb
Speaker 1: skulls should know better that you know your podcast is
Speaker 1: gaining in popularity, and you know people are listening to it,
Speaker 1: including the beat writers that follow your teams because they
Speaker 1: cover your teams, so they're listening to your podcasts. Do
Speaker 1: you not think you're going to get asked about it?
Speaker 1: First of all, nobody should have given those two idiots
Speaker 1: a microphone. The market is saturated with their faces and
Speaker 1: their voices. I'm sick and tired of these guys. I
Speaker 1: think they're terrible people, and I don't want to see
Speaker 1: their faces.
Speaker 3: Ever. They do intrigue me. I do find them somewhat entertaining.
Speaker 3: I would take them on my team. I wouldn't because
Speaker 3: I don't think that they're good people. I don't even
Speaker 3: want to be affiliated or associated with them whatsoever. I
Speaker 3: would almost argue and This is again just my interpretation.
Speaker 3: This is their podcast. They can edit it however they want,
Speaker 3: they can clip it out. There's a reason why.
Speaker 1: They didn't, and I wouldn't be surprised if they agreed
Speaker 1: with Dad, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean there might be something more deep rooted
Speaker 3: going on in Ottawa and in that locker room, So
Speaker 3: we'll likely hear more once you know.
Speaker 1: It's then when there's season after would comes to an end.
Speaker 3: Also, I'm gonna defend lenas to the end. I'm not
Speaker 3: saying right, no no, no, no, no no, no, no,
Speaker 3: you're not. But what I'm saying is, because this is
Speaker 3: the kind of it's always going to be this specific
Speaker 3: topic of conversation. To me, there are certain things that
Speaker 3: should stay in the wrong. This is not about all
Speaker 3: of it publicly at all ever, And you're one hundred
Speaker 3: percent right in that. It's fine if you're going to
Speaker 3: bring somebody on a parent who used to play, or
Speaker 3: just another player who used to play, to talk about
Speaker 3: the old days. Great, talk about the old days and
Speaker 3: your personal experience. But I also feel like it's a
Speaker 3: betrayal of the code of your part of this fraternity.
Speaker 3: So it was almost mocking.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you don't.
Speaker 3: You don't talk about what the other players could or
Speaker 3: couldn't do when you played, and you sure as hell
Speaker 3: don't have commentary on current players because you can't speak
Speaker 3: to what those other people, either in the past or
Speaker 3: right now are experiencing.
Speaker 1: Like you can't do that. You can't do that. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: And Tuca was on the TNT desk yes in the
Speaker 1: game yesterday on Sunday and this specific came up, and
Speaker 1: you know, again, you want all these analysts to be
Speaker 1: open and honest and say what they feel. However, they
Speaker 1: do have relationships with current and former players, and Gernado
Speaker 1: without coming out and saying it, could tell that he
Speaker 1: would have preferred that he not have said anything. And
Speaker 1: Tuca's opinion was that, look, goalies are not going to
Speaker 1: say that they don't want to play because you get tired.
Speaker 1: They're going to say they can't play because they're either
Speaker 1: hurt or they're sick, and he should know that better
Speaker 1: than anyone else with the sickness stuff, so he's just
Speaker 1: kind of being They were being a bit dismissive, but
Speaker 1: they were also taking up for Venus.
Speaker 3: Yes rasks comment is if a goaltender say or any
Speaker 3: player for that matter, is taking a day off whatever
Speaker 3: you want to call it, Like, it's not because he
Speaker 3: wants to sit around and eat bonbonds. So also, you know, Keith,
Speaker 3: don't be such a literalist and think, oh, he's needing
Speaker 3: a day of rest. That means he's resting and he's tired. No,
Speaker 3: you idiot, that's just like a diplomatic way of saying, look,
Speaker 3: something's not right. He's not gonna you don't want to
Speaker 3: talk about why. It's just like you say upper body
Speaker 3: or you say lower body, like, and he's for airing
Speaker 3: the brunt of their workload and playing extremely well for
Speaker 3: the most part for this team, and it gets them
Speaker 3: into the playoff positioning that they're in. So it just
Speaker 3: was a bit of distraction and controversy that's likely not
Speaker 3: needed right now or a team that's fighting to get.
Speaker 4: Into a wild card spot. Yeah, yep, right, Well, let's
Speaker 4: talk about the Ruins and how much they're ruins. Okay,
Speaker 4: So we had that tremendous win against a pretty good,
Speaker 4: very good Dallas Star team.
Speaker 1: They cornched a playoff spot already six to three. The
Speaker 1: Bruins travel to Florida to play games against the Panthers,
Speaker 1: the Tampa Bay Lightning, and then the very next day
Speaker 1: turn around and play the Philadelphia Flyers. On those three games,
Speaker 1: the Bruins managed to only secure one freaking point, and
Speaker 1: after the Florida game, Marco Sturm was not at all
Speaker 1: things and I think he literally came out and said
Speaker 1: that the Bruins basically disrespected their opponent. Now I have
Speaker 1: said that before.
Speaker 3: I thought the loss to the Maple Leagues was a
Speaker 3: bit of your disrespecting your opponent or not taking a
Speaker 3: lesser opponent quote unquote their quotes. Then we fast forward
Speaker 3: to the Tampa Bay Lightening game, which was for the
Speaker 3: most part a pretty good hockey game. Now, I will
Speaker 3: say in all three of these games, and you you
Speaker 3: can dispute me if you want, but I don't think
Speaker 3: you will. The Bruins have gotten and are getting unbelievable
Speaker 3: goal from both Slayman and Jonas unbelievable goaltender. If it
Speaker 3: wasn't for Yoni's corpus Salo so in the Philly game,
Speaker 3: I don't think they would have even secured one fourth. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I agree, Corpuslo had some unreal saves and Swaymen as well.
Speaker 1: Both of them played incredibly well. So what's going right
Speaker 1: and what's going wrong here?
Speaker 3: Because I can tell you for me, and I've raised
Speaker 3: this concern the last week or two, the slow starts
Speaker 3: or kind of falling asleep off the wheel. If they
Speaker 3: don't play at both sixty minutes, the system and the structure,
Speaker 3: then Marco Starr wants them to play in their likelihood
Speaker 3: for success drops inherently.
Speaker 1: Yes, they have become this team.
Speaker 3: This team has kind of evolved as the season has
Speaker 3: gone on, and we've gotten to a point where if
Speaker 3: they do not play that complete game, it's going to
Speaker 3: be a much bigger uphill climb.
Speaker 1: And we've seen them kind of recover in that sense.
Speaker 3: They played a good forty minutes because they were asleep
Speaker 3: at the wheel in the first period, which of course
Speaker 3: then makes I believe.
Speaker 1: In the Florida game, the first period terrible. Yeah, it
Speaker 1: was terrible. Yeah, that's right. And so they have to
Speaker 1: play well.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm not saying that they have to come
Speaker 3: out and score immediately, although that of course helps, But
Speaker 3: how do you how do you improve upon it?
Speaker 1: Like, how do you make that be a thing.
Speaker 3: If they haven't been able to consistently do that up
Speaker 3: until this point, I don't know are their passengers right now,
Speaker 3: are there, or at least passengers in the sense of
Speaker 3: thinking that, well, we've got five points on the next team,
Speaker 3: so we can we can afford to breathe a little
Speaker 3: bit still instead of just treating every game like you're
Speaker 3: only a point ahead of the next team in line.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know how you games when
Speaker 1: you're five on five, scoring has seemingly dried up. You
Speaker 1: can't score on the powers play, and then you have
Speaker 1: instances where you have scatterings of periods where you can't
Speaker 1: manage more than five or shots on goal in a period.
Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, then you wind up having
Speaker 1: twenty one turnovers or takeaways in some games. And I
Speaker 1: brought this up last week too, the odd man rushes.
Speaker 1: It's one thing if you're struggling to generate scoring, but
Speaker 1: then and again, maybe that's an issue of you're trying
Speaker 1: to do a little too luch, too many guys to
Speaker 1: try to do too much, But then you're giving up
Speaker 1: odd man rushes. So then you're making your goaltender's job
Speaker 1: even harder. Yeah, to your.
Speaker 3: Point, against Tampa Bay, Boston had only twenty two shots
Speaker 3: on goal. They had nineteen shots on goal in Philadelphia.
Speaker 3: That's it. And not only does that make for a
Speaker 3: very boring game, and not in overtime, by the way,
Speaker 3: and now god seeing not one in overtime number one,
Speaker 3: because in Pasta and I got called for penalty and
Speaker 3: then Charlie mcavoyd took an undisciplined penalty right after that. Now, again,
Speaker 3: I get that these guys are trying to be leaders,
Speaker 3: and I know that Pasta was gassed, you still have
Speaker 3: to have a freaking awareness ware stick is what you're doing.
Speaker 1: You know what time of the game, it is, what's
Speaker 1: on the line.
Speaker 3: You just can't do shit like that against desperate teams
Speaker 3: because you're gonna wind up paying for it. And they did. Yeah,
Speaker 3: well that was the thing that irritated me the most
Speaker 3: about the Philadelphia game from last night.
Speaker 1: We hadn't seen this in a while.
Speaker 3: The thing that drives me bonkers always any team that
Speaker 3: is playing the way Boston played with the stick infractions.
Speaker 1: That's lazy hockey. That is lazy ass hockey.
Speaker 2: When you were getting be on the rush, you're getting
Speaker 2: caught flat footed, so all you can think to do
Speaker 2: is to hook or hold or trip play better hockey,
Speaker 2: be faster, be in your right position.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, the fact that in this
Speaker 1: past week you had.
Speaker 3: Situations where they couldn't enter the zone, they couldn't get
Speaker 3: set up. I mean, every power play, every power play
Speaker 3: was basically a winste of time because there was there
Speaker 3: was no setup. They couldn't get established in the zone.
Speaker 3: None of the quarterbacks could handle on the point. They
Speaker 3: lost it every single time. I mean, I'm sitting there
Speaker 3: and I'm watching it. I'm like, I don't want to
Speaker 3: watch this because this is just bad hockey. This is bad, bad, bad,
Speaker 3: bad hockey. And the only reason why they didn't get
Speaker 3: obliterated that these scores were as low as they were.
Speaker 3: What was it two to one, three to one, and
Speaker 3: two to one right the Tampa Bay game was I
Speaker 3: believe that was one three.
Speaker 1: One, two to one was because of their goaltenders? Correct?
Speaker 1: They should have rot six sixty one? Yes?
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, and yes. So people look at I watched,
Speaker 3: what are you crabbing about? Really, they've only given up
Speaker 3: what threes or seven goals? Okay, but it could have
Speaker 3: been worse if you're not getting absolutely outstanding goaltending from
Speaker 3: swaymen and still have four more goals than the other
Speaker 3: kias still have to score more goals in the other right, right,
Speaker 3: it's and I just.
Speaker 1: Again that Florida game was a snooze best two, by
Speaker 1: the way, boring. And when have we ever said that
Speaker 1: a game between the Boston Bruins spent a long time
Speaker 1: and the Florida Pansers was boring? Right because Florida literally
Speaker 1: had nothing to play for, but they're playing for pride.
Speaker 1: There are young guys on that team that are playing
Speaker 1: for jobs, you know, other players who maybe playing for
Speaker 1: contracts to stay there. And I get really bothered when
Speaker 1: I hear people say, well, it's been a really long grind,
Speaker 1: that played a lot of hart, they've had the toughest schedule.
Speaker 1: You know what the schedule is, you know what you're
Speaker 1: up against, you know what your travel schedule is. But
Speaker 1: you still have a job to do when you get
Speaker 1: out there on the ice, and your job is to
Speaker 1: play a full freaking sixteen minutes lucky.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I mean, having a tough schedule ahead means that you're
Speaker 3: playing against teams that have high win percentage or points percentage,
Speaker 3: and that only should be intimidating if your team is
Speaker 3: actually that much worse, and I don't think that Boston is, however,
Speaker 3: because if that were the case, they would be blown
Speaker 3: out of the water.
Speaker 1: Right you know.
Speaker 3: I think that's what makes us all the more frustrating.
Speaker 3: We are fair matchups and thinking about who they've got
Speaker 3: coming up next. Carolina and Tampa Bay, I think are
Speaker 3: the toughest of the remaining teams. And it's not a
Speaker 3: question of talent. It's gonna come down to are the
Speaker 3: Bruins actually gonna show up and execute their system?
Speaker 1: And we don't know because we never know which team
Speaker 1: is going to show up and do the job. In
Speaker 1: the Tampa game, it went out before on that powers play.
Speaker 1: You score one or two goals there, and that can
Speaker 1: potentially change the entire trajectory of the game. Not only that,
Speaker 1: what makes it even more frustrating is they're not even
Speaker 1: generating any good offensive momentum because the power plays are
Speaker 1: not good. So they're not fluid, they're not getting good
Speaker 1: shots off, they're not making the opposing goldtender's jobs hard.
Speaker 1: So not a good time of the year for us
Speaker 1: to be having these questions popping up in our head. Right,
Speaker 1: So what is right with the Bruins right now. Other
Speaker 1: than the goaltending, We've seen this before. We've seen them
Speaker 1: be able to bounce back and show us right, will
Speaker 1: show you type of attitude or you know, we're not
Speaker 1: happy with the wave and play. Let's hope that this
Speaker 1: is the case with these last four remaining games. But
Speaker 1: what do you see that's right with them?
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm gonna have to dig deep here because
Speaker 3: quite frankly, I'm feeling not optimistic in terms of what
Speaker 3: I have to look forward to on Tuesday against Carolina.
Speaker 1: I mean, the one thing that I see.
Speaker 3: Consistently this season as opposed to last year, and this
Speaker 3: is just an easy comparison to make because last year
Speaker 3: was just so bad, is their ability to make change
Speaker 3: from period to period, whether it's just an attitude change
Speaker 3: or a change in how they come out and play.
Speaker 3: We did see this in the beginning of the season,
Speaker 3: but we don't really see any more an entire game
Speaker 3: with no play. Again, we can see forty minutes sometimes
Speaker 3: of really good play, and so I think that.
Speaker 1: Serves them well.
Speaker 3: I just am worried that they are going to kind
Speaker 3: of rely on kicking the can down the road and
Speaker 3: saying well, we've got still another period to go. We
Speaker 3: can get that goal back, because again the last three
Speaker 3: games they've lost by like nothing. And so I worry
Speaker 3: in that sense that they think that they have more
Speaker 3: time than they actually do, and then they turn it
Speaker 3: on a little too late. So like they can turn
Speaker 3: it on, and I think that that's great, That would
Speaker 3: be all well and good if you had your five
Speaker 3: on five scoring a little bit more balance or me
Speaker 3: that you could capitalize on opportunities. And I don't understand
Speaker 3: would this power play, because this happens at this time
Speaker 3: of year every year.
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: Is it the other teams have just figured us out? Maybe?
Speaker 1: Maybe how do you go from being the third power
Speaker 1: play in the entire league? No, like the third worst
Speaker 1: in six weeks? How how I don't know. If it
Speaker 1: becomes an instance of either the coaching staff or the
Speaker 1: players becoming stubborn on their units in terms of how
Speaker 1: they want to maneuver their powerplay, I don't know. And
Speaker 1: you know, I've heard the theory of, well, you can
Speaker 1: still have success in the playoffs without a good power
Speaker 1: play because less penalties get called. Okay, but on those
Speaker 1: rare occasions that you do get a power play opportunity.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't you like to know that it might work to
Speaker 1: put a game away in the playoffs situation?
Speaker 3: Yeah, That and the fact that the Bruins continue to
Speaker 3: struggle on the road.
Speaker 1: I mean, that is going to be the nail in
Speaker 1: the coffin. Again.
Speaker 3: We're coming to that time of year where we figure
Speaker 3: out what the epitaph is going to be on the
Speaker 3: tombstone of the season. I am wondering if it's going
Speaker 3: to be couldn't win on the road, because and they're
Speaker 3: going to be the away team they if they make it,
Speaker 3: there's still a chance that they won't. I mean, I
Speaker 3: think that they need to win two games and get
Speaker 3: at least one point if they're going to be on
Speaker 3: the road in the playoffs. And I have no faith
Speaker 3: that they can actually pull it off. I mean, you know,
Speaker 3: even the way things are going in the Eastern Conference,
Speaker 3: I think you've got to be close to one hundred
Speaker 3: points we get I think so they're at ninety five
Speaker 3: right now.
Speaker 1: They have to beat one of the four team or
Speaker 1: two of the four teams when you've got again Carolina,
Speaker 1: Tampa Bay, Columbus and New Jersey and they can't disrespect
Speaker 1: any of those teams because we've seen what happens. So
Speaker 1: this begs the question, which was another topic of conversation,
Speaker 1: with the struggles that the Bruins have clearly been experiencing
Speaker 1: with five o five scoring and play, you bring, should
Speaker 1: they consider bringing James Pagan up? Now, they can bring
Speaker 1: him up, but there are consequences to that, right if
Speaker 1: they bring him up. Yeah, I still say no.
Speaker 3: I still say no because at the end of the day,
Speaker 3: it's my understanding that he's still learning, he still has
Speaker 3: things to learn and work on at the AHL level again,
Speaker 3: because it's still quite a transition from D one hockey
Speaker 3: to AHL and then it's a completely different game from
Speaker 3: the AHL. So how many times have we talked about basically,
Speaker 3: career ahlers who are phenomenal in that league can't do
Speaker 3: anything in the NHL. And I'm just I just don't
Speaker 3: know that he is the solution to any particular problems.
Speaker 3: And I don't think it's worth burning the first year
Speaker 3: of his entry level hard track. Just I don't see
Speaker 3: the benefit right now to doing that. And you've talked
Speaker 3: about this before where you've got these guys on this team,
Speaker 3: they've been working really hard towards this. Most of the
Speaker 3: team has been there in all of these day one,
Speaker 3: from day one. It's not just that they have earned
Speaker 3: their spots at this point, but it's also their problem
Speaker 3: to fix. Like they've earned the privilege to be there,
Speaker 3: but it is also their responsibility to make it right.
Speaker 3: No one else can fix this, no one else should
Speaker 3: fix this except for them, And I don't have the answers.
Speaker 3: It's like, how can you make them do anything better?
Speaker 1: How do you you know what I'm saying? Like, the
Speaker 1: system clearly works.
Speaker 3: We have seen this work very very well with the
Speaker 3: guys that we have, But how do you make them
Speaker 3: play sixty minutes?
Speaker 1: How do you make them do that? I don't know,
Speaker 1: because we've seen these cracks, you know, here and there.
Speaker 1: They're usually not sustained or prolonged crack, right, Yeah, that
Speaker 1: we see. I think what's alarming right now is, given
Speaker 1: where we're at in the season, that this was your
Speaker 1: opportunity right to bolster yourself even more confidently into playoff positioning.
Speaker 3: And you know, I know it sounds like we're talking
Speaker 3: as if they're going to fall out of playoff good.
Speaker 1: Hopefully they will not, right, but they have been in
Speaker 1: control of their own destiny the entirety of the season,
Speaker 1: and when they lose, for the most part, it is
Speaker 1: because of self inflicted wounds. Yes, that this team suffers,
Speaker 1: and that's what is so maddening to be seeing those
Speaker 1: self inflicted wounds at this time of the year. Given
Speaker 1: the benefit of the doubt, if they can come out
Speaker 1: and beat the likes of the Canes and the Lightning, Okay,
Speaker 1: then I might change my viewpoints and my level of concern.
Speaker 1: I think they can if they play sixty minutes. There's
Speaker 1: no reason in my mind that they couldn't.
Speaker 3: I may have had those doubts at the start of
Speaker 3: the season where I genuinely and I said on the podcast,
Speaker 3: I don't think this team is talented enough.
Speaker 1: They've clearly learned how to get the most talent out
Speaker 1: of themselves through this system. It works for them, but
Speaker 1: they have to play the whole time. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not an easy system. We have seen it.
Speaker 3: It requires a good deal. Are smart right for full
Speaker 3: sixty minutes? Intense smart exactly minutes. If they're not awake
Speaker 3: and they're not paying attention, then they kind of rely
Speaker 3: on old habits. Well, I think to some degree they
Speaker 3: let opposing teens take them out of their game, and
Speaker 3: sometimes they can't get themselves back into their game.
Speaker 1: And I don't know why that afference. I think this
Speaker 1: is why sometimes we see the transition from a shitty
Speaker 1: first period or a really good first period to their
Speaker 1: second period. Wall was and it's like, Okay, well, you
Speaker 1: guys figured it out in this period. Why the hell
Speaker 1: could you do this during the other periods before you
Speaker 1: fell behind in a game?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 1: Yea or now either someone's got to help poor Morgan Geeki.
Speaker 3: I feel so bad for him because watching him in
Speaker 3: the Philadelphia game, his degree of frustration, the number of
Speaker 3: times he retaped this, I mean, it's palpable, how frustrated.
Speaker 1: He is, so desperate to try anything to get yourself going.
Speaker 1: I feel so bad for him.
Speaker 3: I have been hesitant to do this because he was
Speaker 3: on such fire at the start of the season, and
Speaker 3: I credited him for carrying a lot of the offensive
Speaker 3: load to start the season.
Speaker 1: He still is the number one goal scorer, I know,
Speaker 1: but I do have.
Speaker 3: I did put him in the penalty box now because
Speaker 3: nineteen games played since the beginning of March, nineteen games
Speaker 3: one goal.
Speaker 1: I mean necess for only eight points. Here's the thing.
Speaker 1: We literally just talked about this earlier. Give it players
Speaker 1: taking a break right, because.
Speaker 3: The mental health side of the game, I think is
Speaker 3: not considered in the same way that some other kind
Speaker 3: of injury could.
Speaker 1: He is so snake bitten he is.
Speaker 3: I don't think it would be the worst thing for
Speaker 3: him to have a night off, not as a punishment
Speaker 3: scratch right. He got that under Montgomery before he kind
Speaker 3: of finally figured out the game. But sometimes you just
Speaker 3: have to tell someone like I think you just gotta
Speaker 3: just like sit one out, just take a step back,
Speaker 3: because you're too You're two in your head, you're two
Speaker 3: in it, and you maybe can't see how to fix
Speaker 3: what's going on because you're just so in it. I
Speaker 3: don't know, but I've been holding off and holding off.
Speaker 3: But I'm like, we need him, and he probably knows
Speaker 3: that better than anybody else. She knows that better than
Speaker 3: anybody else does. But like fair is fair, You're in
Speaker 3: the box, Morgan, and I might stay there until you
Speaker 3: finally PLoP one in. Unfortunately, I also have the five
Speaker 3: word five scoring and even all scoring quite frank, any
Speaker 3: and all scoring, Yeah, needs to be more scoring. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I would agree that discipline situation will stick it in fractions.
Speaker 3: That kind of lazy play just pisses me off. I
Speaker 3: don't want to see that. I'm also throwing Mason lower
Speaker 3: back into the box. I feel a little bit bad
Speaker 3: for him in the sense that man, when he screws up,
Speaker 3: it's bad, right, Like everybody makes mistakes, obviously, but it
Speaker 3: just seems like.
Speaker 1: His fumbleable noticeable and really egregious.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, my fear, my fear because I might have
Speaker 1: PTSD from this too. But when Matt Grizzlik was a
Speaker 1: regular member of the defensive corps and we would get
Speaker 1: into the playoffs, Yeah, his side of the ice was
Speaker 1: targeted on a regular, recurrent basis, And I fear that
Speaker 1: the same thing will happen when the Ruins and it's
Speaker 1: going to exploit Mason will I The thought did cross
Speaker 1: my mind as I was watching the Philadelphia game. I
Speaker 1: think it was that game. I wouldn't be surprised if
Speaker 1: they deal him this summer. No, I wouldn't be shocked either.
Speaker 3: I agree with you, and it sounds like you're giving
Speaker 3: up on a young player that clearly has for a defenseman,
Speaker 3: clearly has good defensive skills.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but you're a defenseman. You've got to display the
Speaker 1: defensive skills on a more consistent, solid basis as well.
Speaker 1: So is that bear on bear that we want you
Speaker 1: to be the whole package?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 3: Sorry, So that's who's in the box for me as well.
Speaker 3: And I think we're both on the same page in
Speaker 3: terms of who's getting the stick tabs. It's basically our
Speaker 3: goaltenders and then the second line.
Speaker 1: That's it. They're the only ones who are excusing novel
Speaker 1: zaka Victor Rodardson and Casey Millstatt. Right now, there be
Speaker 1: goose eggs in these last three games potentially, So I
Speaker 1: mean r and we had a hattie for crying out.
Speaker 1: Kudos to them. I do hope they extend him in
Speaker 1: the off season, but we'll have those conversations when we
Speaker 1: have more tang. Right now, we just need to get
Speaker 1: this team into the playoffs, not limping in firing on
Speaker 1: mostly all cylinders. You don't want to see your team
Speaker 1: lumping into the playoffs. With that said, I want to
Speaker 1: thank our audience for listening. Please make sure to like
Speaker 1: and subscribe for more content, and please feel free to
Speaker 1: leave a rating and a review. So that other Bruins
Speaker 1: fans can find us.
Speaker 3: You can also support our podcast by joining our Patreon
Speaker 3: or following us on our socials at Tape to Tape
Speaker 3: mk and on substack at Tape to Tape mk dot
Speaker 3: substack dot com.
Speaker 1: So with that being said, I will chat with you
Speaker 1: all when I return from my drip. In the meantime,
Speaker 1: I'll hand it off to my awesome co host who's
Speaker 1: going to carry the load while I'm gone. She gets
Speaker 1: the final word, go Be's, go Be's
Podbean