Boston Bruins Playoff Race Tightens | Bruins News | Ep. 136
Liner notes
🎙️ The Boston Bruins playoff race is heating up, and this Bruins game recap dives deep into the action. We analyze key performances from Jeremy Swayman, Pavel Zacha, and Charlie McAvoy, alongside the latest Bruins news that could impact their postseason push. Stay tuned for insightful hockey analysis on power play struggles and defensive lapses as we explore what the Bruins need to fix to remain competitive.This episode offers comprehensive Boston hockey updates, Bruins player analysis, and insider chatter about the Bruins lineup changes and strategies. Whether you're a devoted Bruins fan or a general NHL hockey enthusiast, our detailed breakdowns keep you informed and engaged with everything happening in the Bruins' world.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 3: I need something to do.
Speaker 2: I'll jack shut it out of trouble bocking this same.
Speaker 1: Today, here's a chance pop fa right down with goalie Scars.
Speaker 4: Oh my one a.
Speaker 2: Move by the rookie too.
Speaker 3: On one plaster not moving in set.
Speaker 1: On his own oil dances in podcast at home right
Speaker 1: away corner paster Chester. What is that for?
Speaker 2: Most?
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruins Tape to tape.
Speaker 1: I'm your host today, Caroline with a K and hoy
Speaker 1: do we have a lot to talk, so let's just
Speaker 1: get right into it and welcome in my fabulous co
Speaker 1: host Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 2: Hello Maria, Hello Caroline. Even though it's cloudy, it's a
Speaker 2: sunny day in Bruins Nation.
Speaker 1: It is it is, and it's been quite the week,
Speaker 1: not just for the Boston Bruins, but literally every team
Speaker 1: in the East. It's been a nail bier And I
Speaker 1: almost want to say that this year, hopefully I'm not
Speaker 1: cursing it, but this year it's not a doodle bug race.
Speaker 1: In fact, I feel like it's very different from past
Speaker 1: years because those teams that are fighting for a playoff spot,
Speaker 1: every single one of them people had opinions on before
Speaker 1: the start of the season and at the start of
Speaker 1: the season, and I would argue that every single one
Speaker 1: of those teams fighting for a spot has something to prove,
Speaker 1: whether it's Columbus or Ottawa, Detroit at Boston, Pittsburgh, all
Speaker 1: of these teams that are really down to the wire.
Speaker 1: It does not feel like a doodle bug race at all.
Speaker 2: No, And if we remember correctly and we go back
Speaker 2: to the preseason predictions that were on NHL Network, there
Speaker 2: were hardly any writers even had the Boston Ruins in
Speaker 2: playoff contention. And you know, I myself had predicted early
Speaker 2: on that I thought they would be competitive, but I
Speaker 2: didn't think they would make the playoffs. And I am
Speaker 2: fine to be proven wrong. I will be happy to
Speaker 2: be proven wrong. But things are getting a little too
Speaker 2: close for comfort.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 2: There is very very limited, if no margin for era
Speaker 2: with about what eight nine games for most.
Speaker 1: Teams luck in this season, yes, exactly, And going into
Speaker 1: the week, all of those teams that I mentioned had
Speaker 1: the same number of games played.
Speaker 3: Right now, it's a little uneven. Again.
Speaker 1: We've got we'll set the table to showcase what we're
Speaker 1: going to be discussing later which is the playoff picture
Speaker 1: at hand. But you've got Boston and Columbus with seventy
Speaker 1: four games played, but you've got Montreal with seventy three,
Speaker 1: Ottawa and Detroit also with seventy three games played, and
Speaker 1: all of these teams are well within the margin of
Speaker 1: error you have. And actually even Philadelphia has kind of
Speaker 1: snuck up out of nowhere with also eighty six points
Speaker 1: for them, Detroit and Ottawa, and you've got eighty eight
Speaker 1: points for Columbus although they are fighting potentially for that
Speaker 1: third spot in the metro, so they're currently tied in
Speaker 1: points with Pittsburgh, although tiebreaker being in favor of Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: and then Montreal with ninety four points, so it is
Speaker 1: absurdly tight. It is very stressful to be watching all
Speaker 1: of these games as a Bruins fan, but it is
Speaker 1: a pretty fantastic.
Speaker 2: But all the Bruins can do is focus on their
Speaker 2: own game and get points, points, points, points exactly.
Speaker 1: Before we talk a little bit more about that big picture,
Speaker 1: let's talk about a little bit of news semi around
Speaker 1: the rink, because again we're going to be really focusing
Speaker 1: on this playoff picture, but the biggest news for the
Speaker 1: Boston Bruins. Outside of Boston is the fact that James
Speaker 1: Hagens has signed his ATO and is currently in Providence.
Speaker 1: He's played a few games and he seems to be
Speaker 1: settling in nicely. He's had his first goal, he's had
Speaker 1: a few assists. It seems like he's also really starting
Speaker 1: to adjust to the pace of play. Obviously, D one
Speaker 1: hockey is fast hockey, but the AHL is even faster
Speaker 1: and the NHL is even faster than that, and so
Speaker 1: it was a great idea, of course to have him
Speaker 1: get started in Providence as soon as possible. But knowing
Speaker 1: and understanding and the fact that Bruins' playoff picture could
Speaker 1: come down to the final games, do we see him
Speaker 1: for a game?
Speaker 2: I don't think it's wise. I don't think it's wise
Speaker 2: to do so. You are battling for your playoff positioning.
Speaker 2: You have got guys right now that have been there
Speaker 2: throughout the course of the battle. With his playoff positioning,
Speaker 2: I'm not sure I see the benefit to James Higgins
Speaker 2: right now in his development. I could be wrong, but
Speaker 2: you know, the question is who do you pull out
Speaker 2: of the lineup to do so? And let's not forget
Speaker 2: that regular season games are one level and playoffs are
Speaker 2: a whole other level. And I know there's been a
Speaker 2: lot of conversation about you know, well, you know, they
Speaker 2: did it with Charlie McAvoy, and they did it with
Speaker 2: Tory krug and you know, I know people are excited
Speaker 2: I did about seeing what this young man can do
Speaker 2: for the future of Boston Bruins. I'm just not sure
Speaker 2: that it needs to happen right now.
Speaker 3: But yeah, well, and I think you make a really
Speaker 3: good point in that. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Sure, Charlie McAvoy, Tory Kruge, they came in during the
Speaker 1: playoffs and at the very end. But there were two
Speaker 1: very big differences, one being Charlie McAvoy was and is a.
Speaker 3: Completely different beast of a player.
Speaker 1: Higgins is obviously an excellent player, seventh overall pick, but
Speaker 1: I feel like where Chuck he was at a similar
Speaker 1: point in his career. First of all, McAvoy was older,
Speaker 1: I believe he was twenty, and he was much more ready.
Speaker 3: And also the Bruins playoff picture was very different.
Speaker 1: They were already, if not already in the playoffs. I
Speaker 1: can't remember the timing exactly, but it was already a
Speaker 1: done deal in terms of what the playoffs were gonna be,
Speaker 1: and that is not the case today.
Speaker 2: No, And you know what if if the Bruins end
Speaker 2: up with that ex by their their name, that says
Speaker 2: they've clinched and you've got a couple of games left,
Speaker 2: all right, fine, yeah, right, bring them up? What do
Speaker 2: you you know? Bring them up and see, give them
Speaker 2: a taste, give them a right, give them a little
Speaker 2: bit of a flavor. But I just think it's it's
Speaker 2: a risky move. I agree, speaking of I think possibly
Speaker 2: risky moves before the playoffs. The other big piece of
Speaker 2: news around the rink is the.
Speaker 4: Fact that Bruce Cassidy is our shit as the head
Speaker 4: coach of the Vegas Golden Knights, replaced by John Tortorella, who.
Speaker 1: I had to check this because it felt weird. Tortorella
Speaker 1: was let go as the Flyers head coach almost exactly
Speaker 1: to the day, a year ago from his announcement. It
Speaker 1: was like a year and two days, and we don't
Speaker 1: have any additional information.
Speaker 3: Nothing has come out. However, this is weird.
Speaker 1: This is kind of suspicious because it's a time of
Speaker 1: year that you really don't make a ton of changes.
Speaker 1: And it's a strange time to make a coaching change,
Speaker 1: regardless if you are in the playoffs or out of
Speaker 1: the playoff picture.
Speaker 3: So I believe for Tortorella when.
Speaker 1: He was fired as the Philadelphia head coach, the playoff
Speaker 1: picture was there is no playoffs for this team, and
Speaker 1: so typically you just let them finish it out and
Speaker 1: then you part ways when the season is over. The
Speaker 1: Vegas Golden Knights are in a playoff position. They've not
Speaker 1: played very well in the last ten to fifteen games. However,
Speaker 1: because they are blessed to be in that ridiculous Pacific Division,
Speaker 1: it seems like you don't have to be very good
Speaker 1: to be in a prime spot. And yet, with two
Speaker 1: weeks to go in the regular season, the Vegas Golden
Speaker 1: Knights decide he's out towards is in, And you've got
Speaker 1: a team that has a brand new.
Speaker 3: Coach just before the playoffs.
Speaker 1: I can't imagine how that is a good idea at all.
Speaker 1: So this is my speculation because of the timing and
Speaker 1: the weirdness and the potential for disruption for the players.
Speaker 1: Something was not good there. Something must have happened. You
Speaker 1: don't just fire a coach two weeks before the playoffs,
Speaker 1: when the players have been playing his system. It's a
Speaker 1: huge change, and to bring in Tortorella, to me, signals
Speaker 1: that ownership or whoever's making the decisions, has decided that
Speaker 1: significant change needs to be brought in because John Tortorella
Speaker 1: has earned the reputation, for good or for bad, as
Speaker 1: being the coach you bring in when you need to
Speaker 1: fix things and you need a serious guy to do it.
Speaker 1: It's like boot camp fixing, not the we're gonna, you know,
Speaker 1: hold hands in kumbaya and build a team to fix it.
Speaker 1: He comes in to fix really broken teams.
Speaker 3: What's your take?
Speaker 2: So I too think it's an odd timing for this
Speaker 2: to happen with eight games left in the season. It
Speaker 2: has happened before. I think Larry Robinson way back took
Speaker 2: over as interim head coach of the New Jersey Devils
Speaker 2: with eight games remaining, and the Devils ended up winning
Speaker 2: the Stanley Cup that year. Next. We all know Bruce
Speaker 2: Caps City quite well here, and we know that Bruce
Speaker 2: Cassidy's ways can be a bit harsh, yes, And we
Speaker 2: also know that his messaging after a period of time
Speaker 2: can sometimes fall on deaf fears or become very old.
Speaker 2: Now if perhaps players I heard a little snippet of
Speaker 2: what Elliott Friedman said earlier about this, and it seems
Speaker 2: that players had gone to management and ownership earlier on
Speaker 2: and they've ACKed Bruce. Now whether or not that message
Speaker 2: from players grew even louder this time around. But they're
Speaker 2: not bringing in a guy who's any softer or fuzzier
Speaker 2: then no, But my understanding. I also understand though too,
Speaker 2: that you know, Tortorella was part of the USA men's
Speaker 2: hockey team coaching staff, and by all accounts, guys like
Speaker 2: playing for Twrdorella. He can be he can be rough
Speaker 2: and tough, but nine percent of the time he has
Speaker 2: his players backs. Yeah, and Vegas has been getting also
Speaker 2: shitty goaltending. Now, I don't know is that a coaching
Speaker 2: issue or whatever, but you know this is this is
Speaker 2: a Golden Knights organization who discards players and coaches like
Speaker 2: you know, we take out our trash yep. So you know,
Speaker 2: as shocking as it is not shocking, right, And you know,
Speaker 2: maybe they felt that they needed to do this because
Speaker 2: maybe they feel that they are a better team than
Speaker 2: what they are showing in that brutal Pacific Division. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and they wanted to give themselves a better opportunity at
Speaker 2: making a run for a Stanley Cup. I don't know,
Speaker 2: but it did seem to like come out of virtually nowhere.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you've mentioned and it's a well known thing
Speaker 1: where like you said, Vegas has a tendency to I
Speaker 1: don't throw away players have no qualms about turning their back.
Speaker 1: I even let's say that there was there was nothing sure,
Speaker 1: it's entirely possible that there was no incident or whatever happened.
Speaker 1: It's then a really crappy thing to do as an
Speaker 1: organization to dump a coach at this point for a
Speaker 1: multitude of reasons. One that coach has given you almost
Speaker 1: the entire season. You're not going to get you know,
Speaker 1: you're not going to give them the courtesy to finish
Speaker 1: it out. If the writing's on the wall, writing's on
Speaker 1: the wall, fine.
Speaker 2: But if the players have tuned them out, right, If
Speaker 2: players have tuned them out, and you're in this brutal
Speaker 2: of a division and on paper you look good, right, right,
Speaker 2: but you're not playing up to that level of that potential,
Speaker 2: then what is the organization seems supposed to throw the
Speaker 2: season away. And if you got and if you have
Speaker 2: players pitching, you know, leaders on the team. If I'm
Speaker 2: not saying that they somewhat happened here in Boston with Bruce,
Speaker 2: which you know, it's like you say to you saw Bruce,
Speaker 2: maybe you want to change a style a little bit.
Speaker 1: You know, I mean, look what happened in Boston. He
Speaker 1: lost the room. That happens to every coach eventually, right,
Speaker 1: the messaging just becomes stale. But I think it's kind
Speaker 1: of also really crappy on the part of Vegas that
Speaker 1: if that's what it was, if there was otherwise no
Speaker 1: other incident, You've now also made people pause around Cassidy.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying that he's going to have a
Speaker 1: harder time finding a job, but it might not be
Speaker 1: as easy because people will want to say, well, what
Speaker 1: happened happened in a way that's a little bit more
Speaker 1: suspicious than you know, the natural parting of ways. When
Speaker 1: the season ends, right, the timing is just bad, you know, odd, Yeah,
Speaker 1: for a team that's in in you know, and and
Speaker 1: again maybe management and ownership the year feels that they've
Speaker 1: been underachieving and now you do have leaders and senior
Speaker 1: players on the team saying he's just you can't with
Speaker 1: him anymore. You know, you just can't and you can't
Speaker 1: just allow your season to be very we believed flushed
Speaker 1: down the toilets. Yeah, agreed. So we will find out more,
Speaker 1: I'm sure in the coming days.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I'm sure there'll be more tea that comes out.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's one a statement on behalf of the Vegas
Speaker 1: Golden Knights to bring in someone like John Tortorella. He
Speaker 1: is not some sort of warm body placeholder at all.
Speaker 1: He comes in, He's coming to work. Keep an eye
Speaker 1: a little on that should make for some interesting playoff
Speaker 1: hockey out west. But let's shift back over to the
Speaker 1: Bruins and this playoff race and the insane week that
Speaker 1: we experienced. It was the last four games of microcosm
Speaker 1: of what this entire season has been. We had a
Speaker 1: disastrous game against the Toronto Maple Leafs first, and luckily
Speaker 1: for us, unlike how we've seen during this particular season,
Speaker 1: there wasn't some sort of multi game skid to follow
Speaker 1: said disastrous game. However, it was still a little bit
Speaker 1: of a roller coaster from that point on. So let's
Speaker 1: talk really briefly about the Toronto game, because I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, we don't want to necessarily rehash some of
Speaker 1: it in the sense that we've been here before. They
Speaker 1: didn't show up. They were just an embarrassing product out
Speaker 1: on the ice. Their power play who continues to be
Speaker 1: just deplorable. But Maria, you'd made a comment to me
Speaker 1: before we started recording today about how this horrible game
Speaker 1: actually laid the foundation for what we saw later in
Speaker 1: the week.
Speaker 3: Explain, So, when.
Speaker 2: You play in the manner in which you play against
Speaker 2: the Toronto Maple Leafs, where you're just bad in every
Speaker 2: phase of the game, absolutely bad. And you know, let's
Speaker 2: start with the surprising choice of goaltenders for this game,
Speaker 2: where you know, Jeremy Swayman started this game and we
Speaker 2: were all guessing that it would have been the opposite,
Speaker 2: because then they had a game the very next night
Speaker 2: in Buffalo which we all said, listen, this is going
Speaker 2: to be a statement game for the Sabers. Corpse is
Speaker 2: going to play against the Leaves, and Swayman will play
Speaker 2: against the Sabers blah blah blah. But the manner in
Speaker 2: which the Bruins played that game, to me, made it
Speaker 2: seem almost as if two things. They were either looking
Speaker 2: their head to the Sabers game and or to some
Speaker 2: degree disrespecting their opponent on Tuesday night against the Leaps,
Speaker 2: both very I think. I think it's im plausible to
Speaker 2: some degree. But then players are calling themselves out m
Speaker 2: HM and their coach, who I think they obviously clearly
Speaker 2: clearly respect, yes, clearly listen to, clearly want to play for,
Speaker 2: follows them all out and basically says everybody was bad
Speaker 2: tonight except for Jeremy Swinman, and he was absolutely right
Speaker 2: to do that. Now, that could have gone again. I
Speaker 2: hate to compare and contrast, but if this was last season,
Speaker 2: that would have been a sliding down the hill so
Speaker 2: fast that you wouldn't be able to stop it.
Speaker 1: If it were December, that's exactly what would have happened,
Speaker 1: or even a little bit in January. We're not that
Speaker 1: far removed, No, we're not that far removed to me.
Speaker 2: To me, that's to see the way that they bounced
Speaker 2: back in the game against Buffalo Folk volumes about the
Speaker 2: focus and the understanding of what needs to be done
Speaker 2: to get yourselves.
Speaker 3: Into the playoffs. Yes, yeah, one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: I think You're absolutely right in that they came off
Speaker 1: a series of wins prior to this Toronto game where
Speaker 1: they were showcasing all the best things about this Boston
Speaker 1: Bruins team, and to play against the Leafs and be
Speaker 1: so badly embarrassed. I'm glad it happened to some degree
Speaker 1: because it was the wake up call that they needed
Speaker 1: to survive the rest of this particular week and perhaps
Speaker 1: give them something to go after, to dig down for,
Speaker 1: because playing against Buffalo and Minnesota and Columbus really really
Speaker 1: tested them. This team, unlike last year, has an identity. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it means they have to grind it out. That is
Speaker 1: their identity.
Speaker 2: No, no, that is their idea. And they do display resiliency, yes,
Speaker 2: and more often than not display a no quit demeanor. Yes.
Speaker 3: Yes.
Speaker 1: However, the concern that I have with that is they
Speaker 1: don't make anything easy. Nothing is easy, nothing is effortless.
Speaker 1: Everything requires every ounce of what you have in the tank.
Speaker 2: And they and they do make things. They're the creators
Speaker 2: of their own wounds.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah.
Speaker 2: For example, that Columbus game, the Columbus game just on Sunday,
Speaker 2: in the first period, they were awful. The only the
Speaker 2: only player who was ready to play the first period
Speaker 2: of that hockey game against the Blue Jackets was Jeremy Swayman. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Two turnovers in the first period directly led to two
Speaker 2: goals for the Columbus Blue Jackets.
Speaker 1: Yes, well, I love to see that resilience and especially
Speaker 1: just the grind it out, not giving it up, not
Speaker 1: giving up.
Speaker 3: How sustainable is that? Truly? It is exhausting as a fan.
Speaker 1: I can't even imagine how it is as a as
Speaker 1: a player. You know, we've we've seen other games, you
Speaker 1: and I we watch other games on TV and whatnot.
Speaker 1: And there are other teams out there that are just
Speaker 1: completely effortless that they are these machines, right, think Colorado,
Speaker 1: and you've got the Boston Bruins coming into Buffalo or Columbus,
Speaker 1: and both of those teams, while Buffalo is fairly comfortable
Speaker 1: in their position in terms of the playoffs, both teams
Speaker 1: I believe had played did they play, They also played
Speaker 1: the night before and had recently I believe, come off
Speaker 1: of losses. So the Boston is coming in and they
Speaker 1: are playing against teams that are also hungry for wins. Yes, Buffalo,
Speaker 1: like I said, Buffalo is in a much better position
Speaker 1: than Boston, but I feel like they still have a
Speaker 1: what I would call a good chip on their shoulder,
Speaker 1: like we've got a lot to prove, right, We're not
Speaker 1: gonna slide back into how things are, like what you
Speaker 1: see is for real, and so you know they're going
Speaker 1: in with the right kind of attitude saying that's a win.
Speaker 1: We have to get Columbus. They're fighting for a spot now.
Speaker 1: Granted they are much closer to a third place spot
Speaker 1: in their division than Boston is, but they'd come.
Speaker 3: Off of a couple of losses.
Speaker 1: And not to skip too far ahead about Columbus, but
Speaker 1: that one was kind of going into that game that
Speaker 1: was a one hundred percent must win game, not just
Speaker 1: because of how much closer, of course we're getting to
Speaker 1: the end of the season, but the fact that we
Speaker 1: got to play them again. We have one more game
Speaker 1: against them, and we're potentially looking at a wild card
Speaker 1: spot fighting for it with them. I didn't know until
Speaker 1: yesterday that the Columbus Blue Jackets have the third best
Speaker 1: goal differential in the first period with a plus twenty one.
Speaker 2: But they also have one of the worst in the
Speaker 2: third period.
Speaker 1: I know well, but still the other two teams being
Speaker 1: Colorado and Carolina, and sure enough we saw exactly why. However,
Speaker 1: part of that was, of course, because the Boston Bruins
Speaker 1: did not show up on time to this game, and
Speaker 1: they were exceptionally lucky that they were able to get
Speaker 1: those lost minutes back. Now, the game against Buffalo also
Speaker 1: started behind, were able to force it into a pretty
Speaker 1: quick overtime. Do you see a difference in those two
Speaker 1: games in that game, the Buffalo game versus the Columbus game.
Speaker 2: Well, the difference is is the Bruins have a tendency
Speaker 2: this season to sometimes let the other team dictate the
Speaker 2: style of But okay, you know at this point of
Speaker 2: the season how you need to play, how the coaching
Speaker 2: staff has coached you to and it's hard. It's really hard, right,
Speaker 2: because you have to play both ends of the ice
Speaker 2: with this style that Marco has implemented. There is no
Speaker 2: if anta butts about it. You have to frig and
Speaker 2: play both ends of the ice. And if you're not
Speaker 2: willing to do that, it's going to be along sixty minutes.
Speaker 2: And so, for whatever reason, for whatever reason, when the
Speaker 2: Bruins hit the ice on Sunday night against the Blue Jackets,
Speaker 2: they allowed Columbus to run rough shot over them. And
Speaker 2: it wasn't until very very late in that first period
Speaker 2: where Tanner, Jano and Mark Castilek had a couple of
Speaker 2: heavyweight bouts saying, Okay, you think you guys are going
Speaker 2: to do this all night, we have news for you.
Speaker 2: This is what's going to happen if you think you're
Speaker 2: going to keep playing this way. Not only was it
Speaker 2: a message to the Blue Jackets, it was also a
Speaker 2: message to their teammates, right, wake up, wake the bleep up.
Speaker 2: Uninspiring hockey in that game that first period was like,
Speaker 2: are you kidding me? I can't watch this, I can't
Speaker 2: can't watch this. Yeah, yeah, And then you start thinking about,
Speaker 2: oh my god, here it comes the Monday morning quarterbacking
Speaker 2: about swaymen playing back to back games and the criticism
Speaker 2: with regard to that, and and you know my thought
Speaker 2: on that, right, you got to be the guy, has
Speaker 2: to be the guy. He has to bear the brunt
Speaker 2: of the workload for likely the remaining portion of the season,
Speaker 2: and if they get into the playoffs, dude, then that
Speaker 2: is yours until you say otherwise.
Speaker 1: So and I want to say, I mean, I'm sure
Speaker 1: the I'm sure the players know these things. I want
Speaker 1: to say that prior to Swayman's back to back start,
Speaker 1: which I had a feeling was coming because of how
Speaker 1: good he's played, I knew it was coming. I wasn't
Speaker 1: sure if it was a good idea, but I knew
Speaker 1: it was coming. I also think he is incredibly competitive,
Speaker 1: and I want to say I could be totally making
Speaker 1: this up that this is the only other goalie who's
Speaker 1: done this, but I know he has done this. I
Speaker 1: believe I heard that there's only one other goaltender who
Speaker 1: has played in back to back games this season in
Speaker 1: this way, and it was Soroken. And he's no nobody
Speaker 1: goaltender either. So I wouldn't be surprised if there is
Speaker 1: also a motivation for Jeremy Swayman to be not just
Speaker 1: the guy in Boston, but to be a legitimate guy
Speaker 1: across the league. I think there's still plenty of people
Speaker 1: who don't know who he is, or he has said
Speaker 1: it himself. He has set it himself that he wanted
Speaker 1: to be the guy. Now you're putting your money where
Speaker 1: your mouth is, and I know people are saying, you know,
Speaker 1: I've seen it on my social media feed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I want to see what he does in
Speaker 2: the playoffs.
Speaker 3: Look all right, Well, one step at a time.
Speaker 2: When you get into the playoffs, it's because he helped
Speaker 2: get you into the playoffs, all right? Can we just
Speaker 2: like it? Well?
Speaker 1: And and we had this whole conversation in our discord group,
Speaker 1: which again, if you haven't joined in, you should totally
Speaker 1: stop in for game day chats. But after that first
Speaker 1: period we were discussing the fact that he was great,
Speaker 1: the team in front of him.
Speaker 3: Was garbage and garbage.
Speaker 1: Are we looking at a situation where we wasted a
Speaker 1: Did we waste a good Swayman start?
Speaker 3: Start?
Speaker 2: Would have been a very fair question if the results
Speaker 2: were different. But I have to say I didn't see
Speaker 2: that come back coming. No, And I had said in
Speaker 2: the discord, just we just need a goal, We need one.
Speaker 2: They needed one goal, right because they came out the
Speaker 2: Bruins came out hot in that second period. They were
Speaker 2: a totally different team from the first period to the
Speaker 2: second period. And I think Columbus was a little bit
Speaker 2: shell shocked.
Speaker 1: Yes, because they Bruins have been bad in the second period, right, No, yeah, no, No,
Speaker 1: it's not a small sample size.
Speaker 2: But generally they are bad in the second period, so
Speaker 2: their hard work was rewarded and the power play actually
Speaker 2: came through in a really big way against Columbus. And
Speaker 2: I have to say that was probably that game against
Speaker 2: Columbus on Sunday night was probably my favorite game of
Speaker 2: the year to watch. I felt like it was a
Speaker 2: playoff game, which.
Speaker 1: Is funny because I felt that the game against Minnesota
Speaker 1: was actually one of my favorite games of the season
Speaker 1: because I thought it was It was a lot of fun,
Speaker 1: and part of me wonders if Boston's slow start, non
Speaker 1: start in the first period against Columbus was again another
Speaker 1: situation where they came off of what I would call
Speaker 1: one of their more effortless wins against a good team
Speaker 1: in the Minnesota Wild. You know that game, You look
Speaker 1: at it on paper and you think, well, Minnesota is
Speaker 1: the better team. They have the more depth, they've got
Speaker 1: Quinn Hughes that they have more, they've got spectacular goaltending,
Speaker 1: and Boston just owned that game for fifty minutes of
Speaker 1: effortless ownership on their part. And you know, they got
Speaker 1: a little squishy for a stretch and the third, but
Speaker 1: on the whole, one of the most fun games that
Speaker 1: I've seen Boston play all season, and that's a little
Speaker 1: bit of my concern. Now, I'm thinking, are we seeing
Speaker 1: this kind of a pattern where Boston has a great game,
Speaker 1: a fun game, high energy game, an energizing game, and
Speaker 1: then they go into their next game that is a
Speaker 1: very much so must win, not just for point collecting
Speaker 1: like the Minnesota game was, but because of a legitimate
Speaker 1: threat on their position in the playoff structure. And then
Speaker 1: they go and they you know, they don't start on time. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: unlike with the Toronto game, they woke up and did
Speaker 1: not allow that to go on. So do we are
Speaker 1: we worried that this is something that could we could
Speaker 1: be seeing again, where Okay, what's this next game going
Speaker 1: to look like? Because they were able to eke it out,
Speaker 1: so what, they're proud of themselves, and they forget to
Speaker 1: play when they play against Dallas.
Speaker 3: I don't know, are you worried?
Speaker 2: I'm worried, yes, because you know, instances like that can
Speaker 2: still rear their ugly head, but they can ill afford
Speaker 2: to have regular recurring instances of periods like that period
Speaker 2: against Columbus because you know, I know you've heard me
Speaker 2: say this before you have to work all that much
Speaker 2: more harder to come from behind. It takes so much
Speaker 2: more effort and energy to play from behind, and if
Speaker 2: you don't start on time, especially in the playoffs, it
Speaker 2: can cost you. It can cost you a series. And
Speaker 2: there's just no other way to say it. So my
Speaker 2: hope is that these are, you know, buckets of cold
Speaker 2: water that get slapped in their faces. It seems to
Speaker 2: me they are enough leaders in that room that have
Speaker 2: the voice to be able to say we're not playing
Speaker 2: like this, We are not going to play like shit
Speaker 2: again for an entire game.
Speaker 3: Yeah, okay, so.
Speaker 2: That makes me feel a little bit more confident about
Speaker 2: the resolve of this this group of Ruins players.
Speaker 1: Well, let me hear your thoughts on your favorite least
Speaker 1: favorite player, because I feel like you went through all
Speaker 1: the emotions yesterday. Ampas lynn Holm.
Speaker 2: Huh, he's driving me bonkers this season.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't understand.
Speaker 2: You know. We see snippets of good play and then
Speaker 2: I see snippets of did you really just turn the
Speaker 2: puck over like that? Did you really just get another
Speaker 2: stick in fraction? And so I don't know if he's
Speaker 2: in his own head at this point but he certainly
Speaker 2: hasn't been the same consistent player since he came back
Speaker 2: from his injury. So you know again now I'd rather
Speaker 2: see him on power Play Unit number two than Mason Lorik,
Speaker 2: thank you very much. Yes, but I also said in
Speaker 2: our discord, I don't understand what the aversion is to
Speaker 2: given Nikita Zadora a shot on that second power Play unit.
Speaker 2: The guy can skate, he's strong on the puck ferry.
Speaker 2: He's got a good hard shot. What have you got
Speaker 2: to lose at this moment in time.
Speaker 3: I don't know. I can't keep I can't keep.
Speaker 2: Watching either lynd Holm or Laura and sometimes Macaboy giving
Speaker 2: up oddman rushes when you're on a freaking power play, Right,
Speaker 2: I'm okay with Chuck.
Speaker 3: He's staying on the power Play because.
Speaker 2: He's he's in beast mode and we will talk about
Speaker 2: his stats in a little bit. He's giving that second unit. Now,
Speaker 2: you have other options, You have other options, and I
Speaker 2: don't understand, right, what have you got to lose?
Speaker 3: I don't know. I said this exactly last night.
Speaker 1: I don't really want to see Hampus on the power
Speaker 1: Play two unit.
Speaker 2: Yes, you did, you did, really don't. And my response
Speaker 2: was limited options. They do have limited options in that regard,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't mean we have options, right, It doesn't
Speaker 2: mean that you have no options, which is why. And
Speaker 2: I said this, I don't know when I even said
Speaker 2: it to the guys on Morning Brew and Jeffy was like,
Speaker 2: I know, I agree with you. That's this is when
Speaker 2: the power play struggles were like it was bad, it
Speaker 2: was really really bad. Yeah, And I know they don't
Speaker 2: have a lot of practice time because of the schedule
Speaker 2: that they've been having. Maybe that's part of the concern that,
Speaker 2: you know, they don't have time to work someone else
Speaker 2: in these guys that have already been worked in to
Speaker 2: that second power play unit.
Speaker 1: But my biggest issue with hampuslim Home quarterbacking the power
Speaker 1: Play unit has been his He's been very weak on
Speaker 1: the lately and he's not carrying the puck in like
Speaker 1: he used to.
Speaker 2: Something is awry because he is a very fluid skater,
Speaker 2: very fluid skater, and he's got decent hands, yes, but
Speaker 2: he's not doing that since he came back from his injury.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he can't seem to not either, he can't seem
Speaker 1: to get it in, get it in deep. His passes
Speaker 1: are being intercepted. He's making bad decisions about where to
Speaker 1: send that puck and those get intercepted, and you see
Speaker 1: these shorthanded chances by the other team. I would be
Speaker 1: curious just to see zadorof because of how strong he
Speaker 1: is on the puck. But besides that, I mean, it
Speaker 1: seems like everybody else is humming along, and even even
Speaker 1: Hampus got better. He had some key, very important moments
Speaker 1: during that particular.
Speaker 2: Game right right, and he's he's been on my nerves
Speaker 2: because of the number of stick infractions. We've been kind
Speaker 2: of you know, tongue and cheeking about it. But it's
Speaker 2: been frustrating to watch, which is why I wonder if
Speaker 2: there is again something else he in his own head.
Speaker 2: And also whatever injury he had, is it lingering or
Speaker 2: has it had an impact on his skating, because he
Speaker 2: doesn't seem to be skating as fluidly into you know,
Speaker 2: the opposing end of the ice as he had been
Speaker 2: in his previous season with the Bruins.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, So let's talk about then your stick taps,
Speaker 1: because we have the same votes. This week, we had
Speaker 1: week of travel Zaka multi games. We had Jeremy Swayman
Speaker 1: playing about as good as we have ever seen him play.
Speaker 1: And we had a head coach who not only was
Speaker 1: calling players out right, but we've got a coach who
Speaker 1: was actually showing emotion on the bench. So walk me
Speaker 1: through your stick taps and what stood out for you
Speaker 1: for these folks.
Speaker 2: So let me just give you some numbers for my
Speaker 2: stick tats. Yes, in the month of March, Ruins have
Speaker 2: played fifteen games. Pavel Zaka has thirteen goals and eight
Speaker 2: assists for twenty one points. Pasta is next in line,
Speaker 2: seven goals, thirteen assists for twenty points. Victor Arvidson I
Speaker 2: love this man five goals, twelve assists, seventeen points. Charlie
Speaker 2: McAvoy a beast six points, Tennis sixteen points. Ksey Middlestat
Speaker 2: has eleven points. Even Elias Lindholm is working his way
Speaker 2: back up there again. Right. The one guy I really
Speaker 2: still feel that he's got to get his ass moving
Speaker 2: is Morgan Geeky. That line he's got points, Zaka, Ardvdson
Speaker 2: and middle stat has been killer. Absolutely, they are quickly
Speaker 2: becoming lethal weapons. They are Boston Bruins. So they all
Speaker 2: get my stick taps. And I really do hope that
Speaker 2: the Bruins reach an agreement to extend Ardwitdsen in the
Speaker 2: off season because I think this guy, this guy epitomizes
Speaker 2: being a Boston Brwin. I think he likes playing here.
Speaker 2: I like watching him play here, works his ass off.
Speaker 2: He clearly has developed a great rapport and working relationship
Speaker 2: with Pavel Zaka. I think Zaka has been rejuvenated. We've
Speaker 2: never seen him play like this before ever. This is
Speaker 2: a career waiting for right, yes and again, waiting forever.
Speaker 3: It seems coming.
Speaker 2: It's all coming at a good time, all coming at
Speaker 2: a good time. And Jeremy Swayman, he's been a workhorse
Speaker 2: and he's going to continue to need to be a workhorse.
Speaker 2: And I thought I heard some snippets on a couple
Speaker 2: of different podcasts about you know, doesn't a conversation doesn't
Speaker 2: of votes potentially for Swayman and Jack Adams votes for
Speaker 2: Marco Storm.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, well, And also in regards to Arvidson, not
Speaker 1: only is he all of the things that you said,
Speaker 1: but he also is a great ambassador for Marco's Storms
Speaker 1: system because it fits him like a glove quite frankly,
Speaker 1: and he's also a leader in that room. I guess
Speaker 1: he speaks when he needs to speak, Yes, exactly, I'm
Speaker 1: I'm loving all of those particular choices. Now, the penalty box,
Speaker 1: we didn't talk much because it irritates us to no end.
Speaker 1: Mason Laurai remind I'm now, I'm not remembering the exact game. However,
Speaker 1: he had a game that was so atrocious. I think
Speaker 1: it was Buffalo. I fully expected the coach to staple
Speaker 1: his butt to the bench.
Speaker 2: I thought he was I thought he would get a
Speaker 2: healthy scratch. Didn't. And he wasn't the only one. I mean,
Speaker 2: the Maple Leafs game was bad. I think he had
Speaker 2: some some, a greef some. It was two games. At
Speaker 2: the Maple Leafs game, he clearly was out muscled. Oh
Speaker 2: godsled on more on one occasioned And I've said this before.
Speaker 2: Needs needs to be stronger on the puck, and he
Speaker 2: needs to win up battles. And I think there was
Speaker 2: a little bit of a carryover into the Buffalo game.
Speaker 2: He wasn't the only one that was bad in that
Speaker 2: Toronto game, but unfortunately he stood out to me, maybe
Speaker 2: because I watched him with a little bit more pressure
Speaker 2: I than anyone else.
Speaker 1: On his decision making. His defensive decision making was not.
Speaker 3: Great. You know, the we heard in both.
Speaker 1: Broadcasts comments about how he has improved his defensive game,
Speaker 1: because that was a massive, massive issue in the start
Speaker 1: of the year, and he's been fine since he's been
Speaker 1: moded down to the third pairing, and so it was
Speaker 1: kind of funny that in the last in those two
Speaker 1: broadcasts it was discussed how much he's gotten better. And
Speaker 1: then he had two of the worst games that he's
Speaker 1: had in quite a long time.
Speaker 3: And I was I was honestly shocked that he wasn't benched.
Speaker 1: And he actually was a scratch on Sunday against Columbus. However,
Speaker 1: it was not a healthy scratch. He's suffering from some
Speaker 1: kind of mild, minor upper body to which I asked, well,
Speaker 1: is it bonehead ititis? Because he certainly was being like that.
Speaker 1: But whatever, his issue is considered minor enough that he's
Speaker 1: not expected to be out. But I will give a
Speaker 1: stick tap to Yoki Haru who came in because he's
Speaker 1: been one who's been a healthy scratch quite a bit,
Speaker 1: and he stepped in, he stepped up, he had a
Speaker 1: solid game. It was as if he hadn't missed a beat,
Speaker 1: and so I was very pleased to see whatever happens
Speaker 1: should the Bruins make the playoffs, that they've got some
Speaker 1: depth in their defense that anyone can come back in
Speaker 1: and pick.
Speaker 3: Up where the other left off.
Speaker 1: So but Mason Lowery, it's been a minute since he's
Speaker 1: been in the penalty.
Speaker 3: Box for us, but boy did he earn it.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 3: He's not the only one.
Speaker 2: But you know, at this at this point, critical point
Speaker 2: of the season, can't and again you know you've got
Speaker 2: you can't have stuff like that. I mean, and this goes,
Speaker 2: this goes across the whole lineup, because you know what
Speaker 2: I also have in my penalty box is the Bruins
Speaker 2: have been giving up way too many odd man rushes,
Speaker 2: especially on the tower play. Like it's one thing if
Speaker 2: your power play, you know, isn't isn't operating to its fullest,
Speaker 2: it's a whole not a ballgame. When now you're giving
Speaker 2: up constant shorthanded opportunities like that that just simply cannot
Speaker 2: happen in today's NHL. You just can't let it happen.
Speaker 3: It's too fast. So that needs that needs.
Speaker 2: To be cleaned up and I know they don't have
Speaker 2: a lot of time to practice and whatnot, but it
Speaker 2: seems to me that the Bruins do it with too
Speaker 2: much regularity.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's again this particular team, whether it's the team
Speaker 1: construction being that Jenga block where they've gotten a little
Speaker 1: bit more flexible in that they've gotten a little bit
Speaker 1: more robust in the sense that if you're missing a piece,
Speaker 1: it's not going to totally collapse the team. But in
Speaker 1: a similar vein, if they don't keep their foot on
Speaker 1: the gas with whatever situation is at hand, they seem
Speaker 1: to not be able to keep up. Like there's no
Speaker 1: room for any kind of cruise control anywhere with this.
Speaker 1: But we have a couple of big games coming up
Speaker 1: this week. They're eight remaining games, five of them are
Speaker 1: on the road, which.
Speaker 3: Does make me nervous.
Speaker 1: However, the Columbus game was the first time that Boston
Speaker 1: has been over five hundred on the road since game
Speaker 1: number one.
Speaker 2: Oh god, well, all right, well we're trending upward. We're
Speaker 2: trending upward. Listen. They got to figure out if they're
Speaker 2: going to make a playoff one, they're going to be
Speaker 2: able to figure out how to steal a game or
Speaker 2: two on the road.
Speaker 3: They they just taxes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and who knows, the Buffalo game could very well be.
Speaker 3: Preview to the first round.
Speaker 2: Should be that that would be such a fun series
Speaker 2: and that would will certainly go six to seven games one.
Speaker 1: Because if just briefly looking at the standings, and again
Speaker 1: we're recording this on Monday the thirtieth, we've got Boston
Speaker 1: is in the first wild card spot and Buffalo, well,
Speaker 1: we'll see Buffalo is neck and neck with Tampa right now.
Speaker 1: Technically based on the first tiebreaker, Tampa is in first
Speaker 1: place in the Atlantic. Buffalo, Sabers and the Canadians are
Speaker 1: in second and third. But who knows that could change
Speaker 1: because Sabers, this.
Speaker 2: Is how Tyson Atlantic is in the last ten games.
Speaker 2: I just saw this post, yep.
Speaker 1: And they and we all all play each other. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of Atlantic games happen.
Speaker 3: In this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Buffalo six two and two, Montreal seven three and oh,
Speaker 2: Boston sixty two and two, Ottawa six three and one. Yes,
Speaker 2: this is tight, tight, tight, folks, Yes, mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you've got in terms of Atlantic Division games, you've
Speaker 1: got the Habs playing the Panthers and the Lightning.
Speaker 3: Boston is playing the Panthers and the Lightning. The Senators are.
Speaker 1: Playing the the Panthers and the Lightning and the Sabers.
Speaker 1: So it's a very divisionally heavy end.
Speaker 3: To the season, so Strap and everyone, because it's.
Speaker 2: Almost as if the NHL schedule listen to what they
Speaker 2: were doing not.
Speaker 1: I mean, it makes for exciting times, I guess. But
Speaker 1: we've got the Stars coming up. Obviously, every point matters.
Speaker 1: This is an opportunity to collect points because this is
Speaker 1: not only not a divisional game, it is not even
Speaker 1: a conference game.
Speaker 3: Still, big points.
Speaker 1: The Stars have clinched that, there's no reason I would
Speaker 1: think that they would ever let off a guess.
Speaker 2: They can't because that's the last thing you want to
Speaker 2: do heading into the playoffs. You want to be playing
Speaker 2: your best hockey exactly playoffs, regardless of whether you have
Speaker 2: clinched a spot yet or not. So it's not going
Speaker 2: to be a cake walk by any stretch of the imagination.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: So from there, Boston heads down to the state of
Speaker 1: Florida where they're going to be playing the Panthers on
Speaker 1: Thursday and the Lightning on Saturday, and then immediately after
Speaker 1: that they're going straight to Philadelphia and playing a game there,
Speaker 1: so again.
Speaker 3: Three games that are pretty.
Speaker 1: Much must must get a point let's just put it
Speaker 1: this way, must get a point in at least three
Speaker 1: of those four games.
Speaker 3: In my opinion.
Speaker 2: Well, overall, the Bruins had a great week. It played
Speaker 2: four games and came away with six points. So that's
Speaker 2: that's a good week's work.
Speaker 3: So happy.
Speaker 2: They just need to keep that mojo moving forward.
Speaker 1: So thanks again everyone. Make sure you like and subscribe
Speaker 1: for more content, and be sure to leave a rating
Speaker 1: and review to help other Bruins fans find us. You
Speaker 1: can support the podcast by joining our Patreon or following
Speaker 1: us on our socials at Tape to Tape mk and
Speaker 1: on substack at Tape to Tape mk dot subsack dot com,
Speaker 1: and as always, go Bes bass
Speaker 2: St
Podbean