Boston Bruins Offseason Begins: Leadership, Roster Flaws, & Playoff Lessons | Bruins News | Ep. 142
Liner notes
🎙️The Boston Bruins may be out of the playoffs, but the biggest questions surrounding the organization are only getting louder. In this episode, we break down the Bruins’ end-of-season press conference, Cam Neely and Don Sweeney’s comments about the future of the Bruins roster, and the growing frustration around Boston’s No. 1 center problem.We also discuss David Pastrnak’s emotional Behind the B locker room moment and what it reveals about leadership inside the Bruins organization.
Plus: Carolina looks terrifying, Buffalo and Montreal continue battling in the NHL playoffs, and we evaluate whether Boston’s season was a success despite another first-round exit. This episode features Boston Bruins analysis, Bruins news, NHL playoff discussion, Bruins player analysis, and Boston hockey updates as the offseason begins.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 1: I need something to do. I Jack sending out a
Speaker 1: trough Abocknna says, today here's a chance pop from right
Speaker 1: down with goalie scars.
Speaker 2: Oh my one a move by the rookie.
Speaker 1: To on one plaster not moving in setting jet on
Speaker 1: oil dances. Ain't podcast at home right away, corner paster Kista, what.
Speaker 3: Is that for?
Speaker 1: Most?
Speaker 3: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Ruins Tape to tape.
Speaker 3: We are recording on Monday, Ny eleventh, and I'd like
Speaker 3: to wish a belated happy Mother's Day to all of
Speaker 3: our moms who are listeners. We hope that you all
Speaker 3: had a great day. I know that I did, and
Speaker 3: I'm hoping my co host Caroline with Aka had a
Speaker 3: wonderful day as well. Welcome in, Happy belated Mother's Day, Thanks.
Speaker 2: Maria, same to you. We had a wonderful day. The
Speaker 2: weather cooperated and we got to spend a lot of
Speaker 2: time outside and it was delightful. It was a beautiful
Speaker 2: day for me as well.
Speaker 3: Got to play a little golf with my daughter, daughter
Speaker 3: in law and her mom, spend a lot of quality
Speaker 3: time outside with family and my little granddaughter.
Speaker 2: So yes, it was an awesome day.
Speaker 3: They're still hockey to talk about, even though it's not
Speaker 3: directly related to the Boston Bruins. Because we are in
Speaker 3: the thick of the Stanley Cup Playoffs right now, we're
Speaker 3: slowly getting down to the bottom line of those teams
Speaker 3: that are separating themselves. And typically, folks, we do our
Speaker 3: setting of the table and then we do our spin
Speaker 3: around the rank. But it's summer, we're being a little
Speaker 3: bit more cash So we're just going to dive right
Speaker 3: in to talk about the teams left in the Stanley
Speaker 3: Cup Playoffs, and then we're going to get down to
Speaker 3: the nitty gritty of the Bruins end of season. The
Speaker 3: end of season press conference by Neely and Company, we
Speaker 3: have some very detailed conversation. We're going to have some
Speaker 3: very detailed conversation about a video clip from behind the
Speaker 3: Bee that directly involves David Pasternap and we both have
Speaker 3: some thoughts about that, and there's been quite a lot
Speaker 3: of feedback received on the socials and on our local
Speaker 3: sports talk radio shows and other podcasts about that pasta clip.
Speaker 3: But let's start with the Stanley Cup playoffs. So I
Speaker 3: want to start with the Carolina Hurricanes, and the fact
Speaker 3: that they have now swept in fine fashion both teams
Speaker 3: that they have played against. So I ask you, my friend,
Speaker 3: are they the real deal?
Speaker 2: Two sweets? They are scary, scary good. And this is
Speaker 2: a team that has been quietly dominant for at least
Speaker 2: the last five years. They certainly were the pain in
Speaker 2: the behind for the Bruins for a number of years.
Speaker 2: A couple of sears.
Speaker 3: Thorn in their side is what I would call them,
Speaker 3: an absolute freaking thorn in their side.
Speaker 2: And it's interesting because, especially considering this entire season, you
Speaker 2: and I were both in agreement that it never really
Speaker 2: seemed like there was a team that took hold of
Speaker 2: the East because there was just so much competition for
Speaker 2: nearly every level within the bracket structure that it just
Speaker 2: never seemed like any team in particular took off. And
Speaker 2: who knows, maybe that's just because in comparison to the West,
Speaker 2: things were so much more different, because Colorado really started
Speaker 2: the season like they were shot out of a cannon,
Speaker 2: So anything that was happening in the East never could compete.
Speaker 2: But this is a team that was certainly well in
Speaker 2: control of their division all season, and we've watched a
Speaker 2: lot of Carolina hockey over the last few years, because again,
Speaker 2: they have been in the playoffs, and they've gone deep
Speaker 2: into the playoffs for many years at this point, and
Speaker 2: it's been pretty boring hockey leading up to this. But
Speaker 2: I have to say, first of all, this Carolina team,
Speaker 2: they've always been good. They've always been extremely dominant when
Speaker 2: it comes to shots, shot attempts, and shots on goal.
Speaker 2: That's obviously been their m all season. This is one
Speaker 2: of the teams few teams I would almost argue to
Speaker 2: the next level in the playoff. Noticeably, they are scary good.
Speaker 2: They are efficient, they are relentless, and their goaltender is
Speaker 2: lights out. He is playing amazingly well. And I think
Speaker 2: of all the years that I have seen Carolina play
Speaker 2: in the postseason, this is the strongest I have ever
Speaker 2: seen them be. To the point where I actually said
Speaker 2: to some folks both in the discord, my family members,
Speaker 2: my friends, I think this is a team that, honest
Speaker 2: to God, could go all the way and I wouldn't
Speaker 2: be surprised if we see a Colorado Carolina final, because
Speaker 2: while the way to stop Carolina may sound simple on paper,
Speaker 2: to be able to execute it, I think would be
Speaker 2: incredibly difficult. The team that can beat Carolina is the
Speaker 2: team that has the ability to defensively outplay Carolina because
Speaker 2: you may have a very good goaltender, but can your
Speaker 2: very good goaltender survive forty shots a night? No, not
Speaker 2: every night, not every night, not every night.
Speaker 3: And I am in full and complete agreement with you
Speaker 3: on all of your points. And I am going to
Speaker 3: go as far as to say that Carolina will destroy
Speaker 3: either the Sabers or the Habs because neither one of
Speaker 3: those teams seems defensively structured or sound in my view.
Speaker 3: And I have been watching some of these games, not intently,
Speaker 3: but especially where the Sabers are concerned. They have a
Speaker 3: lot of defensemen that forwards even too, standing around watching
Speaker 3: puck watching. Yeah, and Carolina is just going to chew
Speaker 3: you up and spit you out if that's the way
Speaker 3: that you're going to play. And Taylor Hall, Taylor Hall
Speaker 3: has the fifth highest point total for playoff players still playing.
Speaker 2: Right now, you want to talk about the second line
Speaker 2: that has overproduced and overperformed, I could have used a
Speaker 2: guy like that. Oh wait, wait a minute, we had
Speaker 2: him and we traded him away for what my frustration.
Speaker 2: We're going to get to that. As much as I
Speaker 2: can't stand Rob Brindemore, I don't know what it is.
Speaker 2: He bugs me, he bugs me, He's obnoxious. That team
Speaker 2: is very freaking scary. I think at this point the
Speaker 2: only thing in Carolina's way to getting to the Cup
Speaker 2: Final is Carolina because notoriously, for the last few years,
Speaker 2: they've dominated early rounds and then completely choke. Now don't
Speaker 2: see it. I haven't seen any hiccups even when they
Speaker 2: get behind, even if it has only happened once. It
Speaker 2: just it seems to fuel their fire. Honestly, when they
Speaker 2: get behind. And the other thing that we have also
Speaker 2: talked about is the fact that rest may be a
Speaker 2: good or bad thing, and quite frankly, the fact that
Speaker 2: they swept Philadelphia so quickly. Depending on how long this
Speaker 2: Sabers Habs series goes, Carolina could be sitting for the
Speaker 2: better part of two weeks really because by the time
Speaker 2: they were done, the Habs hadn't even played their third game.
Speaker 2: So what is that. What's that going to mean for
Speaker 2: either side? Because one side's going to have just come
Speaker 2: off of playing, which again could be good, could be bad,
Speaker 2: would be bad? Right, you never know.
Speaker 3: They don't get themselves they meaning the Carolina Hurricanes don't
Speaker 3: get themselves to the Stanley Cup Finals. What is shock?
Speaker 3: And what a disappointment that will be because they are
Speaker 3: looking that good that I don't think anyone in the
Speaker 3: East still left in the game stands a snowballs chance
Speaker 3: in hell.
Speaker 2: No, Like I said, we were having this conversation in
Speaker 2: our discord about is there a team that could defensively
Speaker 2: out maneuver Carolina, And it was a good discussion. There
Speaker 2: was talk points made in favor of Montreal over the
Speaker 2: same course, they have to bote. One of them has
Speaker 2: to get out. The thing is, prior to their most
Speaker 2: recent game, I would have said I haven't seen anything
Speaker 2: particularly impressive on both sides, only because each game leading
Speaker 2: up to that point had been because the other team
Speaker 2: didn't show up. The first game, Buffalo was in full
Speaker 2: control because Montreal really just they weren't on time. They
Speaker 2: didn't show up on time, They just were late to
Speaker 2: the series basically, and then the same thing happened, but
Speaker 2: in inversely for Game two, Buffalo didn't start on time
Speaker 2: and the Habs did. Things have started to get more
Speaker 2: interesting as the series has progressed. And I will say
Speaker 2: prior to especially last night's game in Montreal, I really
Speaker 2: enjoy their goaltender do Bush. I think he's a great rookie.
Speaker 2: He's a good goaltender Habs Jersey aside. He had been
Speaker 2: underperforming in my opinion, in the series up until literally
Speaker 2: last night, and he was fantastic. Still cannot tell what's
Speaker 2: actually happening out there, because I will say this in
Speaker 2: rewatching the highlights of that game. There is an expression
Speaker 2: in hockey where you play the man, not the puck.
Speaker 2: And that's an important concept because if all you do
Speaker 2: is focus on the puck, you've got all these other
Speaker 2: players around you who are then getting into position to
Speaker 2: receive the puck, and the puck gets passed a lot
Speaker 2: faster than you can skate. And if all you're doing
Speaker 2: is watching the puck, your man that you're responsible for
Speaker 2: covering is now open. And I got to tell you,
Speaker 2: every single one of those goals and then some scored
Speaker 2: by the Habs, were the result of Buffalo playing the
Speaker 2: puck and not the man. The number of opportunities that
Speaker 2: Montreal had where the player was wide open, had nobody
Speaker 2: on him. That was surprising because I'm not recalling having
Speaker 2: seen that a lot in the Bruins series, and if
Speaker 2: I let's not forget the Bruins were nowhere near as quick.
Speaker 3: First of all, nowhere near as quick as the Habs
Speaker 3: are their offense in that series, the Bruins was not
Speaker 3: at all flee garage in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 2: And look, Lyon is also a very good goaltender. His
Speaker 2: areas of weakness are the cross ice pass, which we
Speaker 2: saw in I want to say Game two, where both
Speaker 2: goalies actually really struggled with the cross ice pass and
Speaker 2: got scored on in those instances. And I think that
Speaker 2: Lion did a good job considering the number of times
Speaker 2: he basically had to fend off a Canadian all on
Speaker 2: his own, and a couple of those goals were just
Speaker 2: greasy goals they got. One of them got knocked in
Speaker 2: basically off his own defender, which again to the point
Speaker 2: saying that the Sabers players were just not where they
Speaker 2: were supposed to be. One thing that the Sabers had
Speaker 2: been really good at, especially playing against Boston, was the
Speaker 2: ability to take advantage of opportunities. But the thing is,
Speaker 2: the Habs are not presenting the Sabers with opportunities. Basically,
Speaker 2: their one goal they scored was there were two goals.
Speaker 2: One was just like a freak like doebush didn't have
Speaker 2: eyes on it at all. I don't know what he
Speaker 2: was looking at. But the second one was a power
Speaker 2: play goal, so they had to be on the man
Speaker 2: advantage just to even score. So I don't know how
Speaker 2: that changed.
Speaker 3: Credit to Marty Saint Louis, but those first couple of
Speaker 3: games it seemed like Buffalo, excuse me, Montreal couldn't score
Speaker 3: unless they were awarded a power play opportunity. Where now
Speaker 3: it's all of a sudden they're getting offense five on
Speaker 3: five and some of the big guys are finally starting
Speaker 3: to show up, which could be very detrimental for Buffalo.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So unless Buffalo figures out how to play the
Speaker 2: man and not the puck doing the opposite, things are
Speaker 2: not looking very good for them. But if what Montreal
Speaker 2: is doing is genuinely that dominating, are they that dominant
Speaker 2: or are the Sabers underperforming? Yeah? I don't know, kind
Speaker 2: of feeling like the Sabers are underperforming. Not to take
Speaker 2: away anything from what Montreal has accomplished. Begrudgingly, I will
Speaker 2: say but thinking about it in terms of who they're
Speaker 2: going to have to play next, I don't know if
Speaker 2: it's enough. I really don't know if it's enough. I
Speaker 2: don't think either team has enough known because by the time,
Speaker 2: especially if it is Montreal at all, and if this
Speaker 2: goes five games or six games, they'll have played almost
Speaker 2: two full rounds of They'll have played maybe thirteen games,
Speaker 2: and Caroline has only played eight.
Speaker 3: I don't know, but it will be interesting to see how
Speaker 3: Buffalo responds in their next game after getting beat down
Speaker 3: in similar fashion to how they beat down the Bruins.
Speaker 3: They lost six to two. They lost six to two.
Speaker 3: It's embarrassing and it's embarrassing, and they look like the
Speaker 3: Bruins out there. No, No, they did they did.
Speaker 2: No. What did I say in the discord the Abs
Speaker 2: did to the Sabers, What the Sabers did to the
Speaker 2: Ruins on that Black Sunday game where they just didn't
Speaker 2: show up to play in the first period and they
Speaker 2: found themselves down for to nothing. I wonder if Lindy
Speaker 2: Ruff will shake things up and throw upl in instead
Speaker 2: of Lyon. I don't know. I'm not saying that Lyon
Speaker 2: has lost the net. I don't think that actually at all. No,
Speaker 2: I don't think not at all either. I think he
Speaker 2: was left high and dry. He was, But I wouldn't
Speaker 2: be surprised if the coaching staff makes a goaltender changed
Speaker 2: decision just to shake things up. I don't know, because
Speaker 2: what else can you do. I don't know. But that's
Speaker 2: the East. I'm not really sure what's happening in the West.
Speaker 2: I know the West is series is tied.
Speaker 3: I mean Minnesota is Minnesota is trying to make a
Speaker 3: series out of it.
Speaker 2: Sure are Holy cow? Did they come back? Yep?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that's sustainable for them. They did
Speaker 2: chase their starting goalie, but that would have only been
Speaker 2: for the one game. He'll be back for Game four.
Speaker 2: I don't know if their approach is a sustainable approach
Speaker 2: to continue on to actually stop Colorado. I think again,
Speaker 2: if Colorado and Carolina are the ones that are in
Speaker 2: the final, I think Colorado has an equally hot goaltender,
Speaker 2: they're going to be they'd be potentially even in that regard,
Speaker 2: and I think, of course Colorado has the elite goal
Speaker 2: scoring group that probably could get through any kind of defense.
Speaker 2: It's just whether or not they can stop the shots
Speaker 2: by Carolina, but that we're getting ahead of ourselves.
Speaker 3: We're getting the series that I'm surprised by, and I
Speaker 3: will admit, given more time the game start, I haven't
Speaker 3: seen a whole bunch of minutes in this series. Is
Speaker 3: Anaheim in Vegas. Anaheim is good on them.
Speaker 2: So I'm not watching that series because I just can't
Speaker 2: bring myself to care. No, that's part of it.
Speaker 3: Part of it is it's like I'm not that invested
Speaker 3: that I'm going to be trying to keep my eyes open.
Speaker 3: But I will say this, the Vegas Golden Knights got
Speaker 3: rid of Bruce Cassidy and now they're in a dog
Speaker 3: fight in this series. So I wonder if they're taking
Speaker 3: a look in the mirror saying I'm still they still
Speaker 3: could have made the playoffs and they could still be
Speaker 3: in this position right now without having fired Bruce Cassidy.
Speaker 3: But be that as it may, even with the herculean
Speaker 3: performance of Mitch Marner in the previous game, they find
Speaker 3: themselves behind the eight ball because the series is now
Speaker 3: tied two to two.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it certainly feels that way even though it's tied,
Speaker 2: But perhaps that's just from the idea that Anaheim it's Anaheim.
Speaker 2: I think the expectations there were also probably pretty low,
Speaker 2: and that's another team that's certainly exceeded expectations.
Speaker 3: It just goes to prove the theory that we hear
Speaker 3: over and over again with regard to the Stanley Cup
Speaker 3: playoffs is just get in.
Speaker 2: Who cares for your seated in some instances, just get in, yeah,
Speaker 2: because you never know what's going to happen.
Speaker 3: Right, So, speaking of just getting in and never knowing
Speaker 3: what's going to happen, we now turn our attention to
Speaker 3: our Boston Bruins.
Speaker 2: Yes, and so we've.
Speaker 3: Had a couple of pieces of news items that came
Speaker 3: out just recently, one of which was the end of
Speaker 3: season presser, which is normally takes place after every season
Speaker 3: is officially over, and that happened here in Boston last week.
Speaker 3: I don't even remember what day it was that Charlie Jacobs,
Speaker 3: Pam Neely, and John Sweeney addressed the media. Now, normally
Speaker 3: you hear about this in advance, garyl links that are
Speaker 3: sent out where you can follow the press conference live. Now,
Speaker 3: unless I was under a rock or totally not paying attention,
Speaker 3: I had no idea that it was occurring until I
Speaker 3: started seeing tweets from media people covering the press conference.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, I had no idea either, And I feel
Speaker 2: like most of the folks in our fabulous discord also
Speaker 2: were not aware. This one was weird. Marco Sturm was
Speaker 2: not there. In the past, we've seen the coaches also
Speaker 2: in attendance. I don't know how common or uncommon that
Speaker 2: fact is, but it certainly felt very low key. And
Speaker 2: maybe it's because, certainly last year we were looking for
Speaker 2: it because we were all very mad about last season.
Speaker 2: But this was very quiet. I'm not sure that there
Speaker 2: was a ton of news that even really came out
Speaker 2: of it, which is also a little surprising because you
Speaker 2: would think to some degree they would want to come
Speaker 2: out and be tooting their own horn. Because, as we
Speaker 2: will talk about in a little bit, the season was
Speaker 2: a success. Well, it was certainly better than any of
Speaker 2: us expected. I think given the roster, you had a
Speaker 2: new rookie, kad coach, you had questions up and down
Speaker 2: your roster for the most part, So yes, I would
Speaker 2: say they for me, they performed better than I expected
Speaker 2: to because I didn't even have them making the playoffs,
Speaker 2: and what I find annoying about both Nealye and Sweney.
Speaker 3: Charlie Jacobs, to me is just a person who sits there, right.
Speaker 3: He's the Jacob, He's the anointed Jacob's family representative. He
Speaker 3: adds nothing of any value or significance.
Speaker 2: I don't know why he's honestly even there, because he
Speaker 2: wants to be give me and he says things. It's like, Charlie,
Speaker 2: just don't even talk because you sound like a clueless
Speaker 2: fool most of the time. To think that Neelie and
Speaker 2: Sweeney just go to their wheel of fortune and spin
Speaker 2: the wheel and say, Okay, what did we say two
Speaker 2: years ago? Oh yeah, this might apply again to this season.
Speaker 2: So let's just regurgitate that same information that we already
Speaker 2: fed the media and our fan base two three seasons ago. Yes, now,
Speaker 2: and Neelie continues, in my view, to talk out of
Speaker 2: both sides of his ass and his mouth. So we
Speaker 2: built it now. You can correct me if I'm wrong,
Speaker 2: if I have my facts incorrect, I will apologize, and
Speaker 2: you can say, no, you, Maria, You're dead wrong. Didn't
Speaker 2: we hear?
Speaker 3: After the Bruins had their asses handed to them by
Speaker 3: the Florida Panthers that we needed to get stronger, tougher. Okay,
Speaker 3: so then we try to build it team based on
Speaker 3: trying to defeat the Florida Panthers, hence the Zadoraf signing. Okay,
Speaker 3: fast forward to this pressor that took place just last week,
Speaker 3: and I hear Kim Neely say, we need to get faster.
Speaker 3: Wait a minute, wait, just a freaking minute. Now you're
Speaker 3: saying because it seems to me, we tried the we
Speaker 3: need to get faster thing, and then we went to
Speaker 3: the knee to get stronger on the back end. So
Speaker 3: now we're going back to we need to get faster.
Speaker 3: So what team are we chasing now? Camp that we
Speaker 3: want to build our team against? And you, idiot, we
Speaker 3: all know that we don't have a number one center.
Speaker 3: You befooled, and whose fault is that?
Speaker 2: You morons? Okay, you absolute unequivocal morons because you didn't
Speaker 2: do your due diligence back when you had Cragie and Burgon.
Speaker 2: How many freaking years? How many freaking years. Then we
Speaker 2: hear Pasta say, I'm going to be turning thirty. How
Speaker 2: many more kicks at the can? Am I going to
Speaker 2: get nearly in response to that to volley backs and.
Speaker 3: Not be full committal on getting his star player the
Speaker 3: help that he needs.
Speaker 2: They need to shit or get off the pot. Shit
Speaker 2: or get off the frigging pot. But if you don't
Speaker 2: address this gaping hole that you know that you have
Speaker 2: had for countless years. Now, how far do you think
Speaker 2: you're freaking gonna get with this rebuilt? Now? How long
Speaker 2: is it going to take?
Speaker 3: And how much patience is Pasta going to have or
Speaker 3: maybe any other veteran on that roster that you're looking
Speaker 3: at and saying, man, guys, you got to roll up
Speaker 3: your sleeves and help.
Speaker 2: This is going to take a while. Really, how long
Speaker 2: is this going to take?
Speaker 1: You?
Speaker 2: Guys keep going out? Oh and by the way, the
Speaker 2: one guy that you thought was going to fit the
Speaker 2: bill now we know is damaged goods because this guy,
Speaker 2: and I'm speaking about Elias Home has a chronic back issue.
Speaker 2: How many times are we going to hear about this back? Yeah? Agreed?
Speaker 2: One point that you said, oh, now we're back on
Speaker 2: the speed, I will say yes. Or was it a
Speaker 2: couple of seasons ago they said we need to get bigger, faster, stronger.
Speaker 2: They got stronger and they got bigger, but I would
Speaker 2: argue that they never went after anyone for speed. They
Speaker 2: never achieved that even close. So that is almost like
Speaker 2: unfinished business that has been lingering since the departure of
Speaker 2: Jake Debrusk, and the fact I was just thinking about
Speaker 2: this last night, getting rid of someone like Jacob Lauco.
Speaker 2: He was fast, but they didn't offer to him. Boston
Speaker 2: needs to get faster, that's a given. I don't know
Speaker 2: what they're gonna do. I genuinely don't know.
Speaker 3: Nearly did acknowledge the need for a number one set,
Speaker 3: But okay, that's we all know it. What are you
Speaker 3: going to do to address it? How are you going
Speaker 3: to address it? Are you relying on one of these
Speaker 3: young guys, because if that's the case, then is I'm
Speaker 3: not saying there's not potential there or Minton or Higgins,
Speaker 3: but we're talking another what two or three seasons down
Speaker 3: the road at.
Speaker 2: A minimum, at a minimum, Yeah, yeah, it's we're looking
Speaker 2: at Don Sweeney's last year of this current contract. I'd
Speaker 2: like to say I would be shocked if it was
Speaker 2: renewed further, but then again, this is Boston and he
Speaker 2: seems to be Cam Neely's favorite scapegoat, you know, guy
Speaker 2: to do his dirty work. I don't have a ton
Speaker 2: of faith in whatever the front office can do. I'm
Speaker 2: thinking that this year's free agency class isn't that much
Speaker 2: better than last year's. They're gonna either have to figure
Speaker 2: it out with what they have, because this is something
Speaker 2: they've been talking about for literally five years. And I
Speaker 2: know these guys don't grow on trees.
Speaker 3: I get it, I get it, But you've made any
Speaker 3: number of other hockey trades and this was a priority
Speaker 3: need that.
Speaker 2: Continues to remain unaddressed. And I don't know how far
Speaker 2: you think you're gonna go without that Pastornach, And listen,
Speaker 2: we all know David Pasternach is not as responsible with
Speaker 2: the puck as people would like him to be, But
Speaker 2: he's also touching the puck. You want him to touch
Speaker 2: the puck because you want him to score so people
Speaker 2: can't shit all over him. Right, He's still put up.
Speaker 2: He's still put up a boatload of points. Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: even without even without the help that he, in my view,
Speaker 2: should get to maximize his potential.
Speaker 3: He's been maximizing it even without that. But can you
Speaker 3: imagine if you get him a legit first line center.
Speaker 2: Just remember, before Patrice merger On retired, David Pasternach hitting
Speaker 2: sixty goals, and we've seen it, we've seen what he
Speaker 2: can accomplish with a confident center. But okay, the people
Speaker 2: who were shitting all over bostonok for his playoff performances. Okay,
Speaker 2: let me explain what happens. Okay, other team's number one
Speaker 2: line and your team's number one line typically go against
Speaker 2: each other, and they basically negate each other. All right,
Speaker 2: it's even harder in the playoffs when you want to
Speaker 2: try to take advantage of that and get your number
Speaker 2: one guy away from the other team's number one guy.
Speaker 2: Is when you're at home and you get the last
Speaker 2: change that didn't work to our advantage for whatever reason,
Speaker 2: because we sucked at home, and we sucked at home
Speaker 2: in the playoffs. And that's also why second to your
Speaker 2: A scoring is important. You're not trading for Connor McDavid
Speaker 2: or Austin Matthews or Brady or Brady Kutchuk. That was
Speaker 2: the first best one and if any of those guys
Speaker 2: are coming to Boston, Okay, No, it's not happening. It
Speaker 2: is not happening. Not just David Pasternach for Brady Kuchuk,
Speaker 2: but the claim it should be David Pasternach and Jeremy Swayman.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, no one could possibly be that. What's an imbecile?
Speaker 2: But speaking of David Pasternach.
Speaker 3: So the other big thing, the other big piece of
Speaker 3: news is, in case you haven't seen it, there was
Speaker 3: a behind the episode that was the Black Sunday Game
Speaker 3: as I call it, where the Boston Bruins were a
Speaker 3: no show in the first period, and there was a
Speaker 3: clip of Pasta going into the locker room and just
Speaker 3: ripping into the team in such a manner that I
Speaker 3: never thought he had it in him to do. He
Speaker 3: said everything to his teammates that we were all saying
Speaker 3: to each other in the discord or screaming at the TV,
Speaker 3: going what a bunch of fucking no shows? Embarrassing, disappointed.
Speaker 3: He said it all, and I didn't think that he
Speaker 3: was capable of it. He showed me a sign. Now
Speaker 3: here's the takeaway that I took from that clip. As
Speaker 3: Pasta is throwing his stick down, ripping his gloves off,
Speaker 3: here's Morgan Geeky standing there finally taking off his chest
Speaker 3: protector and elbow pads, like he could give two shits.
Speaker 2: That was my takeaway. I was looking at him in
Speaker 2: this video clip, going, do you even care that he's
Speaker 2: ripping into all of you at this point in time.
Speaker 2: To me, Yiki's body language was like I could give
Speaker 2: two shits right now. Maybe I'm reading too much into it,
Speaker 2: but that was take my two takeaways from that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he had already given up. I think it's really interesting that, Look,
Speaker 2: this is not a new concept or take certainly. I've
Speaker 2: heard Elliott Friedman talk about this that teams only share
Speaker 2: what they want known ever, and even teams without TV shows,
Speaker 2: because some of them have them, some of them don't.
Speaker 2: Players will almost never publicly display any kind of frustration, anger, resentment,
Speaker 2: negativity towards their teammates in any kind of public manner.
Speaker 2: I find it fascinating that not only did we see
Speaker 2: this clip come out with David Pasternak, but we also
Speaker 2: saw it with Jeremy Swayman when he got pulled in
Speaker 2: that one game, and he wasn't targeting anyone. Let's make
Speaker 2: that clear. He was speaking to the entire team, because
Speaker 2: everybody that was dressed for that game was a no
Speaker 2: show in that first period except for Jeremy Swayman. And also,
Speaker 2: to be clear, just because we never see it, just
Speaker 2: because they don't make it public, doesn't mean it doesn't
Speaker 2: haven't happened, right, please, they hold each other account. But
Speaker 2: the fact that two leaders on the team publicly displayed
Speaker 2: were allowed to be displayed this degree of I don't
Speaker 2: know what you want to call it, conflict, disagreement. I
Speaker 2: don't know what to make of it, but I find
Speaker 2: it very fascinating. And there's been a lot of discussion
Speaker 2: since that clip came out, in particular around David Pasternach
Speaker 2: that for a number of people that is enough to
Speaker 2: just give the man the seat. And look, this is
Speaker 2: not to say that Charlie McAvoy doesn't care.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure that one episode justifies giving someone the seat,
Speaker 3: and I'm not saying you should or shouldn't have it.
Speaker 3: The rumors here around this area have always been, for
Speaker 3: some reason, Charlie McAvoy is the golden child where the
Speaker 3: Boston Ruins are concerned. It's been like that for quite
Speaker 3: some time, and I found it very interesting when cam
Speaker 3: Neely was asked about the status of a point a
Speaker 3: captain and making a decision about a captain for the
Speaker 3: upcoming season. That was something that they did want. They
Speaker 3: do want to address that. Marco Sturn would be heavily
Speaker 3: involved in those conversations, but he almost made it a
Speaker 3: point to say that, and I'm paraphrasing, and maybe I'm
Speaker 3: reading words into it, that this season wasn't really a
Speaker 3: fair assessment of that because Charlie had so many things
Speaker 3: going on with the injury and the illness to his son.
Speaker 2: I am telling you, you're going to hear it here first.
Speaker 2: You're going to hear it here first. I am telling
Speaker 2: you that they want And when I say they management
Speaker 2: want to put that sea on Charlie mcaboy's jersey, I
Speaker 2: mean I believe it. And that rationale about not everyone
Speaker 2: really had the opportunity to show their leadership skills, blah
Speaker 2: blah blah blah blah. How many games you need? How
Speaker 2: many games? I'm just again, that's just me. That's my take.
Speaker 3: Now, there are other discussions about the criteria for being
Speaker 3: a captain. Let's look at past Ruin's captains and what
Speaker 3: they brought to the table. Za Dan o'chara, intimidating, worked
Speaker 3: as assaf, always responsible, always making nine times out of ten,
Speaker 3: making the right place tris bergeron same type of criteria
Speaker 3: rape War before him. Does Pasta have that in him yet?
Speaker 3: Because I will tell you the argument is being made
Speaker 3: and will be made about the fact that Tasta is
Speaker 3: not as defensively responsible as people want him to be.
Speaker 3: That is still a component of his game that needs
Speaker 3: to develop and be brought to another level. I'm not
Speaker 3: saying it's right or wrong. I'm not saying it's right
Speaker 3: or wrong, but I'm just saying now I can make
Speaker 3: the same argument for Charlie McAvoy because I'm still on
Speaker 3: the fence when it comes to this player. He is
Speaker 3: not a franchise altering fenceman in any way, shape or
Speaker 3: form right now. I don't know if he ever will be.
Speaker 3: His offensive skills still need to be proven.
Speaker 2: To me.
Speaker 3: I do think that sometimes defensively he's not as consistent
Speaker 3: now This year better, absolutely better, absolutely was in the
Speaker 3: best years, right, his best year, statistically Show me that.
Speaker 3: Show me that early and often. Okay, and I'll be
Speaker 3: in your corner.
Speaker 2: Kid. I like your thought experiment when thinking about past captains,
Speaker 2: and as you're describing them, one word crops into my
Speaker 2: mind and this one word is one that I would
Speaker 2: use to describe David Pasternach and not Charlie McAvoy. And again,
Speaker 2: I'm not like I love David Pasternach. He's but he's
Speaker 2: not my guy, right, I'm the same boat as you.
Speaker 2: I'm like, h not satisfied with either option. But whatever
Speaker 2: one word elite elite franchise altering elite player was, were
Speaker 2: any of those other captains perfect? No? No, you know
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that they were. You know, your argument
Speaker 2: about him not being as defensively minded as we would like.
Speaker 2: Of course, absolutely, but that's also what happens when you
Speaker 2: are touching the puck is often as absolutely and and
Speaker 2: he's got three two or three guys on you like
Speaker 2: super glok and when you are the and the other
Speaker 2: thing is what he's working against is the fact that
Speaker 2: because he is the only one like him, and we've
Speaker 2: seen the lack of secondary scoring, the lack of depth scoring, well,
Speaker 2: it's easier for a team to neutralize the one reliable
Speaker 2: goal scorer and just be on him with that high pressure,
Speaker 2: as opposed to if there were multiple players. Again, look
Speaker 2: at the perfection line. We go back to that a lot, right,
Speaker 2: A team has to cover effectively three guys versus now now, yes,
Speaker 2: so it's easy Tensis And again, listen, I know they.
Speaker 3: I know they're all professional athletes, and I know in
Speaker 3: their heart of hearts they know when they don't perform well.
Speaker 3: They don't need to hear it from us. They don't
Speaker 3: need to hear it from us and or David to
Speaker 3: react in that manner after you heard the boost, of course,
Speaker 3: I'm sure they all heard the boose. And for him
Speaker 3: to say in the post game to be as reflective
Speaker 3: sometimes you know, a backfires because they say something that
Speaker 3: you say to yourself, oh shit, maybe he should have
Speaker 3: taken thirty seconds before he answered that question. But when
Speaker 3: a season comes to an abrupt end and you're being
Speaker 3: reflective and you're looking at from your perspective, you're going
Speaker 3: to be thirty years old, how many more kicks at
Speaker 3: the can do I have at this right? And that's
Speaker 3: your star player, you're elite player, right. Don't you think
Speaker 3: that you've got to take that into consideration. He's not
Speaker 3: telling you what deal to make, but he's asking for
Speaker 3: some help, and you shouldn't poo poo that, you shouldn't
Speaker 3: ignore it. That has spurred a lot of conversation, which
Speaker 3: is great conversation for us to have. I'm not sure
Speaker 3: what direction they're going to go in. I wouldn't be
Speaker 3: surprised if they went into next season still without still
Speaker 3: without and waiting to make that determination. You don't know
Speaker 3: what they're going to do in the off season. Look,
Speaker 3: we've talked about this before. When the Bruins signed to
Speaker 3: the Daniel Chara because he was the biggest free agent available.
Speaker 2: At the time.
Speaker 3: Part of the deal was that he would become the captain,
Speaker 3: and you know what, to his credit, he had a
Speaker 3: couple of really really rough years during the early part
Speaker 3: of his captaincy here, to the point that his wife
Speaker 3: had said to him, we make a mistake coming here.
Speaker 3: But we know how that story ended, and there was
Speaker 3: a happy ending to that story. Who knows what they'll
Speaker 3: do in the off season, because stranger things have happened. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm not sure at this point that the next captain
Speaker 3: of the Boston Bruins is on the current roster.
Speaker 2: I'm really not. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know
Speaker 2: what to think of it. But one of the things
Speaker 2: that we've done for the last few seasons and for
Speaker 2: those who have been listeners for a while know that
Speaker 2: this is something that I've done with my dad for
Speaker 2: many years, which is we reflect on the season and
Speaker 2: decide what goes on this season's tombstone. And I had
Speaker 2: a hard time with this year. In the past, it's
Speaker 2: been pretty cut and dry. They couldn't finish, they couldn't
Speaker 2: clear the puck, that couldn't enter the zone, things like that, right,
Speaker 2: I And last season, my god, we had a wheel
Speaker 2: to choose which of these things was gonna happen where
Speaker 2: they would lose the game. That was so gross. That
Speaker 2: was so gross, and yet it was actual, but it
Speaker 2: was right. Yeah, my initial thought was certainly colored by
Speaker 2: how their playoff series went, and I had to sit
Speaker 2: with it for a minute and remind myself that's not
Speaker 2: necessarily how we come up with that epitaph. It's on
Speaker 2: the season, not necessarily playoffs, because again, playoffs are totally
Speaker 2: than different. Because my initial reaction after they lost to
Speaker 2: Buffalo it was lack of urgency, I'm not one hundred
Speaker 2: percent sure that's how I would still label their tombstone.
Speaker 2: I think because I had to be reminded of some
Speaker 2: interesting stats. So I'm going to share some interesting stats,
Speaker 2: and then I'm going to ask you how you would
Speaker 2: want to label this season. Hit me, this past season,
Speaker 2: the Bruins finished with forty five wins, twenty seven losses,
Speaker 2: and ten overtime losses. They finished with one hundred points,
Speaker 2: and they had a six to ten points percentage, and
Speaker 2: Charlie Jacobs calls that a success. By the way, here's
Speaker 2: the insane thing. I'm going to agree with him, because
Speaker 2: here's a little bit of context. Specifically, last season we
Speaker 2: finished thirty three, thirty nine, and ten with seventy six
Speaker 2: points and an abysmal for sixty three points percentage on
Speaker 2: average for the last ten years, and I've adjusted the
Speaker 2: COVID years accordingly. Average season finished with fifty two wins,
Speaker 2: twenty six losses, eleven overtime losses for one hundred and
Speaker 2: sixteen points. Now, that may seem like significantly better, but
Speaker 2: the points percentage six forty nine, so six' ten six
Speaker 2: forty nine not terribly. Different forty five wins fifty two. Wins,
Speaker 2: okay maybe it's a little bit lower than. Average, however
Speaker 2: the other THING i wanted to point out THAT i
Speaker 2: looked at that first season where The bruins made the
Speaker 2: playoffs after a year where they. Missed the last time
Speaker 2: was twenty sixteen twenty, seventeen and that season they went
Speaker 2: forty four thirty one and seven with ninety five points
Speaker 2: and a five to seventy nine points, percentage and they
Speaker 2: lost in the first. Round the other time before that's
Speaker 2: worth looking at two thousand and, seven two thousand and,
Speaker 2: eight they went forty one twenty nine twelve with ninety
Speaker 2: four points and a five to seventy three points percentage
Speaker 2: and they lost in the first. Round so remember this
Speaker 2: season they were forty, five twenty seven and ten and
Speaker 2: one hundred points with six ten points percentage and they
Speaker 2: lost in the first. Round thinking about it in that,
Speaker 2: perspective was it a below average season for The Boston. Bruins,
Speaker 2: yes for what we have known for the last decade
Speaker 2: of how this team has, played how they have, performed
Speaker 2: what we have expected of this. Team, yeah in terms
Speaker 2: of that first year after missing, playoffs they actually overperformed
Speaker 2: a little bit and they got as far as they
Speaker 2: ever have in that first year post missing the. PLAYOFFS
Speaker 2: i find that to be, promising and no one had
Speaker 2: them even sniffing the playoffs when THE nhl does all
Speaker 2: of their preseason previews or season previews team by team by,
Speaker 2: team writer by writer by, writer no.
Speaker 3: ONE i don't recall anyone he thought The bruins would
Speaker 3: even make the.
Speaker 2: Playoffs, yeah and the fact that it was basically a
Speaker 2: decade since The bruins had missed the. PLAYOFFS i think
Speaker 2: what we saw happen last, year what we saw happen
Speaker 2: this year shows that it was a blip like it
Speaker 2: has been in the. Past AND i do think that
Speaker 2: they did a good. Job as much as it feels
Speaker 2: like because of how the season, ended they didn't do
Speaker 2: a good. Job they did do a good. Job so
Speaker 2: that changed WHAT i would say in terms of WHAT
Speaker 2: i was going to put on the, epitaph because AGAIN
Speaker 2: i was also considering things like they were unreliable or
Speaker 2: again there was no. Urgency and, ultimately in the, END
Speaker 2: i think What i'm gonna put on the epitaph is
Speaker 2: self inflicted BECAUSE i think they could have done, more
Speaker 2: and every time they did, well they shot themselves in
Speaker 2: the foot self inflicted. Wolds we used that term all season,
Speaker 2: long self inflicted. Wounds they had four notable winning. Streaks
Speaker 2: for every single, one there was an equally disastrous losing,
Speaker 2: streak and they were always right next to each. Other
Speaker 2: they started with a pretty awful losing streak From october
Speaker 2: thirteenth to the twenty, seventh followed by a phenomenal winning
Speaker 2: streak from the twenty eighth To november, eleventh and then
Speaker 2: immediately afterwards From november thirteenth To december, second it was
Speaker 2: a losing, streak and then we had a winning, streak
Speaker 2: and then we had another winning, streak and then we
Speaker 2: had inconsistent to the. Inconsistent, yeah the season ended thirteen
Speaker 2: wins and twelve loss is the Post olympic. Break they
Speaker 2: were middle of the pack for goals four and goals.
Speaker 2: Against they were tenth out of thirty two in terms
Speaker 2: of goals for fourteenth out of thirty two goals. Against
Speaker 2: like you had, said Thank god for good. Goaltending if,
Speaker 2: anything you could even have an asterisk that says the
Speaker 2: bad side of. Average, meh maybe we just say. Me
Speaker 2: their eulogy would be they got great. Goaltending they, displayed
Speaker 2: for the most, part a no quit. Attitude they also
Speaker 2: had the ability to quote unquote bounce, back but they
Speaker 2: never had, solid consistent let's finish the job. Approach this
Speaker 2: year is a hard one because you can't quite put
Speaker 2: your finger on, it because, no and we can't dump
Speaker 2: on them right we. Did we spent our time doing,
Speaker 2: that which is our wont to. Do it's our.
Speaker 3: Podcast, however knowing what we were looking at to start this,
Speaker 3: season knowing that this organization is in the midst of a,
Speaker 3: rebuild you can call it a, retool it's a, rebuild
Speaker 3: we had to expect the ebbs and flows and the
Speaker 3: ups and downs that they clearly gave. Us just by
Speaker 3: your statistics that you provided to, us was the season
Speaker 3: better than we? Expected you'd be lying if you said,
Speaker 3: no it was better than because none of us saw
Speaker 3: them being able to put together a significant win. Streets
Speaker 3: and there were instances where they beat some very good.
Speaker 3: Teams they took advantage of opportunities that were presented to
Speaker 3: them and beat some teams that were clearly more talented
Speaker 3: than they. Were that gave us. Hope maybe sometimes it
Speaker 3: was false, hope but the hope was still. There, now
Speaker 3: having said all of, that do we think they are
Speaker 3: going and heading organizationally in the right? Direction BECAUSE i
Speaker 3: still don't think they are until they address and find
Speaker 3: a way and this is no what don this is your.
Speaker 2: Job this is your.
Speaker 3: Job it's a spright you signed on for this. Job
Speaker 3: but you need to address monumental issues that we have
Speaker 3: had for a period of going ON i don't even
Speaker 3: know how many years. Now and you need secondary consistent secondary.
Speaker 3: Scoring can we solve the problem of no secondary?
Speaker 2: Scoring that's key taking shots and getting goals back and getting.
Speaker 3: Goals you can't keep putting a band aid on an open.
Speaker 2: Wound they've been trying to treat the symptoms and not
Speaker 2: the underlying. Problems all in, all was it an entertaining hockey? Season,
Speaker 2: yes we were.
Speaker 3: Entertained we saw some good hockey being, played AND i think.
Speaker 2: The future is. Bright we saw a lot lot of
Speaker 2: good things from a lot of the young kids had
Speaker 2: the opportunity because they were actually given a training, camp
Speaker 2: a rookie, camp to legitimately fight for a, spot AND
Speaker 2: i think that Allowed boston to inject some youth into
Speaker 2: the main roster and things.
Speaker 3: That we have been asking for as fans for a
Speaker 3: couple of. YEARS a couple of years. Now, okay, great
Speaker 3: you've heard, it not that they listen to. Us but
Speaker 3: when you stand up and say that your goal is
Speaker 3: to make a deep run in the playoffs to bring
Speaker 3: A Stanley cup back To. Boston what is your, blueprint
Speaker 3: because this is not the blueprint for, it because now
Speaker 3: you've got other teams in The east that have accelerated
Speaker 3: their pace in getting, there and you're falling a little
Speaker 3: bit further, behind and so you've got to stop signing
Speaker 3: these players who would on any other teams be, good
Speaker 3: very good third and fourth line.
Speaker 2: Guys we shall see what the trading situation is between
Speaker 2: now And july, One but If boston is, SERIOUS i
Speaker 2: think we would see some business happening Before july. ONE
Speaker 2: i think.
Speaker 3: We'll see our next in our next, EPISODE i think
Speaker 3: we're going to try and Help John sweeney solve some
Speaker 3: of his.
Speaker 2: Problems, yes, yes, absolutely we'll be talking about guys who
Speaker 2: didn't really meet expectations and people we would love to
Speaker 2: see moved office.
Speaker 3: Roster, yeah moved off this roster until that. Episode thank
Speaker 3: you for. Listening please make sure you like and subscribe
Speaker 3: from more, content and be sure to leave a rating
Speaker 3: and a review to help Other ruins fans find. Us
Speaker 3: you can support our podcast by joining Our patreon or
Speaker 3: following us on our socials At tape To, Tape kay
Speaker 3: Had On substack at t to tape m k dot
Speaker 3: substack dot. Com any closing thoughts my friend Go, bees
Speaker 3: Go be's
Podbean