Boston Bruins Playoff Postmortem | Bruins Playoff News | Ep 141
Liner notes
🎙️The Boston Bruins’ season ends in disappointment after a playoff loss to the Buffalo Sabres and the problems go far beyond one series. In this Bruins game recap and breakdown, we analyze Boston’s lack of scoring depth, inconsistent offensive production, and the continued reliance on David Pastrnak as the team’s only elite threat.We also discuss Jeremy Swayman’s standout performance, the failure of key players to step up, and what Pastrnak’s comments reveal about the team’s urgency.
This episode covers Bruins news, player analysis, and what needs to change this offseason as Boston hockey looks to avoid wasting its remaining championship window.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please? I need
Speaker 1: something to do. I'll rock sending out a trough of bocking.
Speaker 2: This says, here's a chance, pop right down with goalie scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my one a.
Speaker 2: Move by the rookie too.
Speaker 1: On one plaster not moving in Marsha, get its oil dances.
Speaker 3: Ain't podcast at home right away?
Speaker 2: In Corners pastor Chester?
Speaker 1: What's that for?
Speaker 2: Boston?
Speaker 4: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruins Tape to Tape.
Speaker 4: I'm your host today, Caroline with a K. It's May
Speaker 4: and the Boston Bruins are no longer playing playoff hockey.
Speaker 4: But before I continue on with talking about the sadness
Speaker 4: that is being a Boston Bruins fan, let's welcome in
Speaker 4: my fantastic.
Speaker 2: Co host, Maria. Hey, Maria, how's it going. Oh it's okay.
Speaker 2: I'm probably going to talk about the sadness that is
Speaker 2: being a Boston sports fan this weekend. We're here, we
Speaker 2: woke up, we got out of bed, we're breathing.
Speaker 4: Somebody's got a sage TD garden or hire some ecti,
Speaker 4: which is most of all.
Speaker 2: They need to put the yellow steats back in. Number
Speaker 2: one melts the ice entirely, burn the parquet floor and
Speaker 2: start all over again.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a bad luck spot right now in Boston.
Speaker 4: If you like those haunted history tours. I'm sure that's
Speaker 4: the scariest place in the entire city right now for
Speaker 4: anyone who's not aware of what we're alluding to. On
Speaker 4: Friday night, the Bruins playoff chances ended abruptly with yet
Speaker 4: another lost on home ice. And then we had our
Speaker 4: Boston Celtics who were up three games to one on
Speaker 4: Philadelphia seventy six ers and proceeded to lose Game seven
Speaker 4: on the TD Garden parque floor. So who is more
Speaker 4: miserable than we are here in Boston right now. Oh,
Speaker 4: and then we have the head coach of our football team.
Speaker 2: Who is dealing with a myriad of cheating allegations, and
Speaker 2: a Boston Red Sox team who absolutely sucks. And now
Speaker 2: you have young players arguing with veteran players or trying
Speaker 2: to show each other up on the field. For those
Speaker 2: who have been waiting to enjoy our misery across the
Speaker 2: sports world, here you have it. I am giving it
Speaker 2: to you on a platter, and we deserve all that
Speaker 2: we have coming our way of this form.
Speaker 4: They should enjoy it now because if anything has taught
Speaker 4: me in sports, the city of Boston will not be
Speaker 4: down for long. It's the city of champions for a reason.
Speaker 4: But besides being sad that the Boston Bruins season is over,
Speaker 4: we can be happy to some extent that there is
Speaker 4: still hockey to watch that will be significantly less stressful
Speaker 4: for us because it doesn't matter what happens here on out,
Speaker 4: and you don't have a dog in the fight. It's
Speaker 4: funny how enjoyable the sport and the games can be
Speaker 4: to watch. Indeed, and of the three teams facing elimination
Speaker 4: on Friday night, the Montreal Canadians and the Tampa Bay
Speaker 4: Lightning were the only team game that actually resulted in
Speaker 4: a Game seven, and that happened just the other night,
Speaker 4: and it was a history in the making kind of game.
Speaker 2: When a professional hockey team who was in a game
Speaker 2: seven can only put what was the final shots on back,
Speaker 2: maybe nine shots on goal, and you win the free game.
Speaker 2: If you're the Tampa Bay Lightning, you're sitting there going
Speaker 2: how the hell did this happen?
Speaker 4: I hope that the Bruins coaching staff and Bruins players
Speaker 4: paid very close attention to how the Habs were able
Speaker 4: to accomplish something like that, because this season, Boston, at
Speaker 4: least at the very end, was quite good at getting
Speaker 4: very few shots on goal, but they couldn't win.
Speaker 2: And the Sabers will be playing the Habs in the
Speaker 2: second round.
Speaker 4: We've already seen Carolina and Philadelphia get started, and by
Speaker 4: the time this episode airs, they'll already have had their
Speaker 4: second game. But that one is going to be an
Speaker 4: interesting series to see how Philadelphia responds, because holy cow,
Speaker 4: did they get steamrolled.
Speaker 2: Yeah they looked a little bit deer in the headlights. Yeah,
Speaker 2: same one against Carolina. Rip Tockett is a very good,
Speaker 2: seasoned coach. I'm sure that he'll have his guys a
Speaker 2: little bit more or alert to what's going on. And
Speaker 2: Ladar didn't have a great game either, and to some
Speaker 2: degree he was left a bit high and dry in
Speaker 2: some instances. So that'll be interesting to see how that
Speaker 2: plays out. I'm hoping Philly gives the Kynes a little
Speaker 2: bit more of a run for their money, but we'll see.
Speaker 2: Carolina's been there, done that on more than one occasion,
Speaker 2: and this is new territory for the Philadelphia Flyers.
Speaker 4: It sure is, and Carolina their ability to just absolutely
Speaker 4: pepper the opposing team with shots. The only way I
Speaker 4: can see Carolina being stopped is besides their annual choke
Speaker 4: fest in the third round. Is a team that is
Speaker 4: exceptionally strong defensively with exceptional goaltending. That's really all that
Speaker 4: it's going to take. And there doesn't seem to be
Speaker 4: very many teams out there that have a defensive structure
Speaker 4: that is particularly built to play against a team like Caroline,
Speaker 4: which is fascinating because the way that Carolina plays isn't new.
Speaker 4: This is how they've been playing with Rod dbod for
Speaker 4: quite a while and I don't know, nobody seems to
Speaker 4: have created some kind of opposing defensive structure against that.
Speaker 2: And to your point of last week's episode, Freddie Anderson
Speaker 2: has been fantastic. So in the Last Out.
Speaker 4: In the last Colorado and Minnesota have kicked off their
Speaker 4: series as we suspected, It's probably going to be a
Speaker 4: well matched fight.
Speaker 2: Fifteen goals in the first game, where was the defense
Speaker 2: and the gold spent that game?
Speaker 4: That was an interesting tone setting game, especially with the
Speaker 4: fact that Colorado has been sitting and waiting and same
Speaker 4: thing with Carolina. They've been sitting and waiting and you
Speaker 4: never know how that's going to go.
Speaker 2: I know it didn't appear to be much rest in
Speaker 2: either one of those teams, but yeah, I was a
Speaker 2: little shocked by that nine to six score game one. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's crazy. Yeah.
Speaker 4: And then we've got the Vegas Golden Knights playing Anaheim
Speaker 4: and I'm sure that's going to be a snooze fest.
Speaker 4: And as a hockey fan, I can tell you that
Speaker 4: is not one of the games I will be staying
Speaker 4: up to make an effort to wow.
Speaker 2: I have very little interest in watching that game. I
Speaker 2: think I was more interested in hearing the postgame comments
Speaker 2: by Leon d Reisidel and Connor McDavid. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: how things are going to turn out in Edmonton at
Speaker 2: this point where you've got both of your superstar players,
Speaker 2: that your franchise has taken steps backwards.
Speaker 4: That's not something you want to hear. And it does
Speaker 4: make you wonder what kind of message they were sending,
Speaker 4: either on purpose or not, to ownership and management, because
Speaker 4: we're going to take it right back to the Boston Bruins,
Speaker 4: because our very own franchise player, David Posternach had some
Speaker 4: interesting things to say after the game on Friday, where
Speaker 4: he said, of course, it's disappointing turning thirty in a
Speaker 4: couple of weeks, had one sniff at the Cup. So far,
Speaker 4: it gets harder every single year. You don't want to
Speaker 4: waste any opportunity. What do you make of his comments?
Speaker 2: Is there anything to read into it? Should we be worried?
Speaker 2: What I read into it is a cleef for help
Speaker 2: to management. Get this guy some fucking help. We have
Speaker 2: been dealing with conversations around this team's lack of scoring
Speaker 2: for years now. I'm not talking one season, two season,
Speaker 2: four years. You can't keep shopping in Filean's basement and
Speaker 2: putting contracts that are like a noose around your neck
Speaker 2: against your cap space and thinking that the results are
Speaker 2: ever going to change. The reality is the Bruins lost
Speaker 2: to the Buffalo Sabers because they couldn't score more goals
Speaker 2: than the Buffalo Sabers did. That's the reality of it.
Speaker 2: You couldn't score because you don't have proven finishers on
Speaker 2: this team, and Morgan geeky, disappeared when you needed him most.
Speaker 2: Elias Lindholm disappeared when you needed him most. Pavel Zaka
Speaker 2: disappeared and David Pasternak is subject to criticism. I understand
Speaker 2: that he is your superstar, but he's also the one
Speaker 2: player on your team that every other team knows they
Speaker 2: can just target and try to shut him down and
Speaker 2: prevent him from doing what he is capable of doing.
Speaker 2: So to me, how I read that is a crime.
Speaker 2: For help.
Speaker 1: Now, at some point, Sweeney and Eely need to shult
Speaker 1: to get off the park, shit, or get off the
Speaker 1: park and address the gaping pole that this team has
Speaker 1: had for quite some time.
Speaker 2: Agreed.
Speaker 4: I think it's been particularly frustrating seeing David Pasternak this
Speaker 4: last season.
Speaker 2: But I'm not saying that he.
Speaker 5: Was relegated to a playmaker's role. I think that that's no, no,
Speaker 5: But he he knowledge to that he should have taken
Speaker 5: more shots. It's easy to say that now, and when
Speaker 5: you now, you want to say, well, why did you
Speaker 5: pass up?
Speaker 2: Right? Why did you pass up? You wonder why people
Speaker 2: are like fancy in the building and boeing, It's because
Speaker 2: you guys are passing up open looks. I don't know
Speaker 2: if it's a mindset, a philosophy, or what the hell
Speaker 2: the problem is?
Speaker 4: I mean, I wonder was he passing the puck all
Speaker 4: that frequently or making these plays all that frequently, and
Speaker 4: an effort to diversify the goal scoring to see can
Speaker 4: we develop can we get other people going? The problem
Speaker 4: that I've had over the last five years has been
Speaker 4: the fact that you will have flash in the pan
Speaker 4: players and we just with the exception of David Pasternak,
Speaker 4: we just have not had or seen in a very
Speaker 4: long time, another player outside of Pasta who is a
Speaker 4: reliable offense ive threat. We had the second line this season, they.
Speaker 2: Were they were one of the best lines in the league. Yes,
Speaker 2: but then Arvidson goes out with an injury, right right,
Speaker 2: But this came It feels like it came out of nowhere.
Speaker 2: So how can I then assume that is the real deal?
Speaker 2: Because we've seen Pavel Zaka be mediocre in the scoring
Speaker 2: department for a very long time and then all of
Speaker 2: a sudden he is great. We saw Charlie Coyle be really.
Speaker 4: Disappointing for a long time and then all of a
Speaker 4: sudden he was great for one or two seasons. Brandon
Speaker 4: Carlow mediocre for a really long time, and then one
Speaker 4: or two seasons he was great, and then they.
Speaker 2: Just drop off. Where are these players?
Speaker 4: And I hate to always go backwards because it doesn't
Speaker 4: do us any good. But we don't have a new
Speaker 4: David Krachi. We don't have a new Patrice Bergeron or
Speaker 4: a new Brad Marshan. We don't have those players who
Speaker 4: you look at them and they are great year after year.
Speaker 4: We just don't see that consistency on this roster. So
Speaker 4: there is no reliable depth and you're at the mercy
Speaker 4: of well, I hope this is a good season, and
Speaker 4: it's likely that if you have these flash in the
Speaker 4: pan guys, they will go hot and cold. And that's
Speaker 4: exactly what happened with that second line. I think management understand.
Speaker 4: Management should be well aware of the fact that it
Speaker 4: was malfeasance on their part not to plan for the
Speaker 4: day that Teres Bergeron and David Craigie were no longer
Speaker 4: Boston Ruins. And now you're trying to piece snail something
Speaker 4: together in the hope that lightning strikes and that you, oh, well, aw,
Speaker 4: look we found the guy, right, we just found the
Speaker 4: guy in a deal. And those guys don't fall off
Speaker 4: of trees easily, right, they don't. They don't now you've
Speaker 4: got James Higgins, who will see what he is able
Speaker 4: to bring to the table in his first full season.
Speaker 4: There was no reason to throw that kid into this
Speaker 4: scenario right now, Absolutely none, as far as I'm concerned. Look,
Speaker 4: I'm the one who at the start of the season,
Speaker 4: and I'll call myself out, my prediction was they wouldn't
Speaker 4: even make the playoffs with the roster that we were
Speaker 4: looking at in front of us. So for them to
Speaker 4: have played as decently as they did throughout the course
Speaker 4: of the regular season and to make the playoffs, they
Speaker 4: proved me wrong. What they didn't prove to themselves is
Speaker 4: that they had the mental fortitude to fight through the
Speaker 4: adversity and deal with whatever issue they have with fucking
Speaker 4: winning at home and be able to take advantage of
Speaker 4: the scoring opportunities when they presented themselves.
Speaker 2: But Alec Lyon for the Sabers played really well. Did
Speaker 2: he play better than Jeremy Swayman? Ok? Maybe statistically he did,
Speaker 2: but he wasn't challenged as well as Swayman was. If
Speaker 2: you had been able to get him moving from side
Speaker 2: to side, but you couldn't even manage that. So that
Speaker 2: is an inherent flaw on you an inherent criticism on
Speaker 2: you and the roster construction, and also credit to the
Speaker 2: Buffalo Savers for their defensive structure. Both things can be true,
Speaker 2: but what is more frustrating is that there was too
Speaker 2: much and we've said this a lot during the regular season,
Speaker 2: too much one and done offensively, too much of it.
Speaker 2: You're not going to have any sustained success with that
Speaker 2: kind of a recipe, yes, exactly.
Speaker 4: And I think even when we're talking about the fact
Speaker 4: that the Bruins' management has not been able to bring
Speaker 4: in anybody who is sustaining any kind of offensive prowess,
Speaker 4: it seems like the only players who they were able
Speaker 4: to get that out of were all players that they
Speaker 4: drafted themselves. Maybe that means James Hagen's is gonna eventually.
Speaker 2: Fill one of those roles.
Speaker 4: But I think one of the things that Ruins management
Speaker 4: scouting whoever they like, to try and find that diamond
Speaker 4: in the rough. And look, I think that we've gotten lucky,
Speaker 4: and we've certainly found some of those diamonds in the rough,
Speaker 4: but unfortunately, it still doesn't seem like any of them
Speaker 4: are actual diamonds. They've been I don't know, some kind
Speaker 4: of precious.
Speaker 2: Gem, ruby, an emerald, but not one of them is
Speaker 2: a diamond, right.
Speaker 4: I'm thinking of Morgan Geeky, and again I'm not in
Speaker 4: disagreement with the contract that he landed. I am not
Speaker 4: dissatisfied with Morgan Geeky. I just think he's not been
Speaker 4: tested long enough.
Speaker 2: He's not a big game player. No, he's not a
Speaker 2: big game player. I think this is an opportunity for
Speaker 2: us to be honest about what we saw. And I
Speaker 2: expected him to step up as he had done during
Speaker 2: the regular season, and he was virtually invisible. You want
Speaker 2: me to encourage the resigning of Pavosaka, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know because I don't see enough from these
Speaker 2: players that instill the faith that I want these guys
Speaker 2: to be part of this continuous rebuild or retool or
Speaker 2: whatever the hell the Ruins organization wants to call it
Speaker 2: that they're doing right now. And I'll throw Charlie Macka
Speaker 2: going into that bucket too. You know, i'n't been shy
Speaker 2: about saying that he is, to me, one of the
Speaker 2: most overrated defensemen that I have seen in my long
Speaker 2: tenure of watching Bucky. To me, a franchise altering defenceman
Speaker 2: is Kale mcar Charlie. You want to know Kal mccar no,
Speaker 2: And maybe that's not what the Bruins need him to
Speaker 2: be or want him to be, But I don't view
Speaker 2: him as our franchise altering defenseman. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: And one of the other things that again I hate
Speaker 4: living in the past here, but it's what's missing when
Speaker 4: I talk about David Krachie, What's what was his nickname?
Speaker 4: What did we say, Oh, here comes playoff stretch. Yeah,
Speaker 4: not a single player until quite literally the end in
Speaker 4: David Pasternach and Ermis Wayman, although I would argue he
Speaker 4: was at such a high level anyways, not a single
Speaker 4: other player on that roster elevated their game in this
Speaker 4: playoff series.
Speaker 2: Not a single one. In my opinion.
Speaker 4: Nobody brought it. Nobody showed me that step up, that
Speaker 4: playoff mentality, that leap in performance. Nobody was ex explosive,
Speaker 4: nobody looked like they were shot out of a cannon.
Speaker 2: But none of that existed. None of that existed for me. Yes,
Speaker 2: I wholeheartedly agree with you. Again, We're going to have
Speaker 2: these conversations during the off season because clearly there's still
Speaker 2: a significant amount of work to do in an effort
Speaker 2: to try and build a potentially championship roster. Here for
Speaker 2: the Boston Bruins.
Speaker 4: Again, Yes, and I think that the laundry list of
Speaker 4: not just their needs from a personnel perspective, there's a
Speaker 4: clear list there. There's also a clear list of changes
Speaker 4: that need to happen on the ice behaviorally, the shot taking,
Speaker 4: the penalty issues, the stick infractions. I'm optimistic to some
Speaker 4: extent because I think the issues are both fixable and
Speaker 4: attainable dots.
Speaker 2: I think the fixable part is what is extremely challenging,
Speaker 2: because if you want to fix it quickly, then you
Speaker 2: need to make a big hockey trade. Right If you're
Speaker 2: telling me that we can fix it, but we're going
Speaker 2: to fix it through drafting and patience, Okay, but who
Speaker 2: is it who have you identified that you're going to
Speaker 2: fix this problem with? Because listen, based on what David said,
Speaker 2: he's going to be thirty years old. Hey this summer,
Speaker 2: how many more hockey years does he have? Realistically, how
Speaker 2: many more hockey years does he have?
Speaker 1: Do you?
Speaker 2: And I'm talking to you, Sweeney and Neely, do you
Speaker 2: want to run the risk of having this guy who
Speaker 2: clearly wants another opportunity at a Stanley Cup. How long
Speaker 2: do you think he's going to wait around for that?
Speaker 2: How long do the people in Edmonton think that Conor
Speaker 2: McDavid is going to wait around for that before they
Speaker 2: go to their agents and say, get me the hell
Speaker 2: out of here. We're looking at another four or five
Speaker 2: years yeah before and it's so hard to get there.
Speaker 2: It is so freaking hard to get there. How long
Speaker 2: do you think these guys are going to sit around
Speaker 2: waiting for that to occur?
Speaker 4: I think I wouldn't blame a single elite player for
Speaker 4: making that request. And quite frankly, even though there was
Speaker 4: significant pain involved around it with Brad marshand, he used
Speaker 4: that same privilege last year in his benefits. Right now,
Speaker 4: it's easy to talk about because it's not realistic. It's
Speaker 4: not something that's happening right now. Marshan, like it's where
Speaker 4: a year removed. We saw that it was ultimately worth
Speaker 4: it for him in the long run, for what he
Speaker 4: wanted and why he did it. But I think it's
Speaker 4: a very real possibility that hopefully those idiots in the
Speaker 4: front office don't allow to happen.
Speaker 2: I'm sure they're very well aware of where their deficiencies
Speaker 2: are on this roster. But the question is how to
Speaker 2: get them addrussed, and how long it's going to take
Speaker 2: to get them addrussed, And what risk do you write
Speaker 2: on that your veterans like David Pasternach. Maybe they aren't,
Speaker 2: I don't know, but I think of if it's me
Speaker 2: and I'm thirty years old and I'm looking at another
Speaker 2: four or five years of potentially trying to rebuild this team,
Speaker 2: peace out, get me out of here. Yes, agreed, So
Speaker 2: let's do a real quick stick taps for the series
Speaker 2: as a whole. Jeremy Swayman absolutely told us all to
Speaker 2: have a cup of you know what because we were
Speaker 2: all very critical of him. A lot was made of
Speaker 2: the contract that he signed, but there is no arguing
Speaker 2: in my mind that Jeremy Swayman was the best Boston
Speaker 2: Bruin player in this series versus the Sabers. Oh, hands
Speaker 2: down one in agreement. I think he's the only one
Speaker 2: that I would give a genuine stick tap to. As well.
Speaker 4: For David Pasternach, let's just say he's excused from the
Speaker 4: conversation entirely.
Speaker 2: Yes and no. In my view, the leaders on this
Speaker 2: team and I'm talking about Pasta and Charlie and hanpus
Speaker 2: lind Home. They needed to be difference makers and they
Speaker 2: were not. They absolutely were not difference makers in this series.
Speaker 2: And I know you've got a mixture of vets and
Speaker 2: young kids, but those are the guys that are wearing
Speaker 2: the letters on your jerseys. When you have captains in
Speaker 2: the past or leaders in the past, the likes of
Speaker 2: which were Zadano Chara and Patrise Berjon and Brat Marshand
Speaker 2: and you physically see them just by the performance on
Speaker 2: the ice, saying to their teammates and to the fans,
Speaker 2: watch me and do as I do. Did you see
Speaker 2: any of that in this series against Buffalo? Not until
Speaker 2: it was too late. And I don't think you need
Speaker 2: to have a sea on your jersey or a lettle
Speaker 2: on your jersey to do that, but that was definitely missing.
Speaker 4: Yes, yes, but also for play off purposes. That's what
Speaker 4: your game in the playoffs requires of every player. And
Speaker 4: even in the regular season, and next week we'll talk
Speaker 4: about will do a whole season review, post mortem evaluation,
Speaker 4: but even all during the regular season, we never saw
Speaker 4: anybody take the team on their back. We saw David
Speaker 4: Posternoch do that last year, right around the time that
Speaker 4: Brad Marsham was traded away. If you follow me on
Speaker 4: my socials, you'll know that I am coming to the
Speaker 4: opinion that when it is time to name the next
Speaker 4: captain of the Boston Bruins, I think it needs to
Speaker 4: come from the outside because as much as I love
Speaker 4: David Posternach and I think he's earned it, I almost
Speaker 4: wondered if him taking on that leadership role with the
Speaker 4: departure of Brad marshand, if that the pressure of the expectations,
Speaker 4: whatever you want to call it, if that was detrimental
Speaker 4: to his game, or maybe he felt like he had
Speaker 4: to be a different player, Maybe he felt he had
Speaker 4: to be that playmaker to be a leader. I don't know, obviously,
Speaker 4: I think that it did something to his game and Boston.
Speaker 4: As much as we talk about the things that they need,
Speaker 4: the things that they were missing, he's that bird in hand,
Speaker 4: and we need to make sure that no matter what happens,
Speaker 4: he's still that reliable goal scorer. I mean, we only
Speaker 4: have the one, and we need to make sure that
Speaker 4: he's still performing in in that role. I mean, he
Speaker 4: had yes one hundred points this season, but nowhere's near
Speaker 4: the goals that we're used to and I don't know,
Speaker 4: I'm starting to feel like, whatever the decision is made,
Speaker 4: I don't think they're going to go looking outside. But
Speaker 4: I do think that it negatively impacted his performance on
Speaker 4: the ice. But penalty box is anyone not in the box?
Speaker 2: Otherwise? What about the kids? I mean, I mean the
Speaker 2: kids were the kids. I don't think they had Did
Speaker 2: they play well? Did they play poorly? I'm kind of
Speaker 2: middle of the road. They weren't very noticeable. They didn't
Speaker 2: have any type of an impact in the end results
Speaker 2: of games. So I'm not going to dump on them
Speaker 2: because I expected more from other But if we were
Speaker 2: putting our eggs all in the kid basket, then we
Speaker 2: were in bigger trouble than we thought we were in.
Speaker 2: Same thing with the fourth line. They performed well, but
Speaker 2: if you're putting all your eggs in that basket, you're
Speaker 2: in big trouble. They're in really big trouble. Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 4: I do think that Husnadinov started to become a little
Speaker 4: bit more noticeable in the final two games of the series.
Speaker 2: I liked his game.
Speaker 4: He was in a lot of places. I think he's
Speaker 4: got a lot of speed. He's also still very young,
Speaker 4: so this is not the top of his game. I
Speaker 4: think he has more to give. I think also with Freezerman,
Speaker 4: he's another one. He's young, and it's not that they
Speaker 4: are not fast enough or strong enough, but you could
Speaker 4: definitely see a lot of our more inexperienced and younger
Speaker 4: players just not as strong on the puck as someone
Speaker 4: like David Pasternach and so constantly than just being pickpocketed
Speaker 4: and pushed around because they just didn't have whatever it
Speaker 4: takes strength, physical, strength of mind, whatever it takes to
Speaker 4: be strong on the puck and maintain possession.
Speaker 2: But I'm not worried about them.
Speaker 4: I think as long as they continue to be developed properly,
Speaker 4: and I think under the guidance of Marco Sturm they
Speaker 4: will be that they'll become better.
Speaker 2: Hopefully the series was a learning experience for these younger guys.
Speaker 2: I will say, though, we do need to touch upon
Speaker 2: Charlie mclboy's actions at the end of the Guests.
Speaker 4: I want to I'm going to come out on record
Speaker 4: and say I don't care what the other guy did
Speaker 4: to you. I don't care if he boarded you to
Speaker 4: an inch of your life. I think it's unacceptable that
Speaker 4: he turned around and tried to do a truba. Yeah,
Speaker 4: it's disgusting, it's absolutely it's I'd rather have seen him
Speaker 4: try and throw a punch. No, it's shitty, it's just
Speaker 4: shitty action.
Speaker 2: It's dirty. And I understand what was done to you,
Speaker 2: what precipitated the action was dirty as well. But your
Speaker 2: stick is not a freaking weapon. And you're going to
Speaker 2: get suspended, Charlie. When you're offered an in person hearing,
Speaker 2: you are going to get a suspension. It's just a
Speaker 2: question of how many games that suspension is going to be. Yes.
Speaker 4: Ever since and I call it swinging a truba, ever
Speaker 4: since Truba walked away without any sort of repercussion for
Speaker 4: doing that to Trent Frederick a couple of years ago,
Speaker 4: it seems like any other time that it has happened since,
Speaker 4: player Safety has taken that very seriously.
Speaker 3: And because if they screwed that one up, totally screwed
Speaker 3: it up. They did, they did, and for a leader
Speaker 3: to do that again and stage just there's no excuse.
Speaker 3: There's no excuse, no not Yeah.
Speaker 2: I hope you enjoy your first three or four games
Speaker 2: watching from the eighth floor Charlie to start next season,
Speaker 2: because it's going to be I'm guessing it's going to
Speaker 2: be at least three games. I think that many we'll see.
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know it's Charlie a first time offender.
Speaker 2: I don't know of that sort. Yes, it's not the
Speaker 2: first time he's been suspended. I don't think that factors in.
Speaker 2: I think it's just a matter of now you're going
Speaker 2: to be labeled as a quote unquote repeat offender. I'd
Speaker 2: be surprised if it isn't at least three games.
Speaker 4: But yeah, with that being said, we'll watch our Stanley
Speaker 4: Cup playoff hockey slightly sad, but at least relieved of
Speaker 4: the stress and anxiety that was watching the Boston Bruins
Speaker 4: play against the Buffalo Sabers.
Speaker 2: I'm making it known that my rooting interests moving forward
Speaker 2: are with the Buffalo Sabers. I'm not there yet. I'm
Speaker 2: still bitter. I'm not there yet.
Speaker 4: I want to see them earn, like really earn their spot,
Speaker 4: because I don't think that they were actually genuinely challenged
Speaker 4: in any meaningful way against Boston after the first two games, well,
Speaker 4: I don't.
Speaker 2: Know how much of a challenge they're going to get
Speaker 2: against a team that can only manage nine shots on
Speaker 2: goal in a game, but we shall see what the
Speaker 2: Montreal Canadians bring them.
Speaker 4: Make sure you like to subscribe for more content, and
Speaker 4: be sure to leave a rating and review to help
Speaker 4: other Bruins fans find us. You can support the podcast
Speaker 4: by joining our Patreon or following us on our socials
Speaker 4: at Tape to Tape MK and on Substack at Tape
Speaker 4: to Tape MK dot substack dot com. Any final thoughts, Maria.
Speaker 2: I know I can't. I can't even I can't even
Speaker 2: say what we normally say in closing the Bruins season
Speaker 2: is over. It ended as I expected it to end,
Speaker 2: with some bitter disappointment. That's all I have to say.
Speaker 2: I'll say it as always go bes
Speaker 4: The b
Podbean