Boston Bruins on the Brink vs Sabres | Bruins Playoff News | Ep 140
Liner notes
🎙️The Boston Bruins are on the brink of elimination after a brutal Game 4 loss to the Buffalo Sabres, and the problems go far deeper than one bad night. In this Bruins game recap, we break down what’s gone wrong in this series: from defensive breakdowns and costly turnovers to a complete lack of offensive production.We dive into Bruins player analysis, including Jeremy Swayman’s standout effort despite the chaos in front of him, and share bruins hot takes and insider chatter on Boston’s struggles. The growing concerns around Boston’s inability to adjust to Buffalo’s aggressive forecheck are front and center.With Sabres now fully in control, this episode covers the biggest issues facing Boston hockey right now, with NHL insider insights and what needs to change heading into Game 5.
If the Bruins want to keep their season alive, it starts with accountability, execution, and finally making adjustments.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please?
Speaker 2: I need something to do.
Speaker 1: I'll jack send it out A trouble bocking, this says today,
Speaker 1: here's a chance pop fa right down with goalie scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my one a move by the rookie too.
Speaker 2: On one faster not moving in shoeing, jet on Oil
Speaker 2: dances in podcast.
Speaker 1: Wait home right way corner, paster Chester. What is that for? Moston?
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Ruins Tape to tape.
Speaker 1: I will be your host today. I am Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 1: We are recording today's episode on Monday, April twenty seventh,
Speaker 1: the day after one of the most disgusting playoff losses
Speaker 1: in recent Ruins history. But before we pile on to
Speaker 1: that horrible, horrible showing out the Boston Ruins, I want
Speaker 1: to welcome in my fabulous co host, Caroline with a K.
Speaker 1: Welcome in, and have you recovered from our rant of yesterday.
Speaker 1: I'm actually more discussed today because flipping around on social
Speaker 1: media and seeing a very short one from Storm and
Speaker 1: a short one from Chucky, and I'm like, I don't
Speaker 1: care what you.
Speaker 2: Have to say.
Speaker 1: There wasn't even any excuse making because they were like
Speaker 1: DearS in the headlights When asked about it, particularly the coach,
Speaker 1: I have no answer for that. Well, you better find
Speaker 1: a fucking answer, marfo or you're all going to be
Speaker 1: packing your golf bags. Potentially on Tuesday night, We're gonna
Speaker 1: take a little bit deeper dive into yesterday's game and
Speaker 1: also this series as a whole, because I have been
Speaker 1: away for most of these games. I was able to
Speaker 1: listen to some of the games because I was disjointed
Speaker 1: with the time change in the area of the world
Speaker 1: that I was in. Did we underestimate the Buffalo Savers?
Speaker 1: Are we borderline disrespecting the Buffalo Savers? Were our expectations
Speaker 1: too high for this Boston Ruins roster going in to
Speaker 1: this series given the way that games have played out
Speaker 1: thus far. I also want to talk about the Bruins
Speaker 1: whole playoff record since twenty nineteen, and also the fact
Speaker 1: that we are potentially not going to have Victor Arvidson
Speaker 1: in the lineup because as of our recording, the Ruins
Speaker 1: have started their regular practice and Arvidson is not on
Speaker 1: the ice for practice, and in looking at the replay
Speaker 1: of the hit that he took that sent him down
Speaker 1: to the tunnel. He looked a little bit sunned and
Speaker 1: out of sorts, and now I'm beginning to wonder if
Speaker 1: we're looking at a potential percussion isshue. It doesn't appear
Speaker 1: that Marco had any type of update. And also another
Speaker 1: absentee player. This is supposted by our friend of the pod,
Speaker 1: Bridget Prue. Nikita'sadora is also absent from Brohan's practice today. Interesting,
Speaker 1: So I do recall that Nikita, I can't remember if
Speaker 1: it was game three, game two, he disappeared for a
Speaker 1: little bit down to the tunnel at one point in time.
Speaker 1: So I'm wondering if there's something that is nagging, creeping
Speaker 1: up or bothering him, because he too hasn't he hasn't
Speaker 1: exuded his full authority, so to speak, in this series
Speaker 1: as well. Well, we'll get to all of that as
Speaker 1: it relates to the Western Bruins that we will take
Speaker 1: our spin around the rink because there are other playoff
Speaker 1: series that have now concluded and others that may end
Speaker 1: up concluding in the very near future. So we had
Speaker 1: in the West, we had the Colorado Avalanche sweep Bank
Speaker 1: La Kings yesterday, bittersweet ending for Anse Copetar, who has
Speaker 1: had an illustrious career in the league. So I'm sure
Speaker 1: the LA Kings did their best to try and extend
Speaker 1: that series, but Colorado was a little bit more than
Speaker 1: they could handle. Yeah, and I find it interesting that
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's really like a criticism, but
Speaker 1: people have said, how come it was so close? And
Speaker 1: why did Colorado not totally obliterate them? At the end
Speaker 1: of the day, Colorado doesn't want to spend all the
Speaker 1: gas in the tank on a first round team, so
Speaker 1: why would you expect them to blast them out of
Speaker 1: the water. They clearly were the better team in spite
Speaker 1: of the best efforts that LA could throw out there.
Speaker 1: It almost felt like Colorado was just reserving their energy
Speaker 1: and their effort to be just good enough because they
Speaker 1: know it's a marathon, it's not a sprint, So what's
Speaker 1: the point in potentially opening up yourself to injury or exhaustion.
Speaker 1: So I find those kind of criticisms of Colorado a
Speaker 1: little bit silly. I hear what you're saying, but my
Speaker 1: opinion is that the Stanley Cup playoffs is a totally
Speaker 1: different dynamic and mindset than the regular season, and it
Speaker 1: seems that players and teams find another gear, and I
Speaker 1: think that's why in most instances, the games themselves are
Speaker 1: relatively closer than what you might be saying in the
Speaker 1: regular season. To the ABS credit, even if they were
Speaker 1: not clicked into high gear, they bought themselves a little
Speaker 1: that of rest for they have to get to the
Speaker 1: next round. So kudos to them for giving themselves a
Speaker 1: little bit of a breather so that they can potentially
Speaker 1: survive the marathon that.
Speaker 2: Is the Stanley Cup playoffs.
Speaker 1: And just looking at my bracket too, realizing that they're
Speaker 1: going to have to play the winners of Dallas Minnesota,
Speaker 1: and whoever comes out from that series, I think is
Speaker 1: going to be a much tougher competition. Again, no disrespect
Speaker 1: to LA they kept up. It was competitive. It was
Speaker 1: not a blowout.
Speaker 2: No, they were not blowout games.
Speaker 1: You're right. No, whoever it is that Colorado plays next,
Speaker 1: it's going to be a much more.
Speaker 2: Difficult series to play against, definitely.
Speaker 1: And continuing in the West, I find this shocking. The
Speaker 1: Anaheim Ducks are up three games to one on the
Speaker 1: Edmonton Oilers. Now, the game on Sunday night went into
Speaker 1: overtime and it was a bit of our controversial goal
Speaker 1: that the Ducks scored only a couple of minutes into overtime.
Speaker 1: It took a long time to review this goal. The
Speaker 1: original call was a good goal. How the officials called
Speaker 1: it a good goal when you couldn't see the entirety
Speaker 1: of the pop crossing for redline because Jari Skate was there,
Speaker 1: and so right after an extensive review, they deemed it
Speaker 1: to be a good goal. And Anaheim is now up
Speaker 1: three games to one. But I still find that shocking.
Speaker 1: I don't know how you feel, but I guess I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm let me put it this way. The part that
Speaker 1: I find surprising is the fact that it's Anaheim. I'm
Speaker 1: not surprised that Edmonton is finding themselves in this kind
Speaker 1: of situation because a couple of things. One, this is
Speaker 1: a team that I think overly relies on two players
Speaker 1: to make things happen. And I have said for years
Speaker 1: hockey is one of those sports where you cannot win
Speaker 1: a championship on the back of one player two players.
Speaker 2: You can't. It is like not really possible.
Speaker 1: You have to have deep play, like deep lines and
Speaker 1: contributions from everyone, and incredible goaltending and you're seeing again
Speaker 1: this situation where it's coming back down to McDavid and
Speaker 1: dry Cidle, maybe Zach Hyman, but you also have Tristiannari. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm rarely ever going to go after a goaltender because,
Speaker 1: like we talked about in our emergency pod, when you
Speaker 1: are losing games six to one, that is rarely entirely
Speaker 1: fault of the goaltender. Okay, you're losing six to one,
Speaker 1: what the heck are the other guys doing in front
Speaker 1: of them? But two things can be true at the
Speaker 1: same time. And I say this also about Stuart Skinner
Speaker 1: in Pittsburgh, and I said this the last game that
Speaker 1: he played. It's not necessarily his fault that they're losing
Speaker 1: if the players in front of them are not getting
Speaker 1: the job done. However, Harry and Skinner are not going
Speaker 1: to steal games for you.
Speaker 2: They're just not.
Speaker 1: They're not Wedgwood, they're not Swaymen, they're not Basilevski, they're
Speaker 1: not Bobrovski.
Speaker 2: We saw.
Speaker 1: I can't remember now because the three years in a
Speaker 1: row that the Panthers have been to the finals, but
Speaker 1: one of those years the Florida players were basically losing
Speaker 1: the series and it was Bobrovski who kept them in
Speaker 1: it and got them out of that series.
Speaker 2: Sorry, Tristan, it's not you.
Speaker 1: And again the Oilers have played deep two years in
Speaker 1: a row.
Speaker 2: Look at what happened with Florida.
Speaker 1: They fell apart, not because they were bad, but because
Speaker 1: they physically had to recover from three straight Stanley Cup runs.
Speaker 1: Edmonton has gone deep two years in a row. It
Speaker 1: just becomes physically challenging in this day and age to
Speaker 1: go far. I can't believe that Anaheim is the beneficiary
Speaker 1: of whatever the heck is happening over there, But here
Speaker 1: we are. They had to have known that it was
Speaker 1: still a risk putting their eggs in the Jari basket, right.
Speaker 1: They didn't make a change, Maria, they know, I know,
Speaker 1: and you know what, I don't feel bad for them anymore.
Speaker 1: I'm actually kind of sick and tired of fearing about it.
Speaker 1: To be perfectly honest with you, If you're not at
Speaker 1: this point, I think even an unseasoned hockey fan understands
Speaker 1: that to some degree, you need to build your team
Speaker 1: from the back end forward. If you don't have good gold,
Speaker 1: then how far do you think you're going to get
Speaker 1: you can have as many Connor McDavid as you want,
Speaker 1: but it's you're not getting good goaltending or you don't
Speaker 1: have a good defensive structure, then you're not going to
Speaker 1: get very far. That's just my opinion. We'll see what
Speaker 1: happens and see if Anahearm can block what like glean
Speaker 1: might be a very big upset. Honestly, you know what
Speaker 1: would be hilarious. And this is just a sidebar because
Speaker 1: I thought this conversation has been coming up again in
Speaker 1: the social seeds that I see, because it's not only
Speaker 1: that time of year playoffs people complaining about the structure
Speaker 1: of the playoffs, which we have voiced our opinions on,
Speaker 1: but then also a lot of newer hockey fans saying,
Speaker 1: wait a minute. You're telling me that the two teams
Speaker 1: that play against each other in the Stanley Cup aren't
Speaker 1: necessarily the two best teams. And that's a fact because
Speaker 1: think about it this way. But you mean to tell
Speaker 1: me that the next round could be Utah versus Anaheim, Okay,
Speaker 1: Colorado versus Dallas, Yes, and that the winner of those two,
Speaker 1: like the Western Conference, would be between some behemoth Dallas, Minnesota,
Speaker 1: Colorado and newby Green to playoffs Anaheim and Utah. Like
Speaker 1: good for Anaheim and Utah. Don't get me wrong, would
Speaker 1: call that parody? Someone call that parody and give credit
Speaker 1: to parody. I know. I'm just saying that's the buzzword
Speaker 1: that is being used. That's just crazy to think about.
Speaker 1: And again in the West, they have I think a
Speaker 1: significantly bigger issue with that. We've seen this many years
Speaker 1: in a row now that the teams that are not
Speaker 1: making it to the conference final, like it's absolutely insane
Speaker 1: that they're not there because they get knocked out earlier around.
Speaker 2: I don't see that.
Speaker 1: Being an issue in the East, but I think that's
Speaker 1: where your parody is. Where it's like every single round,
Speaker 1: those teams are genuinely killing it. I mean, I'm trying
Speaker 1: to say this without being insulting, but like, no, I
Speaker 1: understand the promise of what you're saying. That's out being
Speaker 1: disrespectful to those teams. Listen, that Pacific Division was hot garbage.
Speaker 1: It was not in line with the level of play
Speaker 1: that we saw in the other divisions this season. So
Speaker 1: the next series in the West is the Dallas Yards
Speaker 1: and Minnesota Wild and those teams are tied at two
Speaker 1: games apiece and I have no idea who is going
Speaker 1: to come out in that series, but that has the
Speaker 1: potential to go six to seven games. Yeah, very well matched.
Speaker 1: Colorado could be getting the nice long rest there, which
Speaker 1: is pros and cons to that. I think sometimes when
Speaker 1: a team sits around for too long a period of
Speaker 1: time and all they're able to do is practice against
Speaker 1: each other, I don't think that helps keep you sharp
Speaker 1: and focus. And then to finish up in the West,
Speaker 1: we have Utah Mammots and Vegas Bolden Knights, with Utah
Speaker 1: being up to games to one at this point. But
Speaker 1: I am so disinterested in this series, like just care
Speaker 1: less of us, And even though my guy John Tortorella
Speaker 1: is behind the bench for Vegas, I really am not like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not dying to.
Speaker 2: Watch one of these games.
Speaker 1: No, by no means, but I am thrilled that Utah
Speaker 1: is doing well and I want to see them move on.
Speaker 2: They're my underdog.
Speaker 1: Thanks to Anna forgetting me on that wagon, because I
Speaker 1: love to see that success story because they are the
Speaker 1: buffalo of the West in the sense that ownership issues
Speaker 1: management issues really prevented them from having a genuine opportunity,
Speaker 1: and the league did them a disservice too. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you want to see a quote unquote new young franchise
Speaker 1: be successful in a new place because that's just good
Speaker 1: for the game.
Speaker 2: And also screw Vegas. Yeah, I hear you. Okay.
Speaker 1: So our roundup in the East is Carolina swept the
Speaker 1: Ottawa Senators over the weekend. Tim Stutzel is such an
Speaker 1: a hole. He is just such an a hole, right
Speaker 1: with all of the embellishment. I'm glad they're gone.
Speaker 2: I'm glad.
Speaker 1: I feel bad to Lena's because he played his assaf
Speaker 1: he was their best player. Rady could Chook was almost
Speaker 1: a no show in this series. Yeah he was. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he was a waste of space. We're waiting for Carolina
Speaker 1: to just get to the Eastern Conference finals so they
Speaker 1: can choke yet again. But watching Carolina, we talked all
Speaker 1: season in the East about how it never really seemed
Speaker 1: like somebody took charge and took the lead in the conference, like.
Speaker 2: Colorado head out in West.
Speaker 1: But watching Carolina, they have sent a message this playoffs
Speaker 1: that they are serious. They are sticking with their game plan,
Speaker 1: coming in peppering the opponents with a gazillion shots, and
Speaker 1: they are good this year. They've always been good, but
Speaker 1: I feel like they are a little bit next level.
Speaker 1: And Freddy Anderson has been lights out. His kryptonite is
Speaker 1: getting hurt. He always has been an excellent goalpender. He's
Speaker 1: just prone to a variety of sometimes weird injuries. Just
Speaker 1: from what I've seen, I'm super impressed and I think
Speaker 1: that they will be a very scary opponent to play against. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll see who they end up playing. Because Tampa and
Speaker 1: the Nadians are tied at two games apiece, this is
Speaker 1: another series that may go the distance as well, and
Speaker 1: whoever gets them, I don't know how much these guys
Speaker 1: either team will have lucked in the tank. That one's
Speaker 1: actually been a little bit surprising in the sense that
Speaker 1: I feel like Tampa Bay is underperforming and Montreal is overperforming,
Speaker 1: and they've met in the middle, and I don't know
Speaker 1: who's going to come out on top, but I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be surprised if it's Montreal. This is a young team
Speaker 1: that is hungry, They are fierce. They've got some phenomenal goaltending.
Speaker 1: If the Habs don't figure out how to stop Brandon Hagel,
Speaker 1: they're going to be in one. He has just been
Speaker 1: a one man wrecking machine for the Tampa Bay Lightning.
Speaker 1: Their only weakness I think is shockingly Vassilevsky. He's not
Speaker 1: really where he's been in the past, especially in past playoffs.
Speaker 2: I think he's beatable.
Speaker 1: He's getting a little long in the tooth by Goltemper standards.
Speaker 1: He peeked young, he pieced early right, and he's played
Speaker 1: a lot of hockey, and he has seen a lot
Speaker 1: of rubber. So it stands to reason that that could
Speaker 1: cut up to you at some point in time. But
Speaker 1: that's been that's been a fun series to keep keep
Speaker 1: your eyes on. It's been good, entertaining, floppy. The other
Speaker 1: series that could end up finishing tonight is the Penguins
Speaker 1: and the Flyers. They are up three games to one
Speaker 1: right now and they play tonight in Pittsburgh. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think that's been a highly entertaining series. Those teams do
Speaker 1: not like each other at all. It was literally no
Speaker 1: room left. I forget what game. It was no room
Speaker 1: left in my other penalty box. And I think they
Speaker 1: call Biscinette referred to it as like the Flyers playing
Speaker 1: stumpbag hockey, and I don't think he meant it. Meant
Speaker 1: it in a detrimental way, but when you it reminded
Speaker 1: me of old school flyers for bullies. Yeah. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: certainly didn't expect Pittsburgh to lay such an egg the
Speaker 1: first two games.
Speaker 2: I didn't think that they were going.
Speaker 1: To get swept, and it was possibility, But of the
Speaker 1: three that where he were on sweepwatch, they were the
Speaker 1: ones that I thought, there's no way that Sidney Crosby
Speaker 1: is going to allow that to happen. And they played
Speaker 1: a completely different game. They were much more disciplined, and
Speaker 1: they had a different goaltender, which I think made a
Speaker 1: big difference. He was much better than Stuart Skinner, unfortunately
Speaker 1: for Skinner, so we're probably going to see him again tonight.
Speaker 1: I got the sense that the nerves and excitement for
Speaker 1: this really young Philadelphia team also got to them thinking that, oh, look,
Speaker 1: we might be on the verge here and nobody thought
Speaker 1: we were going to get in, and we snuck in
Speaker 1: at the last minute, literally in overtime. But four wins
Speaker 1: in a row for a team as old as Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I've got it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they might want to ask they might win tonight.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised if they take this game, but
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be Philadelphia. I could be
Speaker 1: eating my words in a week, but I just think
Speaker 1: they're too far behind the eight ball Rick talk. It
Speaker 1: is a good and agel coach. He'll have his flyers
Speaker 1: ready to go and understanding the significance. To me, it's
Speaker 1: a far greater task and a more rewarding task finish
Speaker 1: off a team on their home ice. It's awesome to
Speaker 1: do it in your own building, but to me, it's
Speaker 1: a better testiment to you as a team to finish
Speaker 1: off your opponent in their own building. That's another coach,
Speaker 1: you know what we were talking about yesterday. That's another
Speaker 1: coach who's extremely experienced up against a newer coach, a
Speaker 1: younger coach, younger coach. Ye, the younger coach has more veterans.
Speaker 1: The veteran coach has kids. And I think there's something there.
Speaker 1: There's something to be said about that kind of dynamic
Speaker 1: that can you teach an old dog new tricks? I
Speaker 1: don't know, And that's what I think is happening with Pittsburgh.
Speaker 1: I mean, yes, they've got some young kids, but it's
Speaker 1: not the same energy that you see out on the
Speaker 1: ice with those flyers, So they might be playing Carolina,
Speaker 1: know that'd be my guest. Yeah, we'll have all of
Speaker 1: those updates for our next bog. So now we get
Speaker 1: to our team and the predicament that the Bruins find
Speaker 1: themselves in, which is they are now down three to
Speaker 1: one to the Buffalo Sabers, and even after our rant
Speaker 1: of yesterday, we will both significantly hissedo. As I'm sure
Speaker 1: many people in that building were many people who gave
Speaker 1: up a beautiful Sunday afternoon in Boston to sit inside
Speaker 1: and watch this hockey game to the degree that they
Speaker 1: could tolerate it. That first period, as I was thinking
Speaker 1: about it last night, reminded me so much of the
Speaker 1: first period of Game seven of the Stanley Cup Finals
Speaker 1: against the Saint Louis Blooms, where you know, the Bruins
Speaker 1: lost the game in the first period and there was
Speaker 1: no way in hell that they had any chance of
Speaker 1: coming back to win that game because of the way
Speaker 1: they started. So I did a little checking, and I
Speaker 1: wanted to see what the Bruins won't playoff record has
Speaker 1: been since that period of time. Now I understand They've
Speaker 1: been a great home team all season long. But it's
Speaker 1: a cliche, but the Stanley Cup Finals are different. Everyone
Speaker 1: starts with the clean slate, and the Bruins record at
Speaker 1: home in the playoffs since twenty eighteen and nineteen is
Speaker 1: a dismal eighteen wins and twenty three losses on a whole.
Speaker 2: Nine sounds like we've.
Speaker 1: Got to hire an Etsy witch here, Maria stage the
Speaker 1: plays now in this instance, in this series, I understand
Speaker 1: they don't have fume ice advantage, which is all the
Speaker 1: more degree of importance that you maintain, serve and you win.
Speaker 1: We can rehash everything we talked about yesterday. You know
Speaker 1: what I wanted to get your thoughts on at the
Speaker 1: introduction of this pod. Did we underestimate Are we underestimating
Speaker 1: the Buffalo Sabers? Were our expectations too high with this
Speaker 1: buster rule and til and can they regroup and try
Speaker 1: to make a series of this? So to answer your
Speaker 1: first question, I don't think that we underestimated Buffalo. I
Speaker 1: think that is not a good excuse for any NHL
Speaker 1: team going into the playoffs because you have an entire
Speaker 1: staff of people whose job it is to prepare the
Speaker 1: team for against the opponent that they are playing. And
Speaker 1: one of the things that makes playoff hockey different from
Speaker 1: the regular season is the fact that you are playing
Speaker 1: the same team at least four times in a row. Now, well,
Speaker 1: the Bruins are playing a divisional rival, so yes, they
Speaker 1: played them four times this year. They played them though
Speaker 1: at four very different points in the Sabers season, three
Speaker 1: of which were really before their GM change and the
Speaker 1: breath of fresh air that they received. It was still
Speaker 1: early in the season, but Boston played Buffalo like three
Speaker 1: times pretty quickly, and then they played them one time
Speaker 1: much later. And in that particular game, Boston was rolling
Speaker 1: with some wins and Buffalo was going through a little
Speaker 1: bit of a rough patch.
Speaker 2: So Boston got the win.
Speaker 1: But I don't think any team should ever say that
Speaker 1: they underestimated their opponent, because you have scouts, you have
Speaker 1: coaching staff, You're watching video, You're learning how these teams play.
Speaker 1: You're trying to figure out these are their plays, this
Speaker 1: is how they behave, this is how you get under
Speaker 1: their skin. You do the homework so you're prepared to
Speaker 1: play a good game, and then you make adjustments in game.
Speaker 1: So I think what's happened in that regard is not
Speaker 1: that they have underestimated Buffalo. Either they didn't prepare, they
Speaker 1: didn't do their homework, or as I have been saying
Speaker 1: like the last week, their in game decision making is
Speaker 1: absolutely atrocious. Atrocious. If Lindy Ruff has some tricks up
Speaker 1: his sleeve, good for him. Every NHL team is going
Speaker 1: to have little tricks up their sleeves, things that they
Speaker 1: might not debut until the playoffs, right because they're trying
Speaker 1: to be sneaky and strategic. But then it behooves the
Speaker 1: Boston Bruins to continue to do the work, continue to
Speaker 1: do the homework, continue to watch the video, continue to
Speaker 1: adjust their game in game if the other team makes changes,
Speaker 1: and I think that's been shockingly bad, especially on home lines.
Speaker 1: Look at the last change. I think what has happened
Speaker 1: with the Boston Bruins is threefold. One, we've known all
Speaker 1: season that this is what we've been working with, because
Speaker 1: how many times have we seen them go through a
Speaker 1: stretch where it's like they've fallen and bumped their heads
Speaker 1: and they don't remember how to play hockey, multiple stretches,
Speaker 1: at least three really bad ones. Secondly, I think this
Speaker 1: is a massive failing from the coaching staff the administrative
Speaker 1: side of things. Now, that does not excuse the players
Speaker 1: from any responsibility of said homework and decision making in game,
Speaker 1: because obviously, like Hampus, what has been wrong with you
Speaker 1: all season? You can't make a good decision to save
Speaker 1: your life. That's nothing that a coach can necessarily fix.
Speaker 1: That's not something that's as fixable as calling a time
Speaker 1: out an appropriate time during a game when things are
Speaker 1: getting out of hand and your team is just standing there.
Speaker 1: But the third thing is this is the culmination of
Speaker 1: every bad habit, everything that Boston has been doing wrong
Speaker 1: since twenty nineteen. And this is where I was like, oh,
Speaker 1: we got to get the Etsy Witch to clear out
Speaker 1: this bad juju, because it almost seems like when they
Speaker 1: are faced with adversity, these bad habits creep in and
Speaker 1: it doesn't really seem to matter who the personnel is
Speaker 1: because we've obviously, for the most part, cleared house from
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. So where the heck are these bad habits
Speaker 1: coming from? How is it possible that since twenty nineteen
Speaker 1: we've had three fourish coaches who want to count last
Speaker 1: year having to and the power play ceases to exist
Speaker 1: at a certain point, the actions that are being taken
Speaker 1: on the ice keep happening, the players looking lost. These
Speaker 1: are things that I have been seeing just creep in
Speaker 1: when things start to go wrong, losing the mental battle,
Speaker 1: not having the mental fortitude to power through. How is
Speaker 1: that sticking around when you have an almost entirely new
Speaker 1: team and they don't seem to have an answer to
Speaker 1: be able to slow down Buffalo's wor check. And we've
Speaker 1: talked about this in the past, where the defensive structure
Speaker 1: that's a Brewings want to play requires everyone everyone to
Speaker 1: be skating and backchecking forwards, defenseman okay, And when that
Speaker 1: doesn't happen, it is a recipe for disaster because then
Speaker 1: the system starts to break down and other guys feel
Speaker 1: like they need to do a little bit more, and
Speaker 1: it is a domino effect. Not only that we're not
Speaker 1: even establishing our own for check to try and set
Speaker 1: up some sustained offensive ozone pressure in Buffalo's end in
Speaker 1: four games, pretty much the only players who are plus
Speaker 1: players in the four games against the Buffalo Sabers are
Speaker 1: Andrew Pete, John Corally, and Mark Casteller. Everyone else is
Speaker 1: a minus Pablzaka minus five, Pastronoch minus five, h lind
Speaker 1: Home minus five. War I didn't even play yesterday, but
Speaker 1: it's still a minus four Middle stat minus four, Macaboy
Speaker 1: minus four. It goes on and on. Everyone is in
Speaker 1: pretty much negative numbers because not only aren't they scoring anything,
Speaker 1: but they're on the ice when Buffalo is kicking your
Speaker 1: ass putting goals in the net. So I don't know
Speaker 1: how you change that at this point because your roster
Speaker 1: is what it is. You have can move a die
Speaker 1: or two in and out or up and down, but
Speaker 1: it's not helping David Pasternak. Yeah, it's not helping Pabozaka,
Speaker 1: it's not helping Elias lind Home. It's I don't see
Speaker 1: how it changes.
Speaker 2: For the next game.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know, because to your point from our
Speaker 1: emergency pod, then and now you're going back to Buffalo
Speaker 1: where Lindy Ruff's going to get whatever matchup you want. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: After Boston has these bad games, they have a tendency
Speaker 1: to come back the next game and do well. I
Speaker 1: know that there is at least one instance this season
Speaker 1: where that was the expectation and it didn't happen. But
Speaker 1: also if you recall early in the season when they
Speaker 1: were on that ten game just nightmare tour of the West.
Speaker 1: We kept saying, Okay, surely the next game is going
Speaker 1: to be better, because when they've had a bad game,
Speaker 1: they're better the next day. But they had to hit
Speaker 1: rock bottom to come back, and they were playing different
Speaker 1: teams each night every time that happened, and that is
Speaker 1: a variable.
Speaker 2: It does not exist in this particular equation.
Speaker 1: Right now, they know what you're doing, right, they have
Speaker 1: figured out your game plan, and they have figured out
Speaker 1: a workaround for it, which we've seen many other teams
Speaker 1: figure out, which is check the frigging hell out of
Speaker 1: everybody that's out on that ice, because then you're going
Speaker 1: to get what we see, which is the scrambling around,
Speaker 1: the panic with not making a smart play on the top,
Speaker 1: and it's a total breakdown. And I don't know how
Speaker 1: hunger that because, as I said before, your roster is
Speaker 1: what it is now. It's a roster that has served
Speaker 1: you well during the regular season. We've got you into
Speaker 1: the playoffs, we see how difficult this team can be
Speaker 1: to play against when everybody is on board and doing
Speaker 1: what is ass of them and doing the job at hand. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but it seems like now we are the ones being
Speaker 1: the Boston Bruins being worn down. Yeah, and I like
Speaker 1: Storm's system. I think it's a good system. It's different
Speaker 1: is one two to two defensive structure. I don't think
Speaker 1: that the answer is well, throw that out the window
Speaker 1: for next fall and try something what easier. I don't
Speaker 1: think that's the answer.
Speaker 2: I don't know. Is it a roster.
Speaker 1: Issue where there are guys who are just not bought
Speaker 1: into it. I don't understand how and why these crazy
Speaker 1: bad habits are creeping in when it's not the same
Speaker 1: team anymore. It's the hesitation to actually shoot and passing
Speaker 1: that has been a problem for at least three years.
Speaker 1: At least three years. It's the lack of urgency multiple
Speaker 1: years issue from time to time, depending on the season.
Speaker 1: All Right, the epitaph would read all they could didn't
Speaker 1: clear it or they couldn't enter the zone. But these
Speaker 1: little things add up and you end up with a game.
Speaker 1: That is what was out there yesterday for the people
Speaker 1: on social media who were dumping their truckload of shit
Speaker 1: on Jeremy Swayman, and they'll see it again. I'm run
Speaker 1: Swayman bandgirl. I still think he has things to prove
Speaker 1: to me. However, what happened, what is happening in this
Speaker 1: series is not at the feet of Jeremy Swayman. Now
Speaker 1: are the golds during the series that you say, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, would you like to have one or
Speaker 1: two of those backs yesterday in that first period? If
Speaker 1: I was Jeremy Swayman, I would have freaking pulled myself
Speaker 1: out of the game. And then when I skated over
Speaker 1: to the bench, okay, I would have given my teammates
Speaker 1: a lot more shit than he gave them when he
Speaker 1: skated off, right, because they deserved to get an earful
Speaker 1: from their goalie. O. For the people who were dumping
Speaker 1: this on Shor, you're never going to win a Cup
Speaker 1: with Swaymen, you all don't know what in hell you're
Speaker 1: talking about. You just jump on the bend wagon with
Speaker 1: the I hate all the elite goalies in Boston bride right.
Speaker 1: That's lazy, it's lazy, it's uninformed, and you clearly don't
Speaker 1: understand the game in front of you if you think
Speaker 1: those four goals were his fault, because here's these are
Speaker 1: the four goals. First goal, McAvoy could not pass to
Speaker 1: Jonathan asbro Asparo couldn't catch the pass. Mitton grabs the
Speaker 1: puck for whatever reason, gets forced back into the defensive
Speaker 1: zone and he gives up the puck under pressure, and
Speaker 1: so it turned into a two on one rush and
Speaker 1: Krebs slams it in. Okay, you want to say, well,
Speaker 1: but Jeremy should have stopped it. Jeremy should have never
Speaker 1: seen that puck correct That puck should have been out
Speaker 1: of the fricking zone. That was a failure of the
Speaker 1: skaters in front of him. Second goal, the classic Boston
Speaker 1: Bruins too many men penalty because of course, of course
Speaker 1: it's many men. Hampus Lynnholm sends the puck up into
Speaker 1: the air to the middle of the ice, in the
Speaker 1: middle of the penalty, Kill didn't put enough mustard on it,
Speaker 1: and it ended up getting intercepted by boeen Byram and
Speaker 1: Josh Dong gets it into the net. Maybe if Hampis
Speaker 1: wasn't being lazy about how he sent the puck out,
Speaker 1: if he took the puck out, if he actually looked
Speaker 1: around and made a better decision, maybe we don't know,
Speaker 1: it wouldn't have ended up back where it came from.
Speaker 1: And what have we been calling these all season long?
Speaker 1: What have we been calling these issues? Inflicted wounds? Self
Speaker 1: flicted wounds? Yep, Jordan Harris. I mean I feel for him,
Speaker 1: I like him very much, but he didn't get on
Speaker 1: a playing time. But still he gives up the puck,
Speaker 1: he was not strong enough on the puck while trying
Speaker 1: to get out, and Zach Benson grabs the puck and
Speaker 1: does a close range backhander on net. He got the
Speaker 1: pad on the shot, but then rebound. So if your
Speaker 1: skater had been stronger on the puck, had better puck possession,
Speaker 1: swim and would have had to face that rebound. And
Speaker 1: then Casey Medlsett just turned it over to allow Benson
Speaker 1: to get a shot on goal and swim and stop
Speaker 1: the puck, but then he had to freeze it for
Speaker 1: a defensive zone draw, and Geeky then just turned over
Speaker 1: the puck under heavy for checking once again, and there
Speaker 1: was a close range shot put pastwaymen. So your team
Speaker 1: is basically allowing all of these incredibly high danger shots
Speaker 1: on goal. They're called high danger for a reason. It's
Speaker 1: because a lot of goalies don't stop those shots. So
Speaker 1: what are we doing here? I don't know what we're
Speaker 1: doing here, and I don't know why Marfo either is
Speaker 1: stubborn were unwilling to make in game adjustments. I myself
Speaker 1: was shocked to see Swayman come back out in that
Speaker 1: second period. I thought sure there would be a ringing
Speaker 1: of asses in the locker room in between periods, pointing
Speaker 1: at my goalie and saying, you all let this fucking
Speaker 1: guy down. He was the only one that came out
Speaker 1: ready to compete and play in the first period. And again,
Speaker 1: how much of a difference would that have made, I
Speaker 1: don't know, But we're allowed to talk about it and second, yes,
Speaker 1: and have conversation about it. Sure, but I think it's
Speaker 1: almost as irritating to me the mismanagement from the bench
Speaker 1: as some of the comments that just again screams to me,
Speaker 1: you don't know and understand hockey when you just say
Speaker 1: either there was entirely Swayman's fault or the other gross
Speaker 1: misunderstanding of seeing that clip of Jeremy Swayman getting off
Speaker 1: the ice and kind of giving the bench the business
Speaker 1: as he's walking off the ice and interpreting that as
Speaker 1: him being mad that he got pulled. I'm sorry, what
Speaker 1: were you not watching this game. He's not mad that
Speaker 1: he was pulled. He was pissed that the people who
Speaker 1: were in front of him were not doing their job,
Speaker 1: because I would be livid too, What are you doing?
Speaker 2: He had every right and I don't care that he
Speaker 2: did it.
Speaker 1: No, I don't give him more of the business. I
Speaker 1: don't care. You know what, I care about the emotion
Speaker 1: that he was missed off enough to look as teammates
Speaker 1: in the eye. And I don't know what he said,
Speaker 1: but I can only imagine that it would be something
Speaker 1: like do your fucking jobs or get your heads out
Speaker 1: of your asses, just as in aside, I'm looking because
Speaker 1: I'm looking at my social media. The practice lines today,
Speaker 1: Janelle Corallly cast alike. You're not going to touch Dkluving
Speaker 1: because they've probably been the Roan's most consistent line throughout
Speaker 1: this series, which is great but is also a bit
Speaker 1: of a problem when you what line is your best
Speaker 1: and most consistent line Defensive pairings Asparro McAvoy, Lintold Harris
Speaker 1: Lorid Peak, So it looks like he might be drawing
Speaker 1: Lorice drawn back in the extras at Practice, Pagan's Steve's
Speaker 1: and Joki Hary So there you have it. This could
Speaker 1: be your lineup for the game on Tuesday night. But listen,
Speaker 1: I know I tried to finish our rant yesterday on
Speaker 1: a somewhat positive which is not like me. We've seen
Speaker 1: this team bounce back before.
Speaker 2: But I don't have a good feeling.
Speaker 1: I do not have a good feeling at all going
Speaker 1: into this game on Tuesday night of Boston Ruins. And
Speaker 1: it's simply because of the lack of adjustment in the
Speaker 1: last two games. We've seen them be able to even
Speaker 1: in other games, make adjustments, make changes, not allow three
Speaker 1: straight periods of chaos and there's been zero adjustment. There's
Speaker 1: been zero in game change. So after six periods, why
Speaker 1: would I think that they could make a change. Maybe
Speaker 1: they can make a change for one game. Okay, so
Speaker 1: it goes to six games. I don't know unless something
Speaker 1: happens drastic in this game on Tuesday. But unlike the
Speaker 1: Philadelphia Flyers, who I think, like I said, their youth
Speaker 1: got them nervous and excited and maybe they just couldn't
Speaker 1: close the deal there with Pittsburgh, Buffalo is not that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're new to the playoff scene, but their players are
Speaker 1: not inexperienced guys in general, they've been steady eddy stay
Speaker 1: the course, especially since Game three. The first two games
Speaker 1: with the fighting, I think maybe that's something that came
Speaker 1: from Lindy. I wouldn't be surprised if he says, all right,
Speaker 1: you've had your fun, you've got it out there, now
Speaker 1: just go and take care of business. And that's what
Speaker 1: Buffalo has been doing. They've been going in and they've
Speaker 1: taken care of business, and good on them, and they've
Speaker 1: got confidence, they've got swagger yep. So to me, it'll
Speaker 1: be a it'll be interesting to see how the Bruins
Speaker 1: respond and the level of leadership that is going to
Speaker 1: be on display on Tuesday night, from the likes of
Speaker 1: David Pasternach, Charlie McAvoy, empisilintome. Those guys are all we
Speaker 1: are letters on their chest and the rest of the
Speaker 1: team should be taking their signals from them. Dick Taps,
Speaker 1: do we have any We've got a couple of works.
Speaker 1: I mean, Jeremy's Slayman. It's a no brain showing the
Speaker 1: most leadership out of any one of those nineteen other guys.
Speaker 1: He's been showing leadership and consistency in his play that
Speaker 1: is unmatched across the board.
Speaker 2: That's it.
Speaker 1: And I do want to give stick taps to the
Speaker 1: Bruins fourth line because i've oh, yeah, yeah, I've said they.
Speaker 1: They seem to be the only grouping that is playing consistently.
Speaker 2: Well in the penalty box.
Speaker 1: I've got pretty much every phase of the Bruins game
Speaker 1: except for the goaltending, and I will give it up
Speaker 1: to the penalty kill units.
Speaker 2: They've done.
Speaker 1: The PK has been good, but the offense has stunk
Speaker 1: like they have been kept to what how many goals
Speaker 1: on home ice too? Too? Yeah, that's that's two freaking
Speaker 1: sad and disgusting. And the Bruins defense, so the defensive structure,
Speaker 1: they are not getting the job done. They are not
Speaker 1: making virtually anything far forward the Buffalo Sabers. And again
Speaker 1: I don't think it's because the defensive structure as a
Speaker 1: plan is a bad plan. They are not.
Speaker 2: Executing on it. So that's on players.
Speaker 1: To that end, we have Game five on Tuesday evening
Speaker 1: in Buffalo. I can't even venture to make a prediction
Speaker 1: because I don't have a warm and fuzzy feeling at
Speaker 1: this point in time based on the regression of play
Speaker 1: that we have seen from the Ruins and the elevated
Speaker 1: level of play. Because I don't want to disrespect the
Speaker 1: Buffalo Savers, but they seem to have elevated their game. No,
Speaker 1: they changed their game appropriate and being down rid to
Speaker 1: one is not insurmountable. But it's a hill to climb
Speaker 1: because it's just not been close.
Speaker 2: It's not been close.
Speaker 1: No, no no. So with that said, thank you for listening.
Speaker 1: Please make sure that you like and subscribe to the
Speaker 1: more content. Be sure to leave a rating and a
Speaker 1: review to help other SAD Bruins fans find us. You
Speaker 1: can also support our podcast by joining our Patreon or
Speaker 1: following us on our socials at Tape to Tape MK
Speaker 1: and you can find us on substack at Tape to
Speaker 1: Tape mk dot substack dot com. With that said, any
Speaker 1: closing pats my friend go Mobies, Hobies
Podbean