Bruins Hockey in Olympic Mode | Ep. 129
Liner notes
🎙️ The NHL is on Olympic break, but the Bruins conversation is heating up. We break down Bruins injury decisions, Olympic roster drama, leadership questions, and a furious response to a mishandled hit on Charlie McAvoy.Plus, our annual Bruins Midseason Awards: listener results, big debates, and why Morgan Geekie and Fraser Minten have been revelations. Team USA has a scary-good team in the women's tournament, but it is anyone's game on the men's side.
Bruins hockey analysis, NHL context, and fan discussion you won’t want to miss.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 1: I need something to do. I Jack send it out
Speaker 1: A trunk a BOCKNNA says time today, here's a chance,
Speaker 1: popta right down A goalie scars, oh my one a
Speaker 1: move by the rookie.
Speaker 3: To on one faster not moving in shot.
Speaker 1: On his own oil dances in't podcast? Wait at home
Speaker 1: right away? Corner faster gusta, what.
Speaker 2: Is that for?
Speaker 1: Most?
Speaker 2: Welcome in, everyone to another episode of Bruin's Tape to Tape.
Speaker 2: We are recording this episode on Monday, February ninth. Officially,
Speaker 2: the NHL is on a break. The Olympics have officially started.
Speaker 2: Opening ceremonies took place on Friday. But I would be
Speaker 2: remiss before. Well, first of all, let me welcome in.
Speaker 2: Let me welcome in my friend, my co host, and
Speaker 2: the woman who likely will keep me sane during this episode,
Speaker 2: Caroline with a K.
Speaker 3: I hope you're staying warm, because today, my god, again,
Speaker 3: we're talking a month now, I'm a popsicle.
Speaker 2: Well, the temperatures are even more frigid in New England
Speaker 2: because Sunday was a Super Bowl. Yeah, and I would
Speaker 2: be remiss if I didn't say that it is a
Speaker 2: sad day in Greater New England because the New England
Speaker 2: Patriots were I don't want to say embarrassed, but they
Speaker 2: clearly weren't ready for the big stage against the Seattle Seahawks.
Speaker 2: Credit to the Seahawks, their defense ate Drake May and
Speaker 2: the offense alive like they ate more of Drake May
Speaker 2: than I did yesterday with the Super Bowl food that
Speaker 2: we had good and to me, now again, did any
Speaker 2: of us in New England expect the Patriots to get
Speaker 2: to the Super Bowl? Absolutely freaking not. Is the future
Speaker 2: relatively bright? Yes? For people who are calling Drake May
Speaker 2: a fraud, get a grip on yourselves. Okay, get a
Speaker 2: freaking grip on yourselves. Did he look out of sorts? Yes?
Speaker 2: Did he have a bad game, yes? Was it a
Speaker 2: bad time to have a bad game as a function, yes,
Speaker 2: But to say that he's a fraud, you've all lost
Speaker 2: your minds. People, you've all lost your minds. But I,
Speaker 2: for one expected a better game. I was shockingly disappointed
Speaker 2: by how out of sorts and anemic the offense looked.
Speaker 2: Defense for the Patriots kept them in that game throughout
Speaker 2: the course of the game. So it's not an awesome
Speaker 2: day in New England right now, lablab, that's lablamm that's
Speaker 2: a bummer.
Speaker 3: I feel for you. I'm not a football person, so
Speaker 3: I'm like, I don't really care one way or the other.
Speaker 3: But my husband is. He's a Pats fan, so in
Speaker 3: the morning, AGG give him a pat on the shoulder,
Speaker 3: said sorry about your football team, but that's football.
Speaker 2: Here for hockey, Here for hockey. We're here to talk Olympics.
Speaker 2: We are doing our annual kind of traditional awards show.
Speaker 2: Thank you to our listeners who participated and voted. I
Speaker 2: think we had some interesting, very interesting result decisions, which
Speaker 2: we'll we'll talk about you and I are going to
Speaker 2: disclose our own individual ballots. But before we get started,
Speaker 2: we've got a little bit of news to break down here.
Speaker 2: The late breaking news before the Olympics even started was
Speaker 2: that we had concerns about Pavel Zaka, and I know
Speaker 2: that I had been vocal on our last podcast about
Speaker 2: he's good to go. Why isn't he playing for his team?
Speaker 2: Apparently he is not good to go because he is
Speaker 2: a no go for the Olympics, which I'm sure is
Speaker 2: a disappointment to him.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, But I mean, on the flip side we're looking
Speaker 3: at he's getting almost two Well, he's definitely getting two weeks,
Speaker 3: maybe two and a half. Yeah, the non Olympians will
Speaker 3: start their practices before the Olympics is over, so he'll
Speaker 3: still get a good I think two weeks of break.
Speaker 3: Hopefully that's a good amount of time for him to
Speaker 3: rest and recover so that he can go with the
Speaker 3: distance when they come back, because it's gonna be hitting
Speaker 3: the ground running very intense hockey, basically pre playoff games.
Speaker 3: I'm glad that you know, in the long run, that
Speaker 3: was the decision that was made to hopefully give him
Speaker 3: an opportunity to get back. And last week you also
Speaker 3: had a similar critique against Elias Linnholm and he did
Speaker 3: go there. But let's see if he actually plays too,
Speaker 3: because I think teams are allowed a couple extra players,
Speaker 3: so it'll be interesting to see if is he going
Speaker 3: to continue to sit out or are they actually going
Speaker 3: to put him in play, So we shall see what
Speaker 3: happens there.
Speaker 2: So that's and then team captains were named. It appears
Speaker 2: that our friend Charlie McAvoy is quite the spokesperson or
Speaker 2: Team USA, which honestly he likely has a better personality
Speaker 2: than Austin Matthews does, so I can understand why he's
Speaker 2: the more vocal and the guy who's somewhat putting himself
Speaker 2: out there. I still don't understand that decision. I don't
Speaker 2: want to go off on a tangent, but what a
Speaker 2: colossal waste of time of a seat. I know, and
Speaker 2: I know people have their issues with the Kachuk Boys,
Speaker 2: but they have more leadership ability than Auston Matthews does.
Speaker 2: And I know he's a prolific scorer, but that doesn't
Speaker 2: qualify you as a leader based on what we're seeing
Speaker 2: from the team that he plays for. So I just
Speaker 2: don't understand it. I don't get it well.
Speaker 3: And I think also we've talked a little bit in
Speaker 3: our discord and full ownership, I have not looked into this.
Speaker 3: Maybe there is a rule, maybe it is an unwritten rule,
Speaker 3: but we've had a discussion about why certain players maybe
Speaker 3: did not receive a C on their jerseys. And is
Speaker 3: it because in the NHL they only have an A
Speaker 3: or they don't have a letter and so they if
Speaker 3: they're an A, is it disrespectful to someone who is
Speaker 3: a C, you know, to jump them.
Speaker 2: It's it's likely an unwritten rule. Yeah, because there are
Speaker 2: a lot of them in the league, as we very
Speaker 2: well know. Okay, and I can understand that. But if you,
Speaker 2: as a coach and your coaching staff and the general manager,
Speaker 2: who have spent countless amounts of time hands selecting these players,
Speaker 2: but this moment, you know that stuff shouldn't that should
Speaker 2: stuff should right to go by the wayside the respect,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, the respect thing is, is this the right
Speaker 2: person to lead Team USA? Right? And if a bunch
Speaker 2: of us and you know we're not qualified. But if
Speaker 2: many people are saying.
Speaker 3: What huh yeah, why yeah, I mean if if, if,
Speaker 3: if that's the unwritten rule, then I'd rather have seen
Speaker 3: Brady Kuchuk be named captain of Team USA because he's
Speaker 3: a captain. They're actually saying two there are two at
Speaker 3: least two other if I'm just off the top of
Speaker 3: my head of thinking of the roster, there's at least
Speaker 3: two other captains on that team, the other one being J. T. Miller,
Speaker 3: which hell no, no, it's such a shift show in
Speaker 3: New York. Yeah, but anyways, so yeah, I thought that
Speaker 3: was the great I mean, no shock really anywhere I
Speaker 3: think with any of the Olympic team captains that have
Speaker 3: been named Canada Crosby. That's a given, like that's a
Speaker 3: no brainer. Oh yeah, you'll have to remind me because
Speaker 3: I don't remember. I think this is the same as
Speaker 3: it was at Four Nations, but his assistants or alternate
Speaker 3: captains are mccarr and.
Speaker 2: McDavid, and I think there's something to that pattern. You
Speaker 2: bring up a good point with how the letters were
Speaker 2: distributed for these Four Nations tournaments. So maybe it is
Speaker 2: why rock the boat. I just don't I me personally,
Speaker 2: I don't see it like this player now, we don't follow.
Speaker 2: We somewhat follow the maple leafs, but it doesn't seem
Speaker 2: like there's a lot of vocalness that comes from Austin Matthews,
Speaker 2: even in front of the I don't know. I just
Speaker 2: I don't know why it triggers me. I don't know
Speaker 2: why it bothers me, but it does.
Speaker 3: Yeah, fair, I am an agreement Sweden. I didn't realize
Speaker 3: this until quite literally I saw a post about the
Speaker 3: Swedish players arriving in Italy that Gabe Landeskog made it
Speaker 3: that he recovered from whatever injury he had early in
Speaker 3: January I thought he was done the way that it
Speaker 3: was portrayed online and in the media, like, oh, there's
Speaker 3: no way that he's going to get back to full
Speaker 3: health in time. And then of course him being not
Speaker 3: only a member of not the Bruins, but then West
Speaker 3: Coast team failed to stay on top of that news.
Speaker 3: So I was thrilled to see him because this is
Speaker 3: a guy who, like I'm a huge fan, he's worked
Speaker 3: so hard to get back where he is thrilled that
Speaker 3: he could get back. So he's been named captain and
Speaker 3: his assistants are Headmon and Carlson. So I think that's
Speaker 3: going to be a great team, a great team to
Speaker 3: watch as well, and.
Speaker 2: For our Playersdavid Pasternach has been named as an assistant
Speaker 2: captain for Chechia Roman Cerevanka is the captain and radco
Speaker 2: gutis you know, okay, he's a personality. Higher right, he's
Speaker 2: a personality. He's an elder statesman. But listen, you know
Speaker 2: this is going to be some damn good freaking hockey
Speaker 2: to watch. Yep. Yeah, And I don't know that you
Speaker 2: can say that any team right now is a showing
Speaker 2: to win now like Team USA for the women looked tremendous.
Speaker 2: I mean never like, they just looked tremendous. And what
Speaker 2: did we see. We saw a neme or a post
Speaker 2: somewhere that someone had put it was hysterical that someone
Speaker 2: put out they're pretty sure that Women's Team USA could
Speaker 2: beat the New York Rangers right, especially at home, which
Speaker 2: I thought was hysterical.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, I think on the men side it's
Speaker 3: going to be incredibly tight. I don't know that there's
Speaker 3: necessarily any guarantee one way or the other. Although as
Speaker 3: a sidebar, I will say that Team Canada has shown
Speaker 3: up ready for business. Everything that I have seen from
Speaker 3: this team not on the ice. They get off the plane,
Speaker 3: they're in their uniforms, they're walking around, they're unified. Their
Speaker 3: social media is giving everyone an inside low media is fire. Yeah,
Speaker 3: Team USA, they got off the plane looking like bums
Speaker 3: who have traveled halfway across the world and I know
Speaker 3: nothing about them except for Charlie McAvoy is out there,
Speaker 3: you know, having fun him and Swaymen and Ottinger and Wrensky.
Speaker 2: Apparently had been tapped to go in early whatever.
Speaker 3: But on the women's side, I mean, once again, this
Speaker 3: is going to just come down to Team USA and
Speaker 3: Team Canada. It's it's a growing sport. It was first
Speaker 3: introduced to the Olympics in nineteen ninety eight, and the
Speaker 3: rest of the world still has to play a little
Speaker 3: bit of catch up when it comes to just producing
Speaker 3: incredibly high end women's hockey talent. So I just suspect
Speaker 3: that it's just going to come back down to the usual.
Speaker 2: However, the usual suspects, but one never knows. You never know.
Speaker 3: You never know, because again, this is a tournament style
Speaker 3: where it's one game, and one game can go great,
Speaker 3: one game can go poorly. But I will say this
Speaker 3: Team USA, they have won their opening game in every
Speaker 3: Olympic game season that they've played, every all eight from
Speaker 3: Nagano to Milan. Their first game that they've played, the
Speaker 3: women have always won that game. That is insane, that's crazy. Yeah,
Speaker 3: And we're watching history in the making because Captain Hillary
Speaker 3: Knight has just recently, in their last game, tied the
Speaker 3: US Olympic Women's hockey career goal record with fourteen goals match.
Speaker 2: She'll certainly break it during the course of this tournament.
Speaker 2: She will become the standard. Yes, she will become the standard.
Speaker 2: And she's doing it at the you know young age of.
Speaker 3: Thirty mid thirty, thirty four, thirty five. I mean she's
Speaker 3: been in the Olympics.
Speaker 2: That is not all, that's not old, but but by
Speaker 2: hockey standards, given how long she's been doing this. Credit
Speaker 2: to her, man, credit to her. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's pretty it's pretty awesome to watch. So the
Speaker 3: I think Team USA is a pretty.
Speaker 2: Scary looking team. Bye Frankly, Yeah, yeah, it'll be It'll
Speaker 2: be fun. It'll be fun, fun, fun viewing. Yes, and
Speaker 2: so to all of our Olympians, ruins and local Olympians,
Speaker 2: including the women who are representing Team USA, we wish them.
Speaker 2: We wish them all good luck. We wish them all
Speaker 2: good luck.
Speaker 3: Yep. Yeah, and I want to throw in because again
Speaker 3: our episode today is a little bit different format. Yes,
Speaker 3: I do have a stick tap two in particular one
Speaker 3: to Signy a Hola. She's the goalie for Finland. She
Speaker 3: plays for the Ottawa Churge in the PWHL. Now I
Speaker 3: watched this game. This poor woman. I believe this. The
Speaker 3: United States beat Finland five to nothing.
Speaker 2: And at one point Finland only had two shots on goal,
Speaker 2: so allowing five goals. You may think that sounds terrible.
Speaker 2: What an awful goalie.
Speaker 3: This poor woman faced almost fifty shots on goal, she
Speaker 3: only allowed five, so she still had a nine hundred
Speaker 3: safe percentage at the end of this. So that was
Speaker 3: just incredible to watch. She was just absolutely phenomenal. I mean,
Speaker 3: basically facing a firing squad of Team USA. And then
Speaker 3: also my stick tap goes to the Olympic Hockey Tournament
Speaker 3: and the IIHF their tournament rules handout points in I
Speaker 3: believe the p WHL does this. I so badly want
Speaker 3: the NHL to do this, and I think a lot
Speaker 3: of people are in this camp now too. The three
Speaker 3: two one zero points system. They're using it in both
Speaker 3: tournaments for the men's and women's. It's just it's it
Speaker 3: just gets rid of that awfulness that creeps in with
Speaker 3: the loser point. And I'm it's just a much better
Speaker 3: way to reward actual winning because the Bruins and I'm
Speaker 3: sure many other teams even this season and in past seasons,
Speaker 3: have been penalized basically for not going and losing an
Speaker 3: overtime over actually just winning games.
Speaker 2: And then I agree with you. I agree with you.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know me, the gimmick stuff, I can't
Speaker 2: stand it. The's a professional. These are guys who have
Speaker 2: worked their asses off from the time that they were young,
Speaker 2: and we're now treating these games like their you know,
Speaker 2: arcade games with I love the three on three. Don't
Speaker 2: get me wrong, the three on three. You can keep
Speaker 2: that all day, every day. And if you told me
Speaker 2: that you wanted to extend it even by a couple
Speaker 2: more minutes and you would get rid of the shootout,
Speaker 2: I would be jumping up and down for joy. But
Speaker 2: that shootout shit in the NHL, I want to gone.
Speaker 2: I don't know how many different ways I can say this.
Speaker 2: And it's not because my team stinks at it. Yes,
Speaker 2: I know the Bruins stink at it, but to me,
Speaker 2: it has no place in determining the result of a
Speaker 2: professional sporting event. Sorry, just how I feel.
Speaker 3: I think the solution is obviously very simple. I mean,
Speaker 3: I would be willing to live continue to live with
Speaker 3: the shootout if they just did the three to one zero.
Speaker 3: You you cannot. You just you have to award more
Speaker 3: value to a win in regulation, because the point is
Speaker 3: to win in regulation.
Speaker 2: I agree with.
Speaker 3: You, but that is neither here nor there.
Speaker 2: I agree with you, so penalty box I do have
Speaker 2: an okay, okay, because we didn't have an opportunity to
Speaker 2: chat or record after the Bruins played the Florida Panthers,
Speaker 2: where Charlie McAvoy took one of the I don't even
Speaker 2: want to call it textbook hits, but that hit that
Speaker 2: was levied on him is the very definition of targeting
Speaker 2: the head. And first of all, the broadcast team, you suck,
Speaker 2: You absolutely suck when your immediate reaction was to say that, basically,
Speaker 2: Charlie put his head in a vulnerable place. Look at
Speaker 2: the replay first, you absolute morons when you see the
Speaker 2: Florida Panthers player not only leave his skates, but elevate
Speaker 2: himself with the degree that he targets the head. And
Speaker 2: then right, okay, then we get to the NHL officials
Speaker 2: who have been given, they have been absolutely given the
Speaker 2: playbook as to how to address these hits. You call
Speaker 2: it a major immediately immediately, and then you go and
Speaker 2: look at it, but no, what do you assholes do
Speaker 2: you call it two minutes? It's not reviewable. Marco Sturm
Speaker 2: is losing his mind on the bench. The bench is
Speaker 2: losing their mind. We got this guy heading down to
Speaker 2: the tunnel with what looks to he's gotta go to
Speaker 2: have himself checked for a concussion, and to add insult
Speaker 2: to cripting injury, the Department of Player Safety doesn't even
Speaker 2: give it a look, doesn't he Even Paul Maurice knows.
Speaker 2: This is bad. This is bad, and I have to
Speaker 2: pull this player out of the game with a phantom injury. Okay,
Speaker 2: whatever they called it up about.
Speaker 3: He's not massacred on the ice, right right.
Speaker 2: I am so fucking sick and tired of this, so
Speaker 2: sick and tired of it. These are the hits that
Speaker 2: you can't tell me that you care about the safety
Speaker 2: of these players when all of you morons in Toronto
Speaker 2: and at the league office watch this stuff and deem
Speaker 2: it to be okay and not worthy of even a
Speaker 2: game suspension. It's a freaking joke.
Speaker 3: I'm in agreement because regardless, let's just say we're talking
Speaker 3: not even about that particular hit. If the league is
Speaker 3: serious about head injuries, which questionable, if they actually are whatever.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, no, let's just say they know. They
Speaker 2: don't care. They I am this is they don't stay.
Speaker 2: You're right, you don't care, you don't care. The league
Speaker 2: does not care.
Speaker 3: But I would say they are trying to pretend like
Speaker 3: they care, or they want to present maybe a facade, right,
Speaker 3: I think like they're they're pretending like care because they
Speaker 3: have certain elements in place, and and you know, those
Speaker 3: elements could have been brought into place because of the
Speaker 3: players association. However, if a player has a head injury,
Speaker 3: a hit to the head, whether or not, and we've
Speaker 3: seen instances where yeah, no it was the player. He
Speaker 3: just you know, did.
Speaker 2: A late turn and it happens. And we've watched enough
Speaker 2: hot we have watched enough hockey to know in most instances,
Speaker 2: when the player puts himself in that vulnerable position. We've
Speaker 2: talked about this with respect to me, okay, but there
Speaker 2: there is no seasoned hockey fans or viewer who didn't
Speaker 2: look at that hit. And those of you on Twitter
Speaker 2: who are justifying these pits, kiss my ass. All right,
Speaker 2: kiss my ass. You're all morons. You're all more awful.
Speaker 3: But regardless, if if a player is injured and receives
Speaker 3: a head injury and whatever whatever happens, that should be
Speaker 3: a and it causes a stop and play and requires
Speaker 3: medical assistance on the ice in that moment, the on
Speaker 3: ice officials should be reviewing. I don't even think that
Speaker 3: they should have to say, we're gonna call a major
Speaker 3: and review it. Because if you call a major and
Speaker 3: review it, if you you you your two options are
Speaker 3: only it must be a five minute major or it
Speaker 3: then can be a two minute penalty. So regardless, there
Speaker 3: has to be a penalty.
Speaker 4: That's that's the protocol there, and I yeah, and I agree,
Speaker 4: and they didn't follow the protocol. But even just with
Speaker 4: any head injury, any head injury, if they're for some
Speaker 4: strange reason afraid of, you know, start doing that protocol
Speaker 4: because they don't know if there actually was a penalty.
Speaker 3: Then remove that barrier in that case that if someone
Speaker 3: took a head hit, that that requires someone to go
Speaker 3: out on the ice to tend to them. Just look
Speaker 3: at it and then see, like you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 3: like if if if for whatever reason, that threat of
Speaker 3: I can't I can't have a wrong penalty, if that's
Speaker 3: what was going through your mind, which is stupid, but whatever,
Speaker 3: then take it, take that that threshold away, prioritize player safety.
Speaker 3: And I got to tell you this one was so egregious,
Speaker 3: so egregious and seeing everything online, you know, with the
Speaker 3: joke kind of was, you've got Habs fans and Leafs fans,
Speaker 3: uh supporting the Bruins in this and right, I think
Speaker 3: for as obvious as Chucky feels like he can be,
Speaker 3: because you know a lot of players, they feel like
Speaker 3: they have to be really careful about how they criticize
Speaker 3: the league publicly, he was I think pretty obviously upset,
Speaker 3: you know, and I wouldn't be.
Speaker 2: And then you, because you screwed out as officials, then
Speaker 2: you give Marco Sterm a bench minor. Well, of course
Speaker 2: he should lose his freaking mind. I'm surprised he didn't
Speaker 2: throw sticks and gloves out on the ice after that,
Speaker 2: because that's what I would have done. You watch this,
Speaker 2: this that you know, one of your star defencemen, a
Speaker 2: key component to Team USA, who just came back from
Speaker 2: a horrific injury, who is now playing some of the
Speaker 2: best hockey we've seen him play in quite some time,
Speaker 2: and you watched him, You watch him take a blow
Speaker 2: to the head, and you're supposed to sit there quietly
Speaker 2: because you morons screwed up. And then nobody holds these
Speaker 2: referees accountable nobody holds them accountable for them.
Speaker 3: Now, I wouldn't be surprised if we hear something comes
Speaker 3: of this in regards to the Players Association because I think,
Speaker 3: I think Charlie McAvoy is he's a very smart person.
Speaker 3: He's a very he's articulate and an eloquent speaker. I mean,
Speaker 3: he's very well educated, so he can advocate, I think,
Speaker 3: And I wouldn't be surprised if that wasn't the end.
Speaker 3: We may never know what happens after the fact, but
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised if Players Association was contacted like
Speaker 3: that was just that was pretty pretty awesome.
Speaker 2: I'm going to put my black and gold rose colored
Speaker 2: glassism because I would bet a month's pay that if
Speaker 2: that hit had been levied on Connor McDavid, e, Connor, Bdard, Naplin, Celebrini,
Speaker 2: your name, and Dar anybody beyond a Boston Browen, that
Speaker 2: that would have been an immediate five minute major call.
Speaker 2: Immediate five minute major call. And I stand by that
Speaker 2: this this type of incident is not a small sample
Speaker 2: size when it comes to the way calls are made
Speaker 2: are not made as it relates to stars on the
Speaker 2: Boston Bruins.
Speaker 3: Yeah, agreed, I agreed, don't But anyway, let's maybe talk
Speaker 3: about something a little bit more fun.
Speaker 2: Let's get into our awards. So yay, we put together
Speaker 2: our own little awards ballot, which we have been doing.
Speaker 2: Now what is this our third year? Now we're doing
Speaker 2: this and it's fun. You know. We got some of
Speaker 2: our our listeners and viewers to chime in. We had
Speaker 2: some interesting results. So how do we want to break
Speaker 2: this down? Do we want to do them based on
Speaker 2: your vote, my vote and viewer votes and then dissect Okay,
Speaker 2: so my ballot is in my hot little hands here.
Speaker 2: You can't see it, people, But so Caroline has no idea.
Speaker 2: Don't where I'm going with some of my decisions. Some
Speaker 2: may be a little bit surprising, but I think for
Speaker 2: the most part, we're somewhat all on the same page.
Speaker 2: So we'll start with the Heart Trophy, the Bruins Heart Trophy,
Speaker 2: which is awarded to the player judged most valuable to
Speaker 2: his team. So our listeners voted for Pasta. Yes, my
Speaker 2: friend Caroline voted for Pasta. My vote is for Morgan Geek,
Speaker 2: and I'm going to make my case fascinating. I'm going
Speaker 2: to make my case no, based on the fact that
Speaker 2: we are looking at this, you know, I don't know
Speaker 2: if we're at the midway mark. However, I do recall
Speaker 2: me saying and I think there was consensus in the
Speaker 2: past and early pods where would this team have been
Speaker 2: without Morgan Geek at the start of the season and
Speaker 2: the scoring tear that he had been on. And so
Speaker 2: based on the sample size that we were looking at,
Speaker 2: and I Pasta is the superstar of the team most definitely,
Speaker 2: and he has been in the running in the past
Speaker 2: for the most valuable player in the league. But if
Speaker 2: I'm looking at this from a Bruins standpoint in terms
Speaker 2: of you know, he Pasta was a little bit quiet
Speaker 2: for a little bit to start the season, and Morgan
Speaker 2: Geek basically had the team on his back. So that's
Speaker 2: why he got my vote.
Speaker 3: Nice well, and I have to say so folks who
Speaker 3: are listening, obviously you can't see, but I'm going to
Speaker 3: be posting this also in our substack. The results so
Speaker 3: for listeners and followers who voted, all of our categories
Speaker 3: were done in rank choice order, so you could move around,
Speaker 3: you know, and rank the different players as his custom
Speaker 3: in a lot of these categories in real life, and yes,
Speaker 3: I also voted for David Pasternak, but Morgan Geeky he
Speaker 3: was my second choice. And for our listeners who voted,
Speaker 3: David Pasternach received the most points, followed by Morgan Geeky,
Speaker 3: Jeremy Swayman, Charlie McAvoy, Nikita Zadorov, and so on and
Speaker 3: so forth. So it was actually pretty uh, I bet
Speaker 3: you we probably had that David Pasternach and Morgan Geeky
Speaker 3: one two two one a handful of times. You know,
Speaker 3: I think it's a no brainer for either of them,
Speaker 3: because David Pasternach he is he is the He is
Speaker 3: the foundation of this team. And in the past year,
Speaker 3: especially since the trade deadline, he has entered another year
Speaker 3: another level that makes him that much more valuable because
Speaker 3: he's not just your best player, He's not just your
Speaker 3: best goalscorer. He's become a tremendous playmaker and his overall
Speaker 3: ability to contribute in every possible way, to me is
Speaker 3: just that little bit that tips him over the edge.
Speaker 2: Now, no, no, no, this this was no disrespect to Pasta.
Speaker 2: There's no wrong answer here. Yeah, there's no history. I mean,
Speaker 2: he clearly again and I've said it before, how lucky
Speaker 2: are we to have by David Pasternach on this team.
Speaker 2: But if I'm looking at it holistically and based on
Speaker 2: you know the fact that he was somewhat quiet to
Speaker 2: start this season Morgan geeky. I mean even David Pasternach
Speaker 2: had said it at one point in time, I bet
Speaker 2: he can score sixty goals, you know. So that's where
Speaker 2: my mindset came from with regard to this award. Ye
Speaker 2: how our next award is called what we're referring to
Speaker 2: as the New Bruin Trophy, which to us is kind
Speaker 2: of the quasi called a Memorial Trophy, which is Rookie
Speaker 2: of the Year. We do have a lot of new
Speaker 2: players on the team this year, so you know, we
Speaker 2: wanted to kind of take a look at and include
Speaker 2: the players who came in at the deadline last year
Speaker 2: and include them in this because their time was relatively short. Yep.
Speaker 3: So our listeners, yep, Fraser Minton.
Speaker 2: Caroline chose Fraser Minton, and I myself also chose Fraser Minton.
Speaker 2: So this was a landslide win for Fraser. I think
Speaker 2: it was basically a no brainer.
Speaker 3: Although I have to say for our listeners. And I'm
Speaker 3: trying to remember exactly how I ranked these different folks.
Speaker 3: I believe I my top three were the same as
Speaker 3: what our our audience voted, which was for a Metten first,
Speaker 3: Victor Arvidson second, and Marat Husnadinov third. Those were all
Speaker 3: very tight, close in points. And I I mean I
Speaker 3: I was in agreement with what the audience had to say.
Speaker 3: So definitely our top our top new guys for sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, no, And and you know, Fraser has been
Speaker 2: a he's been a revelation this season. And it's again
Speaker 2: it's it's somewhat silly to look at the fact that
Speaker 2: the maple Leafs just gave up, gave him up for
Speaker 2: it nothing, not a lot, not a lot. So moving on,
Speaker 2: moving on. So now we have the seventh Player Award,
Speaker 2: and this is an award that is I forget how
Speaker 2: long Nesson has been Neisson, in conjunction with the Bruins,
Speaker 2: has been running this contest and it's it's it's a
Speaker 2: fan award and anyone can vote on it. You can
Speaker 2: vote early, you can vote often, and it's typically given
Speaker 2: to the player on the team who works hard every
Speaker 2: day for the good of the team. Without any expectation
Speaker 2: and who you say to yourself, Wow, I didn't see
Speaker 2: this coming. I didn't see the ability for this player
Speaker 2: to make this kind of contribution to the Boston Bruins. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so our listeners voted for Marat Ustadinov. Caroline you your
Speaker 2: vote went to Pablo Zaka did and mine went to
Speaker 2: Mark Castello.
Speaker 3: Oh see, I love all of these though, they're all excellent.
Speaker 3: These are all very excellent. I mean, you know, I
Speaker 3: think for me, when I did my rank choice voting,
Speaker 3: I mean, it was so hard because there's been there's
Speaker 3: been a lot of quiet contributors that just has surprised us.
Speaker 2: But here's my view of Mark castle It. In my justification,
Speaker 2: I mean, this guy came in and he's embraced everything
Speaker 2: related to the Boston Bruins and the culture. He works
Speaker 2: his ass off shift after shift after shift, he has
Speaker 2: his teammates back time and time again. He's becoming pretty
Speaker 2: decent in the faceoff dots where Marco will send him
Speaker 2: out there to win a particular specific face off, and
Speaker 2: she's become a penalty killer. So that's my you know,
Speaker 2: the rationale from my voting from Mark castle It, that's excellent.
Speaker 3: And also I didn't realize until just now that I
Speaker 3: didn't include him as a choice for our audience. So
Speaker 3: I'm sure they also would have agreed with you if
Speaker 3: given the choice, because I forgot about him.
Speaker 2: I'm so sorry. I got him there and I got
Speaker 2: him there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, for me, I chose Zaka because you know,
Speaker 3: we love we love this guy, but we also love
Speaker 3: to tease him that, you know, he can't hit the
Speaker 3: broadside of a barn when it comes to the net,
Speaker 3: and this, that and the other. And I think that
Speaker 3: he this season, he's just really been able to produce
Speaker 3: in a way that we haven't seen in a very
Speaker 3: long time. I mean, he's one of the top goal scorers,
Speaker 3: his points, I mean, he's he's been just having a
Speaker 3: season and so that was just kind of nice, unexpected,
Speaker 3: especially coming from somebody who's been on the team for
Speaker 3: a little while at this point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, no, no, there's no there are no
Speaker 2: wrong answers, folks, But we're just you know, making our
Speaker 2: cases and justifying those that we did we did choose.
Speaker 2: The next one is the the tre Spurs are On Award,
Speaker 2: which is also known as the Frank Trophy, and it
Speaker 2: is awarded to the forward who excels at the defensive
Speaker 2: aspects of the game. This one was a tough one
Speaker 2: for me. This one was a tough one for me
Speaker 2: because I kind of had Mark Castelick in that category
Speaker 2: as well, just because you know, I'm seeing how Marco
Speaker 2: uses him now and the trust that Marco has in
Speaker 2: castle Lick. But I will say that our listeners, our
Speaker 2: listeners went with Mark Castelick. Yep, you my friend went
Speaker 2: with Elias Lindt Holm. I put Pavel Zaka in here. Ah, so,
Speaker 2: but I tell you it was a struggle for me. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it was a real struggle. Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 3: I think, first of all, it's always going to be
Speaker 3: a struggle for me to pick this one because in
Speaker 3: my mind, the standard is Patrice Bergeron and there's nobody
Speaker 3: who's coming close to what he was able to do.
Speaker 3: So it's kind of hard, Like I'm.
Speaker 2: It's really hard comparison I'm putting. Yeah, I'm fair.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm putting an unfair comparison. Uh, you know in
Speaker 3: my mind. But I think you're right again, no wrong answers,
Speaker 3: because I think all of our centers have done pretty
Speaker 3: decent jobs out there this year. You know, we've we
Speaker 3: talked for a couple of seasons about how well we
Speaker 3: don't have good centers. We don't have good centers, and
Speaker 3: I think that this year is finally a season where
Speaker 3: that's really not the bulk of the conversation because they're
Speaker 3: all doing.
Speaker 2: Really great jobs out there. They're all overperforming well. And
Speaker 2: also it speaks to the defensive structure of the team,
Speaker 2: because if you're going to play the system that they
Speaker 2: want to play, everybody has to be defensive responsible. It
Speaker 2: just can't fall to certain players. And I think that
Speaker 2: might have also made it a bit difficult to pinpoint
Speaker 2: someone on this team, this current roster who was excelling
Speaker 2: at that. Yep. Yeah. So our next award is the
Speaker 2: James Norris Memorial Trophy. And I know this is a
Speaker 2: particular stickler for you because this has basically become like
Speaker 2: a I don't know, it's lost somewhat, It's become a
Speaker 2: little watered down from the league standpoint. So we've tweaked
Speaker 2: it a little bit to say this is for the
Speaker 2: defenseman who demonstrates a commitment to defensive play, not to
Speaker 2: just padding their stats with goals and assists and a
Speaker 2: high plus minus so, and we were very specific in
Speaker 2: explaining that as part of this vote. So, Caroline, you
Speaker 2: went with Jonathan Asparo, Yes, is that correct? I did,
Speaker 2: our listeners went with Nikita Zadoro, and I myself am
Speaker 2: also going with Nikita Zadora because I think, me personally,
Speaker 2: from day one, he has been the bruins steadiest and
Speaker 2: best defenseman all season.
Speaker 3: Low true, Yes, no, I agree. For me, my number
Speaker 3: two choice was Nikita Zadorov. I think, you know, when
Speaker 3: we're looking at that back end, we don't have a
Speaker 3: high number of truly truly defensive defencemen at home defenceman,
Speaker 3: so obviously, in that regards, it's one of two. Basically,
Speaker 3: we have some two way players that were in the
Speaker 3: mix as well. But I ended up with going with
Speaker 3: Asparo for two reasons. One and I think he is
Speaker 3: even more a pure at home defenseman, even more than Zadorov.
Speaker 3: I think Zadorov has a little bit more variety in
Speaker 3: what he does out there. And then also simply because
Speaker 3: when Asparo was out for what was it five a
Speaker 3: handful of games, the Bruins were terrible. They did, and
Speaker 3: as soon as he came back, they had a not
Speaker 3: just a winning record, a dominantly winning record. They were
Speaker 3: like five and one or five and two or whatever
Speaker 3: it was. So, uh, he's clearly some kind of secret
Speaker 3: sauce there in regards to the defense. So that's why
Speaker 3: he got my vote this time.
Speaker 2: So then what we'll stick with the defense defenseman category
Speaker 2: and we made this award up ourselves and it's called
Speaker 2: the Bobby or Defenseman Award. I still think that the
Speaker 2: James Norris should be changed to Bobby or trophy Bob.
Speaker 2: What the hell do I know? So this is for
Speaker 2: the defenceman who demonstrates skill in two way play and
Speaker 2: can be called an offensive defenseman. Yes, And so our
Speaker 2: listeners went with Charlie McAvoy. You, my friend went with
Speaker 2: Charlie McAvoy, And I too went with Charlie McAvoy. Yep.
Speaker 2: And I don't know if that's like, you know, processed
Speaker 2: by elimination for me, just because now Charlie has been
Speaker 2: playing a lot better and has been getting more involved
Speaker 2: offensively than many of the other defensemen we currently have
Speaker 2: on this roster.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, and I think for me, I went with
Speaker 3: Chucky because when I was ordering my list, I and
Speaker 3: immediately just took the the more defensive defenseman and you know,
Speaker 3: dragging them down and looked at kind of what I
Speaker 3: had left and Hampus he is a great two way player.
Speaker 3: He's just not having that year this year.
Speaker 2: He's not having another year. And the injury, I mean,
Speaker 2: both players have been injured, right, but his injury I
Speaker 2: think has had an impact on him more so than
Speaker 2: we likely even know about. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And with Mason LORI, yes, he is a and an
Speaker 3: offensive defenseman. You know, he's great at goal scoring and
Speaker 3: points and things like that. But at the end of
Speaker 3: the day, I was thinking more, Okay, you want to
Speaker 3: have someone who can balance both because they are still
Speaker 3: a defenceman. So to me, it's it's Charlie all the
Speaker 3: way in that regard. Mason just doesn't have that defensive
Speaker 3: piece at all.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So I was like, I can't vote for him
Speaker 3: for this.
Speaker 2: So now we're making our way to the Lady Ban
Speaker 2: Memorial Trophy, and this is typically awarded to player a
Speaker 2: player who has exhibited outstanding sportsmanship and gentlemanly conduct combined
Speaker 2: with the high standard of playing ability. So our listeners
Speaker 2: went with Pavel soaka you my friend went with Elias Lindholme,
Speaker 2: and I went with Victor Arvidson just because I wanted
Speaker 2: to show him a little bit of love. I think
Speaker 2: he has he has been quietly playing very well for
Speaker 2: the Boston Bruins. I don't think he gets a lot
Speaker 2: of recognition for his level of play and his effort
Speaker 2: on the ice for the Bruins, and that that was
Speaker 2: my rationale for voting for Victor.
Speaker 3: Yeah, definitely, again, I had no wrong answers. I think
Speaker 3: that the Boston Bruins have a lot of players who
Speaker 3: play really hard, they play really well, and they behave
Speaker 3: out there on the ice.
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, you know, keeps his nose clean, right,
Speaker 2: keeps his nose clean, does does his job. So that's
Speaker 2: why I gave Ardbitson my vote. And we're we're gonna
Speaker 2: wrap up our voting with the Bill Masterson Memorial Trophy Award.
Speaker 2: This is awarded to a player who exemplifies the qualities
Speaker 2: of perseverance and dedication to Hoteyle. Our listeners went with
Speaker 2: Charlie McAvoy. Caroline, you went with Jonathan Asboro and I
Speaker 2: went with Mikey Simont. Oh very nice, and I did
Speaker 2: so because you know, he's had his ups and downs
Speaker 2: the Bruins. He's been scratched, he's been back in he's
Speaker 2: been scratched, and when he comes back, he comes back
Speaker 2: and works hard and plays hard.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, I went with Jonathan Asboro because I just
Speaker 3: love his story that he's played six seasons in the
Speaker 3: AHL and typically when that happens, it's probably not really
Speaker 3: gonna happen for you at the NHL level, and who
Speaker 3: knows what the future will bring for Jonathan Asbro. But
Speaker 3: since he's gotten the call up early in the season,
Speaker 3: I mean, he has just made the most of it.
Speaker 3: He's earned himself a two year deal and the fact
Speaker 3: that you know, it seems like he never gave up
Speaker 3: when he was in the AHL and committed to making
Speaker 3: it and just playing the game for the love of
Speaker 3: the game. That's he got my vote. And then my
Speaker 3: number two was the listener's number one, which was Charlie
Speaker 3: McVoy because I mean, the man has had just an
Speaker 3: absolutely horrific year.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's got a he's had a tough goal over
Speaker 2: is very much so earning that nod as well. So
Speaker 2: that wraps up our Ruins Awards. We thank you all
Speaker 2: for participating. If you have any any comments or critiques
Speaker 2: about anyone that we voted for, Please feel free to
Speaker 2: share them on our social media's you can. You can
Speaker 2: find us on x you can find us on substack.
Speaker 2: Our social handles are at tape to tape mk and
Speaker 2: on substack. You can find us at tape to tape
Speaker 2: mk dot substack dot com. Please feel free to give
Speaker 2: us a rating, a review and make it easier for
Speaker 2: other listeners to find us and find our our content
Speaker 2: and uh.
Speaker 3: Of course, as always, go Bees and go Olympics, Go Bes,
Speaker 3: Yay Team USA
Podbean