NHL Free Agency: Where Do the Boston Bruins Stand? | Ep. 155
Liner notes
🎙️The Boston Bruins faced a quiet NHL free agency, but their roster moves still raise questions. We discuss Boston’s offseason and impactful trades over free-agent signings. Plus, a broader NHL free agency review with teams like Toronto, Edmonton, San Jose, and Los Angeles, and what it means for the Bruins’ progression towards the new season.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 3: I need something to do.
Speaker 4: I'll Jack sending out a trough of bocking to say thy.
Speaker 1: Watch today.
Speaker 4: Here's a chance pop fa right down the goalie scars,
Speaker 4: oh my water move by the rookie to on.
Speaker 3: One paster not moving in far set it joins on
Speaker 3: his own oil dances at podcast. W at home right away,
Speaker 3: corner fastersta, what is that for? Most?
Speaker 2: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruin's Tape to Tape.
Speaker 2: I will be your host today. I am Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 2: I am joined today as always by my fabulous and
Speaker 2: hardworking co host Caroline with ak Welcome in.
Speaker 3: How are you good? I'm good. We are about a
Speaker 3: month away from the start of youth hockey season, so
Speaker 3: my friends and family have all been warned that they
Speaker 3: have fewer than thirty days left to hang out with us,
Speaker 3: and then they won't see us until April.
Speaker 2: Then you'll be living in rinks in and around your
Speaker 2: area of the country. Yes, and we are getting closer
Speaker 2: and closer to the start of relatively formal HL related activities. Well,
Speaker 2: we'll be coming upon workie camp and then training camp.
Speaker 2: So with that in mind, we are going to be
Speaker 2: focusing this episode and upcoming episodes to do a little
Speaker 2: bit of deep dives into three different topics. Today, we're
Speaker 2: going to focus on free agency and how the Bruins
Speaker 2: fared or didn't fare, and how teams across the league
Speaker 2: fared with free agency during the summer of twenty twenty six,
Speaker 2: and then following episodes, we're going to be doing kind
Speaker 2: of detailed, comprehensive reviews of the Bruins' defensive groups and
Speaker 2: forward groups. So we'll start with free agency. So, in
Speaker 2: terms of what the Bruins did during free agency, I
Speaker 2: shuddered to say that the biggest deal that they made
Speaker 2: was signing Connorclifton. Short of that, there wasn't anything that
Speaker 2: caused us to want to dance in the streets, so
Speaker 2: to speak.
Speaker 3: And they didn't even really do much in terms of
Speaker 3: actual signings because a lot of their roster changes came
Speaker 3: about because of trades. JJ Peterke came through a trade.
Speaker 3: What's his name, well, the Wiborgan or the defenseman from Magers.
Speaker 3: He came via a trade, but was even less busy
Speaker 3: than last year's free agency, And we thought that that
Speaker 3: was a snoozefest.
Speaker 2: This positively put us in a coma. It was a
Speaker 2: snooze fest as it came to the Bruins. There were
Speaker 2: other teams, and we'll do a little bit of reviewing
Speaker 2: on that, but there were other teams that made it
Speaker 2: worth their while to participate in free agency. And let's
Speaker 2: face facks, we've come to understand for the most part,
Speaker 2: how Bruins management operates, and any of us who continued
Speaker 2: to wait for the Bruins to make big deals or
Speaker 2: big splashes in free agency, I think we've learned that's
Speaker 2: just not how they roll. And this really wasn't a
Speaker 2: free agent class where the Bruins had a snowball's chance
Speaker 2: in hell of landing anybody of any notoriety simply because
Speaker 2: they didn't have the money to do so, or they
Speaker 2: didn't have the assets that one might need to part
Speaker 2: with in order to make participating in free agency worth
Speaker 2: their while.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it was underwhelming in general in the grand scheme
Speaker 3: of things, But I think we've known for a really
Speaker 3: long time that Boston is risk averse, and that tends
Speaker 3: to happen. I think with a lot of really well
Speaker 3: established teams, I think you'll still see that in some degree.
Speaker 3: You No, you're not going to see crazy big moves
Speaker 3: with teams like New York or Montreal or Toronto or
Speaker 3: even Buffalo. It's you're going to see some of the
Speaker 3: more exciting things happen with teams that are younger or
Speaker 3: they're actively building, and so because they're building, they have
Speaker 3: a lot more money to spend. Hence why we saw
Speaker 3: the craziness of the offersheet situation flying left and right.
Speaker 2: Oh, that was a little fun between Flyers and the Ducks.
Speaker 3: And even other teams that do have a lot of
Speaker 3: established players like Florida. I mean, that's a totally different
Speaker 3: kind of organization. The way that they operate, the way
Speaker 3: that team another team like Vegas, the way they approach
Speaker 3: doing business is very different. And so it's not a
Speaker 3: surprise then that those teams in particular were quite active
Speaker 3: in aggressively pursuing a lot of very high end talent.
Speaker 3: The one was the biggest surprise to me in terms
Speaker 3: of signings offer sheet drama aside, honestly, was where Bobrovski
Speaker 3: ended up. No one I saw that coming. Yeah, who
Speaker 3: saw that coming? I didn't think that he was going
Speaker 3: to be staying in Florida because of how expensive he
Speaker 3: is and his age. Those are just two factors that
Speaker 3: are always gonna ultimately result in a player going elsewhere.
Speaker 3: I was surprised at Toronto was as aggressive as they
Speaker 3: were and they went after him and they got him.
Speaker 3: So that's going to be a great test to see
Speaker 3: where the issue really lies, because there's no way you're
Speaker 3: going to be the reason they're not doing well. Yes,
Speaker 3: I agree with you. There.
Speaker 2: The other the other significant signing I think we're on
Speaker 2: the topic of goalies is Frederick Anderson signing with the
Speaker 2: Oilers because what have we been saying for what seems
Speaker 2: like a flippant eternity where Edmonton is concerned, When are
Speaker 2: they actually going to get a bona fide full tender
Speaker 2: in there now? Again, that will also be very very
Speaker 2: telling in terms of where lies the problem in Edmonton
Speaker 2: And if Freddie Anderson isn't part of the solution to
Speaker 2: the problem, does Zapp push Connor McDavid and even Drivesidle
Speaker 2: to want to continue being invested.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and Anderson, he's obviously he's very elite, unlike a
Speaker 3: goalie like Bob or even I would argue Swayman or Vassie.
Speaker 3: He's got some sometimes some issues with consistency, and then
Speaker 3: he sometimes will have some health issues that result in
Speaker 3: his inability to just play at that level consistently because
Speaker 3: he's out. I don't know that he's necessarily the perfect
Speaker 3: goalie to hire for Edmonton in order to actually definitively
Speaker 3: say this is where the problem is, like how hiring
Speaker 3: Bob in Toronto will most certainly help them identify the issues. However,
Speaker 3: Anderson will always give the team in front of him
Speaker 3: the opportunity to be in the game and take that game.
Speaker 3: He's that kind of goalie. That's where his consistency lies.
Speaker 3: If Edmonton is unable to take advantage of those opportunities.
Speaker 3: I do think that he is going to be that
Speaker 3: Bell Weather. He may not be the perfect goalie, the
Speaker 3: best goalie, but he's a heck of a lot better
Speaker 3: than anything that they've had for a number for.
Speaker 2: A number of years. He's a very good NHL goalie,
Speaker 2: and some might argue that if Edmonton had had a
Speaker 2: very good NHL goalie, we might be having a different
Speaker 2: conversation and maybe they would have had a better opportunity
Speaker 2: to invoice it as Stanley Cup. At this point, I
Speaker 2: think it's incumbent on the Oilers right now. It'll be
Speaker 2: interesting to see how things play out there because their
Speaker 2: head coach has been a lightning rod of criticism, mostly
Speaker 2: due to his own actions. So it'll be interesting to
Speaker 2: see how long Mike Babcock can hold his shit together
Speaker 2: to understand that this is a new age NHL and
Speaker 2: young players have to be and maybe are expecting to
Speaker 2: be treated in different manners than players of the past.
Speaker 2: From what I've read by all accoutuns, the players are
Speaker 2: speaking highly of Mike Babcock, but the proof will.
Speaker 3: Be in the win loss record.
Speaker 2: Yes, it always is, right, Yeah, that's the de facto
Speaker 2: test is prove your worth in a win loss record.
Speaker 3: So some other big news, which was technically assigning. Patrick
Speaker 3: Kane is returning for his final hurrah.
Speaker 2: Now that was kind of a little, i don't want
Speaker 2: to say, shocking surprising, because all the speculation from insiders
Speaker 2: was that it was either Buffalo or he'd go back
Speaker 2: to Detroit. Now, I wonder if the uncertainty with what's
Speaker 2: happening with Dylan Larkin in Detroit led him to look
Speaker 2: in a different direction. Could he is he's from Buffalo.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, this is kind of my understanding of the situation,
Speaker 3: and I wasn't paying super close attention, but this is
Speaker 3: just my outsider's take. He's currently third seven years old.
Speaker 3: He turns thirty eight in November. And was it a
Speaker 3: two year deal that he signed? Two year? Yeah, eight million.
Speaker 3: He's effectively playing till he's almost forty, So this is
Speaker 3: this is it it?
Speaker 2: And maybe he wants to retire.
Speaker 3: And so my impression, knowing that he was looking at
Speaker 3: his final years in the NHL, he was going to
Speaker 3: end up in one of two places, Buffalo because that
Speaker 3: is where he is from, or he's going to go
Speaker 3: back home to Chicago. And when I saw that headline,
Speaker 3: my reaction was, that's what's right. I'm I'm of the
Speaker 3: ilk that if you have a player who spends the
Speaker 3: majority of their career with you and they end up leaving,
Speaker 3: everybody leaves for the most part, like the experiences of
Speaker 3: Andre Copitar or Patrice Bergeron or Sidney Crosby, that's really
Speaker 3: rare and unusual, even final years of their career. I mean,
Speaker 3: what happened with Brad Marshan not unusual. Bobby or finish
Speaker 3: playing with the Bruins. Esposito didn't finish with the.
Speaker 2: It's it's highly unusual. It's unfortunately, especially when it's because
Speaker 2: you have this hardcast, right, but you've had business and
Speaker 2: you've had sustained success. Kane and Tapes and Postsa and
Speaker 2: Donkey Keith. How many Stanley Cups did they win as
Speaker 2: a group, and everybody know it was going to have
Speaker 2: to come to an end because you couldn't keep and pay.
Speaker 3: I love seeing this kind of what do you call
Speaker 3: it putting a bow on a career, whether it's yes,
Speaker 3: you literally do get to go and finish playing great,
Speaker 3: but also then seeing opportunities where a player gets to
Speaker 3: come back they sign for a one day contract, like
Speaker 3: we saw with Marc Andre Fleury or even Zadano Chara
Speaker 3: he had signed a one day contract to officially retire
Speaker 3: as a Boston Bruin. I love that kind of story.
Speaker 3: I think that's good on him. I've got my own
Speaker 3: personal opinions about him as a player and a human being,
Speaker 3: but in terms of the way that I think that
Speaker 3: hockey stories should end, great perfect.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and yes he's had some hiccups along the way
Speaker 2: and his off ice stuff, but by all accounts, he's
Speaker 2: been humbled by it, has learned, has grown from it.
Speaker 2: Let's hope, and let's face facts too, that black Hawks
Speaker 2: team could really use some veteran leadership. Here. You have
Speaker 2: Connor Bodard that they signed to a five year eighteen
Speaker 2: million dollars needs molding and growing and developing, right, and
Speaker 2: some of it may be that hopefully Patrick Kane can
Speaker 2: help share.
Speaker 3: Some pearls of wisdom.
Speaker 2: Clearly the black Hawks want Connor Badar to be the
Speaker 2: face of their franchise. Y, I mean, there's no doubt
Speaker 2: about that, but he needs the guidance in order to
Speaker 2: get there. Yeah, I just can't still see that organization
Speaker 2: going anywhere either. So I just they're a little stuck
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I don't know that Patrick Kaine is going
Speaker 3: to provide what they need, at least on the ice. Now. Look,
Speaker 3: I haven't watched him play, so I don't know what
Speaker 3: he can still quite literally bring to the ice. But again,
Speaker 3: as is well known in the sport of hockey, you
Speaker 3: don't win on the back of one single player, and
Speaker 3: so perhaps he is that transition piece to continue to
Speaker 3: explicitly grow and develop Connor Bedard. But then what about
Speaker 3: the rest of their team, And yeah, I was quickly
Speaker 3: looking at their roster and they've got some name Snake
Speaker 3: got Badard, they still have Tyler Bertuzzi, Ryan Donado, Patrick Kin,
Speaker 3: Andrew MANJAPANI. I'm just looking at this going there's nothing
Speaker 3: here that's going to set the world on fire. No.
Speaker 3: Compared to other teams that are actively in a building phase,
Speaker 3: this has been a long time rebuild though.
Speaker 2: This is really taken the Blackhawks, like, we get frustrated
Speaker 2: here in Boston with our rebuild retotal process, but you know,
Speaker 2: we hope we're in a shorter window.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and again, that's a team that is a really
Speaker 3: well established, entrenched in the culture team, so they're probably
Speaker 3: going to be a lot more risk averse. It's not
Speaker 3: like with San Jose or Anaheim. They're making waves. They're
Speaker 3: going they're being aggressive, and they're pursuing a lot of
Speaker 3: really young talent. And San Jose, I think is a
Speaker 3: perfect example to compare with Chicago in terms of their
Speaker 3: rebuild because over the last couple of years, those two
Speaker 3: teams have had top five picks multiple years in a row,
Speaker 3: and look at what has been happening in San Jose
Speaker 3: versus what's happening in Chicago and San Jose. I don't
Speaker 3: know that hockey town. I don't know if it's raining
Speaker 3: money there or what the hell is going on.
Speaker 2: But in addition to they made out like bandits in
Speaker 2: the draft, they made out like Bandrinia again, are you about?
Speaker 2: Oh no, he's heads above conniber Dart, heads above No,
Speaker 2: there's just no two ways about it. Heads above Connibra Dart.
Speaker 2: But they also in free agency signed Jacob Truba and
Speaker 2: Mason Marchmant.
Speaker 3: I know, I know they've got a phenomenal goaltender in Askarov.
Speaker 3: That guy impressed the heck out of me the two
Speaker 3: times that we saw Boston play. And they just signed
Speaker 3: maclin Celabrini, right, he most expensive contract, and you have.
Speaker 2: The numbers, they are in front of you because they
Speaker 2: make you want to vomit gold on he's.
Speaker 3: I believe he's making nineteen million dollars per year.
Speaker 2: He signed a five year, ninety one million dollar extent
Speaker 2: with a cap hit of eighteen million, eight hundred per season.
Speaker 3: Nineteen million dollars.
Speaker 2: And how much does David Pastor Knack make chunk change eleven?
Speaker 2: He's and what's going on kids, Like, I think players
Speaker 2: don't get worked up about this for the most because
Speaker 2: their salary caps keep going up, and no one's going
Speaker 2: to begrudge anybody getting their bag up cash, right.
Speaker 3: Because then they set the market. Those guys set the
Speaker 3: market for the next guy. They get it that if
Speaker 3: maclan Celebrini can make nineteen million dollars, if David Pasternach
Speaker 3: were to come up, if his contract were coming up
Speaker 3: in this year, you mean to tell me that he
Speaker 3: wouldn't be jumping from eleven million dollars to twenty million dollars. Easy.
Speaker 3: Of course they want to.
Speaker 2: See those guys, And this is what makes I just
Speaker 2: don't understand this. Just to compare and contrast, So we
Speaker 2: have Maclin Celebrini, who is a generational talent.
Speaker 3: There's just a generational talent, right, he's a lot of kids.
Speaker 2: And then but I'm then I'm looking at what the
Speaker 2: Minnesota Wild gave Carillo, who is basically a no show
Speaker 2: in the playoffs, but they signed him to an eight year,
Speaker 2: one hundred and thirty six million dollar contract with the
Speaker 2: cap hit of seventeen million per season.
Speaker 3: Which that had been previously the highest the highest. There
Speaker 3: was an extension during the season.
Speaker 2: During the season. Yeah, and then it came Leo Keemlson
Speaker 2: because their hand was forced, and then and then Macrimona.
Speaker 2: It's I guess it's great for the NHL to see
Speaker 2: guys getting these types of deals because it shows the
Speaker 2: league is growing. It's apparently getting more profitable. Right the
Speaker 2: TV revenues, marketing revenues, those streams are flowing in next year.
Speaker 2: The next season, the cap is slated to go up again.
Speaker 2: The league is making progress. I mean, it's never going
Speaker 2: to be anything like what NBA players are pulling down. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: don't worry about going to catch baseball. My god, they
Speaker 2: have no no. So it doesn't matter that there's been
Speaker 2: all kinds of conversation about a potential workstopage next season,
Speaker 2: because there are owners who want to implement a salary
Speaker 2: cap similar to how it's implemented in the NHL, and
Speaker 2: that conversation is being spearheaded by the majority owner of
Speaker 2: the Boston Red Sox, John Henry, who happens to own
Speaker 2: the Pittsburgh Penguins.
Speaker 3: At one time.
Speaker 2: There's pros and cons to which I think, when is
Speaker 2: enough money enough money to be earned by players? If
Speaker 2: owners are doing it at the expense of the athletes.
Speaker 2: That's what The.
Speaker 3: Thing that always will come with a salary cap is
Speaker 3: a salary floor, and that is just as important, I think,
Speaker 3: for maintaining that parody as the cap, because to your
Speaker 3: point of owners then going on the cheap. You talked
Speaker 3: about how this was the case decades ago.
Speaker 2: You would see in Boston, well, they would never spend
Speaker 2: to the cap. It was one of the most embarrassing
Speaker 2: worst kept secrets in the NHL, never what they spend
Speaker 2: to the cap.
Speaker 3: And so there's so many things wrong with that because
Speaker 3: you're exploiting players, the fans are irritated because you're not
Speaker 3: going to bring in anybody who's really good because you
Speaker 3: don't want to pay them. And then you may end
Speaker 3: up on a team that is never going to go
Speaker 3: anywhere because your ownership will not spend the money. They
Speaker 3: will not invest the money in the team to grow
Speaker 3: and get better. And then you're playing against teams that
Speaker 3: if they're spending millions a billion dollars every year, how
Speaker 3: could you possibly compete against a team like that? That's
Speaker 3: not a You don't want to play a game like that,
Speaker 3: it's not fun. Ask long suffering Buffalo fans, and we're
Speaker 3: in a similar situation where maybe not in terms of
Speaker 3: the money spending, but just being in this stagnant, terrible place.
Speaker 3: Nobody wants that, and that's honestly, one of the best
Speaker 3: things about a salary cap is a mandatory salary floor.
Speaker 2: The thing that concerns me a little bit is, you know,
Speaker 2: we're still seeing a lot of long term deals being
Speaker 2: signed because there's money there to give the higher end players, right,
Speaker 2: because the organization's like, this is our guy, we drafted him,
Speaker 2: we got to have this guy on the team. Okay, fine,
Speaker 2: so sign him to the seven, eight year deal. But
Speaker 2: there is concern about the guys who are now signing
Speaker 2: just a one year deal or a two year deal
Speaker 2: because they want to see what the next deal could
Speaker 2: potentially bring them. So I guess good for them, but
Speaker 2: it makes it harder on ownership to plan your future, right,
Speaker 2: no stability stability.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's interesting because I feel like we don't see
Speaker 3: a ton of mid length term contracts as much anymore.
Speaker 3: We don't really see the four year the five year
Speaker 3: as much, which again I get both arguments, because maybe
Speaker 3: the ownership doesn't want to have that seven year contract
Speaker 3: because that's what the new contract length is, right, they
Speaker 3: want to have it lower potentially if it's a guy
Speaker 3: that they're unsure about or they want to let's see
Speaker 3: it kind of situation. And I see young players or
Speaker 3: other players wanting to do the one two year contract
Speaker 3: to then maybe jump up in salaries. So it's a
Speaker 3: very complicated situation. And I don't know. It just seems
Speaker 3: like it goes through different trends in what we see
Speaker 3: and as every CBA gets negotiated since it really got
Speaker 3: going after the four h five lockout, contracts used to
Speaker 3: be like twenty years long. No, not really, but twelve right,
Speaker 3: twelve year long contract, which is insane, and the term
Speaker 3: has gotten shorter and shorter, and so it just got
Speaker 3: shorter now and I wouldn't be surprised if in coming
Speaker 3: years they get even a little bit shorter. I don't know,
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: And you know what, if that's the case again, I say,
Speaker 2: good on the players, go get you bag of cash now.
Speaker 2: I say that now. But do you want a little
Speaker 2: bit of loyalty too.
Speaker 3: From your players? Right?
Speaker 2: Do you want to stick around and try to be
Speaker 2: part of something bigger and special? Now, if you're languishing
Speaker 2: in an organization that just seemingly can't continue to get
Speaker 2: out of its own way, I'm referring to have an example.
Speaker 2: I think the Edmonton Oilers are a perfect example of that.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: I have to give Connor McDavid a shit ton of
Speaker 2: credit for sticking it out there, because at some point,
Speaker 2: when do you say to yourselves?
Speaker 3: What am I doing here? Am I here? Do I
Speaker 3: want to win.
Speaker 2: A Stanley Cup? Of course I want to win a
Speaker 2: Stanley Cup? Am I going to be able to do
Speaker 2: it here? How many kicks at the can are we
Speaker 2: going to get here to do this?
Speaker 3: Exactly? Yeah? And of course they're also motivated because they
Speaker 3: want to stay in a single place because then they
Speaker 3: start to have families. They don't want to move a lot.
Speaker 3: It's ever changing and evolving, and there's a ton of
Speaker 3: reasons why you would want to go in any direction. Personally,
Speaker 3: I would like to see more two, three, four year contracts.
Speaker 3: I don't have anything wrong against the long term ones,
Speaker 3: that's absolutely yeah. We want to lock up players like
Speaker 3: Geee Pasternak, you Celebrini, whomever. But I think if you're
Speaker 3: coming in and you're not a one hundred percent guarantee,
Speaker 3: known entity. Right you come in, you do need to
Speaker 3: stay with the team. I think at least for two years.
Speaker 3: I love to go back to the metaphor of a job.
Speaker 3: Right you start your job, you really got to wait
Speaker 3: a whole year to learn a year's worth of your
Speaker 3: job and how everything works and how you were and
Speaker 3: then really you can start to make a true impact
Speaker 3: or make changes or do whatever in the second year
Speaker 3: of your job. And anyone who's coming in for really
Speaker 3: less than that, can you really make an opinion on
Speaker 3: how impactful they were. Maybe, but you really got to
Speaker 3: know if they're the right fit. You have to have
Speaker 3: them for a couple of years. You really you have to.
Speaker 2: Well, it'll be interesting to see how this all plays
Speaker 2: out with these two or three year terms. And that
Speaker 2: leads me into what other teams have done here in
Speaker 2: free agency, because the Bruins free agency was so boring.
Speaker 2: The Dallas Stars and Jason Robertson now they came to
Speaker 2: terms and they had good arbitration, one year, twelve million
Speaker 2: dollar deal for hun and he turned down apparently an
Speaker 2: offer from another team.
Speaker 3: From what I've heard and read, it wasn't that he
Speaker 3: was strictly chasing money, although you do see that with
Speaker 3: the younger players, For him, he explicitly wanted to stay
Speaker 3: in Dallas. He wanted to make his money in Dallas.
Speaker 3: So he obviously was given an opportunity and apparently more
Speaker 3: than just the opportunity in Seattle. We just don't know
Speaker 3: where else. But he wanted to make that money specifically there,
Speaker 3: and so I understand that. I get it. Dallas is
Speaker 3: going to have to figure out what they want to
Speaker 3: do because once he's I believe he's eligible for free
Speaker 3: agency next summer.
Speaker 2: He's on free agent list again for twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: Seven, but he'll be unrestricted or he is listed will
Speaker 3: be listed as a UFA in twenty twenty seven. Dallas
Speaker 3: is going to have to think long and hard about
Speaker 3: how they want to manage that.
Speaker 2: And Tyler Sagan will be part of that on the
Speaker 2: Dallas Stars as well. The list in general for twenty
Speaker 2: twenty seven has some significant and serious names on it.
Speaker 2: You know, you've got Robertson, Carlson, Dowdy, Sagan, Nikita Kucherov.
Speaker 2: Now again, these players, they likely won't go anywhere. Mark Stone,
Speaker 2: cal mccarr right, Alex Petrangelo, Sidney Crosby, Quinn Hughes. That's
Speaker 2: going to be an interesting story to follow. That's a
Speaker 2: really big one in Minnesota and his brother Jack, because
Speaker 2: you're probably reading the same things that I've been reading
Speaker 2: about they want to be together. Where is that going
Speaker 2: to be? Is it going to be in Jersey? Is
Speaker 2: it going to be in Minnesota? Is it going to
Speaker 2: be someplace else where a team could swoop in and say, hey, boys,
Speaker 2: look what we have here. You who knows. I don't
Speaker 2: know if the Bruins will be in on any of this,
Speaker 2: but again, if the Bruins are looking at a short
Speaker 2: term retool, right, because we all know that Sweeney is
Speaker 2: fairly adept at making good hockey trades or good hockey signings, right,
Speaker 2: this list has no shortage of pretty good players. If
Speaker 2: you look at what's coming up for next season. Now,
Speaker 2: a lot of these guys may get extended during the
Speaker 2: course of the season because owners and organizations may not
Speaker 2: want to risk them going, especially when they finally nail
Speaker 2: down how much more the cap is going to go
Speaker 2: up next season.
Speaker 3: Fully expect a lot of those big names who are
Speaker 3: faces of their franchise to be extended but I think
Speaker 3: you're right in that they like to wait and find out,
Speaker 3: and I believe they get a sense of what the
Speaker 3: cap is going to be the following year by the
Speaker 3: start of the new calendar years the year, so then
Speaker 3: typically you'll be seeing as trades ramp up as well.
Speaker 3: Between then and mid March, those big names are going
Speaker 3: to get resigned. To think Kle mccar, Nikita kuchirov Mark Stone,
Speaker 3: they're gonna be staying. I would be shocked, especially if
Speaker 3: Kale mccar and went anywhere else, anywhere.
Speaker 2: Else, or even Sidney Crosby. I can't imagine, right, I know,
Speaker 2: I know there's especially.
Speaker 3: With I don't know how much stock I buy into
Speaker 3: the rumors, especially ones that don't explicitly involve the Boston Bruins,
Speaker 3: but the biggest one being that, Okay, if sid really
Speaker 3: wants another legitimate Cup run, could he end up in Colorado?
Speaker 3: Could he end up in Montreal because they're up and coming.
Speaker 3: Could he end up in Florida for a year? I
Speaker 3: don't think that would be a good fit.
Speaker 1: He loves playing with Brad Marsham, Yeah, but the player
Speaker 1: that Sidney Crosby is, I don't think that would ever work.
Speaker 1: But I could see.
Speaker 3: Him in Colorado and the culture that they have there,
Speaker 3: and even potentially Montreal because of the youth and excitement there,
Speaker 3: and he could maybe see that being also a place
Speaker 3: to make a big impact. Although you could then make
Speaker 3: the exact same argument for staying we building on his
Speaker 3: legacy of sending the next young group of Penguins players
Speaker 3: out into the beyond. This is also the last season
Speaker 3: for Alex Ovechkin.
Speaker 2: You just took the words out of my mind because
Speaker 2: they've been on the same trajectory for a long time.
Speaker 2: And Sydney Crosby presents himself as someone who is extremely loyal. Yes,
Speaker 2: and I can't imagine that he would lead the Penguins
Speaker 2: to go elsewhere. And Alex Ovechkin is coming back for
Speaker 2: one more season at a very team friendly price of
Speaker 2: four and a quarter million dollars. Yeah, I could see
Speaker 2: Sid doing right. This is a one year deal. Who
Speaker 2: knows if this will be it for Alex or not?
Speaker 2: Seems like believe he turns forty one this September. That's
Speaker 2: right because he Sid also just had his birthday last week.
Speaker 2: In case anyone ever forgets, it's eight seven eighty seven.
Speaker 2: So he just turned thirty nine years old.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 4: It would be a hell of a thing if both
Speaker 4: of those players, who are two players whose skill and
Speaker 4: rivalry rejuvenated the entire league, especially right after.
Speaker 2: The lockout, they put the NHL on the map again,
Speaker 2: and their rivalry and there to some degree of camaraderie.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine them retendering at the same time they
Speaker 3: they started as enemies and then it kind of turned
Speaker 3: into a very healthy mutual respect. If you go back
Speaker 3: and you watch interviews. I've seen definitely interviews with Sid
Speaker 3: who is the consummate professional, But when he was a kid,
Speaker 3: he would say in interviews, I hate that guy. Like
Speaker 3: you could never imagine him saying anything like that today
Speaker 3: just because he's now, you know, this elder statesman. But
Speaker 3: I think people forget that twenty years ago he was
Speaker 3: a kid who was like, I hate that guy. And
Speaker 3: now it's just such a mutual respect for each other.
Speaker 3: But if, man, if they were to retire together, huge
Speaker 3: that usually pretty Yeah. I just got goose by I
Speaker 3: am and I gotta tell you. The Hockey Hall of
Speaker 3: Fame has a three year mandatory waiting period before you
Speaker 3: can be considered and you used to be able to
Speaker 3: have scenarios where that could be waived, and I believe
Speaker 3: Wayne Gretzky was the last one where that was waived. God,
Speaker 3: can you imagine them making sid wait wouldn't no? Could no?
Speaker 2: There's like, just put him in, Obuchkin in. They should
Speaker 2: just put him in now. They should just put him
Speaker 2: in now. And just as an aside, an interesting points
Speaker 2: during one of our discord conversations, the LA Kings and
Speaker 2: I want to I want to touch it on what
Speaker 2: they did free agency, because what they did is unbelievable
Speaker 2: in free agency as well. But they also announced that
Speaker 2: they were going to retire it immediate, to which you said,
Speaker 2: and you were absolutely right to which why does it
Speaker 2: take the Bruins so long to make these announcements and
Speaker 2: schedule these things, and to which my response was because
Speaker 2: they want to ensure that they take the fullest advantage
Speaker 2: the opportunity to capitalize financially.
Speaker 3: Oh ye, in any way, shape or form. Yes, yep.
Speaker 3: And maybe this is the thinking of other organizations, but
Speaker 3: still very good question, very fair to ask. How the
Speaker 3: Bruins are That's why always been like what do we do? Yeah?
Speaker 3: And again I know.
Speaker 2: They're doing it, and people will say, what quit your bitch,
Speaker 2: and they're doing it. He's going to have the whole
Speaker 2: day to himself, and as well, he should have data himself.
Speaker 2: But it seems to me that there are certain no
Speaker 2: brainer things that an organization, you know, La Kings just said,
Speaker 2: we're doing this. Yeah, he's finished, We're doing this.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. And it's always been like this because maybe
Speaker 3: you know, someone might make the argument, well they had
Speaker 3: the centennial, then it was going to be Chara because
Speaker 3: then it's going to be burg around and you have
Speaker 3: to do things in a spread out way or whatever.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 3: No, now, even if the centennial hadn't happened, they still
Speaker 3: would have waited. They could have done it. No, they
Speaker 3: could have done it before the centennial the year that
Speaker 3: Tara retired.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So anyways, you know, any opportunity I can take
Speaker 2: take a shot at Bruin's ownership, I'm going to tease it.
Speaker 2: So the La Kings also made Jesus. I think they
Speaker 2: had the most free agent signings other than did they
Speaker 2: really the Yeah I'm looking at so Vegas signed four
Speaker 2: five sick nine wow, nine free agents. Now you know
Speaker 2: a lot of like they're going to be like deal
Speaker 2: breakers or deal makers in this. But they've certainly added
Speaker 2: to their their depth, so they've they've got quantity maybe
Speaker 2: over quality, where I'd say the signings by the La Kings.
Speaker 3: Were quantity and quality.
Speaker 2: You know, say what you will of a Corey Perry,
Speaker 2: the guy can still bring it, you can still bring it.
Speaker 2: He's still got grello. He's still a dickhead, but he
Speaker 2: can still bring it on the ice.
Speaker 3: Scott Lawton, Yeah, some good signings and they have Panarin
Speaker 3: and they have Paner right. Ellie is definitely one of
Speaker 3: those teams that they're like San Jose or even Anaheim.
Speaker 3: They've had glimpses in the very recent past. Anaheim has
Speaker 3: won a Stanley Cup. The Kings have won a Stanley Cup.
Speaker 3: San Jose's come really close. So they've gotten the taste
Speaker 3: and they want to do well. And I think I
Speaker 3: wouldn't be surprised if some of the aggressive actions of
Speaker 3: Anaheim have also motivated the Kings to get their rears
Speaker 3: in gear because they're nearby rivals. The Kings have fallen
Speaker 3: short in the same round of the playoffs for like
Speaker 3: five years, and they've always been a competitive team. I
Speaker 3: don't remember them in recent years kind of being ap team.
Speaker 3: But now that they have a little more money, they're
Speaker 3: taking advantage. I think of the opportunity that they have.
Speaker 3: That's what organizations should do. That's what you like to see.
Speaker 2: The other as it relates to maybe the competition for
Speaker 2: the Bruins is the Tampa Bay Lightning landed John Carlson
Speaker 2: from the Washington Capital. But John Carlson anyways, who pretty
Speaker 2: damn good defenseman in my mind.
Speaker 3: Yeah, speaking of other really perennial powerhouses that didn't really
Speaker 3: do a ton, I mean, aside from Tampa, they were
Speaker 3: relatively quiet, but they didn't have much that they needed
Speaker 3: to do because their head coach has a system that
Speaker 3: really has continued to create a team that is so
Speaker 3: competitive and it's independent of maybe necessarily the personnel. And
Speaker 3: it's the same thing I think like within Carolina, where
Speaker 3: they didn't do a heck of a lot. They lost players,
Speaker 3: as is expected when you win the Stanley Cup, but
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be worried about them not keeping up because
Speaker 3: of the system established by their head coach. So they
Speaker 3: could have done zero moves and I would still be
Speaker 3: just as nervous playing against them this fall right. There
Speaker 3: are only a few teams that can do that, and
Speaker 3: it's like Colorado, Tampa, and Carolina and it comes down
Speaker 3: to their coaches.
Speaker 2: So are there any other free agent we might have
Speaker 2: missed in terms of notable I don't think so. Maybe
Speaker 2: someday we'll be talking about some splash that the Bruins make.
Speaker 2: But it seems like whenever we get to these types
Speaker 2: of events that we're always rumored to be in the
Speaker 2: mix of something, but it never really comes to fruition,
Speaker 2: but by the bridesmaid, never the bride, always the bride'smaid.
Speaker 2: So with that being said, we thank you for listening.
Speaker 2: Please make sure you like and subscribe for more content,
Speaker 2: and be sure to leave us a rating and a
Speaker 2: review to help other Bruins fans find us. You can
Speaker 2: support our podcast by joining our Patreon or by following
Speaker 2: us on our socials at Tape to Tape m K
Speaker 2: and on Substack at Tape to Tape mk dot substack
Speaker 2: dot com. Any closing thoughts, Bees Go Bruins.
Speaker 4: Something the
Speaker 3: B
Podbean