Signed, Sealed, and Still Re-Tooling in Boston? | Ep. 99
Liner notes
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨🎙️ The signings are in, the dust has settled, and it’s time to talk roster. In this episode, we break down the Bruins’ free agency moves and hand out our overall grade for the offseason. Who made the cut, who raised eyebrows, and what does it all mean for the season ahead? Let’s get into it.
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ Boston Bruins Gear
We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
🎧 Listen now and join the conversation!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 2: Please?
Speaker 1: I need something to do.
Speaker 2: I'll jack sending out a troup of buck of this
Speaker 2: says to day, here's a chance, pop right down with
Speaker 2: goalie Scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my, what a move by the rookie.
Speaker 2: Too on one faster not moving in with Marsha get it?
Speaker 1: Jet Oil dances in podcast Wait at home, right way corner,
Speaker 1: paster Chester. What is that for? Moston? Welcome in everyone
Speaker 1: to another episode of Bruins Tape to Tape. I'm your
Speaker 1: host today, Caroline, and I am joined by my fabulous
Speaker 1: co host, Maria from Watertown. Hey Maria, Hey Caroline, how's
Speaker 1: it going. It's going, it's going. It's about mid July,
Speaker 1: so we're just another week closer to hockey season. It's
Speaker 1: also a million degrees out and I have to show
Speaker 1: off some of my fantastic swag from our merch store.
Speaker 1: If you're not watching on YouTube, I've got a fancy
Speaker 1: glass with our microphone logo on it. I'm enjoying my
Speaker 1: juice cocktail here. It's fantastic. I'm keeping cool, keeping cool.
Speaker 1: How about you, Maria? What are you doing cool right now?
Speaker 2: Well, my air conditioners have not turned off much at
Speaker 2: all during these dog days of summer, So I'm spending
Speaker 2: as much time as I can, maybe out on the
Speaker 2: golf course and you know, reading up on as much
Speaker 2: hockey as I can stomach at this time of the year,
Speaker 2: while everyone else is taking their hockey breaks for development
Speaker 2: camps and training camps and rookie camps start in earnest.
Speaker 2: But we've had our time off and now it's time
Speaker 2: to take a look at the Bruins ross moving forward
Speaker 2: into the upcoming season.
Speaker 1: I know it's that time of year where every fan,
Speaker 1: no matter what team they're on, is asking the question,
Speaker 1: who's on my team again? I don't know who plays
Speaker 1: here anymore? What is this roster actually like?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Right, right?
Speaker 2: All valid questions, what are we going to look like?
Speaker 1: How are we going to do?
Speaker 2: And you know, obviously those are all going open ended
Speaker 2: questions right starting the season right and Bruins management really
Speaker 2: hasn't done a whole heck of a lot during free
Speaker 2: agency to maybe quell any of the fears of concerns
Speaker 2: that are being raised by not only us, but many
Speaker 2: other seasoned Bruins fans. So we're here to help in
Speaker 2: any way we can, but just rest assured that we
Speaker 2: likely have similar trepidations going into the upcoming season.
Speaker 1: Yep, well, I'm sorry, but Maria, as we go through
Speaker 1: Don and Cam's I don't know business dealings from a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago, I'm afraid you're gonna get a
Speaker 1: little hot under the collar. But see now, I'm trying
Speaker 1: to stay.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to stay, come in retirement mode, and you
Speaker 2: my friend, trying to poke the bear.
Speaker 1: Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm not the one making
Speaker 1: these horrible decisions. Okay, I'm not making these horrible decisions.
Speaker 2: Help us, I know.
Speaker 1: But before we dive right in, we're just going to
Speaker 1: take a super quick little ad break. All right, Bruins fan,
Speaker 1: If you're thinking about picking up some new gear, now's
Speaker 1: the time. I'm already planning to grab a fresh poster
Speaker 1: NEC jersey this fall. Who knows, maybe he's rocking a
Speaker 1: new letter on the front. The NHL Shop is running
Speaker 1: tons of season ending and summer sales right now, including
Speaker 1: twenty percent off Fanatics gear. And here's the best part.
Speaker 1: When you shop through our link in the show notes,
Speaker 1: a portion of your purchases helps support this podcast. Same
Speaker 1: gear you'd find at the pro Shop, but with way
Speaker 1: better perks. So stock up, save big, and help keep
Speaker 1: Bruins Tape the Tape rolling all year long.
Speaker 2: Hey Bruins fans love the pod, Well, here's an opportunity
Speaker 2: to join the team. Become a Friend of the Pod
Speaker 2: on Patreon and unlock more Bruins content, merch perks, and
Speaker 2: the community we've built with diehard fans like you. For
Speaker 2: just three dollars a month, Join Gallery of the Gods,
Speaker 2: get ad free episodes, sticker swag, and a disco out
Speaker 2: in the merch shop. Or go full legend with the
Speaker 2: Black and Gold tier, bonus content, virtual watch parties, more swag,
Speaker 2: and full access to our substack. No matter the tier,
Speaker 2: you're in the room with us. Tap the link in
Speaker 2: the show notes and take your spot on the bench.
Speaker 1: All right, Maria, So here's the current situation as it
Speaker 1: stands it is. So we're recording this a little bit early.
Speaker 1: It's July eleventh recording day, and Boston currently has two
Speaker 1: point one million dollars still left in cap space, so
Speaker 1: the cap is going up to ninety five and a
Speaker 1: half million dollars, and there are currently three teams across
Speaker 1: the league that are over the cap. But keep in
Speaker 1: mind teams are allowed to exceed the cap by ten
Speaker 1: percent in the summer and they just have to get
Speaker 1: into compliance by the start of the season. And so
Speaker 1: Boston is currently six under the cap. So there are
Speaker 1: six other five other teams ahead of Boston that have
Speaker 1: less space than them. So not sure what you make
Speaker 1: of that. Not sure if it's trepidation, if it was
Speaker 1: the you know, availability of talent. I mean, in general,
Speaker 1: what was your impression going into free agency in terms
Speaker 1: of player availability at all? Like, were you impressed not
Speaker 1: impressed with the crop of free agents.
Speaker 2: I was not lusting after anybody, if if that's an
Speaker 2: appropriate response, I mean, were there viable players out there? Sure,
Speaker 2: you know, but I wasn't. I certainly wasn't going to
Speaker 2: throw the kind of money at Mitch Marner that Thegus
Speaker 2: Golden Knights threw at him. And Sam Bennett by all accounts,
Speaker 2: was going to stay in Florida no matter what. Right,
Speaker 2: that's just how the writing on the wall was. You know,
Speaker 2: Brockfester decided to stay in Vancouver, So right, maybe that
Speaker 2: was part of management's plan, right, I think we all
Speaker 2: at that time of the year, trade deadlines, free agency. Right,
Speaker 2: we look at it as Christmas in July, and who
Speaker 2: doesn't want a shiny new toy? Yeah, as a gift,
Speaker 2: but at what cost do you bring that gift to someone?
Speaker 2: My issue is that then we go out and sign
Speaker 2: a litany of and again, I don't want to be
Speaker 2: disrespectful in how I described this, because you know, anybody
Speaker 2: who plays in the NHL clearly has some level of skill, talent,
Speaker 2: and ability, or else you wouldn't be there. Yeah, but
Speaker 2: when did the Boston Bruins become the land of misfit toys?
Speaker 2: I know, a lack of a better Like we've once
Speaker 2: again gone out and signed a bunch of jacks to
Speaker 2: what end?
Speaker 1: Exactly? What end? Exactly? Now, this is something else that
Speaker 1: I haven't asked you yet. This season feels like or this,
Speaker 1: you know, off season certainly feels like a lot of
Speaker 1: I don't know if you would say it's the players
Speaker 1: doing this, the team's doing this, but it's it feels
Speaker 1: like it's flirting with circumventing the expected rules or whatever
Speaker 1: you want to call it by doing the trade and
Speaker 1: sign deal. We saw that with a number of players,
Speaker 1: but most notably, of course, Mitch Marner. And in that
Speaker 1: particular scenario that almost actually felt like an extortion situation
Speaker 1: that if Vegas didn't participate in a trade to get Marner,
Speaker 1: that if it went to free agency, that Toronto was
Speaker 1: threatening then to accuse them of interference regardless, it seemed like,
Speaker 1: aside from the fact that a lot of teams did
Speaker 1: some very last minute extensions, so we were being teased
Speaker 1: for a really long time on the possibility of some
Speaker 1: players hitting the market. They didn't, and then you saw
Speaker 1: a number of these trade and sign situations. What do
Speaker 1: you make of that trend? Because I wouldn't be surprised
Speaker 1: if we started to see that a little bit more
Speaker 1: as well. I mean, certainly teams would want something in
Speaker 1: return if their big fish is walking away for nothing,
Speaker 1: right well, and.
Speaker 2: You know what, I'm all for it for a variety
Speaker 2: of reasons. Number One, right, you drafted, if we're talking
Speaker 2: specifically about Mitch Marner, sure was drafted by the Maple
Speaker 2: Leafs a quote unquote homegrown talent. As an organization, you
Speaker 2: have invested an enormous amount of time, energy, and resources,
Speaker 2: not the least of which is money. And so why
Speaker 2: would you want to see that individual just go waltzing
Speaker 2: off and not get anything in return. Now, you, as
Speaker 2: the player an agent, you can say, well, the return
Speaker 2: on your investment was the fact that I played here
Speaker 2: for all this time, and you know I contributed. I
Speaker 2: was a meaningful contributor to the success of your team.
Speaker 2: So I can see both both sides of the coin
Speaker 2: in that conversation. I do like the the the drama
Speaker 2: of the you know stuff that came out about the tampering. However,
Speaker 2: if you listen, and as you do and I do,
Speaker 2: we listen to other podcasts, and tampering happens all the time.
Speaker 2: Oh for sure, it happens all the time. So I
Speaker 2: think Toronto, you know, to their credit and I hate
Speaker 2: to give them maple Liefs any credit for anything, took
Speaker 2: advantage of that because they know that there have the
Speaker 2: the the league is taking longer heart of looks at
Speaker 2: those types of shenanigans or potential backdoor deals. So, you know,
Speaker 2: good on Toronto.
Speaker 1: I suppose, I suppose I know, but listen, we'd be applauding.
Speaker 2: We'd be applauding otur team as opposed to what our
Speaker 2: team did was you know, kind of give away, give
Speaker 2: virtually give away your team's identity traded away, and I'm
Speaker 2: not sure that you got Now there's no even Stephen trades, right.
Speaker 2: I mean, it would be nice if that's how it worked,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't work that way. However, in some circumstances,
Speaker 2: you expect a little something something back in return when
Speaker 2: you trade away your identity and your culture.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yep. So let's take a quick look then at
Speaker 1: what actually what business was conducted. So I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: first through the extensions and then we'll talk about the acquisitions.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to talk about a player real quick,
Speaker 1: give you the basics of his contract, and then Maria
Speaker 1: gets to share her honest and unfiltered opinion of this deal.
Speaker 1: We'll call this a deal or no deal game of
Speaker 1: free agency for you. So let's start with Morgan Geeky,
Speaker 1: obviously the one that had all of us wringing our
Speaker 1: hands a little bit because of just how close to
Speaker 1: the deadline this one got. And we're all a little
Speaker 1: I don't know, Jumpie, based on last year's situation with
Speaker 1: Jeremy Swayman. But Morgan Geeky has signed a six year,
Speaker 1: five point five cap hit contract which includes signing bonuses
Speaker 1: through twenty twenty nine, he has full no tray for
Speaker 1: two seasons, and then he has a modified no trade
Speaker 1: in twenty seven to twenty eight to a seventeen team list,
Speaker 1: modified no trade twenty nine for a twelve team no
Speaker 1: trade list, and a modified no trade for twenty nine
Speaker 1: and thirty a sixteen no trade list, and then his
Speaker 1: final year of the contract. It's just the contract. What
Speaker 1: do you think of this deal for Morgan geek.
Speaker 2: I'm fine with the money. I'm fine with the money.
Speaker 2: The term might be a little bit longer then I
Speaker 2: would have, you know, I guess expected or wanted. However,
Speaker 2: I have said this on more than one occasion. If
Speaker 2: Pasta is happy, then we should all be happy. Clearly, clearly,
Speaker 2: there was chemistry that developed between these two players, and
Speaker 2: they made each other better on the ice together. My
Speaker 2: fear for Morgan Geeky is the expectation of living up
Speaker 2: to that contract, because now you know what he's done
Speaker 2: is you know, he made himself a thirty goal scorer
Speaker 2: for the first time in a while, and we his
Speaker 2: fans right are going to come to expect very close
Speaker 2: to that, if not a bit more than that, because
Speaker 2: you know their chemistry didn't really start developing until the
Speaker 2: second half of the season.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, So.
Speaker 2: That's my only concern for that, And you know, I'm
Speaker 2: The other thing is these no trade clause They friggin
Speaker 2: drive me crazy. You know, I understand why you give
Speaker 2: no trade clauses to elite players, sure, elite players.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Now, these no trade.
Speaker 2: Clauses are seemingly, like, you know, a part of the
Speaker 2: regular recurrence of contract negotiations. Now, I know it's only
Speaker 2: two years, but still, I don't know. I just stn't
Speaker 2: know when this became such a kind of secondary no
Speaker 2: brainer all that we're just going to hand out no
Speaker 2: trade clauses everybody and anybody that's not a new deal
Speaker 2: with their team.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree. I mean, there's it's one of those
Speaker 1: things that I think there are certainly gms who are
Speaker 1: teams who hand them out a little too freely in
Speaker 1: some situations. But what the right circumstances are I don't
Speaker 1: know the answer to that.
Speaker 2: But I don't either. It just seems like it's become
Speaker 2: extremely common.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and starting to you can start to see certain
Speaker 1: teams really it tied up in a way that's not ideal.
Speaker 2: Then it it can become contentious, right, and we saw
Speaker 2: that happen at the Range. Though there was some dirt,
Speaker 2: you know, dirty pool that happened in with the Rangers
Speaker 2: with regard to with Jacob Trubas. So just just a
Speaker 2: little aside. But I'm glad Morgan Geeky is back, and
Speaker 2: I'm glad that you know, he'll be playing likely i'm assuming,
Speaker 2: alongside David Pasternach for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. The only thing for me that this contract
Speaker 1: makes me a little bit nervous is the fact that
Speaker 1: it expires the same time as David Pasternach. And you know,
Speaker 1: obviously I don't know what the cap is going to
Speaker 1: be in twenty thirty one, but if both players are
Speaker 1: healthy and continue to play at a high level, they
Speaker 1: will be young enough to be eligible for at least
Speaker 1: one more contract in their career. And again, if everything
Speaker 1: goes really well and they are both still phenomenal players,
Speaker 1: that is going to be an expensive year.
Speaker 2: That is going to be because David Plastronach is a bargain.
Speaker 2: He is a bargain. And actually I think I heard
Speaker 2: as I was listening to the Spit and Chickletz last
Speaker 2: podcast when they did their free agency review, and Ryan
Speaker 2: Whitney was just laughing about the value of David like
Speaker 2: it's a it's a joke that David Pasternak is only
Speaker 2: and again tongue and she only making eleven million dogs
Speaker 2: compared to you know, other elite players in the league.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, just as a in a side. Even
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago, when his contract extension talks
Speaker 1: were happening, there was talk this was part well, we're
Speaker 1: about two season into the new contract. He could have
Speaker 1: really pushed and if he had, for some reason gone
Speaker 1: to free agency, he could have walked away with at
Speaker 1: least thirteen million dollars.
Speaker 2: And this was a couple of seasons ago. And you
Speaker 2: know what, maybe maybe he will again. You know I
Speaker 2: mentioned this kind of tongue in cheek in our discord conversation.
Speaker 2: But you know, how much patience does a David Pasternach
Speaker 2: have to be part of a rebuilding effort? Right if
Speaker 2: things become as challenging and trying as they were last season,
Speaker 2: and I think we all hope that doesn't happen. Yeah,
Speaker 2: how long would it take before he marches into Donnie's
Speaker 2: office and say, yeah, I gotta go get me out
Speaker 2: of here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, exactly. He's not thirty yet. But once they
Speaker 1: hit thirty and they don't have a cup to their name,
Speaker 1: I think they really start to get probably a little nervous.
Speaker 1: But that's a conversation for a other day or another day.
Speaker 1: So let's talk about Marat housnadinof So he's one again. Listeners,
Speaker 1: if you haven't already listened to our conversation about him
Speaker 1: from a couple episodes. He was a trade acquisition. He
Speaker 1: came to Boston in the swap with Minnesota, and he
Speaker 1: came in as an RFA, just a straight RFA. So
Speaker 1: he was one of those players where if he's basically
Speaker 1: at the mercy of management, so it was either he's
Speaker 1: given a qualifying offer and he takes it because he
Speaker 1: has no arbitration rights, or he's not given a qualifying
Speaker 1: offer and he's you know, set free to be a
Speaker 1: UFA for that particular off season. So he was granted
Speaker 1: a qualifying offer and he actually took a pay increase,
Speaker 1: So he got a two year deal, a nice little
Speaker 1: bridge deal nine to five as a cap hit. The
Speaker 1: base salary this coming year is nine hundred thousand and
Speaker 1: next season is nine fifty, so that evens out obviously
Speaker 1: to nine twenty five. So management clearly was intrigued enough
Speaker 1: to give him that kind of a deal, especially considering
Speaker 1: one of the next folks that we're going to talk
Speaker 1: about who did receive a qualifying offer and who didn't
Speaker 1: receive a qualifying offer in Jacob Lauco. So we're talking
Speaker 1: right now all essentially pennies like not even one percent
Speaker 1: of the cap. And it's interesting who got picked and
Speaker 1: who didn't. But that aside, because I'm sure we'll talk
Speaker 1: about that when we talk about the next fellow, Marat Husnadinov.
Speaker 1: What do you think about this particular deal, the term
Speaker 1: and the pay, and you know, based on our conversation
Speaker 1: about him last month, what do you think.
Speaker 2: I mean, does it light my fire? No, it doesn't.
Speaker 2: But you know, at least the money and the term
Speaker 2: themes use a friendly for the organization and it doesn't
Speaker 2: luck them in to anything that they can't get themselves
Speaker 2: out of if you need me. But I think you know,
Speaker 2: Whustadino falls into a category of a lot of other
Speaker 2: guys on this roster in a similar vein that you're like, okay,
Speaker 2: but why right, But why sure, why why not?
Speaker 1: Right? It's kind of like, okay, you know me and
Speaker 1: my analogies. So now we're shopping for groceries, and you
Speaker 1: know you have to have vegetables, right, you got to
Speaker 1: eat your veggies. So do you pick the green beans
Speaker 1: or the carrots? Well? Which one? You know? Maybe you
Speaker 1: don't love either, but which one do you pick? Uh?
Speaker 1: Who knows? Right what he is? He could be something
Speaker 1: interesting and a good deal. He could be something that's
Speaker 1: interesting and good trade bait, so to speak. But yeah,
Speaker 1: when it comes to this amount of money, okay, like great,
Speaker 1: Maybe he's such an unknown that's kind of the problem.
Speaker 2: I think that's part of it. And maybe they know
Speaker 2: something we don't. Maybe they see something we we don't.
Speaker 2: But you know, when when you cobble together, you know,
Speaker 2: nine twenty five here, nine point fifty here, one point two,
Speaker 2: it's like.
Speaker 1: What is it? What?
Speaker 2: When you add that up, couldn't you have gotten yourself
Speaker 2: a viable, proven scent?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: And again maybe maybe maybe maybe the deals aren't out there.
Speaker 2: Maybe the deals aren't out there. Maybe there's so much
Speaker 2: uncertainty with this franchise right now that it's not an
Speaker 2: attractive proposition to come right here. And when you have
Speaker 2: management that has a reputation for hardball negotiations and nickel
Speaker 2: and diming players, you know, don't don't underestimate the fact
Speaker 2: that there's still a lot of people in the league
Speaker 2: that don't like how brad Marshand was dealt with. And
Speaker 2: I know, you know, they can say we sent him
Speaker 2: to where he wanted to go, and you know, there
Speaker 2: may be some truth to some of that. However, you
Speaker 2: look like a bunch of boobs.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say idiots, but yeah, he has boobs.
Speaker 1: Idiots because you didn't want to pay him right right,
Speaker 1: Oh exactly, you could have had one brad Marshand and
Speaker 1: instead you went off and bought ten John Beacher's right. So,
Speaker 1: speaking of John Beacher, he's the one that was particularly
Speaker 1: shocking to me, considering again you had Jacob Blouco right there.
Speaker 1: So John Beacher, this is this is interesting to me.
Speaker 1: This was a last chance deal. So he just came
Speaker 1: off of a three year deal. Previously he got a
Speaker 1: qualifying offer and a one year deal of nine hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. Now what makes this interesting is he is
Speaker 1: now in this one season making less than he did
Speaker 1: in his previous contract. His old contract was worth nine
Speaker 1: to twenty five and that also had signing bonuses. So
Speaker 1: he effectively is taking a twenty five thousand dollars pay
Speaker 1: cut Tuesday in Boston, and he took the deal. And
Speaker 1: I think this is the last chance for him. I
Speaker 1: think they're giving him the last chance. What are your
Speaker 1: thoughts on this?
Speaker 2: Well, here we have another instance of a draft pick
Speaker 2: who has is struggling in this organization, struggling to develop,
Speaker 2: struggling to reach a level of expectation that maybe there
Speaker 2: was when drafting this player. It's interesting with the one
Speaker 2: year deal and bringing in a coach in Marco Sturm,
Speaker 2: who has been applauded for his development of young players
Speaker 2: in the Los Angeles Kings system. So maybe this is
Speaker 2: one of those instances where, Okay, maybe this is your
Speaker 2: last chance. We do see something there. Maybe Storm can
Speaker 2: bring it out in a feature more consistently and to
Speaker 2: the level that justifies being a high draft pick. If
Speaker 2: that doesn't happen, he won't make it past March.
Speaker 1: I don't think. I'm not I'm not sure I would
Speaker 1: even give him that much time, honestly, right, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's gonna be certainly traded for something. And I think,
Speaker 1: you know, thinking back on his previous couple of seasons
Speaker 1: when he made it out of rookie camp, you know,
Speaker 1: alongside Mason Laurai and and all those kind of young kids,
Speaker 1: that group, he certainly has special skills when it comes
Speaker 1: to like face offs. He was one that was doing
Speaker 1: a great job with that, and he he does do
Speaker 1: some things very well. But as we've seen since see right,
Speaker 1: as we have seen with you know again that little
Speaker 1: group that I'm gonna just call the kids, right who
Speaker 1: all kind of came up together Patra low Rye Beacher.
Speaker 1: The problem with those kids is they've not been developed properly.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying it in a way that doesn't
Speaker 1: put some of the responsibility on them, Like obviously, yes
Speaker 1: there's stuff that they have to be filed. They failed to.
Speaker 2: Take advantage of opportunities that were clearly provided them in
Speaker 2: training camp scenarios where you know, in past years, there
Speaker 2: weren't a lot of open spots, open foster spots on
Speaker 2: the Boston Bruins team. They got lucky in that time
Speaker 2: period because there were open spots. However, on the flip side.
Speaker 1: You know, last year in particular, I feel like those
Speaker 1: kids were put in scenarios where they were they never
Speaker 1: were gonna succeed, right, Like you know, putting Mace LOWII
Speaker 1: and we'll talk about him, you know, on in a
Speaker 1: position where without Charlie McAvoy and any sort of really
Speaker 1: good guiding hand, like, he went awry. You know, so
Speaker 1: maybe don't put him in that situation because he's twenty
Speaker 1: three and he doesn't know what he's doing. Or with
Speaker 1: Patra you know, why are you not calling him up
Speaker 1: to give him the experience? Or with Beacher, like why
Speaker 1: are you playing him in this way? So you know,
Speaker 1: it was it it. There were two sides to kind
Speaker 1: of what's happened with that particular group of kids. But yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll see if the new coach can kind of help
Speaker 1: turn them around, because they are the kids, right this
Speaker 1: is the this is the best that we have with
Speaker 1: this particular a group because right now our best players
Speaker 1: are quickly approaching thirty years old, and you need to
Speaker 1: make sure that the next batch in line right behind them,
Speaker 1: your twenty to twenty five year olds are getting properly
Speaker 1: developed so that they can take over. And that's the
Speaker 1: big question mark and Veature falls into that particular group.
Speaker 1: The other of the of the kids, obviously, Mason Lawright
Speaker 1: surprised everybody with a two year, three point two million
Speaker 1: dollars signing with signing bonuses this coming season worth two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand dollars. This is obviously a significant
Speaker 1: pay bump from his nine to twenty five k previously. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, we've alluded to this particular contract in previous
Speaker 1: episodes with complete shock, because I think we both agree
Speaker 1: that when he's good, he's very, very good. It's a
Speaker 1: lot like how it was with Matt Rislick. When he's great,
Speaker 1: he's great.
Speaker 2: When he's bad' not horrible, it's bad and and not
Speaker 2: just bad where you say, oh, geezz, a young player
Speaker 2: made a mistake, No, he's bad is in that's it's costly, Okay,
Speaker 2: it can be costly and yeah, yeah, but it's an overpay.
Speaker 1: I don't this one.
Speaker 2: I don't. There's a couple of them I don't understand,
Speaker 2: and you know, far be it from me to try
Speaker 2: and understand, because you know, Don Sweeney's from Harvard and
Speaker 2: Heed's a lot smarter than me. But Jesus Christ, like
Speaker 2: really you rewarded this kid with that much of a
Speaker 2: bump yeah in in pay I don't, I don't understand it.
Speaker 2: I I would like to have someone in that organization
Speaker 2: explain to me the justification with that significant a jump
Speaker 2: in this player's salary.
Speaker 1: It should be Uh. I would have said, I was
Speaker 1: maybe expecting a one point five, right, And I would
Speaker 1: have even.
Speaker 2: Said, you know, to to something okay, right, because again,
Speaker 2: in in the scheme of things, what is that to
Speaker 2: an organization right at this point in hockey?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: But three point two when you you have clear, clear
Speaker 2: and definable needs and I know, I know you can't
Speaker 2: carry the money over from one year to the other, right,
Speaker 2: But that does that mean that you should spend it
Speaker 2: all or a big part of it in an area
Speaker 2: that you scratch your head going huh, but why.
Speaker 1: They could have used that extra million or to pay
Speaker 1: brad marshand. Instead we've got an overpaid.
Speaker 2: So that's basically you make a good point, because that's
Speaker 2: basically what you did. So you gave it to a
Speaker 2: twenty three year old kid who now offensively offensively as
Speaker 2: a defenceman. He's clearly gifted and he seems to that
Speaker 2: aspect of his game comes more naturally to him, but
Speaker 2: the defensive part of his game still needs a ton
Speaker 2: of work. And so again these are the decisions where
Speaker 2: you want to just looked on Sweeney in the face
Speaker 2: and say, what the.
Speaker 1: Fuck are you doing? Yeah, yeah, it's that one's a
Speaker 1: head scratcher, and more evidence to the notion the idea
Speaker 1: that when Don and Cam are negotiating, that they are
Speaker 1: the worst negotiators out there, that they're the absolute worst,
Speaker 1: that they're terrible at negotiating, and I think this is
Speaker 1: one of them. So the last extension also kind of
Speaker 1: came in at the eleventh hour that did surprise me.
Speaker 1: So we talked about Henry Joki har you during our
Speaker 1: trade acquisition player profiles, and he was one that again
Speaker 1: coming in so late into the season, only playing those
Speaker 1: twenty games on a team that was just already drowning
Speaker 1: and you know, difficult to watch. He was the one
Speaker 1: that we weren't really sure if he actually wanted to
Speaker 1: be in Boston because, if you recall, at the trade deadline,
Speaker 1: he effectively said to Buffalo, because that's where he came from,
Speaker 1: he wanted out, just get me out of here, and
Speaker 1: Buffalo essentially just gave him to Boston for I think
Speaker 1: basically nothing in return. So we had raised the question
Speaker 1: does he even actually want to be in Boston? Is
Speaker 1: this a place that he wants to be in? Is
Speaker 1: he a good enough defenceman? Like? What kind of defensive
Speaker 1: abilities does he even bring to the table. So, whatever
Speaker 1: he did in those twenty games, Bruins management thought well
Speaker 1: of him because he earned himself a three times three
Speaker 1: million dollar contract with signing bonuses in twenty five twenty
Speaker 1: six worth five hundred thousand dollars and then in twenty
Speaker 1: six twenty seven a signing bonus of two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty and your favorite, a modified no trade clause for
Speaker 1: the twenty five to twenty sixth season and eighteen no
Speaker 1: trade list. So what do you think of this one?
Speaker 1: I was surprised, but I was too.
Speaker 2: I was too because I think we were both in
Speaker 2: agreement that this would be one player where we would
Speaker 2: be like, you know, I'm not going to shed any
Speaker 2: tears if they move on, right. You know, I think
Speaker 2: he's young. He's young. He you know last season. I'm
Speaker 2: just looking at us now career wise, you know, in
Speaker 2: four hundred and seven games He's had nineteen goals seventy
Speaker 2: eight assists, which is not too shabby. Sure career wise,
Speaker 2: though he's overall in his career he's a minus seventeen,
Speaker 2: although he finished the twenty twenty four to twenty five
Speaker 2: season as a plus thirteen, so there must be Again
Speaker 2: they clearly the Bruins want to become a harder team
Speaker 2: to play against. We've heard that terminology used quite often
Speaker 2: already in this offseason, almost to the point where you know,
Speaker 2: it's it's making me nauseous to continue to hear it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that in the term we want to play with more jukes,
Speaker 2: which I'm like, give me a break, Yeah, give me
Speaker 2: a break. So you know you can and we've talked
Speaker 2: about this before. You can have not have enough defense.
Speaker 2: You can never have enough goaltending, right right, yep.
Speaker 1: So well, and he's an interesting one because again and
Speaker 1: again maybe.
Speaker 2: A little overpay too well. Yeah, so two things.
Speaker 1: One to your point of his kind of maybe less
Speaker 1: than fantastic statistics. Keep in mind where he is coming from.
Speaker 1: He's coming from Chicago, He's coming from Buffalo team not exactly, no, no, no, understood. Yeah, right,
Speaker 1: And that's probably one of the rationales because again, you're
Speaker 1: they want to go back from you know, from what
Speaker 1: Storm says, Sweeney says, they want to go back to
Speaker 1: a more well, let's see if this comes to fruition,
Speaker 1: then I call it back to the you know, the
Speaker 1: Claude Julian days, where we're likely going to be having
Speaker 1: to watch a lot of games where you hope they
Speaker 1: get a lead and then they protect that lead and
Speaker 1: you end up winning the game, you know, three to two,
Speaker 1: two to one, you know, somewhere along those lines. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but that's exhausting.
Speaker 2: It is exhausting. It's exhausting to fans. It's frustrating to
Speaker 2: fans because you know that style of play. Everybody has
Speaker 2: to be defensively responsible, right right, but then at the
Speaker 2: expense of potential rate of I don't know again.
Speaker 1: And that's what you have to do when you don't
Speaker 1: have a ton of offensive power. Obviously, as we're going
Speaker 1: to discuss, they will get from him. The other thing,
Speaker 1: you know that I wanted to bring up was, you know,
Speaker 1: you mentioned his price tag now when we had our
Speaker 1: conversation about him a couple of episodes ago. One of
Speaker 1: the things that also gave you pause and hesitation was
Speaker 1: his contract that he was finishing up, which was a
Speaker 1: three point one million dollar contract, and the price kind
Speaker 1: of gave you pause. You know, he he took a
Speaker 1: quote unquote pay cut of one hundred grand, but he
Speaker 1: made up for it in the fact that he got
Speaker 1: a little bit of term, like a little bit of
Speaker 1: a bridge deal. Any kind of reaction to that, or
Speaker 1: is it more of a well, let's wait and see now,
Speaker 1: because he's here for X number of years, is he
Speaker 1: actually worth Yeah? Three?
Speaker 2: I mean, I guess I have no choice but to say,
Speaker 2: let's wait and see. That might explain why Laura got
Speaker 2: what he got, because maybe they anticipated right, and they
Speaker 2: probably didn't want Yokiharu to be making more money than Laura.
Speaker 2: You know, these are the dilemmas that when you sometimes
Speaker 2: mismanage your froster or misallocate, you know, player values. This
Speaker 2: is the conundrum of the pickle or the mess that
Speaker 2: you get yourself into. One can only hope that he
Speaker 2: continues on an upward trajectory and becomes maybe you know,
Speaker 2: a team who because listen, any playoff contending team at
Speaker 2: some point in time is always looking for defensive help
Speaker 2: heading into the playoffs. I mean, yeah, look at what
Speaker 2: Seth Jones did for the Florida Panthers, and I'm not comparing.
Speaker 2: I'm not comparing well this kid to Seth Jones. I'm
Speaker 2: just the analogy of, you know, needing to shore up
Speaker 2: and have as much defensive depth. So maybe he one
Speaker 2: of the two of them, either Yokiharu or Lori, becomes
Speaker 2: a viable asset for the Bruins.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Yep. So let's dive in now to the new
Speaker 1: folks on the team. First, I'm going to talk about
Speaker 1: actually the trade acquisition Victor Arvidson. He was traded in
Speaker 1: from Edmonton on He's on year two of a two year,
Speaker 1: four million dollar contract. Edmonton did not retain any of that,
Speaker 1: so that is a four million dollar paycheck coming straight
Speaker 1: from Boston. And keep in mind he is a thirty
Speaker 1: two year old winger. Thoughts on this it basically, you know,
Speaker 1: another one of those like Yoki Haru situation where it's like,
Speaker 1: all right, here, take this guy. You know, I'm sure
Speaker 1: Edmonton was trying to shed cap, so here here's this
Speaker 1: veteran player.
Speaker 2: Why did you take his whole salary?
Speaker 1: Like?
Speaker 2: Why what? Why are you doing? Favors for the Edmonton Oilers.
Speaker 1: Right, so keep this in mind. Here's a little bit
Speaker 1: of info on him. If you don't know who he is.
Speaker 1: Obviously he is coming from Edmonton. Last season, he played
Speaker 1: sixty seven games, so pretty much most of the season.
Speaker 1: He had fifteen goals. All right, I'm not gonna you know,
Speaker 1: based on our current situation, I'm not going to say
Speaker 1: poo pooh to fifteen goals, twelve assists for twenty seven points.
Speaker 1: He was a minus three and he had twenty four
Speaker 1: penalty minutes. But on the plus side, his corsi four,
Speaker 1: so the man does take shots was over fifty percent.
Speaker 1: It was fifty five percent, So I mean, I guess
Speaker 1: I can't be mad about that. What do you what
Speaker 1: kind of role do you think this guy is going
Speaker 1: to even.
Speaker 3: Be playing on the team, because I hope this guy
Speaker 3: will light a fire under pavel Zaka's ass especially if
Speaker 3: this guy is a has a shoot first mentality, which
Speaker 3: is what we've heard, that he will take a shot,
Speaker 3: whereas pavel Zaka sometimes.
Speaker 2: Right doesn't take the shot that's given to him. There's
Speaker 2: there's a potential upside right to him as a player.
Speaker 2: He's got decent playoff stats, again, not that this roster
Speaker 2: is a playoff roster at this point in time, right, yeah, yep,
Speaker 2: but if if nothing else, maybe it will light a
Speaker 2: fire under sure, I mean, you know, State, and maybe
Speaker 2: we'll give them flexibility to be able to have moving
Speaker 2: parts on, you know, within the first three lines.
Speaker 1: Sure, exactly. So you know, Arvidson's coming off of a
Speaker 1: team that was just on obviously the ultimate Cup run,
Speaker 1: you know, thinking about where he could be placed on
Speaker 1: the roster, I think general consensus is that he would
Speaker 1: be a second line right wing and that Pavo Zaka
Speaker 1: would be moving to the left wing to be centered
Speaker 1: by Casey Middlestat. You know, we didn't really see I
Speaker 1: mean again those final twenty games when we're all we
Speaker 1: were all in deep mourning, like nobody was really paying attention.
Speaker 1: So we don't really know what that's going to look
Speaker 1: like potentially, But I would like.
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you something, if the this year's
Speaker 2: team and coaching staff and management doesn't address their secondary
Speaker 2: scoring problems, okay, once and for all, this retool rebuild
Speaker 2: is going to be worthless, going to be worthless, and
Speaker 2: and you know, maybe that's some of what you know,
Speaker 2: the hope for Victor Arbinson will be where they can
Speaker 2: maybe try to balance and not have one top heavy line.
Speaker 2: But you've I mean, and again, I hate to keep
Speaker 2: going back and comparing, but the Florida Panthers have set
Speaker 2: the standard in the league for what you need to
Speaker 2: do to be a successful team. Not the best tea
Speaker 2: in the league. They don't care about the President's Trophy,
Speaker 2: but to be an elite team in the playoffs. They
Speaker 2: have set the standard. And you look at their lines
Speaker 2: and you see that they have balanced scoring throughout their lines.
Speaker 2: So the Bruins have got to figure this out. Maybe
Speaker 2: that's part of it. I still don't get why they
Speaker 2: felt the need to take the entire contract.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know they had the space. I have
Speaker 1: no idea, but I will say one thing, and it's
Speaker 1: I need to see this potential second line. If this
Speaker 1: is our base second line of Zaka, middle Stat and Arvidson,
Speaker 1: I'm going to need to see forty to fifty goals
Speaker 1: from this line this coming season. Oh yeah, yeah, minimum? Right,
Speaker 1: because I'm tired, and I think minimum, I know, fifty
Speaker 1: goals out of these combined players. And that's being forgiving
Speaker 1: and allowing Casey Middleset to effectively not have to score.
Speaker 2: But like you know, it has to come somewhere.
Speaker 1: It's got to come from your top six. I'm not
Speaker 1: worried about the top line right like I'm expecting.
Speaker 2: Oh, they're going to get No.
Speaker 1: One hundred goals from the top line. I need to
Speaker 1: see forty to fifty from that second line to feel
Speaker 1: like we're moving in the right direction for this. But
Speaker 1: are we.
Speaker 2: Are we setting our expectations much too high? And are
Speaker 2: we setting ourselves up for disappointment?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: Hard to answer either one of those questions right now
Speaker 2: until we start seeing games, but I think we're going
Speaker 2: to be able to get those questions answered pretty quick
Speaker 2: into the season.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, yep, exactly. All right, So next we will
Speaker 1: talk about the actual signings. So we brought in Jordan
Speaker 1: Harris from the Columbus Blue Jackets, a twenty five year
Speaker 1: old defenceman. He was traded in twenty twenty four from
Speaker 1: the Habs to Columbus, but he was not given a
Speaker 1: qualifying offer, so that made him a UFA for this
Speaker 1: off season. He'd been making one point four million annually
Speaker 1: in his previous contracts, but in signing with Boston. He
Speaker 1: actually took a pretty significant pay cut with a one
Speaker 1: year deal worth eight hundred and twenty five thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: so really quickly, because I didn't I have no idea
Speaker 1: who this kid was. He played only thirty three games
Speaker 1: last year with a goal and four assists minus one.
Speaker 1: You know, I think this is probably one of those
Speaker 1: situations where it's we need to gather uh defenseman just
Speaker 1: to have in the wings. You know, maybe he's gonna
Speaker 1: be in the you know, the the seventh or eighth
Speaker 1: defenseman to move up and down. But I just thought
Speaker 1: it was really intriguing that he was being paid, you know,
Speaker 1: over a million dollars previously and then got this one
Speaker 1: year deal for quite a lot less. So just maybe
Speaker 1: like what's going on here?
Speaker 2: But this he's a local boy, and so we know
Speaker 2: how much Donnie loves his his local boys. So you know,
Speaker 2: maybe it was a match that worked out not only
Speaker 2: for the organization but for the player too. So and again,
Speaker 2: you know, credit to the player for being willing to
Speaker 2: take a quote unquote hometown discount. But yeah, so I'm
Speaker 2: told I haven't I have very little expectation of that.
Speaker 2: If we see much of him at all, because you know,
Speaker 2: and let's hope this is not the case unless there
Speaker 2: are injuries again to key defensive players. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: we're going to see a lot of Jordan Harris, right who, Yes,
Speaker 2: he could shock the world, who knows. Sure, So our last.
Speaker 1: Two signings, I'm going to be very intrigued to see
Speaker 1: how they compare as the season progresses, because I am
Speaker 1: talking about, of course, Tanner Jane and Michael Isamont. Now,
Speaker 1: both players are twenty eight year old forwards. Okay, the
Speaker 1: difference in what their terms are and their pay is significant. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, And so I and I don't I don't
Speaker 1: know much about these players other than the you know,
Speaker 1: the stats and the information that I've read about them
Speaker 1: and seen in their you know, trade histories and blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. But this is going to be really interesting
Speaker 1: for me to track. I believe both players are effectively
Speaker 1: third line players. So let's start out with the easy one,
Speaker 1: which is Ismat because there's this less less to talk
Speaker 1: about him, I suppose. So he was traded this past
Speaker 1: year at the deadline from Tampa Bay to Seattle. He
Speaker 1: had He's received a two times one point four million
Speaker 1: dollar contract, which is an increase from the eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand that he got from Tampa Bay. So kind of
Speaker 1: actually the inverse of what happened with Jordan Harris. So
Speaker 1: clearly Boston c something In this forward, you know, per
Speaker 1: the Internet, it says he can play all three positions,
Speaker 1: so he's likely though, gonna get a winger role. He's
Speaker 1: fairly I thought he was fairly I don't know, unknown
Speaker 1: to me, but he played seventy seven games last season,
Speaker 1: so he clearly was out there doing his thing. Nine goals,
Speaker 1: seven assists, sixteen points, he was a plus one and
Speaker 1: his coursy four percentages of fifty two. So I'm intrigued
Speaker 1: by him just from those statistics alone, that here you've
Speaker 1: got this kid who is making you know, one and
Speaker 1: change or whatever I just said and two. Yeah, at
Speaker 1: one point four to five million. And I think he's
Speaker 1: a little bit of a dark horse. I like that
Speaker 1: he played a full seventy seven last year. If he's
Speaker 1: a third liner nine goals, I'm not mad about that. No, No,
Speaker 1: So I'm intrigued. I don't know about your thoughts on
Speaker 1: I am too. I am too.
Speaker 2: And I like the fact that you know, there's an
Speaker 2: addition of competition for certain roles and hopefully you know,
Speaker 2: we talked about this last year at the start of
Speaker 2: the season about what a ship Show training camp was,
Speaker 2: and they seemed to be, you know, no clear direction
Speaker 2: or structure or you know, just it was just not good.
Speaker 1: It was just not good.
Speaker 2: So I think that this season there are actually viable
Speaker 2: spots that you know there in essence, these will be tryouts,
Speaker 2: These will be tryouts, and you are likely going to
Speaker 2: earn I hope you are likely going to earn your
Speaker 2: role or your spot in the opening day lineup by
Speaker 2: or two of what you accomplish during training camp and
Speaker 2: maybe you know, some of the preseason games. So i'm
Speaker 2: i'm i'm, I'm okay with this signing. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: it didn't cost you a lot. No, there's a good
Speaker 2: opportunity for a viable return and reward at at low risk.
Speaker 2: At low risk.
Speaker 1: Now to the other guy, the other guy, the semi counterpart. So,
Speaker 1: like I said, I'm expecting uh to be your third
Speaker 1: line right winger and the left winger. Oh and you
Speaker 1: know what, Maria, I just realized I forgot to put
Speaker 1: down some notes about another player. So we're gonna have
Speaker 1: to do his review on the fly. But he's an old,
Speaker 1: old friend of the team, so I shouldn't.
Speaker 2: Be Oh yeah, mister, I forgot all about it.
Speaker 1: But we're gonna talk about Tanner Jane. But Tanner Jane.
Speaker 1: So so I again have heard that there was a
Speaker 1: lot of competition for this guy. And if you recall,
Speaker 1: and we've talked a little bit about him, just because
Speaker 1: this competition.
Speaker 2: Doesn't mean mean that you have to be the highest bidder.
Speaker 1: Right, And was this ape was his alleged bidding war
Speaker 1: over him due to the fact that he can actually
Speaker 1: accomplish something, or is it because of the lack of
Speaker 1: options available for in the free agency? But regardless, So Danner,
Speaker 1: you know, essentially has taken over the contract of what
Speaker 1: Trent Frederick had. So he's he's signed a five year,
Speaker 1: three point four million dollar contract with I know, with
Speaker 1: signing bonuses and not tiny signing bonuses either. In twenty
Speaker 1: five twenty six it's a two point twenty five million
Speaker 1: dollar bonus, twenty six twenty seven a one point five,
Speaker 1: and twenty seven to twenty eight a one million and
Speaker 1: he has a full no trade through twenty twenty seven
Speaker 1: and then it goes modified for the next two seasons
Speaker 1: after with a fifteen team no trade followed by a
Speaker 1: seven team no trade. Now what irritates me about this
Speaker 1: particular contract because look, big picture, three point four million
Speaker 1: dollars Uh, not a ton of money, right, no snier,
Speaker 1: It's the right, fair, right, fair value, and even potentially
Speaker 1: fair term for a decent third line player.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Uh. My particular issue becomes the term and a little
Speaker 1: bit of the pay when I do a little bit
Speaker 1: of digger deep, dig deeper digging on this, particularly.
Speaker 2: Because he hasn't panned out right anywhere that he has landed.
Speaker 4: Right, he seems to have failed to meet expectations every
Speaker 4: team that he has played for in the NHL.
Speaker 1: That arguably the last time he was what I would
Speaker 1: consider successful was when he played for the Moosejaw Warriors,
Speaker 1: and this was, you know, quite a number of years
Speaker 1: ago at this point. Now, yes, I've heard the stories
Speaker 1: about how he is one of the most fit players
Speaker 1: that he has you know, awards named after him for
Speaker 1: his you know, fitness and his commitment to the room.
Speaker 2: He's a character guy, he'll defend his teammates, blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: Right, but I'm also getting a little bit tired of
Speaker 1: this team instead of trying to develop its own identity whatever,
Speaker 1: this post golden age ruins, because the golden age for me,
Speaker 1: of course, was the Chara Berger on marshand era. It
Speaker 1: now is the time for the team to figure out
Speaker 1: and develop its own new culture and its own identity.
Speaker 1: And right now, what it seems like they've been doing
Speaker 1: for the last two years is how do we be
Speaker 1: like Florida. Well, your only Florida can be Florida, right.
Speaker 1: You can try to imitate it, and it will never
Speaker 1: pan out to be exactly the same. You're going to
Speaker 1: end up with a cheaper in terms of quality, a
Speaker 1: crappier version that is just inauthentic and not who you are.
Speaker 1: And I recently listened to Elliott Friedman talking about how, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, the impression that he's getting from a wherever
Speaker 1: is that Jane is being brought in to take on
Speaker 1: some of those minutes that Zadorov was getting. But let
Speaker 1: me tell you, my friend, Zadorov wasn't getting minutes for fighting.
Speaker 1: He was getting minutes because he was taking stupid penalties
Speaker 1: because he's a lazy player, not because he's getting into fights,
Speaker 1: And I don't want a guy who can just go
Speaker 1: out and get into fights just to get into fights,
Speaker 1: or to be this tough guy or whatever. That's that's stupid,
Speaker 1: that is not what this game is. And the other
Speaker 1: idea that is he gonna be the juice that Don
Speaker 1: Sweeney keeps referring to. I'm zach. But I feel like
Speaker 1: if it's done or it's cam, they're trying to and
Speaker 1: you know you've seen this with their new throwback jersey,
Speaker 1: they're trying to go back to a time of old.
Speaker 1: Tradition is important in hockey, right. It's one of the
Speaker 1: things that makes hockey as a sport unique to all
Speaker 1: other sports because it's tradition is so important. But you
Speaker 1: cannot just focus on tradition in a way that takes
Speaker 1: the way you play the game backwards. When the game
Speaker 1: that is being played out on the ice is completely
Speaker 1: different than how it was being played in the nineteen
Speaker 1: eighties and the nineteen nineties. This is a time of
Speaker 1: high skill, extremely high skill elite goal scorers, not a
Speaker 1: time of go out and punch and knock out other players.
Speaker 1: And that is what I got from this particular signing.
Speaker 1: That makes me so irritated with this management because it
Speaker 1: tells me that they are so disconnected from the reality,
Speaker 1: they are so unaware of what the product is that
Speaker 1: is out on the ice these days that I'm at
Speaker 1: a loss because I don't know what they're doing, and
Speaker 1: it's it's troubling to me.
Speaker 2: It's troubling to me that you even right now, right now,
Speaker 2: at this you know, we just went through free agency,
Speaker 2: we just had development camp, rookie camp is going to
Speaker 2: be starting, and I have yet two understand what this
Speaker 2: team's identity is going to be. I've yet to understand.
Speaker 2: I've yet to understand the direction that management is going in,
Speaker 2: even with these particular signings. And I know that the
Speaker 2: phrase that they keep using is we want to be
Speaker 2: a team that's hard to play against. Okay, I can
Speaker 2: wrap my head around that, right because there was too
Speaker 2: much and we talked about it at nauseam where the
Speaker 2: opposing team was literally game after game, shift after shift,
Speaker 2: period after period, skating in, dancing in, waltzing in, walking
Speaker 2: into our own end of the ice, virtually untouched. Okay,
Speaker 2: I can get on board with that, But the last
Speaker 2: time I checked, you still have to score one more goal.
Speaker 2: Than the other team in order to win games.
Speaker 1: Right, yep.
Speaker 2: And I hate to sound like a broken record, and
Speaker 2: I hate to sound like an old head, but Jesus Christ,
Speaker 2: this lack of balanced scoring problem has gone back way
Speaker 2: beyond where we find ourselves now, way beyond. And this
Speaker 2: group has seemingly and when I say this group, this
Speaker 2: management group, because they've been the ones pretty much in charge, Okay, hey,
Speaker 2: have not have not resolved the problem. And for experts
Speaker 2: to say, oh, well, they're just lining themselves up because
Speaker 2: there's a better crop of free agents coming in next year,
Speaker 2: don't let them off the friggin' hook. No, for basically
Speaker 2: what they have done, which is inexcusable roster mismanagement. Okay,
Speaker 2: so again, I'm you know, Tanner jano Is probably is
Speaker 2: a character guy. You know, I've heard many people say,
Speaker 2: you know, he's a great guy to have in the
Speaker 2: locker room. He's got the potential, He's got the potential. Okay, Well,
Speaker 2: we're not in a position. We're not in a position
Speaker 2: I think that we can take reclamation problem project or
Speaker 2: should be taking reclamations right.
Speaker 1: Not at that kind of a term. Right. We can't
Speaker 1: afford a personality higher. Right now, we're in a startup phase.
Speaker 1: We need all hands on deck, we need everybody contributing.
Speaker 1: And I just like, yes, we talk about a lot.
Speaker 1: You know, it's important to have people contributing off the ice.
Speaker 1: That is very important. Obviously, we saw what happened when
Speaker 1: you subtracted all of those off ice support people, like
Speaker 1: what happened then on ice, But we're all right now
Speaker 1: we're trying to find You need to find a balance
Speaker 1: between making sure that you can have a good off ice,
Speaker 1: you know, team, and a good on ice team, and
Speaker 1: for that amount of money, for that amount of time,
Speaker 1: I'm not convinced that it's enough to make a difference
Speaker 1: on or off the ice. So who knows? Again, I mean,
Speaker 1: his agent has got.
Speaker 2: To be phenomenal to have been able to negotiate.
Speaker 1: And and how does he keep getting these opportunities? I
Speaker 1: don't know.
Speaker 2: I just that's the one to me that is like you, okay,
Speaker 2: you dumped Freddy.
Speaker 1: Right now you picked up Against which is just as bad.
Speaker 2: This is this player is likely going to be or
Speaker 2: is on paper probably a better player than Freddy, But
Speaker 2: why the five years?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: Why? Why? Why? Especially considering he's been traded mid season
Speaker 1: two years in a row. I mean, that's just about
Speaker 1: as bad as not getting a qualifying offer, Like, well,
Speaker 1: what does that mean? What's wrong with you? What? That's suspicious? Like?
Speaker 1: I don't like that. But we will of course get
Speaker 1: into his situation more in the coming months. But of
Speaker 1: course I didn't want to forget quickly. Uh. The other
Speaker 1: one that he's come back into the fall Sean Kraal. So,
Speaker 1: if you recall, he started out in Boston way back
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, and he was with Boston for a
Speaker 1: number of years, including through the sad twenty nineteen Cup run.
Speaker 1: And actually his contract in Boston ended in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: one and he left as a UFA to go out
Speaker 1: to Columbus where he he spent four years, and he
Speaker 1: actually took on a great leadership role there. He wre
Speaker 1: A a number of times. But he is, of course
Speaker 1: coming towards the end of his career. He is thirty
Speaker 1: two years old. He just signed a two year contract
Speaker 1: for a little bit less money than he'd been making
Speaker 1: in Columbus. There he'd been making two point five in Boston,
Speaker 1: he's going to be making one point eight five.
Speaker 4: With some.
Speaker 1: No he's actually not getting any bonuses. I was just
Speaker 1: gonna say, but this is a guy who you know,
Speaker 1: we haven't seen him in four years. You're you're gonna
Speaker 1: see him probably at least to start as centering your
Speaker 1: third line. But this is a guy, Now, this is
Speaker 1: a guy who maybe he's not gonna be the biggest producer,
Speaker 1: He's maybe not the you know, he's obviously not going
Speaker 1: to be playing top line minutes. But this is a
Speaker 1: guy I think, who is going to provide good leadership
Speaker 1: on the ice for the bottom six players, especially the kids.
Speaker 1: And he's going to provide good leadership off the ice
Speaker 1: in the locker room. And he costs a hell of
Speaker 1: a lot less. But what are you thinking about Sean
Speaker 1: Coraley returning to Boston?
Speaker 2: I mean again, you know, none of these signings made
Speaker 2: me want to, you know, dance on a table, okay,
Speaker 2: And you know, my last memories of Sean Corally were
Speaker 2: you know, I had higher expectations for him than what
Speaker 2: he ultimately ended up providing, you know, to us. And
Speaker 2: I understand why the Bruins you know, moved on and
Speaker 2: let him go out and you know, get his bag
Speaker 2: of cash someplace else, because they weren't in a position
Speaker 2: where they were going to be paying whatever the market
Speaker 2: value was at the time. You know, again another you know,
Speaker 2: just another guy, just another guy. Sure, just another guy,
Speaker 2: you know, welcome back. I'm sure he's excited to be back.
Speaker 2: He has familiarity with maybe some of the players currently
Speaker 2: on the roster, certainly with management. Management has familiarity with
Speaker 2: the player. Okay, fine, but again we're we're we're building a.
Speaker 1: Roster of this.
Speaker 2: This isn't you know, this isn't twenty and eleven.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, for me, I'm hoping. You know, the
Speaker 1: biggest role that we realized that the team did not
Speaker 1: have last year at all, even at the very beginning,
Speaker 1: was an uncle Nick. So now we're just forever going
Speaker 1: to call that role the uncle Nick. Right.
Speaker 2: Well, it started even before that with you know, the
Speaker 2: likes of you know, I mean, we can start with
Speaker 2: charr but then you know Mark Reki Yeah yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: you know, we can't underestimate Charlie Coyle's contribution as you know,
Speaker 2: a leader in that room. So yes, all important aspects
Speaker 2: of a team's dynamic and culture.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, and even when they when they traded
Speaker 1: Nick Felino away, you know, they brought in Kevin Chatt
Speaker 1: and Kirk who kind of was also a little bit
Speaker 1: in that role. You need that This is gonna sound ridiculous,
Speaker 1: but almost like a den Mother type for the bottom
Speaker 1: six to really be like the leader of those guys, right,
Speaker 1: And there was no Uncle Nick last year for that group.
Speaker 1: Really there wasn't. And I think it was you know,
Speaker 1: it wasn't something that Charlie Coyle could truly take over
Speaker 1: last year because he was having a rough year. So
Speaker 1: it's like really hard, I think, to play that role
Speaker 1: when you yourself are having such a difficult year and
Speaker 1: you're wrapped up in all of that as well. And
Speaker 1: so I think that that's the role that he could
Speaker 1: potentially be taking over, and hopefully that's an element that
Speaker 1: helps with everything that's disastrous happening off the ice as
Speaker 1: well as on the ice. So I'm not mad about it.
Speaker 2: I mean I think, oh no, I'm not bad. I'm
Speaker 2: not mad. I'm just like okay, ho hum, Like it
Speaker 2: doesn't you know, it doesn't give me. None of these signings, right,
Speaker 2: and I'm not sure that anybody is. We're probably not alone.
Speaker 2: None of these signings and deals give me a warm
Speaker 2: and fuzzy. Now, might I get a little bit warm
Speaker 2: and fuzzy when I see players on the ice and
Speaker 2: chemistry maybe developing, But you know, right now, on paper, yeah,
Speaker 2: this is not a roster that gives a lot of
Speaker 2: other teams in the league pause for concern.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I agree.
Speaker 2: Maybe defensively, and maybe that's the road they're going to
Speaker 2: go down. Maybe defensively, you know, because you know Jeremy
Speaker 2: Swayman needs and will I mean, I'm going to say
Speaker 2: that he if he doesn't have a better year, this
Speaker 2: team is in a shit ton of trouble, a shit
Speaker 2: ton of trouble now. You know, based on how he
Speaker 2: performed in the Four Nations, it seems like he was
Speaker 2: on an upward trajectory, right, And I think having McAvoy
Speaker 2: and Lindholm back and healthy and staying healthy, because I
Speaker 2: thought the Bruins defense was going to be miserable for
Speaker 2: other teams to play against last season, and that unfortunately
Speaker 2: was not the case more often than not. So those
Speaker 2: are areas that I'm going to say will improve.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well we shall see, we shall see. So
Speaker 1: it's already been well over an hour. Uh so we
Speaker 1: will call it there. What grade real quick. If you
Speaker 1: were going to give this free agency, what kind of
Speaker 1: letter grade are you handing out? D? Yeah, well I
Speaker 1: said D plus. Yeah, we can read a little bit
Speaker 1: more about.
Speaker 2: We can discuss this before we started, So yeah, right there.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know, maybe you know we still
Speaker 2: have scars from last season. But yeah, it's it's hard.
Speaker 1: It's hard to be an optimistic fan right now because
Speaker 1: it just seems like we are. It's still very much
Speaker 1: an unmoored situation. But uh, as we go through the summer,
Speaker 1: we're going to talk again a little bit more about
Speaker 1: these players, especially the ones that we sort of glossed
Speaker 1: over to see. Okay, is there there there? What did
Speaker 1: management see potentially in this layer that made them go, yeah,
Speaker 1: we gotta get this guy. This is the guy that
Speaker 1: we want. So we will look a little bit further,
Speaker 1: We'll dig a little bit more. We'll bring you that
Speaker 1: information and see if our opinions have changed on that
Speaker 1: at all. This is also I forgot to announce at
Speaker 1: the top of the show, this is our ninety ninth episode.
Speaker 1: So next week we will have a very special guest
Speaker 1: to help us celebrate our one hundredth episode. Uh, and
Speaker 1: then it'll be almost time for preseason stuff, So any
Speaker 1: final thoughts, Maria, I can't believe we're almost at one
Speaker 1: hundred episodes. That's pretty exciting. It's crazy, Yeah, it's crazy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: yeah yeah.
Speaker 2: I can only hope to live to be one hundred.
Speaker 1: Eh maybe, I don't know. If I got to watch
Speaker 1: another you know, mosty years of this hockey, I don't
Speaker 1: know if I could do that. But anyways, as always,
Speaker 1: thanks for listening. Make sure you like and subscribe, follow
Speaker 1: us on all of our socials Tape to Tape MK,
Speaker 1: check out our Patreon for exclusive things, and as always,
Speaker 1: go Bees, Go Bees,
Podbean