The Bruins' $11 Million Goaltending Question | Ep. 147
Liner notes
🎙️This week we dive into the Boston Bruins' goaltending situation, examining if nearly $11 million in salary cap space for Jeremy Swayman and Joonas Korpisalo is too much. We analyze the team's goalie-focused strategy, salary cap challenges, and potential impacts on roster depth. Join us for player insights, team-building priorities, and the future of Bruins hockey while debating if this spending supports a Stanley Cup run or if adjustments are needed.Special hat tip to former Bruins Taylor Hall and Brandon Bussi for getting those 16-Ws!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Hey Bruins fam. This week's episode was recorded last week
Speaker 1: before the Carolina Hurricanes won their second ever franchise Stanley Cup. Well,
Speaker 1: we can't say we're Carolina superfans. We were thrilled to
Speaker 1: see a number of former Bruins win the Ultimate Prize,
Speaker 1: especially Taylor Hall and Brandon Bussy. This week's topic of
Speaker 1: conversation around Bruins goaltending is really timely considering Bussy's meteoric
Speaker 1: rise within the Hurricanes organization. Now, I know you are
Speaker 1: all well informed listeners, but here's a little reminder of
Speaker 1: how Bussy left the Bruins organization and ended up in Raleigh.
Speaker 1: Bussy had started his AHL career with the p Bruins
Speaker 1: and was a member of the team for three seasons.
Speaker 1: Like many things in life, timing determined his future career path.
Speaker 1: In July of twenty twenty five, the Bruins did not
Speaker 1: make him an offer and to hit the market, where
Speaker 1: he signed a one year, two way contract with the
Speaker 1: Florida Panthers. Florida found themselves in a situation where they
Speaker 1: had to send him down, but because Bussy was and
Speaker 1: still is waiver eligible, he had to go on the
Speaker 1: waiver wire. In order to report to the team's AHL affiliate.
Speaker 1: During that very brief window of time, Carolina snapped him
Speaker 1: up and the rest is history. You will most certainly
Speaker 1: hear and read grumblings that Boston screwed this one up,
Speaker 1: but you have to remember one of Boston's strengths has
Speaker 1: been a solid pipeline of excellent goaltending. It's been literal
Speaker 1: decades since Boston has gone seasons with a sieve in
Speaker 1: between the pipes. There will be criticisms levied at Bruin's
Speaker 1: management that Bussy was never given a chance or quote,
Speaker 1: we could have had a cup level guy for less
Speaker 1: than a million, But those are unrealistic arguments that are
Speaker 1: likely rooted and misguided bias. And don't think that this
Speaker 1: is me suddenly becoming a huge fan of management. Please,
Speaker 1: if you've listened awhile, you know how I feel. But
Speaker 1: to the point that Bussy was never given a real opportunity,
Speaker 1: I ask this, when would you have been willing to
Speaker 1: bring him up? Because when Bussy signed his entry level
Speaker 1: contract in March of twenty twenty two, the Bruins had
Speaker 1: the incredible tandem of Linis Almark and Jeremy Swayman running
Speaker 1: the show back there, so how could you possibly interrupt
Speaker 1: that chemistry and flow. It was the perfect season. When
Speaker 1: it came time for Boston to put more eggs in
Speaker 1: someone's basket in June of twenty twenty four, management chose Swayman.
Speaker 1: I won't debate that decision now, and I couldn't tell
Speaker 1: you why management opted to bring in Corpusolo over Bussy.
Speaker 1: I don't know. There can be many good reasons as
Speaker 1: well as many stupid ones and mistakes. Regardless, the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four twenty twenty five season was a disaster in
Speaker 1: so many ways. Not one single thing could have really
Speaker 1: fixed it, including bringing up Bussy. And while bringing up
Speaker 1: players from the AHL can be a good way to
Speaker 1: shake things up with the skaters, it doesn't quite work
Speaker 1: the same for goalies. All the while, more and more
Speaker 1: goalies in Providence have been clamoring for more attention leading
Speaker 1: up to the point that he left. Think Michael d
Speaker 1: Pietro and Simon Zychek. Carolina was incredibly lucky to snap
Speaker 1: up Brandon Bussy, and he won hundred percent deserves all
Speaker 1: the flowers. But for Bruins fans, remember just because his
Speaker 1: name is on the Cup now, does doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: he could have been just as successful in Boston. He
Speaker 1: had an unbelievable team in front of him this season,
Speaker 1: and as we've discussed, the Boston Bruins are nowhere near
Speaker 1: that good right now. So when you listen to today's episode,
Speaker 1: save yourself the stress and don't yell at us about
Speaker 1: Brandon Bussy. We know enjoy.
Speaker 2: Can you start a podcast with me?
Speaker 1: Please?
Speaker 2: I need something to do a drug sit it out
Speaker 2: in trumble about to the same.
Speaker 1: Castach today, here's a chance pot right down with goalie Scars.
Speaker 1: Oh my, one move by the rookie too on one
Speaker 1: Faster Not moving in with Marsha tounchtime on oil dances
Speaker 1: in't badcasting right home right away, going to Foster, Notchester.
Speaker 2: What's that?
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruins Tape to tape.
Speaker 1: I'm your host today, Caroline with a K, and I
Speaker 1: am joined by my fantastic co host Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 1: Hey Maria, Hello, Hello, how's it going today?
Speaker 2: My friend?
Speaker 1: It's going as always and it's a better day because
Speaker 1: we get to talk about hockey. What can I say?
Speaker 2: Oh, your favorite position or one of your favorite positions.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Today we're going to be talking goaltending and your
Speaker 1: favorite topic around goaltending, which is how much money do
Speaker 1: each of these teams have wrapped up in goaltending? And
Speaker 1: is the Boston Bruins situation worth the chunk of change
Speaker 1: that our goaltenders occupy? Well? Do you like to stir
Speaker 1: the pot? What can I say?
Speaker 2: This conversation is a lightning rod conversation in my area
Speaker 2: I meant right directly in Boston. It is nothing short
Speaker 2: of sports talk radio fodder every time the goalie situation
Speaker 2: in Boston comes up and the amount of money that
Speaker 2: is allocated to said goaltenders, particularly one young man Jared Simon,
Speaker 2: when everyone has a variety of opinions on that. All right, So,
Speaker 2: as wonderful as Tim Thomas was and as spectacular as
Speaker 2: his play was, he certainly didn't make it easy on
Speaker 2: expectations and contracts. And listen, I'm of the mindset that
Speaker 2: do you need really good goaltending? A frigging course, you
Speaker 2: do because a goaltender when you was Stanley Cup on
Speaker 2: his own, No, because somebody still has to put the
Speaker 2: goddamn pop in the net.
Speaker 1: Yes, Well, one point that I always like to make
Speaker 1: not just because I'm a fan of goalies, but I'm
Speaker 1: a parent of a goalie, and this isn't just my
Speaker 1: random opinion. I know that this is a broadly misunderstood
Speaker 1: position and the expectations are often not very realistic when
Speaker 1: you've got people who don't necessarily understand the position and
Speaker 1: what they're supposed to be doing and what they should
Speaker 1: actually be able to do. And you know, I will
Speaker 1: always defend the goaltenders. Can a goalie lose a game? Sure,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that a loss isn't ever a goalie's fault,
Speaker 1: but you have to remember, as you perfectly pointed out,
Speaker 1: is a goaltender the only reason why they win a
Speaker 1: game or a Stanley Cup. No, you can't win a
Speaker 1: game just with one superstar player.
Speaker 2: You have to.
Speaker 1: Remember goalies in that same breath that if a team loses,
Speaker 1: it isn't always necessarily because of the goalie, right. I
Speaker 1: think the Boston Bruins this year great example, especially of
Speaker 1: the fact that how many times did we see both
Speaker 1: of our goaltenders play lights out?
Speaker 2: But at the end of the day, how many times
Speaker 2: did we say, if it weren't for them, the game
Speaker 2: would have gotten out of hand. Or Yes, the goalie
Speaker 2: gave the team a chance to win, a chance to
Speaker 2: come back because they were making these saves. Yes.
Speaker 1: The other point that I would like to throw out
Speaker 1: there because I think now, granted I don't listen to
Speaker 1: the Boston Talk sports radio, you do the lard's work
Speaker 1: in that regard.
Speaker 2: You listen to that, and sometimes I feel the need
Speaker 2: to respond to it, folks, when I think the conversation
Speaker 2: is so ludicrous that I can't stand it any longer.
Speaker 1: Yes, So, for whatever reason, forever, goaltenders have been paid less,
Speaker 1: have been valued, like literally in terms of money, less
Speaker 1: than skaters. And it's not really hard to see why
Speaker 1: the skaters can have a more exciting game. They score
Speaker 1: the goals. You have to score goals to win games.
Speaker 1: I will always make the argument. You can disagree, but
Speaker 1: I will tell you you're wrong that the hardest position on
Speaker 1: the ice is the goaltender. It's the hardest position to play.
Speaker 1: You are the last line of defense. Mentally, psychologically, it's
Speaker 1: the hardest position to be in on the ice because
Speaker 1: even if the goal wasn't your fault, because your teammate
Speaker 1: was in the wrong place and tipped it in. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if the goalie is always gonna take that
Speaker 1: and shoulder that burden. But regardless, my counter argument has
Speaker 1: always been to a lot of what the talking heads
Speaker 1: have said in Boston is you should just pay your goalie.
Speaker 1: Why are you afraid to pay your goaltender? Is your
Speaker 1: goalie good, yes, then why not pay them? On Paul
Speaker 1: are with your top players. If you're one of your
Speaker 1: best players just happens to be a goalie, why does
Speaker 1: he have to work for a discount compared to the skaters?
Speaker 2: And the contrarian argument to that is, in the instance
Speaker 2: of the conversation, the specific conversation that we're going to
Speaker 2: be having about Jeremy Swayman and Jonis Corposalo is the
Speaker 2: fact that the Bruins had been playing this to tandem
Speaker 2: system for quite some time. Yeah, and pretty much games
Speaker 2: were being split evenly, right, And so then it comes
Speaker 2: time for Jeremy Swayman to get his first big deal,
Speaker 2: maybe his only big deal, right unless the Bruins at
Speaker 2: some point move on from him, because he did sign
Speaker 2: a team friendly contract, because I believe that AAV becomes
Speaker 2: very reasonable were the tenure of that contract. But The
Speaker 2: issue for him was that the fact and I was
Speaker 2: in this camp where I was saying, you've only played
Speaker 2: half the games. I need to see what you do
Speaker 2: if you're going to be if you're going to be
Speaker 2: the number one guy, right and you say you yourself
Speaker 2: have said you want to be that guy, I need
Speaker 2: to see how you perform, or I would like to
Speaker 2: see how you perform when you're playing upwards of sixty
Speaker 2: games or close to sixty games as opposed to just
Speaker 2: splitting them, and then you can talk to me about
Speaker 2: what I believe your value is. That didn't happen that way,
Speaker 2: right because you needed to do something something, a deal
Speaker 2: needed to be had or this player was likely going
Speaker 2: to walk away with you getting nothing in return. So
Speaker 2: I understand the frustration with handing someone eight point something
Speaker 2: million dollars when you're saying to yourself, what has he
Speaker 2: done yet to earn that eight point something million dollars?
Speaker 1: But that's not how sports works.
Speaker 2: Sports and these contracts work on what is the market value?
Speaker 2: What has the market value been set out? We've seen
Speaker 2: it happen numerous and countless times with the Fensman with centers,
Speaker 2: with forwards, and it happens with the goalies too, right,
Speaker 2: So do I think that's a lot of money for
Speaker 2: a goal tender, Yes, But when you compare it to
Speaker 2: money that's being made by other goals in the league,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to say that Swiman looks like a bargain,
Speaker 2: but he's not getting He's not getting the same as
Speaker 2: some other elite goalies are.
Speaker 1: Really, what really just drives me nuts about that argument
Speaker 1: that's being made is, Okay, sure, when he was asking
Speaker 1: for that money, he'd only played fifty percent, I get it.
Speaker 1: Who among if you had an opportunity to shoot your shot,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't you take it? He clearly had the talent
Speaker 1: and the skills. I don't think that anyone denied that
Speaker 1: he was even then, particularly exceptional in terms of goaltending ability.
Speaker 1: And we went from Tim Thomas to touk Arask. We
Speaker 1: have very high expectations, not just defensively of our team,
Speaker 1: but of our goaltenders.
Speaker 2: When you're professing to be a defensive minded, defensively structured team,
Speaker 2: you better have really good goaltending and you better have
Speaker 2: really the decore.
Speaker 1: Yes, you've seen teams that don't have that guy in
Speaker 1: the crease, even though they have the guys out in
Speaker 1: front Edmonton Pittsburgh. You still need the guy to get
Speaker 1: the job done. It's part of the package deal. But okay, fine,
Speaker 1: I get that. What I don't understand is why is
Speaker 1: there still this perseveration over the fact that I can't
Speaker 1: believe he's making that much money. The season after or
Speaker 1: the season that he signed that deal wasn't good, but
Speaker 1: the entire season wasn't good, everybody.
Speaker 2: He wasn't in camp. He wasn't in scraining camp, which
Speaker 2: that's that is a bit significant. You're not there with
Speaker 2: the guys. You know, maybe some guys were pissed off too.
Speaker 2: That could have been some of what fractured that locker room,
Speaker 2: right or wrong on Swaymen's part or his agent's part. Right.
Speaker 2: I don't think either side handled themselves well during those negotiations, right,
Speaker 2: But this is the guy that you all everyone there
Speaker 2: was no disagreement about the fact that organization wanted Swayman
Speaker 2: to be the guy, and Swayman wants to be and
Speaker 2: wanted to be the guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And obviously the reason why this is a continued
Speaker 1: point of conversation on the Boston sports radio waves is
Speaker 1: because it's no no, no, it is it is.
Speaker 2: Look at how much money it couldn't even make the playoffs.
Speaker 2: Tim Thomas won you a Stanley Cup? Yes, okay, how
Speaker 2: many fricking years ago was that we're talking about twenty eleven?
Speaker 2: And he had an out of body experience right, an
Speaker 2: out of body experience in twenty eleven during the playoffs.
Speaker 1: It's so on brand for Boston sports talk radio to
Speaker 1: find a player to make scape go or to bitch
Speaker 1: and moan about.
Speaker 2: And before Slayman, it was Tuka Ress who was in
Speaker 2: their crosshairs. And I had my issues with Tuca, although
Speaker 2: I will give him credit that when it was time
Speaker 2: for him to negotiate his deal, he was like, let
Speaker 2: me play out this season, let me show you that
Speaker 2: I'm worthy, and he put his money where his mouth
Speaker 2: was and he got his deal. Now, were there instances
Speaker 2: where you would say, oh, Tuca, what the hell, what
Speaker 2: the hell where you do? But to lay all of
Speaker 2: the blame on the missed opportunities that core of Boston
Speaker 2: Bruins had on the feet of tukarasp is lazy takes.
Speaker 1: And that was my whole point about the position is
Speaker 1: it's easy.
Speaker 2: It's very easy. You can get all the glory and
Speaker 2: all the blame, right. It kills. I'm just gonna go
Speaker 2: off on a tangentcy It kills. It absolutely kills certain
Speaker 2: members of local Boston sports talk radio to if knowledge
Speaker 2: when Jeremy Swayman plays well, it absolutely freaking kills them
Speaker 2: to say he played well, he kept them in the game.
Speaker 1: Why do you want him to be bad?
Speaker 2: Good? So they can point their finger and say, see, see,
Speaker 2: look at this team. They only have a total of
Speaker 2: eight million dollars invested in goalies. Where you're paying this
Speaker 2: guy over eight million dollars just for one guy.
Speaker 1: It's first of all, your money, So who cares?
Speaker 2: It's not like, can you give a hext other than
Speaker 2: the fact is I can't say that. I don't. I
Speaker 2: can't even believe I'm defending them. The only rational argument
Speaker 2: for that is that you're tying up money in an
Speaker 2: area where you know you have other needs when you're
Speaker 2: doing a rebuild. If your roster was all hunky dory
Speaker 2: and you didn't have significant holes and gaps in them,
Speaker 2: then I could say, what do you care? It's not
Speaker 2: your money when you look overall, and we're going to
Speaker 2: talk about this, when you look overall at how much
Speaker 2: money the Boston Bruins have tied up in just two players.
Speaker 2: Then you can say, hmm, this is a problem when
Speaker 2: you're trying to do a rebuild here, or a reboot
Speaker 2: or a restart or refresher, whatever the hell you want
Speaker 2: to call it.
Speaker 1: So let's talk about the money and the amount of
Speaker 1: money it's tied up in it. Because one thing that
Speaker 1: you said before is this concept of market value. And
Speaker 1: I know this is one of your favorite quotes because
Speaker 1: it was a dumb ass quote from a stupid young
Speaker 1: man who have thought he knew what he was saying
Speaker 1: and he should have just kept his damn mouth shut.
Speaker 2: And he knows nothing of the world yet nothing.
Speaker 1: However, just because it was stupid doesn't mean that there
Speaker 1: was some truth in it. I'm referring to Jeremy Swiman's
Speaker 1: talking about wanting to reset the goalie market. Now, let
Speaker 1: me say this first, and you said this, there are
Speaker 1: times when forward players, especially because they're the highest page,
Speaker 1: do exactly that they reset the market. I think we
Speaker 1: all remember. God now was probably about five or six,
Speaker 1: maybe even seven years ago when I want to say
Speaker 1: it was Connor McDavid or it was Leandreisidel, one of
Speaker 1: the first skaters to crack the ten million mark, and
Speaker 1: that became the line where you identify elite skaters forwards
Speaker 1: and the rest. Most notably this season, Carill capriz Off
Speaker 1: has now pushed that line almost to twenty million dollars.
Speaker 1: He's making I believe here it is seventeen million per year.
Speaker 1: Full no move. If he hasn't set the new market
Speaker 1: rate for elite players, he's propelling that new market rate
Speaker 1: to the twenty million line for any other elite players
Speaker 1: who are still sitting on old contracts. That's the nature
Speaker 1: of pro sports. Jeremy Swayman and his stupid youth aside,
Speaker 1: why can't a goalie do the exact same thing effectively?
Speaker 1: He has, as much as we don't want to admit
Speaker 1: that his idiotic comment, We've known for years that goalies
Speaker 1: have been underpaid for the value that they bring to
Speaker 1: a team in general. The fact that elite goalies were
Speaker 1: only making three or four million dollars when you had
Speaker 1: someone like Connor McDavid making thirteen or fourteen. How could
Speaker 1: you have such a spread for a position that, yes,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say it's the most important position on the ice,
Speaker 1: but you really can't even compare it to anything else.
Speaker 1: So why is that one that much less? Since then,
Speaker 1: we have seen other signings. Now again, you can agree
Speaker 1: or disagree with the value of those contracts when you
Speaker 1: hear these names, but it doesn't change the fact that basically,
Speaker 1: since Swayman got his eight million dollar deal, that is
Speaker 1: now the new dividing line. That is the new Here's
Speaker 1: where the elite, Here's where are our the guy is
Speaker 1: versus not the guy, that's the difference. So you have
Speaker 1: the most well paid goalie right now in the entire league,
Speaker 1: Igor Schusterkin. He signed his deal not too long ago
Speaker 1: for eleven to five. But then also you have someone
Speaker 1: from Vancouver, yep, Thatcher Demco who is has been tapped
Speaker 1: as there the guy in twenty twenty six. His contract
Speaker 1: extension kicks in eight point five. So that's kind of
Speaker 1: the direction that things are starting to move in. These
Speaker 1: guys are going to be making more and more money. Now,
Speaker 1: is it always necessarily wise? That's a different conversation, and
Speaker 1: I think that it is should be considered independent of
Speaker 1: at least in terms of the Boston Bruins, independent of
Speaker 1: Swaymen and Corpus Salo's abilities, at least for this conversation,
Speaker 1: because we know that they are good players. Let's focus
Speaker 1: maybe the conversation not so much on I can't believe
Speaker 1: they have eleven point two five million dollars in those
Speaker 1: two guys, but rather in one position. And why is
Speaker 1: that maybe a good or bad idea?
Speaker 2: I think I think if you gave Don Sweeney and
Speaker 2: Cam Neely some truth serum, they would have preferred to
Speaker 2: have moved Jonas Corposalo either in the off season. Well,
Speaker 2: they couldn't have. They couldn't do it the year that
Speaker 2: they were negotiating with Swimming, because we would have been
Speaker 2: screwed and tattooed if that pulled out lasted longer than
Speaker 2: it actually did. But you have other viable alternatives in Providence,
Speaker 2: and I think because you had no options between the
Speaker 2: negotiations and the start of the season that you were
Speaker 2: boxed in by these two guys. Now we all know
Speaker 2: that the two goalie system seems to be kind of
Speaker 2: a Neuveau idea that has taken off, and it is
Speaker 2: serving teams well to have two solid goaltenders that you
Speaker 2: can rely on. The question is do you still need
Speaker 2: an elite goaltender to take you to the promised Land,
Speaker 2: or at least give you a chance to get to
Speaker 2: the promised land. I mean, you've got to identify a
Speaker 2: number one guy, the guy that's going to be your
Speaker 2: go to guy, the guy that's going to stop the
Speaker 2: bleeding when you're potentially looking at a three, four, five
Speaker 2: game losing streak. You want the guy that you know
Speaker 2: what you're going to get when you're looking at a
Speaker 2: four or five six game series in the playoffs. Right, Yeah.
Speaker 2: I think if things had played out differently with Swayman
Speaker 2: in terms of how the negotiations did or didn't go,
Speaker 2: I'm not really sure that Jonas Corposalo would still be
Speaker 2: a member of the Boston Bruins. I'm not sure he's
Speaker 2: still going to be a member of the Boston Bruins
Speaker 2: come the upcoming season. I don't think he should be.
Speaker 2: I think you've got to get that money off your books,
Speaker 2: ASA sure.
Speaker 1: Think about it also in the context of looking at
Speaker 1: other teams with clear starting guys. All right, the Winnipeg Jets,
Speaker 1: Connor Hallibuch makes eight point five. He played sixty nine
Speaker 1: percent of the games this past season. Jeremy Swiman played
Speaker 1: sixty seven percent of the game, So Hellabuk had fifty
Speaker 1: seven games played. If you also look at Jay Gottinger,
Speaker 1: who I think is the other big comparable, he's obviously
Speaker 1: a key guy eight two five, he played fifty four games,
Speaker 1: So that's sixty almost sixty six percent. Those are your comparables.
Speaker 2: They're in the window of the ballpark of what they
Speaker 2: should be making their partner.
Speaker 1: Let's then think about what their partner is making. Right.
Speaker 1: So in Dallas, Casey de Smith took on the backup
Speaker 1: role just a little over a million, and for Winnipeg,
Speaker 1: Connor Hellibuck's partner, Eric Commery eight twenty five Unics corpus Sollo,
Speaker 1: he's making three now three million dollars in the grand
Speaker 1: scheme of things whatever. However, when you have in Providence
Speaker 1: multiple goalies, the good goalies, when you have multiples of
Speaker 1: the same thing, either on the team or in your pipeline,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't you bring in the one that is a
Speaker 1: little bit younger, So they're going to be cheaper, you
Speaker 1: have them for longer. You can also simultaneously develop them,
Speaker 1: and that's what you have, especially in Tpietrow he's going
Speaker 1: to be coming in and likely forever long. His contract
Speaker 1: deal is making minimum salary and could potentially provide the
Speaker 1: same level of play that we saw from Unis Corpusolo.
Speaker 1: In fact, d Pietro did have his one game where
Speaker 1: he played briefly and he survived, so that was good.
Speaker 2: Now, things that I think Jeremy Swayman needs to work
Speaker 2: on is I would like to see him play more games.
Speaker 2: I think the issue is when he is playing a
Speaker 2: significant number of games in a row, maybe his level
Speaker 2: of play drops off a little bit. That doesn't help
Speaker 2: the contrarians who are always looking at the eight point
Speaker 2: two five go and see CC. But I just as
Speaker 2: a matter of mathematics, eleven point two five million dollars
Speaker 2: tied up in players who quote unquote are not full
Speaker 2: time players is a lot. And I think that Jonas
Speaker 2: is the one. And Jonas has made noise in the
Speaker 2: fat in the past about wanting to play more games,
Speaker 2: you know, maybe taking on a more significant goalie role
Speaker 2: on a team. But I don't think it's sustainable to
Speaker 2: keep both of these guys. Jonas wants to play more games, Jeremy,
Speaker 2: you're paying him to be your number one guy, so
Speaker 2: you've got to give him the net. If he's going
Speaker 2: to be your number one guy, something has to give here.
Speaker 2: And I wouldn't be at all surprised if conversations aren't
Speaker 2: already occurring about moving Yonus pull us out.
Speaker 1: And if you think about it in terms of what
Speaker 1: he's bringing to the table, If we go back to
Speaker 1: the stats, the goals saved above expected, Jeremy Swayman had
Speaker 1: a phenomenal season period end of sentence, like you can't
Speaker 1: like independent again he was as a candidate. He was
Speaker 1: avet a candidate like right least, so you know he
Speaker 1: had a phenomenal season statistically, regardless of his load management.
Speaker 1: He had a twenty eight point eight goals saved above expected,
Speaker 1: and Unis corpus Allo, for as clutch as he was
Speaker 1: in very key moments, making that timely save in the
Speaker 1: moment you truly need it, whether it's for momentum, purposes, morale,
Speaker 1: he had it. He was there. But on paper his
Speaker 1: goals save above expected was a minus one. He played
Speaker 1: thirty one games, and he was probably better than some
Speaker 1: starting goalies, and he could be a good starter for
Speaker 1: a team that is almost there and needs just a
Speaker 1: little bit better goaltending. Because look, when it comes to
Speaker 1: the Stanley Cup Finals, the most elite goaltend doesn't have
Speaker 1: to be in the Stanley Cup Final, but that elite
Speaker 1: goaltender is going to get you to cross that line
Speaker 1: to get into the playoffs and can make a huge difference.
Speaker 1: And then where it goes from there, that's the final see.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the argument that crops up here
Speaker 2: is when you look at the two teams that are
Speaker 2: in the Stanley Cup Finals right now, Vegas Golden Knights
Speaker 2: and the Carolina Hurricanes, who don't have this kind of
Speaker 2: coin tied up in their goaltending. But what people fail
Speaker 2: to look at is well, what kind of a team
Speaker 2: do they have in front of them? Okay, exactly system
Speaker 2: that they're playing in front of these goaltenders.
Speaker 1: Those are goalies that are good enough, and unfortunately for Boston,
Speaker 1: as we mentioned in our previous episode, Boston is a
Speaker 1: ways away at least from having the skating team out
Speaker 1: front having that level of compete. But again to your point,
Speaker 1: and I think everyone's kind of on the same page,
Speaker 1: and granted Corpusolos he's still signed actually shockingly through twenty
Speaker 1: twenty eight.
Speaker 2: Yes, so the season two more seasons and then he
Speaker 2: becomes a UFA. Now I might know, does his contract
Speaker 2: have any no trade clause in it? Or it does.
Speaker 1: This was signed when Corpusolo and he was in Ottawa.
Speaker 1: He has a ten team no trade list, so it's
Speaker 1: still pretty wide open where he could go. At this point.
Speaker 1: He's not a player that you are trading because oh god,
Speaker 1: we got to get rid of him because he's causing
Speaker 1: damage like Mason Lori. But he's certainly elevated his game
Speaker 1: and has become valuable in that regard.
Speaker 2: No, but he could certainly be part of an attractive
Speaker 2: package to a team who is desperate for goaltender. And
Speaker 2: I always go back to the Edmonton Oilers and Toronto.
Speaker 2: Do they have a goal? Not that you want to
Speaker 2: do an conference deal, but right, right, yeah, but I
Speaker 2: think we're in agreement that the money is too much
Speaker 2: to have tied up in two players. Yes, Jeremy Swayman's
Speaker 2: not going anywhere.
Speaker 1: And Swayman's not the one actually getting quote unquote overpaid
Speaker 1: right in this in this example, Yeah, yeah, right, you're
Speaker 1: just looking at it from a market value perspective. You've
Speaker 1: got your starter who's making eight across the board, and
Speaker 1: you've got your backup probably making about one and change
Speaker 1: at most, which is crazy because we've seen the evolution
Speaker 1: of how teams are using their goaltenders twenty five years ago.
Speaker 1: Twenty years ago, you had one guy playing seventy five
Speaker 1: to eighty games out of eighty two. This coming fall,
Speaker 1: they're going to be eighty four games, and then it
Speaker 1: switched to more. We never saw league wide the fifty
Speaker 1: to fifty. I think that was still pretty unique to Boston,
Speaker 1: but still doing a sixty forty. And now we're kind
Speaker 1: of inching more back towards maybe a seventy thirty. And
Speaker 1: as your starter gets closer and closer to those seventy
Speaker 1: percent of games, it's not going to make sense to
Speaker 1: be paying your backup three million dollars financially, it's not
Speaker 1: going to make sense.
Speaker 2: It just doesn't. I don't want to say it's a
Speaker 2: waste of money, but that money could be put to
Speaker 2: better use in other areas of your roster right now.
Speaker 1: Yes, anyways, we'd love to hear from the listeners. What
Speaker 1: do you think an ideal salary matchup would be for
Speaker 1: or a reasonable expectation is for a salary combo of
Speaker 1: your starter and your backup because it's changing again. I
Speaker 1: think in five years we're going to look back and
Speaker 1: be like, Yep, this was the time when that makeup
Speaker 1: started to change. And it's interesting because things related to
Speaker 1: goalies that doesn't change very long. The popular styles of
Speaker 1: play can change, but what the goalie is doing does
Speaker 1: not change much. Any final thoughts, Maria, Any additional rants?
Speaker 2: No, No, I think I've covered what I needed to
Speaker 2: cover with regard to this specific topic of conversation, which
Speaker 2: sets me over the edge because it's just an ongoing
Speaker 2: Let's find the whipping boy, and it's been the mantle
Speaker 2: and the torch has been passed from Tukarask to now
Speaker 2: Jeremy Swayman to some degree. Yeap. Frustrating.
Speaker 1: Nonetheless, until the Bruins win another Stanley Cup, probably every
Speaker 1: goaltender will go through that experience.
Speaker 2: Yes, you're likely correct. On that, You're likely correct.
Speaker 1: Make sure you like and subscribe for more content, and
Speaker 1: be sure to leave a rating and review to help
Speaker 1: other Bruins fans find us. You can support the podcast
Speaker 1: by joining our Patreon or following us on our socials
Speaker 1: at Tape to Tape MK and on substack at tape
Speaker 1: to tape mk dot, substack dot com. Any final words.
Speaker 2: I think that I am ready to get out and
Speaker 2: play some golf.
Speaker 1: Awesome. I'm as always go
Speaker 2: Bees, sober ones,
Podbean