The Philosophy of Forward Lines | Ep. 87
Liner notes
🎙️ What is the philosophy behind NHL forward lines—and does Boston even have one right now? We dive into the long-standing roles of the top 3 lines (sorry, fourth line), what each line is supposed to do, and how past Bruins teams executed this balance to near perfection. Then we look at the current roster and ask: who’s actually filling these roles—and who’s leaving a gaping hole in the lineup? This episode is one part hockey theory, one part forensic analysis, and a whole lot of wishful thinking that Don Sweeney understands any of it.📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ Boston Bruins Gear
We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
🏒 Read more about Prof. Moe's Philosophy here
🎧 Listen now and join the conversation!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Bruins Tape to Tape.
Speaker 1: I am your host this evening, Caroline. It is is
Speaker 1: April thirtieth. If you're listening to this, Yes, the Bruins
Speaker 1: are still not in the playoffs, but we are still
Speaker 1: getting together and tracking hockey. And what better way to
Speaker 1: kick off our summer season, so to speak, the first
Speaker 1: episode without any active Bruin news, then having a special guest. So,
Speaker 1: but first and foremost, I want to welcome in my
Speaker 1: fabulous co host, Maria. How's it go on? Maria?
Speaker 2: Oh, just scran, just scran. I'm actually you know, no,
Speaker 2: I mean, I mean that sincerely. It's kind of it's
Speaker 2: kind of refreshing to sit back and watch a little
Speaker 2: bit of playoff, really good playoff hockey. Even though we
Speaker 2: don't have a dog in the fight, there's been some
Speaker 2: pretty epic battles thus far.
Speaker 1: It is. I am very highly entertained. It's been an
Speaker 1: excellent first round. But as I mentioned, for those of
Speaker 1: you who are not watching on YouTube, we've brought in
Speaker 1: Professor Mo, friend of the pod, to come on and
Speaker 1: educate us a little bit. So, if you have been
Speaker 1: following our substack account, We've got a special little corner
Speaker 1: dedicated to Mo and his wisdom around all things hockey.
Speaker 1: So what better way to get ready for next season
Speaker 1: than to enlighten us, ourselves and our fans what a
Speaker 1: good team is actually supposed to look like. So welcome
Speaker 1: in Mo. How is it going?
Speaker 3: Thank you, guys, it's great. I appreciate you guys having
Speaker 3: me on again.
Speaker 2: We always love having you when your articles have been
Speaker 2: really really good, really thought provoking and entertaining.
Speaker 3: Good. Yeah, glad that's been working out. They've been fun
Speaker 3: to write, for sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, highly enlightening. I mean, certainly, I think, you know,
Speaker 1: among the three of us, we've been fans of the
Speaker 1: game for a really long time. But at least for myself,
Speaker 1: there have been elements that I have learned a lot about,
Speaker 1: uh that I didn't know beforehand. You know, we talk
Speaker 1: a lot on this podcast about at least I certain
Speaker 1: you talk about it all the time that uh, you know,
Speaker 1: the Boston Bruins. It's it's a team, but it's also
Speaker 1: like a workplace, right and everybody has a job, and uh,
Speaker 1: it could be you have to be the goal scorer,
Speaker 1: you have to be the playmaker, you have to be
Speaker 1: the Uncle Nick kind of player. But besides the personalities
Speaker 1: that you need to have on a team to be successful,
Speaker 1: there are also actual jobs that have to get taken
Speaker 1: care of during a game. And Moe's first article is
Speaker 1: already out on substack, so you should definitely go check
Speaker 1: it out. It's a tape to tape MK at substack
Speaker 1: dot com. You can read that it's the forwards Philosophy
Speaker 1: and he's going to be uh putting out some more
Speaker 1: interesting content around this later this summer, so make sure
Speaker 1: you sub drives you get that into your inbox. You
Speaker 1: can get even more detailed. But before we dive in Maria,
Speaker 1: what has been happening around the rink? Has there been
Speaker 1: any big news that we might find interesting?
Speaker 2: Hot off the presses just before we started recording, is
Speaker 2: that Aaron eck Blad has been suspended two games by
Speaker 2: the Department of Players Safety. And in case folks haven't
Speaker 2: been paying attention to the Lightning Panthers series, the Florida
Speaker 2: Panthers are playing like their typical rat rats that they
Speaker 2: are they are right, and so Blad went after Hagel
Speaker 2: because Hegel knocked one of their guys out, which I
Speaker 2: again I don't have an issue with that, right if
Speaker 2: you do it cleanly. Now, the first hit that at
Speaker 2: Blad laid on Hagel should have been enough, but then
Speaker 2: Hagel Eckblad doubles down and basically delivers like an elbow
Speaker 2: to Hegel's chin. Hagel left the game, didn't come back.
Speaker 2: John Cooper lost his ever love in mind as well.
Speaker 2: He should have because they didn't even call a damn
Speaker 2: penalty on the play.
Speaker 1: It was.
Speaker 2: It was so egregious, so egregious, So you know what,
Speaker 2: it's it's about time, you know. And I know I
Speaker 2: had said that I had adopted them as my playoff team,
Speaker 2: but I even I last night had reached the end
Speaker 2: of my rope with some of the shit shenanigans that
Speaker 2: they're pulling, and then the tip for tap between Paul
Speaker 2: Maurice and John Cooper.
Speaker 1: We only hit guys in of shit. Okay, I'm entertaining.
Speaker 1: I have to say, he was starting to feel like inception.
Speaker 1: How many times are we going back and forth here? Okay?
Speaker 1: How many times are we going to play this pick
Speaker 1: a ball game?
Speaker 2: But anyways, that that was the big news that hit
Speaker 2: right before we started recording the other two pieces of news,
Speaker 2: as we all expected, is that coaches are starting to
Speaker 2: be relieved of their duties or moving on however they
Speaker 2: want to phrase it. But Mike Sullivan has parted ways
Speaker 2: with the Pittsburgh Penguins, and Rick Tackett has also parted
Speaker 2: ways with the Vancouver Canucks. So I've started hearing that
Speaker 2: the Rangers might be interested in Mike Sullivan, which is
Speaker 2: fine by me because I have a philosophical issue with
Speaker 2: having any players coaches that are related to each other.
Speaker 2: And for those of you who don't know, Mike Sullivan
Speaker 2: is Charlie McAvoy's father in law.
Speaker 1: No thank you, yeah, no, thank you.
Speaker 3: Do we even want to recycle coaches again?
Speaker 4: Though?
Speaker 2: No, we talked about that on our discord. I'm over it, mo,
Speaker 2: aren't you? I mean yeah, It just like the message
Speaker 2: will be fresh and new right, likely for a period
Speaker 2: of time perhaps, and then we might find ourselves in
Speaker 2: the same boat again where we're getting rid.
Speaker 1: Of a coach. Two three, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't even know if they last that long anymore
Speaker 2: in the Bruins organization.
Speaker 1: What's the shelf life?
Speaker 2: Should I call Charlie and ask him what the shelf
Speaker 2: life coaches moving forward.
Speaker 3: Well, four coaches in fifteen years is about five years
Speaker 3: a coach ish right, So.
Speaker 2: Well, according to Charlie though, you can't count bru'ce cassidy
Speaker 2: apparently not.
Speaker 3: No, that doesn't have I.
Speaker 1: Don't know what that was then five years Christ, what
Speaker 1: do we do? I don't even know anymore.
Speaker 2: And for those of you who aren't watching playoff hockey,
Speaker 2: you gotta watch playoff hockey because I tell you those
Speaker 2: teams in the West, whoever comes out of the Western
Speaker 2: Conference going into the next round, they're gonna have scars
Speaker 2: all over them because those teams are doing some serious
Speaker 2: battle against each other. And earlier in the week, like
Speaker 2: every series was tied two to two, yep, yep.
Speaker 1: So that means ultimately in the West, nobody is going
Speaker 1: to get through past the first round without six games,
Speaker 1: without six games, which is a lot and quite frankly,
Speaker 1: a lot of these matchups have been so balanced that
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised if we see more two or
Speaker 1: more game sevens, which you really I mean, this is
Speaker 1: completely an uneducated guest, but from my experience of watching, like, yeah,
Speaker 1: game sevens aren't unusual, but they're not common. Like, it's
Speaker 1: not you don't have multiple game sevens in at this level.
Speaker 1: You have a lot of great games, you have a
Speaker 1: lot of overtime.
Speaker 3: But you know this is every series in the West
Speaker 3: could go seven.
Speaker 1: They honestly could. You know, they honestly could. Meanwhile, on
Speaker 1: the East Coast, everyone's going into overtime, So I don't
Speaker 1: know what that means. I don't need everyone's playing. Probably
Speaker 1: at the end, everyone will have played the same number
Speaker 1: of minutes. It's just whether or not it was in
Speaker 1: regulation or not quite frankly.
Speaker 2: Because well, the speculation I've heard from the so called
Speaker 2: expert is that whoever comes out of the Dallas Colorado
Speaker 2: series should be the ones in the Western Conference finals
Speaker 2: and going to the Stanley Cup.
Speaker 1: So we'll see.
Speaker 2: I mean, how much they'll have left by the time
Speaker 2: they get done with each other.
Speaker 1: But who's still physically standing.
Speaker 3: That's the thing.
Speaker 1: You never know, right. They could be an excellent team,
Speaker 1: they could be the best team. But if McKinnon goes down,
Speaker 1: if Sagan is done, if Otter is done, then it's.
Speaker 3: We saw that were Boston when Pasta got hurt the
Speaker 3: first shift against Florida.
Speaker 2: Yeah, sorry, no, are you here?
Speaker 1: To help us or hurt us.
Speaker 3: Definitely hurt. I'm going to make you guys feel a
Speaker 3: lot worse.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I think, I think.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, give given some of our subject matter here,
Speaker 2: we're going to find out how really bad the Brumins
Speaker 2: lines were here.
Speaker 3: But we got rid of Freddy, So I'm happy.
Speaker 1: Yes, that was your mission.
Speaker 2: But yeah, when I was right there, I was right
Speaker 2: there routing on, rooting on with you because uh yeah
Speaker 2: he I fell out of like with him in a
Speaker 2: relative quick hurry.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So let's talk then about the philosophy of forward
Speaker 1: lines before we kind of dive into exactly what you
Speaker 1: believe every single line construction should be, what their jobs are.
Speaker 1: Where did you kind of come up with this philosophy
Speaker 1: and these ideas.
Speaker 3: So a lot of this philosophy just comes from watching
Speaker 3: hockey for the last thirty thirty five years. And also,
Speaker 3: I hate to say it, but playing video games is
Speaker 3: also kind of helped because video games always said your
Speaker 3: top two lines are your scoring lines and your bottom
Speaker 3: two lines are your checking lines. And so I've just
Speaker 3: kind of always had that philosophy just kind of ingrained
Speaker 3: in me growing up. It always seemed, you know, like
Speaker 3: the Joe Thornton, that jumbo line was always the top line,
Speaker 3: the scoring line. They didn't really play much defense. And
Speaker 3: then you got to you know, the twenty eleven Stanley Cup,
Speaker 3: and you had basically the best, most perfect fourth line ever.
Speaker 3: So it's just everybody, you know, like you said, Caroline,
Speaker 3: everybody has a job to play. Everybody slots in in
Speaker 3: a perfect world on a perfect team, and it's just
Speaker 3: one of those things where this this basic principle of
Speaker 3: like line construction and team construction just always comes back
Speaker 3: to the basics of these are what your guys should do.
Speaker 3: This is who should do, what your guys should play,
Speaker 3: the penalty killer or the power play or whoever it is.
Speaker 3: But if you can formulate four really good four lines,
Speaker 3: they'll stack up against anybody else and in the playoffs,
Speaker 3: that's how you get mismatches and that's how you win.
Speaker 1: So yeah, awesome. So let's talk about your first line.
Speaker 1: So we're we're going to start out initially talking more
Speaker 1: more again philosophically, a little bit theoretically, but we definitely
Speaker 1: want to then hear who in the past what ruins teams.
Speaker 1: You talk about the twenty eleven team being so well constructed.
Speaker 1: Give us some examples too, as you walk us through
Speaker 1: what this perfect line looks like.
Speaker 3: In the moverse the mo NHL twenty five. So no,
Speaker 3: it's so your top line, in my opinion, is obviously
Speaker 3: going to be at least your best players. It needs
Speaker 3: at least a sniper, And in my mind, a sniper
Speaker 3: is someone like Pasternak. He's someone that his job is
Speaker 3: to score goals. His job isn't to play defense. It's
Speaker 3: not really to play neutral zone or penalty kill. He's
Speaker 3: there to get you fifty goals a year and that's
Speaker 3: all he does. I know Pasta's knock is you know,
Speaker 3: he doesn't play defense and this stuff. But I was
Speaker 3: just thinking.
Speaker 1: That he's been.
Speaker 2: And again he gets shipped on in Boston sports talk
Speaker 2: radio for that, which is you know again. I try
Speaker 2: not to pay it any attention, but it infuriates me nonetheless,
Speaker 2: because it's more it's just fodder.
Speaker 1: To rile up sharply.
Speaker 2: So you were the same buffoons who have been saying
Speaker 2: for years the Bruins need a sniper. They have one,
Speaker 2: and then you crap all over him because you expect
Speaker 2: him to be something that right, it's it's not a
Speaker 2: regular part of his game.
Speaker 1: If if he if he grows into that aspect.
Speaker 2: Of his game, good for him, Good for him, But
Speaker 2: we want him to put the friggin puck in the.
Speaker 3: Net, right, Yeah, So you definitely want those guys, and
Speaker 3: then it's going to have to be players that compliment
Speaker 3: that person's playing ability. So typically it's it's going to
Speaker 3: be your guys that will get in the zone, get
Speaker 3: on pucks for check hard, but force turnovers and capitalize
Speaker 3: on those turnovers. So again, if you're looking at you know,
Speaker 3: the twenty eleven Bruins team, I mean your top line
Speaker 3: when they were healthy, you had Luch, Crecy and and Horton. Right,
Speaker 3: those are three guys. So you've got Luch, who's going
Speaker 3: to get in there?
Speaker 2: And just what was the truck driver that was saying
Speaker 2: over for those guys?
Speaker 3: Seriously? Yeah, Crecci, who's probably your second man in getting
Speaker 3: the park audishing it to Horton or whoever. I mean,
Speaker 3: Poverly was on that top line in the playoffs and
Speaker 3: we all know Rich Peverley was kind of crappy, but
Speaker 3: he played right. So if you have a good college player, oh,
Speaker 3: like Brown's a good HL player. Sorry, but you need
Speaker 3: those guys and so if you can, and again, if
Speaker 3: you look at like the Joe Thornton, Mike Canneuble, Glenn
Speaker 3: Murray line, none of them were great, but they played
Speaker 3: well together and they complimented each other so perfectly that
Speaker 3: no one wanted to play them. What were they, Maria,
Speaker 3: like the eight hundred pound gorilla liner stopped it? If
Speaker 3: I remember it was, it was awesome like Murray had. Yeah,
Speaker 3: Thornton had like a hundred assists and Murray had like
Speaker 3: fifty goals and it was perfect.
Speaker 2: Hence why those guys nearly you know, ripped Michael O'Connell
Speaker 2: to shreds when they found out that they had basically
Speaker 2: escorted Joe Thornton out the back door without even having
Speaker 2: a conversation with them.
Speaker 1: But I digress.
Speaker 3: Yeh, that's another episode.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah we have old Gripes episode. Yeah, yeah, can
Speaker 1: we do one of those?
Speaker 3: So in my mind and I know we'll get to
Speaker 3: it later, but your top line is your best players,
Speaker 3: your your snipers. If you got a burgeron who can
Speaker 3: play defense, fine, but I don't think he technically has to.
Speaker 3: You know, that line has to be there, but they
Speaker 3: got to be snipers, and they gotta be your your
Speaker 3: top power play guys. Those they have to be there
Speaker 3: because I mean, that's that's how you win, is if
Speaker 3: you put the puck in the net and these guys
Speaker 3: have to be it. So if you guys want to talk,
Speaker 3: you want to talk who on this team? Maybe we'll
Speaker 3: get there.
Speaker 1: I will get there. I was going to get there.
Speaker 1: So us through Yourlleen, do we? So do we in
Speaker 1: your mind? Do we currently.
Speaker 2: Have a top line that fits the descriptors as you
Speaker 2: have just slaid them out for us?
Speaker 3: I would say two thirds of the top line.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right now.
Speaker 3: Well, so Caroline, do you want to get into this
Speaker 3: specifics or move on to the second line.
Speaker 1: Well, let's talk about the whole package and then see
Speaker 1: just how fase far so our second So tell us
Speaker 1: a little bit about your philosophy. Then what's the purpose
Speaker 1: of the second line.
Speaker 3: So your first line consider it like your elite scoring unit,
Speaker 3: right their their job is to score. So your second
Speaker 3: line is kind of to do both, right, score but
Speaker 3: also go against the other team's top two lines and
Speaker 3: shut them down. So again, if you think you had
Speaker 3: Marshan bergeron and whoever or else kind of played with
Speaker 3: those guys. Twenty eleven, they had Reki, right. Reki was
Speaker 3: forty years old and could barely skate, but he played
Speaker 3: with Marshan and Bergeran and they were perfect. So you
Speaker 3: want some consistent offense. Obviously, these guys are your top six,
Speaker 3: so they need to put the puck in the net.
Speaker 3: But again, if your top line is doing that, these
Speaker 3: guys go against the other team's top line and shuts
Speaker 3: them down. They're the guys that will, you know, kind
Speaker 3: of grind out the defenceman on the back end of
Speaker 3: the other team, you know, kind of make them tired.
Speaker 3: That's that's always one thing that kind of gets overlooked,
Speaker 3: is is kind of leaning on the other team's defense,
Speaker 3: especially in the playoffs. That's that's a great way to
Speaker 3: you know, win a series, steal a series. Is I mean,
Speaker 3: that's what Florida does the Boston all the time. They
Speaker 3: for check all the time and put pressure on the
Speaker 3: defense and make them tired. So right, just relentless. Yeah,
Speaker 3: And and the way I like to look at it
Speaker 3: is kind of compare it to baseball, where you've got
Speaker 3: like a five man starting pitching rotation. You don't want
Speaker 3: all pitchers that are the same. You want a little
Speaker 3: bit of difference of you know, people coming at just
Speaker 3: so if you've got the top line that's just come
Speaker 3: and coming and coming, maybe your second line is going
Speaker 3: to be, you know, your neutral zone speed guys that
Speaker 3: will you know, do the do the transition game or
Speaker 3: be a little bit more skilled then a little bit
Speaker 3: more for check. So again this is going to be
Speaker 3: like your Burson are on Marsh and Reki those types
Speaker 3: of players that you know play a little bit more
Speaker 3: defensive minded but definitely are offensive threats.
Speaker 1: And that was my question was these It sounds like
Speaker 1: then this particular line is a little bit more defensively minded.
Speaker 1: Their way takes place in multiple zones. And then I
Speaker 1: appreciate the example of someone like Marshand because it really
Speaker 1: kind of solidifies in my mind when it comes to
Speaker 1: you know, skill and ability. Top six they're all excellent players,
Speaker 1: They're all relatively on par in terms of the best
Speaker 1: at what they do. But when you want to compare
Speaker 1: someone like a David Pasternak, at least prior to this season,
Speaker 1: I would say Pasta or Alexandrovitchkin is this type of
Speaker 1: player I kind of think where they go to their
Speaker 1: place and you know, score their goal. Right, So prior
Speaker 1: to the season pasta effect only really ever, unless he
Speaker 1: got like a fantastic breakaway, he really went to like
Speaker 1: his office and he stood there and waited for the
Speaker 1: pass to snipe that goal.
Speaker 3: Right yep.
Speaker 1: Ovechkin like that's the kind of player that he is, Right,
Speaker 1: he goes to his spot and he scores his goals.
Speaker 1: Whereas if you think about someone like Bred Marshander, even
Speaker 1: I saw this a lot with more geeky this year,
Speaker 1: really knowing how to either evade people to get to
Speaker 1: a place to receive a good pass or to make
Speaker 1: that critical pass like get it in, but also figure
Speaker 1: out how to stop the opposing team before it becomes
Speaker 1: really the defenseman's problem.
Speaker 3: Yep, yep. And I would say, you know, players like
Speaker 3: a Nancy Kopetar probably is like a perfect center line
Speaker 3: second line center would be that type of player who
Speaker 3: plays that two hundred foot game, not necessarily sexy on
Speaker 3: the scoreboard, but definitely plays a game where he affects
Speaker 3: the game off the score sheet. That's kind of my
Speaker 3: hope for like a patra Is to get to that
Speaker 3: that point. I would say, you know, if this team
Speaker 3: was better. Geeky would be a perfect second line winger
Speaker 3: or center, and if Zaka could score again, it would
Speaker 3: be a good second line. So but we all know
Speaker 3: Zaka can't score, so he doesn't.
Speaker 2: Just you know, we're we're putting, we're putting, trying to
Speaker 2: put round peggs into you know, squere square. I mean
Speaker 2: this is yeah, you know, what what you're talking about
Speaker 2: is build building a team right based on what the
Speaker 2: specific players skill level is at.
Speaker 1: Where we we.
Speaker 2: Seem to have a management group that is forcing, not forcing,
Speaker 2: but they're not putting players in the right positions for
Speaker 2: success to succeed, or for the overall good of the
Speaker 2: team to be successful.
Speaker 1: And themselves and like the player themselves right. Certainly, we
Speaker 1: saw I think I think an exception in Jake Debrusk
Speaker 1: when he was put in a position that demanded more
Speaker 1: of him and he needed that apparently, right, and that
Speaker 1: worked out really really well for two years. But then
Speaker 1: you have a situation like with Charlie Coyle, who was
Speaker 1: always a very reliable third line center and they had
Speaker 1: no choice but to call upon him to serve as
Speaker 1: a center either in the first or the second line,
Speaker 1: and he had flashes of when he could do it,
Speaker 1: but he just didn't have what it took and doesn't
Speaker 1: have what it takes to consistently be in those two
Speaker 1: positions you could fill in, you know, but he couldn't
Speaker 1: maintain that that wasn't his role.
Speaker 2: And to always point when you look at you know,
Speaker 2: what is distinguishing the criteria of you know, those that
Speaker 2: are your first line, those that are your second line,
Speaker 2: and we'll get to the other lines, is that you know,
Speaker 2: in in any walk of life, you've got to put
Speaker 2: people in the roles that you know that they are
Speaker 2: capable of handling where they can garner success. And you know,
Speaker 2: in defensive players, I highly doubt that you know, if
Speaker 2: the coach comes to you and says, you know, hey,
Speaker 2: Joe Blow, you're playing up on the top line tonight,
Speaker 2: even though you're a third line player, what are you
Speaker 2: going to say? No, No, no, I'm not comfortable. I'm
Speaker 2: not comfortable doing that, or or vice versa. Right, they
Speaker 2: want to play right and they want to do what's
Speaker 2: for the team because they're team players.
Speaker 3: But yes, and I exactly I do.
Speaker 1: Before we dive into the second half of Before we
Speaker 1: dive into the second half lines. Let's just take a
Speaker 1: super quick word from our sponsor. All Right, Bruins fans,
Speaker 1: if you're thinking about picking up some new gear, now's
Speaker 1: the time. I'm already planning to grab a fresh poster
Speaker 1: neck jersey this fall. Who knows, maybe he's rocking a
Speaker 1: new letter on the front. The NHL Shop is running
Speaker 1: tons of season ending and summer sales right now, including
Speaker 1: twenty percent off fanatics gear. And here's the best part.
Speaker 1: When you shop through our link in the show notes,
Speaker 1: a portion of your purchases helps support this podcast. Same
Speaker 1: gear you'd find at the pro Shop, but with way
Speaker 1: better perks. So stock up, save big, and help keep
Speaker 1: Bruins tape the tape rolling all year long.
Speaker 2: The NBA eighty two game grind is done, and now
Speaker 2: how the real fun begins. The NBA Playoffs are here
Speaker 2: and it's time for all the high stakes drama, clutch moments,
Speaker 2: and jaw dropping plays.
Speaker 1: I can't wait.
Speaker 2: If you're looking to make the playoffs even more exciting,
Speaker 2: Draft Kings Sportsbook has you covered. As an official sports
Speaker 2: betting partner of the NBA. Try placing a bet on
Speaker 2: your favorite player's performance. Will they drop thirty points forty
Speaker 2: or more. It's your call. Here's something special for first timers.
Speaker 2: New Draft Kings customers bet five dollars to get two
Speaker 2: hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly make it a playoff
Speaker 2: front to remember with DraftKings. Download the Draft Kings sportsbook
Speaker 2: app and use code THHPN. That's code THHPN for new
Speaker 2: customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets when
Speaker 2: you bet just five bucks only on Draft Kings. The
Speaker 2: crown is yours.
Speaker 5: Gambling problem call one eight hundred gambler In New York
Speaker 5: call eight seven seven eight hope and Y, or text
Speaker 5: hope and Y four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut.
Speaker 5: Help is available for problem gambling Call eight eight eight
Speaker 5: seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG
Speaker 5: dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill, Casino
Speaker 5: and resorting Kansas twenty one and over. Agent eligibility varies
Speaker 5: by jurisdiction void in New Hampshire, Oregon. In Ontario, bonus
Speaker 5: bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue once.
Speaker 5: For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG, dot CO,
Speaker 5: slash ft ball, NFL plus Premium offer available only to
Speaker 5: new and former NFL Plus subscribers. Additional NFL Plus premium
Speaker 5: terms at nfl dot com slash terms.
Speaker 1: All Right, so welcome back in. We're halfway through our
Speaker 1: forward line philosophy. So, Mo, we've talked about our top six.
Speaker 1: We've heard that phrase time and time again. Top six.
Speaker 4: Obviously, these are some of your best players, the most skilled,
Speaker 4: but we've already started to see with the second line
Speaker 4: that some of the responsibility is slowly shifting away from
Speaker 4: pure offensive power into more of a multi.
Speaker 3: You know, funk.
Speaker 1: Yes role. So where does that put the third line
Speaker 1: in today's game? Because I want to also hear from
Speaker 1: Maria your take on how maybe some of this has changed,
Speaker 1: because even from what you know, Bo and I are
Speaker 1: the same age. So we watched trap Era and Dead Hockey,
Speaker 1: which was a little bit had some similarities to to
Speaker 1: the big bad Ruins of your But let's talk about today.
Speaker 1: What is the third line today?
Speaker 3: Yeah, So for me, this one all depends on the
Speaker 3: coaches philosophy, and there's probably a couple of different routes
Speaker 3: that you can take. In my mind, this is basically
Speaker 3: going to be my workhorse line. So this is where
Speaker 3: a guy like Charlie Coyle is perfect. This is the
Speaker 3: line that I want to basically grind the other team
Speaker 3: down and basically just just own the game and make
Speaker 3: them have the momentum. So basically what this is is
Speaker 3: this is kind of referred to as the shutdown line. Right,
Speaker 3: So they're gonna be the guys that probably are a
Speaker 3: little bit more defensively minded than your second line, but
Speaker 3: they still have to be able to score. So if
Speaker 3: you look back at twenty eleven, a guy like Michael
Speaker 3: Ryder was kind of a perfect third line guy. He
Speaker 3: had that wicked wrist shot where he could almost score
Speaker 3: from anywhere, but he was also pretty underrated defensively. Where
Speaker 3: Maria Caroline, you guys probably remember in the playoffs when
Speaker 3: he basically like played as Tim Thomas and make that
Speaker 3: made that save against So it's yeah, so yeah, and.
Speaker 1: He actually scored, he scored.
Speaker 3: A game winning goal as at all.
Speaker 1: In that very same series to your point, So.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So also, I think you can always also use
Speaker 3: this line as as kind of like a developmental line
Speaker 3: for maybe some rookies. So if you're going to look
Speaker 3: at a guy like like Lycel, maybe this is a
Speaker 3: better line because not really fourth line, because they're really
Speaker 3: going to get what eight ten minutes a game. These
Speaker 3: guys are probably gonna get twelve, thirteen to fourteen minutes
Speaker 3: a game, So a little bit less responsibility. Probably not
Speaker 3: going to play against the top line, maybe the second,
Speaker 3: the third, the fourth line, but definitely a line where
Speaker 3: people can develop. But I think it's it's it's going
Speaker 3: to depend on on what the coach's philosophy is and
Speaker 3: how good the team wants to be, right, I mean,
Speaker 3: you look at Florida. You got Marshane on the third line.
Speaker 3: I mean, Marshane's not a third line winger, but that's
Speaker 3: where he plays because you know what awesome.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And Paul Maurice's philosophy to this conversation is his
Speaker 2: philosophy with regard to that line marshand and forget who
Speaker 2: else is on the line with him. But if they
Speaker 2: can score one goal per series, and these are Paul
Speaker 2: Maurice's words, they can score one goal per series, then
Speaker 2: they're doing their job. Then they're doing their job in
Speaker 2: addition to making life miserable because right when you're on
Speaker 2: the road, you don't get the last change, and so
Speaker 2: you need a third line grouping like that from a
Speaker 2: coaches standpoint, where you don't get that opportunity to, you know,
Speaker 2: get your top guys against the other team's top guys, right,
Speaker 2: So you've got to have that faith in that grinder,
Speaker 2: that grinder line, or that defensive you know, guys that
Speaker 2: are defensively responsible, that have a good chance of winning
Speaker 2: a face off, particularly if the face off is in
Speaker 2: your own end.
Speaker 3: Yep, yep. And that's where guys like Coil were great.
Speaker 3: In twenty eleven, you had Kelly who was a great
Speaker 3: third line center who won the face offs, did did
Speaker 3: the grinding, was a penalty kill specialist. I mean, he
Speaker 3: was what you wanted. So it's it, and it all
Speaker 3: depends where your team's at. You know, use them for
Speaker 3: a developmental line. You could use Life Cell and a
Speaker 3: couple other guys on that line, But for me, it's
Speaker 3: got to be probably one of your better skating lines
Speaker 3: as well. People that can can keep up and I mean, like.
Speaker 1: The other team's face right, right, right. How how much
Speaker 1: does this line in particular maybe get not necessarily changed
Speaker 1: up in terms of personnel, but changed in how they're
Speaker 1: used and how often they're used based on the hoosing
Speaker 1: team and yeah, potential that happened, there is this one
Speaker 1: that could the amount of time fluctuate to some degree
Speaker 1: or is it? Is it less about any of that
Speaker 1: and it's just that's just your particular job and you
Speaker 1: go out when we need you for that particular purpose. Yeah.
Speaker 3: No, it's a good question, and it probably depends on
Speaker 3: probably a bunch of different factors. But the way I
Speaker 3: see it is this line's probably also going to have
Speaker 3: more of your like penalty kill specialists. So if if
Speaker 3: your game is getting more fee and you yeah, so
Speaker 3: these are probably you know, in a lesson perfect world,
Speaker 3: you don't have burst Round or Marsh and who's gonna
Speaker 3: kill penalties? So you've got these guys right that are
Speaker 3: your Chris Kelly's or you know whoever else we've got
Speaker 3: that I can't think of. But uh, you know, maybe
Speaker 3: in a perfect world, you know, Johnny Beecher becomes a
Speaker 3: third line guy if he can developed you know, he
Speaker 3: plays wins the face, he could do penalty kill. You know,
Speaker 3: maybe there your second power play unit. Depending wasn't Castilla
Speaker 3: killing some penalties too before he had all those? And
Speaker 3: think so yeah, and I mean we'll get into the
Speaker 3: fourth line. But I think this line, your third and
Speaker 3: fourth lines, like your top two lines. You want them
Speaker 3: to kind of play off of each other. And again
Speaker 3: it's it's going to determine what style of play that
Speaker 3: line ultimately plays. Right, You've got dump and Chase, you've
Speaker 3: got cycle, you've got the load of high game, you've
Speaker 3: got you know, the neutral zone transition. So it really
Speaker 3: depends who the players are and what that coach's philosophy is.
Speaker 3: I mean, if if you go back to Monty, his
Speaker 3: whole thing was getting the defense activated, and that's why
Speaker 3: they were so good that first year because no one
Speaker 3: saw it coming and no one knew how to defend it.
Speaker 3: Then everybody knew what they were going to do and
Speaker 3: they could stop it. And the Bruins the longer.
Speaker 1: Minor details, right right.
Speaker 3: So I think again it's like the starting pitching kind
Speaker 3: of comparison is is you don't always want all four
Speaker 3: lines to play the same, and you don't want your
Speaker 3: bottom six to always play the same because then the
Speaker 3: other team kind adjusts and they know what's coming and
Speaker 3: they know how to beat the fore check or or
Speaker 3: what they're playing. So if you know this line still
Speaker 3: definitely has to score, So you just can't put a
Speaker 3: whole bunch of rookies or a whole bunch of grinders
Speaker 3: out there, which is why a guy like Writer and
Speaker 3: Kelly kind of worked because they could do both. So
Speaker 3: if you want, we can get into the fourth line,
Speaker 3: because it kind of segues into it, right And and
Speaker 3: I mean for me and Marie, I don't know if
Speaker 3: you know what what you think is. You've kind of
Speaker 3: seen like the big bad Bruins, but this is your energy,
Speaker 3: your physicality line. This is the line that basically goes
Speaker 3: out there and kicks the other team's ass, right, Yeah, I've.
Speaker 2: Never seen in all my years of watching hockey, you know.
Speaker 2: And and the game obviously has changed and evolved. Right
Speaker 2: there there there weren't you know, at a linux and
Speaker 2: specialists and you know, you had you guys on the bench.
Speaker 2: You had you know, one, two, three, four lines, and
Speaker 2: that's how your coaches for the most part, rolled them out.
Speaker 2: And you know, to some degree, I don't want to
Speaker 2: say the game was it wasn't as strategic, and that's
Speaker 2: no disrespect to what was happening back in those days.
Speaker 1: But man, that is a low line.
Speaker 2: I had ever seen anything like that, even in the
Speaker 2: days of the Big Bad Bruins, because not only not
Speaker 2: only did those guys kick ass, which the Big Bad
Speaker 2: Bruins did, but they could also, when needed, be counted
Speaker 2: on to score a goal. Not only did they grind
Speaker 2: down the opposing team, and you know, their their role was.
Speaker 1: Don't get scored on.
Speaker 2: Really, I mean short of that, don't get Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they they were. They were brutal to play against, which
Speaker 2: was a thing of beauty to watch back then.
Speaker 3: They were all very well. I guess Thornton wasn't fast,
Speaker 3: but I mean Pie and Campbell were fast. They were fearless.
Speaker 3: I mean, didn't Campbell break a leg and stay out
Speaker 3: there yeah, blocking shots?
Speaker 1: Yes he did.
Speaker 2: He did alty kill, Yeah, penalty kill on one leg.
Speaker 2: And I was in the building for that game, and
Speaker 2: the entire building was on their feet because we all
Speaker 2: knew something awful had happened, yeah to him, but the
Speaker 2: fact that he stayed out there on one freaking leg
Speaker 2: basically and kept blocking shots.
Speaker 3: So it's just perfect, you know that.
Speaker 2: And again, you know, you can't rewind the clock, right,
Speaker 2: but when you're looking at somewhat of a blueprint and
Speaker 2: a philosophical approach to how you want to build you know,
Speaker 2: a sequence or a series of lines. To me, that
Speaker 2: fourth line, that is a blueprint that I think a
Speaker 2: lot of other teams have picked up on and tried
Speaker 2: to replicate and duplicate and and develop and mirror.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'd agree, And didn't Marshan start as a fourth
Speaker 3: line winger?
Speaker 1: He did? Yeah, I mean a lot of them will
Speaker 1: as well. Right, They're gonna as a way to develop them,
Speaker 1: as a way to like see what what do they
Speaker 1: see to that?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Because ultimate honestly, you know, and again no disrespect, but
Speaker 2: your fourth line is likely not going to be seeing
Speaker 2: the same amount of ice time as your first and
Speaker 2: second lines in theory, right, right, so you know it
Speaker 2: will give you a glimpse in a window. Is you know,
Speaker 2: can we trust these guys in the situation that we're
Speaker 2: putting them in as a fourth line? Can we trust them?
Speaker 2: Can we trust this player to make the right decision
Speaker 2: with that with the puck?
Speaker 1: Yeah? And so actually, one thing that you guys have
Speaker 1: brought up a few times, and I just want to
Speaker 1: make sure that we touch on for again some of
Speaker 1: our newer listeners or you know, newer fans to hockey
Speaker 1: because this year has seen such an explosion in hockey fandom.
Speaker 1: You know, when we're talking about these different lines, first
Speaker 1: of all, the minutes that get played, right, So when
Speaker 1: when you have your top lines, they're typically going to
Speaker 1: be seeing what twenty twenty three minutes, it's maybe twenty
Speaker 1: five if I mean, I.
Speaker 2: Think you want to keep them, you know, under the
Speaker 2: ideally because if not, you're going to wear them out
Speaker 2: right right right, they're out there for the regular shift,
Speaker 2: they're out on penalty, on power play, right, you know,
Speaker 2: on average, And again I'm just guessing I don't have.
Speaker 1: Many three minutes, but twenty minutes twenty minutes I think
Speaker 1: is yeah. And then so for your second line, it
Speaker 1: might then end up being probably closer to what like
Speaker 1: eighteen minutes eighteen is ish, yeah, and then you you
Speaker 1: then start to see a little bit of a drop
Speaker 1: off because I think I would expect a third liner
Speaker 1: to be getting somewhere maybe around fourteen ish minutes. And then,
Speaker 1: like you said, a fourth line is actually going to
Speaker 1: be seeing the least amount of ice time, like significantly
Speaker 1: less ice time, like less.
Speaker 3: Than single digits.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and some some nights it's single maybe eleven, but
Speaker 2: a light minutes some nights.
Speaker 1: It's single digits, right. If right, they might not need them, right.
Speaker 1: It all kind of depends on what the need is.
Speaker 1: And so the other thing, the other question that I
Speaker 1: wanted to put out there is when coaches are looking
Speaker 1: to send out certain lines, right, because like to your point, Maria,
Speaker 1: it's not that way anymore. Where it was just like okay,
Speaker 1: one two three four one two three four, right, Like,
Speaker 1: I mean, they don't do it that way anymore. There's
Speaker 1: a lot more strategy involved now, So you know who
Speaker 1: presumably you're sending out your top two lines based on
Speaker 1: maybe who's also out there at the same time or
Speaker 1: who's coming up. So how do coaches know when to
Speaker 1: send different lines out on the ice? Like who is
Speaker 1: the first line being paired up against? Are they out
Speaker 1: there at the same time as the other two team's
Speaker 1: best line, or is the other team sending out, you know,
Speaker 1: their third line. Is there any kind of predictable pattern
Speaker 1: or rule of thumb when it comes to that, or
Speaker 1: at least in your philosophy in the moverse what would
Speaker 1: be your philosophy for how you send them?
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't answer from it but there maybe
Speaker 2: instances right when you start the game and you're okay,
Speaker 2: first line against first line, right, But we have seen
Speaker 2: those instances where you know, for whatever reasons, you know,
Speaker 2: because say the second or third line had a particularly
Speaker 2: good game the night before, coaching staff or coaches rewarding
Speaker 2: them or right, so there's.
Speaker 1: Debut the home or whatever the case may be.
Speaker 2: Right, and you know, you know, particularly on home ice,
Speaker 2: because you know, as the home coach, you can pull
Speaker 2: them off the ice quick if things aren't going and
Speaker 2: then right you've got your third line out there against
Speaker 2: their first line. But if things aren't going well, you
Speaker 2: pull them off the ice and you throw your first
Speaker 2: line back out there. So you know, I don't know
Speaker 2: that there's necessarily any more kind of a rhyme or
Speaker 2: reason that coaches use other than they want to try
Speaker 2: to get the best matchups, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, probably the biggest rule of thumb is
Speaker 3: like after an icing and it's the other team's fourth line,
Speaker 3: you put your top line out there. I mean, that's
Speaker 3: that seems to always be the case. I think when
Speaker 3: the Bruins won the Cup, they always started the fourth
Speaker 3: line to get that energy, to get that building going.
Speaker 3: So if you've got a line that you can know they're.
Speaker 2: Going to throw a big hit, right, Yeah, yeah, they
Speaker 2: would throw a big hit. And and you would even
Speaker 2: at away games too, you know, club clud hit so
Speaker 2: much newity doing in that line that you know he
Speaker 2: was not opposed, you know, to giving them a start
Speaker 2: here or there to just send a message, this is
Speaker 2: going to be a long night for you.
Speaker 3: Yep. And I think sometimes it will also be maybe
Speaker 3: the coach does players and not so much line matchups,
Speaker 3: because I think you'll always see Carolina and Brenda. Moore
Speaker 3: would always put Stall out there when there was a
Speaker 3: defensive zone face off because he'd pretty much always win it.
Speaker 3: Or you've got bergeron when he was playing, he'd always
Speaker 3: take the defensive zone draws. It looked like the Bruins
Speaker 3: were putting Beacher out there quite a bit to win
Speaker 3: a draw. So it's going to depend a lot on
Speaker 3: the situations. And then especially in the playoffs, you'll kind
Speaker 3: of see who is matching up well against who and
Speaker 3: maybe who's not. And that's always the biggest thing is
Speaker 3: when you're away the away team you got to change first,
Speaker 3: so the other coach can basically, you know, kind of
Speaker 3: match up against you, which is why that whole mice
Speaker 3: is just critical. It is, but i mean probably when
Speaker 3: Coyle was really good, when it was like, what was it,
Speaker 3: the coil haul line, they were always going against the
Speaker 3: other team's third line. So if you've got an upper
Speaker 3: like a like a higher level third line, put that
Speaker 3: against the other team's third line, you've created a great mismatch,
Speaker 3: and yeah, you're probably not giving up any goals or opportunities.
Speaker 3: I mean that's when Coyle, Frederick and Smith, when that
Speaker 3: line first started, they were unstoppable. So it's it's all
Speaker 3: gonna depend on, you know, matchups, who you're playing. I
Speaker 3: think the biggest thing to think about is just where
Speaker 3: where the game is, at, what period, what situation, And
Speaker 3: then usually you can kind of dictate and assume, all right,
Speaker 3: the top line's coming out, just just because even if
Speaker 3: they were just out there or you know, the fourth line.
Speaker 3: You know, sometimes you'll see the fourth line go down
Speaker 3: and force the goalie to freeze the pucks so they
Speaker 3: can get off the ice on the top line gets
Speaker 3: an offensive zone face off. So it's it's it's little
Speaker 3: things like that that you know, is kind of fun
Speaker 3: to watch. The game. Yeah, kind of like those little
Speaker 3: instances and that really sets like the good from the
Speaker 3: the the okay teams apart.
Speaker 1: So so I think we know for the most part
Speaker 1: the vacancies that we have everything. Yeah, but my question is, actually,
Speaker 1: now we're only talking forwards because I know you have
Speaker 1: opinions about the defenseman and we will talk about defenseman
Speaker 1: in another episode.
Speaker 3: Okay, what forwards.
Speaker 1: That we have left are actually not in the right
Speaker 1: spot that maybe they should be somewhere else based on
Speaker 1: what put your put put your coaching hat on, mo
Speaker 1: and tell me, tell us, tell us who would be.
Speaker 2: On the first line with David, because we know David
Speaker 2: is your number one Okay, yeah, first and foremost number one?
Speaker 1: Who who or who should get demoted?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Well all right, let's let's think about this. So
Speaker 3: you've got got Pasta for sure. Yeah, I would think
Speaker 3: the chances of Geeky coming back are probably pretty good.
Speaker 3: So let's just just assume you've got Geeky and Pasta
Speaker 3: as your two thirds of your top line. So I
Speaker 3: think Geeky can play center. But he was playing on
Speaker 3: the on the left side for the most part, right, Yeah,
Speaker 3: which seemed to suit him because it was kind of
Speaker 3: his off side, so we could do those one timers
Speaker 3: pretty easily. I did like the lind home at center option.
Speaker 3: I think that forces Lindholme not to have as much
Speaker 3: pressure on him to produce points. He can kind of
Speaker 3: I don't want to compare him to but he can
Speaker 3: take like the Bergeron esque route where you know, we'll
Speaker 3: take sixty seventy points from him. But as long as
Speaker 3: he can win face offs, be the catalyst that starts
Speaker 3: the offensive zone kind of pressure and momentum by winning
Speaker 3: the draw. But also play that two hundred foot game.
Speaker 3: You just let Kiki and Pasta cook and who cares
Speaker 3: outside of that. If you want to get really really
Speaker 3: really funky and weird, you put geeky and Pasta and
Speaker 3: you pair him with Lora.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna told you we're not talking about defenceman.
Speaker 3: No, but Glorai, you're not tard.
Speaker 1: About Yeah, in the next episode mode.
Speaker 3: But he's a forward, so he counts. But I think
Speaker 3: if you're good, the guy that has to get off
Speaker 3: the top line is Zaka. It's it's over. That experiment
Speaker 3: is done. His defensive game doesn't make up for the
Speaker 3: fact that he can't score even when the net is
Speaker 3: wide open. He just misses the net. So I think
Speaker 3: your top line has to be at least right now,
Speaker 3: it's probably geeky lind Home in pasta. I think unless
Speaker 3: they sign like a Tavares or another, or or if
Speaker 3: they want Geeky to be center and they signed a
Speaker 3: big time left winger, I mean, it's got to be
Speaker 3: those three going into training camp, and they've got to
Speaker 3: play together at training camp.
Speaker 2: Well told us, Don told us that the focus was
Speaker 2: going to be at the wing position. So I don't
Speaker 2: think they're going to be doing anything of significance at
Speaker 2: that center position, which is mind boggling to me. Still
Speaker 2: haven't filled these gaping holes, But what the hell do
Speaker 2: I know?
Speaker 1: Anyways, So I get it.
Speaker 3: I mean I'd rather the Bruins focus on winger than center.
Speaker 3: I think down the middle they could get away with it.
Speaker 3: As long as they actually got like another couple top
Speaker 3: scoring wingers, I think they'd be okay.
Speaker 1: I mean Rakka should stay on that second line then,
Speaker 1: like you said, he's defensively, he's good, he's fine, he's
Speaker 1: just the offensive or does he make better align with
Speaker 1: your philosophy for the third line.
Speaker 3: I think he better aligns on my philosophy of trading him.
Speaker 3: So I mean, so, uh.
Speaker 1: Well, I guess that's enoughtion. I guess so basically we're
Speaker 1: stuck with what we have. It's not like the It's again,
Speaker 1: it's not like it was so cut and dry with
Speaker 1: Charlie Coyle obviously being mismatched in his roles in the
Speaker 1: expectations of him or Trent Frederick where they kept trying
Speaker 1: to make him be some more of a mid center
Speaker 1: and when you've said he really belongs on the fourth line,
Speaker 1: So who knows, maybe we'll get some fresh people in
Speaker 1: that they can then miss.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the Bruins have the makings of a
Speaker 3: good fourth line, and I would say a very good
Speaker 3: top line. Right, So you've got geeky lind Holm pasta
Speaker 3: and on your fourth line if you know, you've got
Speaker 3: Castelic already down there. So he's going to be a
Speaker 3: solid fourth line guy. He'll he'll hit, he'll probably feel
Speaker 3: that Gregory Campbell type role. You've got Beecher who is
Speaker 3: an RFA. But I would be very surprised if they
Speaker 3: don't bring him back. I mean, he's twenty four.
Speaker 1: He's the wild card. About whether or not they'll bring him.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't really care about cup Key.
Speaker 1: I mean I don't either.
Speaker 3: I will let him go. Yeah, I think Lauco would
Speaker 3: be another really good but if you're trying to save
Speaker 3: cap space, I think a guy like Riley Duran is
Speaker 3: a really good fourth line option.
Speaker 1: I mean, we don't forget Loco is League minimum pay
Speaker 1: as well, and he has a lot of speed, so
Speaker 1: he does have that energy.
Speaker 3: Right, He's an RFA, so he'll get a pay bump.
Speaker 3: I think he's making about seven eighty eight now, it'll
Speaker 3: probably make what Castelics make and it's like one and
Speaker 3: a half probably. I mean my favorite fourth line was Steen,
Speaker 3: so I kind of want like another Steam type, So
Speaker 3: I could see Duran being that guy because speed, for checking,
Speaker 3: just a lot of that stuff that shows up off
Speaker 3: the scoreesheet. So when it comes to your second and
Speaker 3: third line, I don't really know what the hell is
Speaker 3: gonna happen. We have nothing that you got middle stats,
Speaker 3: middle stats Okay, I don't know where his lots, but
Speaker 3: I think he could be a third line guy pretty well. Uh,
Speaker 3: you've probably got Licele, who I think could be a
Speaker 3: decent man. You wanted to be a second line guy
Speaker 3: so bad. But he's got to play with a guy
Speaker 3: that also can kind of match his speed and creativity.
Speaker 3: So I don't know if a guy like Patra, if
Speaker 3: if they think he's NHL ready, if you put him
Speaker 3: at the second line role, but then you've got Patra
Speaker 3: and Lycel, who I don't really want them going up
Speaker 3: against a lot like Austin Matthews and those guys will
Speaker 3: just I wouldn't feel comfortable.
Speaker 1: Yeah, comfortable with that.
Speaker 2: And they've got to address this secondary scoring right And
Speaker 2: to me, it was simple, overly simplistic. But that comes
Speaker 2: from you second line, you know, So you've got to
Speaker 2: go out and get some proven If you're going to
Speaker 2: focus on wingers, then you've got to go out and
Speaker 2: bite the bullet and get yourself a proven NHL commodity
Speaker 2: who's going to give you twenty five thirty.
Speaker 1: Goals with your eyes closed.
Speaker 2: I mean, I just don't know how you're going to
Speaker 2: sustain any success if you don't address your secondary scoring
Speaker 2: needs or lack of it.
Speaker 1: We need another Morgan geeky. We need to copy and
Speaker 1: paste him. Winger gave us their thirty goal most like
Speaker 1: we just need another guy like.
Speaker 3: Him, but I wish.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna wrap this up, but we want to
Speaker 1: thank you Mo for coming on the show to share
Speaker 1: your philosophy of forward lines. If you want to read
Speaker 1: more in depth and see some more specific examples again,
Speaker 1: check out our substack. Re Moe has already published that
Speaker 1: article and make sure you like an subscribe, and he
Speaker 1: will be back in our next episode to talk about defense.
Speaker 1: So day as always go Bes Goes
Podbean