Three Wins, One Message: Bank Points or Bust | Ep. 115
Liner notes
🎙️Maria and Karoline shake off daylight savings fatigue and dive into a pivotal week for the Boston Bruins — a team that seems to have finally found its footing after the 7–2 meltdown in Ottawa. With Marco Sturm tightening the reins, the “Bash Brothers” pairing of Zadorov and McAvoy emerging as a force, and the youth movement starting to click, the Bruins look balanced, disciplined, and dangerous again.But as Maria says, “It’s not enough to find your game — now you have to keep it.”
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ Boston Bruins Gear
We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/bruins-tape-to-tape-a-boston-bruins-hockey-podcast--6575298/support.
✨Join the Patreon for Ad Free Listening✨Get Our Merch ✨
📲 Follow us on X, Instagram & Blue Sky ➡️ @TapetoTapeMK
📲 Join our Discord ➡️ https://discord.gg/AQfC73RbnS
📧 Get Snap Shots in Your Inbox ➡️ tapetotapemk.substack.com
🛍️ Shop with us ➡️ We are an NHL Shop affiliate! Support the pod by using this link to get all your Bruins gear.
Speaker 1: Can you start a podcast with me? Please? I need
Speaker 1: something to do, all Jack send it out in trouble.
Speaker 2: About to this same next time tonight. Here's a chance
Speaker 2: PoTA right down on goalie scars, Oh my water move
Speaker 2: by the rookie. Do on one plaster not most.
Speaker 1: Oil dances.
Speaker 2: Ain't podcast?
Speaker 1: Wait at home? Right way, go faster agast?
Speaker 2: What is.
Speaker 1: Welcome in everyone to another episode of Ruins. Tape to tape.
Speaker 1: I will be your host today. I am Maria from Watertown.
Speaker 1: We are recording today's episode on Monday, November third, after
Speaker 1: daylight savings time change fall back, which I think absolutely blows.
Speaker 1: But I want to welcome in my co host, who
Speaker 1: looks nowhere near as tired as I feel with the
Speaker 1: time change. Caroline Letteka, how are you? I'm good, Marian.
Speaker 2: This is the time change I like because I get
Speaker 2: extra sleep, so I'm relatively arrested Dan the darkness.
Speaker 1: I went out and played a quick nine holes yesterday afternoon,
Speaker 1: and by the time we got to the ninth hole,
Speaker 1: the sun was already setting, which to me is obnoxious.
Speaker 1: I do not enjoy this time of year. But be
Speaker 1: that as it may, we certainly got We have a
Speaker 1: lot of hockey to talk about mostly good hockey, mostly
Speaker 1: good hockey. We are going to today talk about how
Speaker 1: we feel about Marco Sturm if he's pushing the right buttons.
Speaker 1: At this point in time, We've got a couple of injuries, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: that we need to talk about and the adjustments that
Speaker 1: have been made in the lineup as a result of
Speaker 1: these injuries. We also want to talk about, finally, the
Speaker 1: youth movement on this current roster making a little noise
Speaker 1: for themselves. Right but very far we dive into all things.
Speaker 1: Boston Bruins will take our usual spin around the rink.
Speaker 1: And I don't know about you, but it seems like
Speaker 1: there's not a lot of hot news happening right now
Speaker 1: around the league. Everyone's, you know, going about their going
Speaker 1: about their business relatively quietly. But there was a little
Speaker 1: scary thing that happened in the Toronto Maple Leafs game
Speaker 1: recently where Chris Tannev had to be taken off the
Speaker 1: ice in a stretcher against the Philadelphia Flyers. I read
Speaker 1: the report this morning. He's back home and resting. But
Speaker 1: you know, regardless of how we feel about any franchise
Speaker 1: and rivalries, the last thing anybody wants to see in hockey,
Speaker 1: is a player get stretched off the ice. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was crazy to see.
Speaker 2: I didn't catch it live, although I know some folks
Speaker 2: in our Discord group did. I was watching the replay
Speaker 2: clip and it seems like it's just one of those
Speaker 2: really freak accidents because it didn't look like a particular,
Speaker 2: you know, crazy hit or falling to the ice in
Speaker 2: some sort of dangerous way. It was a mid ice collision.
Speaker 2: The only thing I can kind of speculate on is
Speaker 2: the whiplash kind of situation. And he has concussion history,
Speaker 2: so I can only imagine that that's what actually happened,
Speaker 2: because it's not like he slammed to the boards or
Speaker 2: something like that.
Speaker 1: So it's scary to see it.
Speaker 2: It's awful, quite frankly, when a player has to get
Speaker 2: taken off the ice in that way. So hopefully he
Speaker 2: recovers soon. And he just had come back. Chris Tannep
Speaker 2: had just come back. It was his first game back
Speaker 2: after missing several games from a prior injury. So again,
Speaker 2: you know, regardless of what color sweater, you know, none
Speaker 2: of us ever want to see that, so wish him well.
Speaker 2: The other piece of news is it seems like the
Speaker 2: Tampa Bay Lightning are the hottest team in the league
Speaker 2: right now, where they've won five games in a row,
Speaker 2: and you know, I know, at the start of the
Speaker 2: season when everyone was making their you know, preseason predictions,
Speaker 2: the Tampa Bay Lightning is a team that a lot
Speaker 2: of people have on their radar to be in the
Speaker 2: playoff mix. Yeah, and what was crazy is the fact
Speaker 2: that they they had a pretty horrible start. They fell
Speaker 2: at the starting line, so to speak, and they were
Speaker 2: at bottom for a little bit, and they've been steadily
Speaker 2: crawling their way right back up to the top. I mean,
Speaker 2: the pros and cons of this condensed season is you
Speaker 2: don't sit around and wait to see if whatever adjustments
Speaker 2: here and there are going to work. It's make the
Speaker 2: adjustment get the results from that pretty quickly. And I
Speaker 2: think Boston has benefited also from that kind of experiment
Speaker 2: because there's very little time in between. Granted, this means
Speaker 2: maybe there's less time for practice, but I mean it's
Speaker 2: more time for execution, and if you don't have a
Speaker 2: lot of time to waste. I think there are teams
Speaker 2: that are benefiting from this condensed schedule, just like Tampa
Speaker 2: is able to just make those changes and go from there.
Speaker 1: Right, And I don't think the Bruins have been one
Speaker 1: of those teams that's been able to benefit from that.
Speaker 1: And Cam Nearly spoke to that during the nests and
Speaker 1: broadcast during one of the games this week, and that
Speaker 1: the Bruins and the Calgary Flames have played the most
Speaker 1: games out of any team in the league right now,
Speaker 1: which you know is I'm not quite sure I understand
Speaker 1: how that happens. But he alluded to the fact that,
Speaker 1: you know, they haven't had a lot of time to
Speaker 1: practice and work on this defensive you know, structure system
Speaker 1: here that we keep hearing about. Hopefully that is going
Speaker 1: to start leveling off here in the coming weeks. We
Speaker 1: shall see, but every team is going to be subjected
Speaker 1: to this at some point this season because of that
Speaker 1: Olympic break.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, so you know, to your point, yes, Boston
Speaker 2: doesn't have the time to experiment in a practice environment
Speaker 2: which is safe for However, they are throwing things out
Speaker 2: there and seeing if they're going to work in real
Speaker 2: time in game situations, and for good or for bad,
Speaker 2: at least they're not then wasting those precious few practices
Speaker 2: on something that might not then actually work out well
Speaker 2: on the ice during the game, so you know, a
Speaker 2: little pros and cons for that. But this right now
Speaker 2: is the longest I think little break stretch that Boston
Speaker 2: has had since the start of the season, which is
Speaker 2: is they played on Saturday, they had Sunday, well I
Speaker 2: don't know if they had it off, but there's no
Speaker 2: game on Sunday, no game.
Speaker 1: There was also practice on Sunday, I believe, and then well,
Speaker 1: there's a team There was a team event or an
Speaker 1: event that was together for season ticket holders on Sunday
Speaker 1: that the players needed to attend for a couple of hours,
Speaker 1: so I would imagine that they'll be back on the ice.
Speaker 2: Crap this thing, yes say, but ultimately what ends up
Speaker 2: happening is I believe they have three games pretty pretty
Speaker 2: much in regular like close succession every two days. Then
Speaker 2: they'll have another mini like two day break, and then
Speaker 2: they are effectively going straight every other day from November
Speaker 2: eleventh all the way through November twenty ninth before they
Speaker 2: have their next two day no game break, which is
Speaker 2: absolutely bonkers.
Speaker 1: It is every other day a hockey game, which not
Speaker 1: great for us either. That'll watch in all these games.
Speaker 1: It's nice to have a little respit from the game. Now,
Speaker 1: did I bite my tongue? Because come July and August,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm dying for hockey.
Speaker 2: So I have to remind myself this is this is
Speaker 2: this is good, this is good for us.
Speaker 1: And during that strict you just talked about it, will
Speaker 1: it'll take them out to the West Coast for that
Speaker 1: annual the annual road trip. But be that as it may,
Speaker 1: we did. We have had some good hockey finally come
Speaker 1: across our radar here. But before we get into that,
Speaker 1: I want to talk about the injuries that right have
Speaker 1: just occurred. So we'll start quickly with the Jordan Harris
Speaker 1: injury and the fact that he's going to be out
Speaker 1: apparently for at least a couple of months to repair
Speaker 1: a right ankle fracture, which is unfortunate because you know,
Speaker 1: I saw some good potential in this player.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it was huge his contributions. He was doing
Speaker 2: a really great job, especially when Hampus was out, and
Speaker 2: I honestly, I didn't cat what had happened to him.
Speaker 2: It wasn't even obvious that he had been injured while playing,
Speaker 2: because you know, play hadn't stopped. So either he was
Speaker 2: just in beast mode that all time, or maybe it
Speaker 2: was just one of those injuries that maybe it didn't
Speaker 2: straight up hurt in a way that kind of was
Speaker 2: alarm bells for him. But whatever it was, he got
Speaker 2: attention pretty quickly and basically immediately underwent surgery, which tells
Speaker 2: you that, okay, well that's a pretty serious situation and hopefully,
Speaker 2: you know, ever since Tory Krug hurt his.
Speaker 1: Ankle, I always get so nervous.
Speaker 2: I get so nervous when I hear about a player
Speaker 2: having ankle surgery because his Tory Krug's career basically has
Speaker 2: come to an end prematurely because of just weird healing
Speaker 2: coming from a an ankle injury. So finger across that
Speaker 2: Harris recovers really well, I mean he's super young, so
Speaker 2: you know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I had him, you know, pegged for taking
Speaker 1: Masonri's spot, which he you know, I think he has
Speaker 1: the potential to do. And well we'll get to Mason
Speaker 1: Laurai as we start breaking down the week that was
Speaker 1: for the Bruins. But yeah, I hope that he will
Speaker 1: recover quickly and then you know, be able to, you know,
Speaker 1: get back on the ice to add to the defensive
Speaker 1: depth that the Ruins I think so certainly need, especially
Speaker 1: if you are going to be focusing on your defensive structure.
Speaker 1: The other big injury that just occurred is, you know,
Speaker 1: we get one lint Home back and the other lind
Speaker 1: Home goes out. So Bruins get Hampus lind Home back
Speaker 1: in the lineup and lo and behold, Elias lind Home
Speaker 1: costs out with an injury. And the latest information that
Speaker 1: I could find this morning was that we know it's
Speaker 1: some type of a lower body injury. We know it's
Speaker 1: it has to be right. We have almost like right,
Speaker 1: I know, I know, but you know how hard They
Speaker 1: won't Yeah, yeah, yeah, they will not by a body's
Speaker 1: part ever. But he he left the Sabers game in
Speaker 1: the second period and didn't return. Apparently Elias hadn't MRI
Speaker 1: on Friday, October thirty. First. I don't think there's been
Speaker 1: any subsequent update on the results of the MRI, but
Speaker 1: what we do know is he expect he is expected
Speaker 1: to be out for a few weeks, which is not
Speaker 1: awesome idea.
Speaker 3: But considering you know, he's he he has most certainly
Speaker 3: turned a page in his career in Boston, and so
Speaker 3: to see him only so many games in now he's
Speaker 3: got to be out and stopping some of that momentum.
Speaker 2: It's such a bummer for him because we could see it,
Speaker 2: We could see what we got him for why he
Speaker 2: was signed, you know. So it's really frustrating, but the
Speaker 2: promising thing at least for right now, although who knows,
Speaker 2: because things can always change, things can get backdated. Right now,
Speaker 2: he is just on IR, so that's a positive thing.
Speaker 1: I think they'll.
Speaker 2: Probably have him on IR for as long as it
Speaker 2: takes to either make a decision about what's going to
Speaker 2: happen next for him, if it's going to be actually
Speaker 2: a lengthy period of time, because I would assume that
Speaker 2: they would be very conservative in terms of let's go
Speaker 2: do any kind of surgical anything unless it's like you
Speaker 2: have to like a like a fracture, like a broken bone,
Speaker 2: where you time is of the essence that if you
Speaker 2: don't do surgery, you're gonna make things worse. So I
Speaker 2: wouldn't be surprised if there's some of that that's happening
Speaker 2: and they're just kind of waiting to see how that
Speaker 2: develops and how his body responds. So if things don't
Speaker 2: look like they're going in the right direction, then I
Speaker 2: would definitely expect them to put him on LTR to
Speaker 2: bring in.
Speaker 1: Then someone else if necessary.
Speaker 2: But they honestly, it seems like they have everything in
Speaker 2: hand with the with the young guys that they've brought in.
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm not saying that he's not missed, because
Speaker 2: he certainly is, but it's been okay.
Speaker 1: Well, he's going to be. I mean, for sure he's
Speaker 1: going to be missed, right you can you can patch
Speaker 1: things together for the short term. I think the biggest
Speaker 1: void is going to be with respect to Eland holmes injury,
Speaker 1: is the power play, because all of his goals thus
Speaker 1: far this season have come on the power play, and
Speaker 1: the power play has been, for lack of a more
Speaker 1: technical descriptor, you know, it hasn't been as impressive as
Speaker 1: one would hope. But I think five to five you
Speaker 1: might be okay. Where you're going to have to build
Speaker 1: the void is likely on those on the first power
Speaker 1: play unit, but you know, we'll we'll talk a little
Speaker 1: bit more in depth about that. What I want to
Speaker 1: start this episode with is the question of has Marco
Speaker 1: Sturm finally started to get his message across and pushing
Speaker 1: the right buttons. Now we'll we'll, we'll start the car
Speaker 1: conversation with the just god awful game against the Ottawa
Speaker 1: Senators where the Bruins lost seven to two. And I
Speaker 1: think we said all we needed to say about that
Speaker 1: game in our snapshots, but suffice it to say that
Speaker 1: they had nothing, absolutely nothing going on in that game,
Speaker 1: pretty much from from top to bottom. And as the
Speaker 1: game went along, I noticed that I did not like
Speaker 1: the body language coming from just about everybody in a
Speaker 1: Bruin's uniform, including including the coaching staff. Particularly to me,
Speaker 1: Pasta did not look engaged at all in that game,
Speaker 1: and that gave me a lot of pause for concern, like,
Speaker 1: what is what is happening here? These players shutting down already?
Speaker 1: Because that was one thing we had talked about in
Speaker 1: previous episodes, that this team didn't seem to have a
Speaker 1: willingness to give up, whereas in that game against Ottawa
Speaker 1: it seemed like they they gave up. Now, the Bruins
Speaker 1: started off decently in that game because Morgan Geeky put
Speaker 1: them up one to nothing, and then Skitzlert as his
Speaker 1: normal you know, let me, someone's gonna touch me and
Speaker 1: I'm going to take a dive, and the refs fall
Speaker 1: for it. They're on a power play and Autowa ties
Speaker 1: the game up one to one. The Bruins had a
Speaker 1: decent first period and then when the wheels fell off
Speaker 1: the bus, they look and fell off a cliff in
Speaker 1: that game.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was as as bad as the Anaheim game was,
Speaker 2: because that prior to the Senator's game, that was the
Speaker 2: worst game that they had played all season.
Speaker 1: As bad as that game.
Speaker 2: Had been, at least what the Bruins that we saw
Speaker 2: on the ice for that circus performance was the we'll
Speaker 2: call them the new Bruins, the we're gonna keep going,
Speaker 2: We're gonna keep playing. We're not gonna fold like a
Speaker 2: deck of cards. We're just gonna keep playing our game.
Speaker 2: And that game against the Dock and we saw that
Speaker 2: when you maintain that positive attitude, that no quit attitude,
Speaker 2: you can start to get somewhere. And they ended up,
Speaker 2: you know, scoring two goals at the end there to
Speaker 2: really make it seem like there was a chance that
Speaker 2: they could recover that game. The game against the Senators
Speaker 2: was a copy and paste from last season. I don't
Speaker 2: know obviously what happened why in this particular instance, this
Speaker 2: game was so reminiscent of what we saw from them
Speaker 2: last year. You know, certainly, were there things that happened
Speaker 2: to them that were out of their control that put
Speaker 2: them behind the eight ball. Absolutely, that's something that is
Speaker 2: always a possibility in any game that they play, any
Speaker 2: team plays. But I just cannot explain what had happened.
Speaker 2: I mean, they lost complete control over themselves. They left
Speaker 2: sway and hanging. Granted it wasn't necessarily his best night,
Speaker 2: but perhaps it just got to the point where I
Speaker 2: don't recall necessarily him being you know, blatantly terrible or
Speaker 2: you know, like completely out of position and not doing
Speaker 2: his job necessarily. And also, quite frankly, the Senators had
Speaker 2: his number for years. This is a team for whatever
Speaker 2: reason he struggles against. Every goalie has that team, so
Speaker 2: that Senators are his, which stinks because they're in our divisions.
Speaker 1: Not very helpful.
Speaker 2: It was.
Speaker 1: It was horrible.
Speaker 2: It was the worst game I've ever seen ever ever,
Speaker 2: And and I'll take it a step further where and
Speaker 2: and this wasn't exclusively on this pairing, but in this
Speaker 2: Autawa game.
Speaker 1: It was glaring to me that Mason, Lauri and Charlie
Speaker 1: mcavoyd as a defensive pairing are a train wreck together.
Speaker 1: They are an absolute train wreck together. Yeah, and so
Speaker 1: it you know, it doesn't appear that there's any kind
Speaker 1: of cohesiveness with the way that each of them plays
Speaker 1: or communication when they are out on the ice together. Yeah.
Speaker 1: In addition to that, this was a stat that I
Speaker 1: heard Brian Johnston, who does the radio broadcast for the Bruins,
Speaker 1: that game against Ottawa was the first time in seven
Speaker 1: years that the Bruins gave up four power play goals
Speaker 1: in one game. Wow. Not pretty no, not pretty no.
Speaker 1: And I can't quite.
Speaker 2: Put my finger on what the problem is necessarily with
Speaker 2: that particular pairing of Laura and McAvoy. We've talked about
Speaker 2: individual issues with each of those players, how we would
Speaker 2: really love to see Charlie be this kind of.
Speaker 1: Player, or.
Speaker 2: Laura he's great at this, but he needs to be
Speaker 2: more this.
Speaker 1: But then together.
Speaker 2: It's it becomes compounded.
Speaker 1: I guess I'm not gonna know. It is because the
Speaker 1: stage player has a distinct nature to their game. Charlie
Speaker 1: apparently can't play the game that we all need him
Speaker 1: to play and want him to play and know that
Speaker 1: he can play when he's worried about Yeah, is he
Speaker 1: going to islurai going to pinch at the wrong time,
Speaker 1: or is he going to pinch at the same time
Speaker 1: that I'm pinching, or is he going to you know,
Speaker 1: cough up the pup when I'm getting ready to do
Speaker 1: something else. So it's just not a cohesive, cohesive unit
Speaker 1: in any way, shape or form. So let's move forward
Speaker 1: then to the game against the New York Islanders, because
Speaker 1: you know, we also had alluded to the fact that
Speaker 1: we thought it might be time for young Mason Lauri
Speaker 1: to have a seat and watch the game from a
Speaker 1: far right or somebody needed to have a seat and
Speaker 1: watch the game from afar, because Marco kept talking about
Speaker 1: on more than one occasion in just recent weeks about
Speaker 1: guys not flying in everybody.
Speaker 2: Needs to inn By the way, the fact that we've
Speaker 2: heard him say that a couple of times, a couple
Speaker 2: of times massive concern.
Speaker 1: Right. I agree with you. I agree with you because
Speaker 1: it begs the question of what is going on here?
Speaker 1: Are they not listening? Is it right? The system too
Speaker 1: difficult to grasp? Or are guys not wanting to grasp
Speaker 1: the system. So so be that as it may. We
Speaker 1: will now move on to the game against the New
Speaker 1: York Islanders that the Ruins ended up winning five to two. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the game started off as poorly. Yes, it was a
Speaker 1: continuation of the night the night before. It was horrible.
Speaker 1: But I was like, here we go again, Here we
Speaker 1: go again, here we go again. So I'll let you
Speaker 1: take the lead on this game, because.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was night and day. From that first period
Speaker 2: into the second period, it was almost like it was
Speaker 2: a completely new game. It was who knows, somebody said something,
Speaker 2: somebody did something, and they were completely different. They scored
Speaker 2: three unanswered goals. We had our powerplay goal by Bill
Speaker 2: Mason Laurai in this game, and Ractice Slinch Home Campus
Speaker 2: Slinch Home was back in the line there.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, And.
Speaker 2: I want to say it was almost as if, I
Speaker 2: don't know, like just the switch went off in their
Speaker 2: heads and they're like, oh, this is what we actually
Speaker 2: need to do. You know, we've talked about in last
Speaker 2: week's podcast episode. We just need to see Boston take
Speaker 2: advantage of one more opportunity. One more opportunity can make
Speaker 2: a huge difference, and this was one of those games
Speaker 2: where that was the case, where we had that extra
Speaker 2: opportunity that they took advantage of in that power play,
Speaker 2: and we saw again mike Yasamont getting out there and
Speaker 2: doing his thing, and those lower lines for a stretch
Speaker 2: of time, towards the end of the unpleasantness, we'll call it,
Speaker 2: they started to get quiet again. It almost seemed like
Speaker 2: we were back to one singular line going, you know,
Speaker 2: towards the end of that losing streak, and all of
Speaker 2: a sudden, we started seeing movement in action.
Speaker 1: We saw Acemont scoring.
Speaker 2: And then even going into the next couple of games,
Speaker 2: we've started to see more of that depth scoring again.
Speaker 1: We've had Arvidson's score goals.
Speaker 2: We've seen Castilik if he hasn't scored a goal, the
Speaker 2: man is about to score another goal.
Speaker 1: I've actually, he's, he's, he's, he's he popped a goal
Speaker 1: into the net. During this stretch of he's been Chasey
Speaker 1: Middlestat has been contributing. And I'm we're going a little
Speaker 1: off topic here, but I really like the chemistry that
Speaker 1: is developing between Casey middle Stat and Victor Ardwoodson. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: we've just seen.
Speaker 2: What again, It just literally like a light switch has
Speaker 2: been has been flicked on. We now all of a
Speaker 2: sudden see all of the different parts moving in the
Speaker 2: way that they need to be moving, that they're doing
Speaker 2: their different kinds of jobs that are required of them,
Speaker 2: and ultimately I think that that is what has contributed
Speaker 2: over the last three games that the Bruins have played
Speaker 2: and have been able to win.
Speaker 1: So it tells me, more so than I.
Speaker 2: Felt earlier in this season thus far, that maybe the
Speaker 2: talent isn't really the issue that Okay, now they clearly
Speaker 2: have the ability to.
Speaker 1: Win games.
Speaker 2: They can win games decisively if they are doing their jobs.
Speaker 2: They clearly can. So now they are setting themselves up
Speaker 2: to this expectation that we are all going to have
Speaker 2: from here on out, especially after the Carolina game that
Speaker 2: we'll talk about shortly, but that was a massive expectation
Speaker 2: setter for well, there's been slow improvement during So we'll
Speaker 2: start with whatever happened in between the first and second
Speaker 2: period of the Islanders game where the Islanders scored on
Speaker 2: their first shot on goal and then shortly after that
Speaker 2: made it two to nothing.
Speaker 1: I don't know what happened in between periods of that game,
Speaker 1: if somebody said something. I hope that someone did, because
Speaker 1: I know what I would be saying if I was
Speaker 1: in that locker room. We're not doing this shit again tonight.
Speaker 1: Not at home. Not at home. And the Bruins came
Speaker 1: out a totally different team in that second period, to
Speaker 1: the point that when the Bruins scored three unanswered goals,
Speaker 1: Patrick Waw was forced to call a timeout, right, to
Speaker 1: call a timeout to get his team back in order again.
Speaker 1: And you know, the Bruins didn't take their foot off
Speaker 1: the gas for the most part. Even though they had
Speaker 1: a three to two lead going into the third period,
Speaker 1: they were able to extend that lead on another goal
Speaker 1: by Morgan Geeky. And I think they also killed off
Speaker 1: a four minute penalty in that game.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think again, if we take a step
Speaker 2: back and kind of look at these three games that
Speaker 2: they've won, and to your point of the slow progression
Speaker 2: of improvement and getting used to being in these new
Speaker 2: er lines, we've had a little bit of adjustment of
Speaker 2: lines that we've now seen for at least two games, right,
Speaker 2: Linholm has missed two games. This is allowing the team
Speaker 2: to also develop that chemistry getting used to each other,
Speaker 2: getting used to those particular line mats and pairings. And
Speaker 2: I think what we saw particularly in the Islanders game,
Speaker 2: because again it was two very different teams that we
Speaker 2: saw play. It wasn't just that the Islanders are what
Speaker 2: I've started to call like they're a little bit of
Speaker 2: the wild West hockey. It's it's a lot of young kids.
Speaker 2: They're they're not particularly great. That can be a lot
Speaker 2: of fun because they might have a lot of chances,
Speaker 2: they take.
Speaker 1: Advantage of chances.
Speaker 2: So because there have been definitely games that we've seen
Speaker 2: Boston play where they win and it's like, well, did
Speaker 2: they win because they were actually the better team or
Speaker 2: was the other did they win because the other team
Speaker 2: was just worse and they kind of got the win
Speaker 2: by default in that case.
Speaker 1: Here, I don't think.
Speaker 2: That the Islanders necessarily got worse. I think they stayed
Speaker 2: relatively stable and the same, and it was Boston that
Speaker 2: truly made the improvements that we saw and continued to
Speaker 2: see into the next two games.
Speaker 1: And one of the notable big changes for me, well
Speaker 1: couple of big changes, right, Myren Instadina as has been
Speaker 1: holding his own on that top line The other big
Speaker 1: change for me, and I'm praying that Marco Stern doesn't
Speaker 1: change this for the foreseeable future, is Zadora and Macavoy
Speaker 1: playing together. They are a couple. They have been in
Speaker 1: this stretch wrecking balls, and I absolutely love it. I
Speaker 1: absolutely love it. Yeah, it's it takes me right back
Speaker 1: to mighty ucks.
Speaker 2: We've got our bash brothers here because you've and I honestly,
Speaker 2: I feel like we've probably talked about this combination in
Speaker 2: theory before in the past, during a summer episode or whatnot,
Speaker 2: and this cannot be the first time that we've seen
Speaker 2: the two of them play together.
Speaker 1: But maybe it is. But but I you know, I
Speaker 1: think I think we've seen snippets. Yeah, we haven't seen
Speaker 1: as I don't think as large of a sample size
Speaker 1: as we have seen in four game stretch herege Yes.
Speaker 2: And Zadorov is really playing kind of a different game
Speaker 2: now too. He's really really just locked in and he's
Speaker 2: doing all the really good things that we saw from
Speaker 2: him periodically in the last season. He's been a much
Speaker 2: more consistent defenceman, a really solid, classic defensive defenceman. And
Speaker 2: when we had our summer episode where we talked about
Speaker 2: the different roles and the jobs of the different pairings,
Speaker 2: and what is an ideal pairing situation. I don't think
Speaker 2: that we really considered pairing Charlie McVoy with someone who
Speaker 2: was a defensive defenseman, because Juckie isn't. He's kind of
Speaker 2: a bit of a He's a little bit of a
Speaker 2: unicorn in the sense that he's not quite the pure
Speaker 2: two way defenseman like you would see hampasil at Holme,
Speaker 2: because he's not nearly as offensively minded as him or
Speaker 2: as offensively minded as LORI wants to be.
Speaker 1: He's also not super defensive defenceman like Carlo was or
Speaker 1: Zudorov is. So he's kind of like this, I don't know,
Speaker 1: in between something. And so I think for the longest
Speaker 1: time we all assumed that, well, for him, you have
Speaker 1: to pair him with an offensive defenseman. But apparently we.
Speaker 2: See him in his best role yet with a defensive defenseman.
Speaker 2: And quite frankly, it makes a lot of sense considering
Speaker 2: what we have seen from him over the last several seasons,
Speaker 2: where when he was in positions and partnered with people
Speaker 2: who required even let's say even a touch more supervision.
Speaker 2: And I'm talking about going all the way back to
Speaker 2: Matt Grizzlick is what I love to say about him,
Speaker 2: the same thing I'm saying about Mason Laurai, which.
Speaker 1: Is, when he's good, he's great. And he's bad, my god,
Speaker 1: is it horrible.
Speaker 2: And he had to periodically, you know, fix his mistakes
Speaker 2: and be aware of not just the play in front
Speaker 2: of him, but what his partner is doing. And I
Speaker 2: think for the first time in a really long time,
Speaker 2: probably since he was paired with Zadino Chara, he doesn't.
Speaker 1: Have to take that response. He can relax. It seems
Speaker 1: like he can relax, play, play a game, play his game,
Speaker 1: take a risk knowing that you know, Ze number two
Speaker 1: is going to be back there, you know, pretty much
Speaker 1: ready to knock someone block off. So you know, I
Speaker 1: think it's been beneficial to Charlie's game, and I do hope,
Speaker 1: I do hope that Marco maintains that pairing for the
Speaker 1: foreseeable future. I know, you know, at some point, at
Speaker 1: some point they're gonna need to figure out what to
Speaker 1: do with Mason Laurai. Now, Mason Laurai missed. He set
Speaker 1: out the game against the last two the last two games.
Speaker 2: He did play a game where he was paired with
Speaker 2: someone else though didn't he.
Speaker 1: Yes, I don't know if they had him with Peak
Speaker 1: at one point in time. I think so, I think
Speaker 1: they had in mind. I think they were just trying
Speaker 1: to Yeah, I mean, I'm good. I'm good with them
Speaker 1: giving him the opportunity right to sit and watch and
Speaker 1: learn and understand what the expectations of you are in
Speaker 1: this defensive minded structure that we're trying to get everyone
Speaker 1: to buy into EAR and to implement. Okay, so we'll
Speaker 1: we'll we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens with that.
Speaker 1: But you know, we have the game against the Sabers,
Speaker 1: which was now tell me if you was surprised by
Speaker 1: this game against the Sabers. The Bruins ended up winning
Speaker 1: four to three in overtime and it was a second
Speaker 1: start in a row fors Copersalo and I don't know.
Speaker 1: I found that a little bit surprising, but also in
Speaker 1: a good way, because I want to give Marco Sterm
Speaker 1: some credit for saying to himself, listen, I got what
Speaker 1: I needed to get out of these guys. In the
Speaker 1: game against the Islanders, there was a message sent, a
Speaker 1: message was received. You play hard, you buy in, you're
Speaker 1: going to earn your spot and likely keep it on
Speaker 1: this team. So to have Jonas make a second start
Speaker 1: in a row, Loria sits out the second game in
Speaker 1: a row, And I wonder if Marko thought that he
Speaker 1: might have inadvertently potentially started a little bit of a
Speaker 1: goalie controversy there, like, you know, what is the message
Speaker 1: that he's sending to me. The message was, listen, I'm
Speaker 1: going with the guys that I know are going to
Speaker 1: give me the best chance to win, which I think
Speaker 1: is a big part of a coach's job description.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, I thought it was great. I was surprised
Speaker 2: but not disappointed, just first from hearing it and then
Speaker 2: of course seeing it, and I think it did several things.
Speaker 2: One we heard from Corpusllo rightly, so he was disappointed
Speaker 2: that he wasn't given more opportunity in net, and he
Speaker 2: absolutely should have because last year he was better a
Speaker 2: lot of the time than Jeremy Swayman, and he should
Speaker 2: have been given the net several times based purely on performance,
Speaker 2: and he wasn't. So it was nice to see a
Speaker 2: coach recognizing that kind of to your point, if you're
Speaker 2: going to go either above and beyond or you're going
Speaker 2: to just make a huge difference. I'm going to recognize
Speaker 2: that and give you that chance. And that was good
Speaker 2: to see because that was a coach that keeps talking
Speaker 2: about not having guys buying in and being on board
Speaker 2: and blah blah blah, and then roll out the same
Speaker 2: lineup all the time.
Speaker 1: Right, put your money where your mouth. Just credits you
Speaker 1: in my view, Yeah, just credits you as a coach. Yeah,
Speaker 1: one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: And I think seeing him not repeat what I also
Speaker 2: thought was a pretty significant issue last year. And who knows,
Speaker 2: maybe the coaching staff last year didn't feel like they
Speaker 2: could do this, Like nobody got sat last year, with
Speaker 2: the exception of like that one time that pasta was set,
Speaker 2: nobody was. Freddy was never a healthy scratch. Corpusolo never
Speaker 2: got the net when.
Speaker 1: He earned it. It was it was, It was weird,
Speaker 1: and accountability was was very much lacking. Yeah year, And
Speaker 1: I don't know if again, the coaching staff felt like
Speaker 1: they were not in a position where they were allowed
Speaker 1: to who knows, But so I liked that he did
Speaker 1: it for that reason. I also liked it because it's
Speaker 1: been discussed out in the Ether, and admittedly so also
Speaker 1: by Swayman, that he thrives on competition. One of the
Speaker 1: reasons why he was so good when Linas Almark was
Speaker 1: there was because it was I think a genuine competition
Speaker 1: for the net in a respectful way, but a genuine
Speaker 1: competition that drove him to want to be better.
Speaker 2: And hopefully, if not necessarily there being a controversy, but
Speaker 2: building and developing a little bit more of competition between
Speaker 2: the two of them likely could serve as an excellent
Speaker 2: motivator for Jeremy Swayman. And I think that it paid
Speaker 2: dividends because by the time we saw him in net
Speaker 2: again against Carolina, he was perfection.
Speaker 1: So it did what it needed to do.
Speaker 2: And still to your larger point, it shows to it
Speaker 2: shows the team. I'm not, you know, bullshitting when I say,
Speaker 2: if you do what I need you to do and
Speaker 2: you work really hard, you are going to be rewarded
Speaker 2: simultaneously if you cannot get your shit together.
Speaker 1: And you continue to just like.
Speaker 2: Either ignore the plan or you're just not capable of
Speaker 2: executing on the plan. Because I'm thinking in this instance
Speaker 2: specifically of Mason Lowriight, I don't know, like is he
Speaker 2: just not getting it? Is he or is he just
Speaker 2: ignoring it? Then you're gonna get scratched because you are
Speaker 2: you are a liability and and we can't have that.
Speaker 2: So I was pleased on a number of fronts. I
Speaker 2: think it accomplished exactly what it needed to do. It
Speaker 2: made one goalie happy, rightly, so happy, fired up another goalie.
Speaker 2: We got what we needed out of him. It was
Speaker 2: it was perfect. It was exactly what we needed and
Speaker 2: he did a great job. You know, he's his corpusolo.
Speaker 2: Stats are somewhat misleading because yeah, they're not spectacular, but
Speaker 2: he's making key saves at points in the game that
Speaker 2: then have the potential to turn into opportunities that the
Speaker 2: Bruins then need to take advantage of. Whether or not
Speaker 2: they are that's a separate issue, but he is giving
Speaker 2: them a key moment save for this team to go
Speaker 2: and run with it.
Speaker 1: And that's I think competition is good, even in the house, right,
Speaker 1: it's never a bad thing to know there's someone that
Speaker 1: you have to look over your shoulder say, yes, this
Speaker 1: guy's help from my job, right, I want to keep
Speaker 1: my job.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, absolutely absolutely, So I thought that was a
Speaker 2: great game in spite of you know, the penalties and everything.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we were creeping back up. That's gotta,
Speaker 1: that's gotta kind of yeah, that's still a bone of
Speaker 1: contention with me. However, you know, they pull out a
Speaker 1: win in overtime. Morgan Geeky extended his full streak to
Speaker 1: six games, to which Pasta said, you know, paraphrasing that
Speaker 1: he thinks Morgan can get fifty goals this year, which
Speaker 1: is coming from pass Bomber fact right, the.
Speaker 2: Fact that a Boston Bruin let alone Morgan Geeky, that
Speaker 2: it's not David Pasternak. The fact that a Boston Bruin
Speaker 2: is in the running right now. Granted it's the beginning
Speaker 2: of November. For you know, most goals is insane.
Speaker 1: It's insane. Have a three one lead in that game
Speaker 1: against Buffalo. They fought their way back in to tie
Speaker 1: the game. So here we go to overtime, and I thought, well,
Speaker 1: isn't this kind of weird in a scary way that
Speaker 1: Marco's got married in Stadina out on the ice. But
Speaker 1: the overtime with am Cryst lynch Holm thankfully and escapes
Speaker 1: me who the other guy was? Was it Fraser, Fraser
Speaker 1: Minton along with it, and you know, Fraser basically picks
Speaker 1: off a pass and those two boys are off to
Speaker 1: the and you could tell that Merret was thinking shot
Speaker 1: the entire way. And I'm so glad that he had
Speaker 1: that shoot mentality because it was a beautiful shot yep.
Speaker 1: And he beat Alex Lyon and he scored his first
Speaker 1: as a Bruin. Yeah, and his first was an OT winner. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and good for him, yeah, good for those guys and
Speaker 1: good you know again, I'm giving Marco some credit for
Speaker 1: having that that faith and confidence in those young guys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it worked out tremendously because you know, if
Speaker 2: they hadn't been able to pull it off, that would
Speaker 2: have really sucked, right, So obviously that this accomplishes so
Speaker 2: much because not only is he putting them that trust
Speaker 2: in them and they actually execute on what they needed
Speaker 2: to do. You've got young players new to the team,
Speaker 2: ish players talk about being able to get additional buy in.
Speaker 2: You know, he's still doing that kind of thing as
Speaker 2: a new coach. It's it's just a month in, he
Speaker 2: he It's not always a percent guarantee. Even if players say,
Speaker 2: like you know, upfront, yes of course I'm going to
Speaker 2: buy in, but deep down do they trust him?
Speaker 1: You know, that's not something you can just decide. You
Speaker 1: have to earn trust.
Speaker 2: And that just helped propel that relationship that he has
Speaker 2: with his players. That that just did so much more
Speaker 2: than win them a game. Really, and those and those
Speaker 2: guys earned that opportunity.
Speaker 1: They they have been working hard, playing hard, doing their
Speaker 1: job and doing their jobs right. So so credit to
Speaker 1: those guys. And then we have a game against the
Speaker 1: Carolina Hurricanes on Saturday afternoon, a matinee game against a
Speaker 1: very very good hockey team. Granted, no, they kind of
Speaker 1: lose their luster in the playoffs, it seems year after year.
Speaker 1: But they're always a boring there, I know. But they're
Speaker 1: a good, solid, strong hockey team. And typically the Bruins
Speaker 1: matinee games. We've had this conversation before about the fact
Speaker 1: that for some reason, staying have sleepy starts to matinee games. Yep,
Speaker 1: I was worried about that, knowing the opponent that was
Speaker 1: coming into the building, But that was not the case
Speaker 1: at all for the Bruins. They started off very aggressively.
Speaker 1: They they were physical, they maintained a great piece of
Speaker 1: play with the Carolina Hurricanes. Dare I say that was
Speaker 1: likely their most complete game of this early season, and
Speaker 1: that third period of hockey was some of the most entertaining,
Speaker 1: back and forth hockey I have seen this season.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, and I had specifically brought this up
Speaker 2: in our snapshot preview of this game that to this
Speaker 2: point in the season, Carolina, you know they are an
Speaker 2: offensive powerhouse.
Speaker 1: They have averaged therefore, check is suffocating and relentless.
Speaker 2: They've averaged thirty three shots on goal over the course
Speaker 2: of I think it's like eleven games or something to
Speaker 2: that point.
Speaker 1: And you want to hear a fun facts, a little
Speaker 1: bit of a shocking fact. Apparently the Hurricanes have the
Speaker 1: worst power play percentage in the NHL right now. That's
Speaker 1: a surprise.
Speaker 2: That is a surprise they checking now because I did
Speaker 2: did the math on this, because this is how I
Speaker 2: figured out, obviously, how many the average shots on goal
Speaker 2: at this point, They've only out of eleven games, they've
Speaker 2: only gotten fewer than thirty shots on goal three times.
Speaker 2: Prior to this game, they were twenty seven, twenty eight,
Speaker 2: and twenty four shots on goal. The Bruins held them
Speaker 2: to under thirty shots on goal, They had twenty nine
Speaker 2: shots on goal.
Speaker 1: Well, and so again this speaks to that defensive structure, right,
Speaker 1: this is what we've been I think we saw in
Speaker 1: this game against Carolina what that structure is supposed to
Speaker 1: look like when you play from start to finish in
Speaker 1: that matter. Yeah, well, and I bring this.
Speaker 2: Up also to say because again people might might be thinking, well,
Speaker 2: you know, the Bruins were playing against a defensively decimated
Speaker 2: Carolina Hurricanes team.
Speaker 1: So you know, of course, what do you expect. They
Speaker 1: had it easier than a team maybe a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks ago would have had because you know, they were
Speaker 1: out without.
Speaker 2: Slaven gostas Bear and KeAndre Miller, so they were missing
Speaker 2: some big players there. Shockingly, Seth Jarvis played. I certainly
Speaker 2: didn't think he was going to because he took a
Speaker 2: shot to the foot like the day or two before. Yes,
Speaker 2: but the fact that when we're looking at just the
Speaker 2: shots on goal, the fact that the Bruins held them
Speaker 2: to twenty nine shots on goal tells me that it
Speaker 2: was truly the Bruins being the reason they won, and
Speaker 2: not the reason they won was because Carolina was easier
Speaker 2: to play against, because they still only got twenty two
Speaker 2: shots on goal against Carolina.
Speaker 1: So clearly they were.
Speaker 2: Still doing their job offensively. Their goaltender was still doing
Speaker 2: his job defensively. So I think genuinely it wasn't just
Speaker 2: a full sixty minute effort. They were good, like objectively good.
Speaker 1: An editor, and I you know, Carolina is not a
Speaker 1: team that plays a physical style of hockey. So for
Speaker 1: the Bruins to come out right from the get go
Speaker 1: and establish a physical level of play, you know, you
Speaker 1: started with you know, Jeno trying to go after you know,
Speaker 1: Taylor Hall right and you get a little scrum going
Speaker 1: that way over over by the bench, and Casta was physical.
Speaker 1: Knackaboyans Dora in this game, in particular against Carolina were
Speaker 1: absolute hitting machines. I just it was, you know, and
Speaker 1: pause a Dora he gets, you know, he The Bruins
Speaker 1: were very disciplined in the game. They only took one
Speaker 1: penalty in this game against Carolina, and the penalty itself
Speaker 1: that was called against Nikita Zadorov was total bullshit in
Speaker 1: my view, because he gets called for being making a good,
Speaker 1: strong play on the puck simply because he's bigger than
Speaker 1: the other guy, which is ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. But be
Speaker 1: that as it may. Only one penalty in that game. Now,
Speaker 1: Carolina's for check in the second period did create problems
Speaker 1: for the Bruins because the Owens didn't get a ton
Speaker 1: of offensive zone pressure in that second period and they
Speaker 1: were scrambling a bit in their own end at times.
Speaker 1: But they weathered the storm. But that third period. There
Speaker 1: was no scoring in that game until the third period. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and that third period of hockey was pretty damn book.
Speaker 1: It was.
Speaker 2: It was fantastic, It was it was exciting. It was
Speaker 2: really really nice to see. And hopefully that kind of
Speaker 2: continues to grow and develop and that we see that
Speaker 2: again and in the next game against the Islanders is
Speaker 2: a pretty quick rematch because we are now at game
Speaker 2: This will be game four of kind of this new new.
Speaker 1: Lineup, new mix of players.
Speaker 2: It can only continue to get better with time. Middlestat
Speaker 2: had a couple of points in that game too. He
Speaker 2: had chances and the goals. He had an assistant.
Speaker 1: Like I said, I well, I loved the chemistry that
Speaker 1: I saw between Victor Ardbertson and Casey Middlestat in this game.
Speaker 1: It seems to be growing ever so strongly. And you know,
Speaker 1: I think Victor Arbertson is starting to come into his
Speaker 1: own little bit too. You know, we know he's not
Speaker 1: afraid to shoot, but you know when those shots start
Speaker 1: start going in, it's nothing but a positive yeah for
Speaker 1: the Bruins. Yeah, Mason Laurai that out another game. So
Speaker 1: to me, it begs the question, what are they gonna
Speaker 1: do with them? Is he the weakest? Is he the
Speaker 1: weak wink? Because Jonathan Asparo, Jonathan Asparo has been he's
Speaker 1: been good, He's fine. Bye.
Speaker 2: Yeah, causing damage, that's the bare minimum at this point.
Speaker 2: The other one though, that we need to keep an
Speaker 2: eye on is Henry Yoki.
Speaker 1: How are you Yoki? Turnovers are becoming a little bit
Speaker 1: of an issue for this player. So that's just something
Speaker 1: to keep an eye out on moving forward. Now, I
Speaker 1: get you know, at some point, you know you you
Speaker 1: signed Moorai, You gave him more money than I was
Speaker 1: willing to give him or would have given him. Yeah,
Speaker 1: think he's going to need to see I would think
Speaker 1: you need to see the ice again. But where where
Speaker 1: do you put him back in where it's a safe
Speaker 1: where that's a safe place for him to third pairing
Speaker 1: third pairing. He cannot be he cannot be a top
Speaker 1: piering guy. Bruins are in such a fragile place right now.
Speaker 1: They've effectively restarted their season.
Speaker 2: Tip tomorrow is like Game one all over again because
Speaker 2: we're at you know, five hundred basically, and they are.
Speaker 2: We've only got so many more games until we are
Speaker 2: at the twenty two game threshold, which is usually Thanksgiving,
Speaker 2: although because of the compress schedule, it's about a week
Speaker 2: before where we will know if the Bruins even have
Speaker 2: a chance.
Speaker 1: So if they're a bubble.
Speaker 2: Team at game twenty two, it's going to be they're
Speaker 2: going to be fighting tooth and nail for every single
Speaker 2: point for a chance to possibly get a wild card spot.
Speaker 2: If they are more than four or six points out
Speaker 2: by game twenty two, it's really not likely to happen.
Speaker 2: We're going to spend another season done after April seventeenth
Speaker 2: or whatever.
Speaker 1: So you've seeing it right, Yeah, as it stands right now,
Speaker 1: you know, the Bruins have won three games in a row,
Speaker 1: more out of five. They haven't lost a game since
Speaker 1: hampuslint Home came back in in the lineup and Mason
Speaker 1: it's been out of the lineup. The next stretch of
Speaker 1: games that the Bruins have are huge, huge, because you're
Speaker 1: playing in New York is these are all in conference games.
Speaker 1: Is you have the Islanders again on Tuesday the fourth,
Speaker 1: you have Ottawa at home on the sixth, and then
Speaker 1: you see the Toronto Maple Leafs on Saturday eighth for
Speaker 1: the first first time this season. So these are all
Speaker 1: significant points for you to try and put in the
Speaker 1: bank as you deal with this crazy, crazy month of October.
Speaker 1: In November, we usually do our game previews, right, we
Speaker 1: try to do our a little bit of a game
Speaker 1: preview here, and I'm just puzzled about who's going to
Speaker 1: be in net for these games, because I'm assuming that
Speaker 1: Swayman will take the net against the Maple Leafs on Saturday. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So then how do you balance the games against the Islanders.
Speaker 1: Do you put Corporate SLLO back in net to the
Speaker 1: game against the Islanders or to your earlier point where
Speaker 1: you say that Swayman seems to struggle mightily against the Senators,
Speaker 1: does Corporate Does Corpos Salo get the nets for that
Speaker 1: game and Swayman gets the Islander game?
Speaker 2: I think so, I think, I think Swayman definitely earned
Speaker 2: the Islander game. There's no reason that he should not
Speaker 2: play that game. And it also accomplishes again two things
Speaker 2: that Thursday, when they play the Senators, put corpion net.
Speaker 1: Don't like it went so poorly.
Speaker 2: Don't do that, and it's a rest and it then
Speaker 2: sets Swayman up for the game against the Leafs, and
Speaker 2: then their next game after that is against the Leafs again.
Speaker 2: So it's it's it's a very very busy, very busy divisional.
Speaker 1: Stretch that we got coming up here. So that's what's
Speaker 1: house around a premium. You're now sitting at five hundred.
Speaker 1: It's almost like you have somewhat of a start clean slate. Okay,
Speaker 1: really five hundred, keep that momentum going yet points right,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that you need to win all of
Speaker 1: these games, it would be great, but at least focus
Speaker 1: on taking points away from these games. Yes, now we
Speaker 1: get to our segment where we do our stick taps,
Speaker 1: slick taps and penalty bops. So I'll start with your
Speaker 1: stick taps.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Obviously, the fact.
Speaker 2: That the team has worked really well together as a
Speaker 2: whole to get themselves back at even that's it's not
Speaker 2: that they're at even it's the fact that it's clearly
Speaker 2: been a true whole team effort, and you really need
Speaker 2: to see that, especially during a season that is clearly
Speaker 2: a season of transition.
Speaker 1: New coat.
Speaker 2: He's sticking to his guns, he's following through. You know,
Speaker 2: he gets that other stick tap in that he's he's
Speaker 2: holding players accountable, he's rewarding players who do extra. He's
Speaker 2: keeping Zadorav and Macavoy together while it's.
Speaker 1: Making me happy with that. I love that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And you gotta love Mara Husnadinov and his moment
Speaker 2: right now. You know, we don't know how long he's
Speaker 2: going to be up on that line, but as long
Speaker 2: as he continues to do what he needs to do,
Speaker 2: he's going to be earning promotions when they become available.
Speaker 2: And you know, I will also throw in stick tabs
Speaker 2: for Marcastlic because he also earned himself a promotion up
Speaker 2: to the third line after last couple of last couple
Speaker 2: of games. I mean, he's been hunting for a goal
Speaker 2: at least each of those last three games.
Speaker 1: He's just really elevated himself in that regard to and
Speaker 1: I think he's missed on that fourth line to be
Speaker 1: perfectly honest with you, because you know I'm going to
Speaker 1: jump to my penalty box. But Johnny Beecher totally unnoticeable. Yeah,
Speaker 1: totally unnoticeable. And I didn't even know he was playing
Speaker 1: at all in that game against Carolina. So I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm just I don't know what's going on with this player.
Speaker 1: But I just it's he's definitely underwhelming. Yeah, the question
Speaker 1: for him is going to be.
Speaker 2: Will he either because he's not been playing right and
Speaker 2: so as a pro athlete, he can't.
Speaker 1: He doesn't want to not be playing.
Speaker 2: However, if he says, well I want to I want
Speaker 2: to play and out, then send me to the AHL.
Speaker 2: He's he's got to go through waivers and is it
Speaker 2: possible that he gets picked up. It could very well be,
Speaker 2: And so if that's a reality, Boston doesn't want to
Speaker 2: give him away for free. So at some point you
Speaker 2: have to wonder, if Boston doesn't want to give him
Speaker 2: away for free, he's gotta then be asking for a trade.
Speaker 2: And so when do we see him depart the organization?
Speaker 1: I think it. It just seems it's only somewhat of
Speaker 1: a matter of time. It's just not happening for him
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, and and it's the lack of opportunities
Speaker 1: because he has been given, in my view, ample and
Speaker 1: fair opportunity.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, they gave him a spot on the roster
Speaker 2: on the NHL roster after the training camp. So, but
Speaker 2: it's hard to really make a difference if you're not playing,
Speaker 2: and it can't be great for his development. So if
Speaker 2: I were him, I'd be saying to my agent, I
Speaker 2: need to be playing, right.
Speaker 1: We've got to figure that out. We'll see what happens
Speaker 1: with that. How about your penalty box? The penalties like,
Speaker 1: it's been a little bit up and down. They've had
Speaker 1: games where it's been better, they've had games where it's
Speaker 1: been worse.
Speaker 2: So I think they just have to keep they just
Speaker 2: have to keep working on that. Their their penalty kill
Speaker 2: has been excellent. But you you've got to keep your
Speaker 2: best players out of five five. You can't have that
Speaker 2: be over use those players. That's just it's dangerous when
Speaker 2: you've got such a condensed schedule, correct.
Speaker 1: I agree with you. Yeah, And the injuries, I'm not beneficial.
Speaker 1: It's particularly eliaslint Home injury. But you know I've got
Speaker 1: marat in stick taps because he's he's earned his opportunity.
Speaker 1: And I think that's, you know, again, good messaging by
Speaker 1: the coaching staff. And I've put Marco storm in my
Speaker 1: stick taps just overall his messaging. You know, I was
Speaker 1: getting a little tired a week or so ago hearing
Speaker 1: Marco's messaging about the buy in and you know, not
Speaker 1: everyone's on board, and even the you know, some of
Speaker 1: the so called you know, the leaders regurgitating that. And
Speaker 1: you know again, so early in the season, we're like, really,
Speaker 1: we're hearing the self ay, and we've already won hire
Speaker 1: some of it. So to their credit, they have put
Speaker 1: their money where their mouth is during this stretch of time,
Speaker 1: and number is that they can maintain the steady level
Speaker 1: of play that we have been seeing. It's been a
Speaker 1: slow build, and I think the game against Carolina should
Speaker 1: solidify for them. If we stay in our structure and
Speaker 1: if we play the right way, we will be in
Speaker 1: all these games. You're not necessarily going to win them all.
Speaker 1: No one expects you to win them all. Just be
Speaker 1: in the game right and see what happens.
Speaker 2: I will say, if it's a winnable game, they better
Speaker 2: win that game.
Speaker 1: I No, no, that isn't off the look. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not letting them off the hook. Yeah, but right again,
Speaker 1: after listening to Charlie McAboy talk and others talk about,
Speaker 1: you know what sounds like a dramatic change from the
Speaker 1: way in which they've been playing for years, Yeah, and
Speaker 1: not having enough and I don't know if this is
Speaker 1: you know, management blowing smoke up our ass saying well,
Speaker 1: we really haven't had enough time to practice and work
Speaker 1: on these things and it's a new system and blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. Okay, fine, right, that's fine, but you can
Speaker 1: ill afford. You can ill afford to have big hiccups
Speaker 1: when you have such a difficult schedule, and banking points
Speaker 1: is going to really matter when you come back from
Speaker 1: that Olympic break, especially if you're still somewhat in the
Speaker 1: mix of things. Right, So the other penalty box for me,
Speaker 1: other than echoing what you said about the penalties is
Speaker 1: Henry Yokihyu. I just think, right, you can ill afford,
Speaker 1: when you're finally getting some momentum to have a player
Speaker 1: who is turning the puck over and the potential that
Speaker 1: that turnover will happen at at an ill opportune moment
Speaker 1: in time, and I think that's what why Mason Laurai
Speaker 1: is in a bit of a timeout right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I agree. I agree, But I think that's
Speaker 4: all she wrote. I think that's all she wrote this episode. Folks,
Speaker 4: we thank you for listening. We thank you for your support.
Speaker 4: Please like and sububscribe to our content so that more
Speaker 4: people can find us. You can find us pretty much
Speaker 4: on any social media platform.
Speaker 1: We are on x we are on substaff. You can
Speaker 1: find past shows on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, just search for
Speaker 1: Ruins tape to tape And with that said, do you
Speaker 1: have any closing thoughts? Go Be's Go Be's
Podbean